Comparison of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy results in patients with epiretinal membrane: 6-month follow-up

The results of the study presented suggest that in patients with ERM, 27G PPV provides more advantages as compared to 25G PPV, which was confirmed by other authors [8, 10]. The mean time of wound closure for all sclerotomies was significantly shorter (~ 16 days) in 27G PPV group as compared to 25G PPV group. Analysis of logMAR DBCVA showed faster return of visual acuity (difference ~ 1 log MAR DBCVA) between 7 and 30 days after surgery in 27G PPV group. In 27G group, mean SIA was significantly lower (30 days 0.3 D, 90 days 0.2 D, 180 days 0.13 D) as compared to mean SIA in 25G group. During follow-up between 1 and 90 days postoperatively, in 27G group mean IOP values were significantly higher than in 25G group (by ~ 1–4 mm Hg). The most prominent difference was shown at the first day after surgery (mean IOP higher by ~ 4 mmHg in 27G group). At the first day after surgery, in 27G group hypotony was observed less commonly (three eyes) than in 25G group (seven eyes).

One of the disadvantages of 27G PPV is prolonged surgery time of ERM. In our series of patients, the surgery time for 27G PPV group was significantly and approximately 3 min longer than that for 25G PPV. Prolonged surgery time for 27G PPV group was achieved also by Ito et al. (~ 0.5 min) [9], Mitsui et al. (~ 4 min) [7] and Naruse et al. (~ 4 min) [8]. The results obtained indicate that the reduced gauge of PPV instruments (lower infusion and aspiration rates) is responsible for longer time of surgery. Surgical trauma is a known cause of inflammation manifested by protein leakage and cell accumulation within the aqueous humor [12]. Prolonged time of surgery might be a cause for increase in flare in the anterior segment of the eye. The inflammation of the operated eyes resolved in all patients from both groups within 30 days after surgery. So the prolonged time in 27G group, as compared to 25G group, did not affect the duration of inflammation, which was also observed by other authors [7, 8].

It is reasonable to expect that 27G sclerotomies would close faster than 25G sclerotomies, as it was proven in the study. The mean time for all scleral wound closure was significantly shorter in 27G group, suggesting faster wound healing. In our study, the trocar was placed at 30° angle to the scleral surface. For the first time for this purpose, a custom-made protractor was used, permitting precisely performed oblique incisions. Such incisions made at precisely controlled angle contribute significantly to the prevention of wound leakage. The wound edges are pressed together and closed by intraocular pressure [1]. In 27G group, faster sclerotomies healing observed could have resulted in faster recovery of visual acuity, IOP and lower frequency of hypotony. Our results suggest that the size and precise angle of incision play an important role in terms of sclerotomy closure.

Mitsui et al. [7] did not observe significantly shorter scleral wound closure time associated with 27G PPV. It is not surprising, because in that study trocar insertion angle was not precisely determined, so there might be some variations in the angle. In consequence, shorter scleral tunnel could be created with higher possibility of wound leakage and prolonged healing. It is difficult to compare our result with the ones obtained by Naruse et al. [8] and Nakashina et al. [10] because of different angle of trocar placement, use of air or gas exchange, phacovitrectomy performance and more than one operating surgeon involved.

Our study results show that 27G PPV group featured earlier recovery of visual acuity in comparison with 25G PPV group and indicate superiority of surgery with smaller instrument gauge. The data obtained were confirmed by other authors [8].

Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) may affect recovery of visual acuity after vitrectomy. Changes in the cornea shape after PPV may induce SIA. The SIA was significantly lower after 23G and 25G PPV as compared with 20G vitrectomy [13, 14]. In our study, in 27G PPV group, significantly smaller SIA was detected during the postoperative follow-up, as compared to 25G PPV group. Lower SIA associated with the use of 27G PPV as compared with the 25G system, albeit not significant, was also observed by Mitsui et al. [7]. This suggests that 27G PPV is less invasive than 25G PPV in terms of SIA.

In our study, the FMT was reduced significantly when compared to preoperative values, similarly to other studies [7, 8] and there were no differences between 27G and 25G groups during six-month follow-up period. This relationship suggests that 1-mm-diameter reduction of sclerotomy in 27G PPV, as compared to 25 GPPV, has no influence on the recovery of normal retinal structure in the macular region.

One of the important features which affects the recovery time of visual function is intraocular pressure level after vitrectomy. In our study, in 27G group IOP was significantly higher than in 25G group up to 90 days after the surgery and the most prominent difference was seen at first day postoperatively. This difference strongly suggests that smaller sclerotomy diameter with comparable length of scleral tunnel, as compared to 25G PPV, is responsible for faster sclerotomy closure and recovery of IOP to preoperative values. Similar relationships were noted by others [9]. One of the complications of microincision vitrectomy is hypotony due to evident or subclinical sclerotomy leakage. The oblique incision and gas tamponade are responsible for faster sclerotomy closure [15‐17]. Also, smaller size of the wound has an impact on the closure of the sclerotomy and plays important role in hypotony prevention [15, 18]. In our study, hypotony (arbitrary defined as IOP less than 7 mmHg) frequency was lower for 27G PPV group than in 25G PPV group and confirmed the above-mentioned data. None of the patients had clinically significant hypotony in the form of hypotony maculopathy or choroidal detachment. In the study presented, we did not use gas tamponade; thus, small (0.4 mm size of sclerotomy) and precise, oblique incision was responsible for the reduction in hypotony incidence. In 27G PPV patients, reduced number or lack of hypotony was also observed by Mitsui [7], Naruse [8] and Ito [9].

In our study, the frequency of postoperative complications in 27/25G PPV groups was low and did not differ between the groups: vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment—one eye (1/30 eyes 3.3%) in both groups and additionally one case (1/30 eyes 3.3%) of macular hole formation in 27G PPV group. The results obtained were comparable to those achieved by Naruse et al. [8]. Results from other studies [19, 20] indicate that smaller gauge PPV is associated with low risk of complications. Our study results are consistent with this conclusion.

Postoperative retinal breaks may occur uncommonly (2.6%) [21] after PPV combining epiretinal membrane/inner limiting membrane peeling located centrally or extrafoveally as a full-thickness holes or pseudoholes [22]. It is suggested that weakening of the retinal glial structure as a consequence of Muller cell decapitation, opening of intraretinal cysts, direct mechanical trauma, dye toxicity and contraction of residual ILM may be responsible for hole formation. In our case in 27 GPPV group, residual ILM caused the macular hole formation and was treated successfully by next 27G PPV. There is no reason to associate this complication with small, 0.4-mm-diameter sclerotomies during 27G PPV. However, it cannot be excluded with certainty that this may be related to the tools used during surgery, i.e., 27G forceps.

The results of 6-month follow-up provided in this study indicate that the use of 27G PPV in patients with ERM significantly reduced sclerotomy wound closure time and surgically induced astigmatism, provided better stabilization of intraocular pressure and allowed faster achievement of visual acuity improvement as compared to 25G PPV. The above-mentioned advantages may determine the 27G PPV as a technique of choice in the surgical treatment of ERM.

Further prospective studies with larger number of cases are necessary to verify those findings.