Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

05.08.2023 | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial

verfasst von: Seong Ran Jeon, Soo-Kyung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jae Myung Cha

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 11/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

The use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST.

Results

Exactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall.

Conclusions

Compared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs.
Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.CrossRefPubMed Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:799–807.CrossRefPubMed Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:799–807.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, Von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–44.PubMed Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, Von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–44.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51:775–94.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51:775–94.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, et al. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(677–87): e3. DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, et al. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(677–87): e3.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T, et al. A comparative study of treatment-emergent adverse events following use of common bowel preparations among a colonoscopy screening population: results from a post-marketing observational study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2993–3006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T, et al. A comparative study of treatment-emergent adverse events following use of common bowel preparations among a colonoscopy screening population: results from a post-marketing observational study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2993–3006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Palma JA, Bhandari R, Cleveland MV, et al. A safety and efficacy comparison of a new sulfate-based tablet bowel preparation versus a PEG and ascorbate comparator in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:319–28.CrossRefPubMed Di Palma JA, Bhandari R, Cleveland MV, et al. A safety and efficacy comparison of a new sulfate-based tablet bowel preparation versus a PEG and ascorbate comparator in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:319–28.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Park YE, Kim TO, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e29884.CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Park YE, Kim TO, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e29884.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SE, Oh DJ, Nam JH, et al. Taking oral sulfate tablets with simethicone for bowel preparation leads to higher adenoma detection rate than polyethylene glycol: a propensity score analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:867–76.CrossRefPubMed Lee SE, Oh DJ, Nam JH, et al. Taking oral sulfate tablets with simethicone for bowel preparation leads to higher adenoma detection rate than polyethylene glycol: a propensity score analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:867–76.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang HJ, Park DI, Park SK, et al. Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:29–36.CrossRefPubMed Yang HJ, Park DI, Park SK, et al. Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:29–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eduardo VMB, Wisam Z. Oral sulfate tablet bowel preparation is associated with erosive gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;2021:S263. Eduardo VMB, Wisam Z. Oral sulfate tablet bowel preparation is associated with erosive gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;2021:S263.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Halphen M, Heresbach D, Gruss HJ, et al. Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:121–31.CrossRefPubMed Halphen M, Heresbach D, Gruss HJ, et al. Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:121–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Joseph RE, et al. Validation of a patient satisfaction scale in patients undergoing bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Patient. 2016;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Joseph RE, et al. Validation of a patient satisfaction scale in patients undergoing bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Patient. 2016;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, et al. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51:60–72.CrossRefPubMed Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, et al. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51:60–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, McGowan J, Cleveland M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:482–91.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, McGowan J, Cleveland M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:482–91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017;66:270–7.CrossRefPubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017;66:270–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1631–42.CrossRefPubMed Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1631–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Arya V, Gupta KA, Valluri A, et al. Rapid colonoscopy preparation using bolus lukewarm saline combined with sequential posture changes: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2156–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arya V, Gupta KA, Valluri A, et al. Rapid colonoscopy preparation using bolus lukewarm saline combined with sequential posture changes: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2156–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M, et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1954–61.CrossRefPubMed Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M, et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1954–61.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:328–36.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:328–36.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Song JH, Bae JH, Yim JY. Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38:410–5.CrossRefPubMed Song JH, Bae JH, Yim JY. Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38:410–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker FA, Mari A, Nafrin S, et al. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:457–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Baker FA, Mari A, Nafrin S, et al. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:457–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rachh PR, Rahane RD. A review on fast dissolving tablet. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:50–5.CrossRef Rachh PR, Rahane RD. A review on fast dissolving tablet. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:50–5.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–84.CrossRefPubMed Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–96.CrossRefPubMed Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial
verfasst von
Seong Ran Jeon
Soo-Kyung Park
Dong-Hoon Yang
Jae Myung Cha
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Studie zur HIFU bei Prostatakrebs lässt viele Fragen offen

Führt eine HIFU-Ablation beim Prostatakarzinom im Vergleich mit einer radikalen Prostatektomie zu ähnlichen onkologischen, aber besseren funktionalen Ergebnissen? Interimsdaten der französischen HIFI-Studie sind uneindeutig. In einem Kommentar zur Studie werden zumindest drei allgemeine Erkenntnisse herausgearbeitet.

Leitlinienkonformes Management thermischer Verletzungen

Thermische Verletzungen gehören zu den schwerwiegendsten Traumen und hinterlassen oft langfristige körperliche und psychische Spuren. Die aktuelle S2k-Leitlinie „Behandlung thermischer Verletzungen im Kindesalter (Verbrennung, Verbrühung)“ bietet eine strukturierte Übersicht über das empfohlene Vorgehen.

Verschlechtert frühe Hyperoxie nach Reanimation die Prognose?

Kommt es sehr früh nach einer kardiopulmonalen Reanimation zu einem Zustand der Hyperoxie, ist dies bei Patienten nach einem Herzstillstand mit schlechteren funktionellen Ergebnissen assoziiert. Das zeigt eine Sekundäranalyse der TTM-2-Studie.

Infektanfälligkeit in früher Kindheit: eine bleibende Last?

Wenn Kinder in den ersten Lebensjahren immer wieder Infekte durchmachen, lässt dies Schlüsse auf die Infektneigung in der weiteren Kindheit zu.

EKG Essentials: EKG befunden mit System (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

In diesem CME-Kurs können Sie Ihr Wissen zur EKG-Befundung anhand von zwölf Video-Tutorials auffrischen und 10 CME-Punkte sammeln.
Praxisnah, relevant und mit vielen Tipps & Tricks vom Profi.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.