Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

01.12.2020

Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

verfasst von: Tae-Geun Gweon, Seung-Woo Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Jeong Rok Lee, Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aim

In standard colonoscopy, the colonoscope is inserted into the cecum, and inspection of the colonic mucosa and polypectomy are performed during withdrawal. The colon configuration can differ between the insertion and withdrawal phases, and some polyps found in the insertion phase can be missed during withdrawal. A few single-center studies investigated whether detection of polyps during the insertion phase affects the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the effectiveness of this strategy is unknown because of conflicting results. We aimed to determine whether polypectomy together with careful inspection during insertion increases the ADR compared with standard colonoscopy.

Methods

A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial was conducted at three university hospitals. Patients aged 50 to 80 years were randomly assigned to the study group or control group. For patients in the study group, polypectomy was performed together with careful inspection during both colonoscope insertion and withdrawal. In the control group, polyps were inspected and removed only during colonoscope withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the ADR, which was defined as the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 adenoma.

Results

A total of 1142 patients were enrolled (study group, n = 571; control group, n = 571). The ADR was similar in the 2 groups (study group, 44.1%; control group, 43.1%; P = 0.72). In the control group, 12 polyps that had been detected during colonoscope insertion were not found during withdrawal (polyp miss rate: 2.1%, 12/571).

Conclusion

Polypectomy and careful inspection during both colonoscope insertion and withdrawal did not improve the overall ADR compared with standard colonoscopy (NCT01925833).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon JY, Cha JM, Jeen YT, Medical Policy Committee of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID), Quality Improvement Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) (2018) Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening. Intest Res 16:48–54CrossRef Yoon JY, Cha JM, Jeen YT, Medical Policy Committee of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID), Quality Improvement Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) (2018) Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening. Intest Res 16:48–54CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRef Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan J, Xin L, Ma YF, Hu LH, Li ZS (2016) Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in patients with non-malignant findings: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 111:355–365CrossRef Pan J, Xin L, Ma YF, Hu LH, Li ZS (2016) Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in patients with non-malignant findings: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 111:355–365CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350CrossRef van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NH, Jung YS, Jeong WS, Yang HJ, Park SK, Choi K, Park DI (2017) Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intest Res 15:411–418CrossRef Kim NH, Jung YS, Jeong WS, Yang HJ, Park SK, Choi K, Park DI (2017) Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intest Res 15:411–418CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, Schatzkin A, Cross AJ, Zauber AG, Church TR, Lance P, Greenberg ER, Martinez ME (2014) Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 63:949–956CrossRef Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, Schatzkin A, Cross AJ, Zauber AG, Church TR, Lance P, Greenberg ER, Martinez ME (2014) Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 63:949–956CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803CrossRef Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370:1298–1306CrossRef Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370:1298–1306CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha JM (2014) Colonoscopy quality is the answer for the emerging issue of interval cancer. Intest Res 12:110–116CrossRef Cha JM (2014) Colonoscopy quality is the answer for the emerging issue of interval cancer. Intest Res 12:110–116CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 110:72–90CrossRef Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 110:72–90CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, Lorenzetti R, de Matthaeis M, Stella F, Campo SM (2009) Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:527–530CrossRef Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, Lorenzetti R, de Matthaeis M, Stella F, Campo SM (2009) Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:527–530CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wildi SM, Schoepfer AM, Vavricka SR, Fruehauf H, Safroneeva E, Wiegand N, Bauerfeind P, Fried M (2012) Colorectal polypectomy during insertion and withdrawal or only during withdrawal? A randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 44:1019–1023CrossRef Wildi SM, Schoepfer AM, Vavricka SR, Fruehauf H, Safroneeva E, Wiegand N, Bauerfeind P, Fried M (2012) Colorectal polypectomy during insertion and withdrawal or only during withdrawal? A randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 44:1019–1023CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewett DG, Rex DK (2012) Inspection on instrument insertion during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 76:381–387CrossRef Hewett DG, Rex DK (2012) Inspection on instrument insertion during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 76:381–387CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanaka MR, Parsi MA, Burke CA, Barnes D, Church J, Rizk M, Zein N, Joseph R, Thota PN, Lopez R, Kiran RP (2015) Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 29:692–699CrossRef Sanaka MR, Parsi MA, Burke CA, Barnes D, Church J, Rizk M, Zein N, Joseph R, Thota PN, Lopez R, Kiran RP (2015) Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 29:692–699CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, Fan JW, Lin CH, Tsui YN, Lee BP, Hung HL (2019) Comparison of polyp detection during both insertion and withdrawal versus only withdrawal of colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 34:1377–1383CrossRef Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, Fan JW, Lin CH, Tsui YN, Lee BP, Hung HL (2019) Comparison of polyp detection during both insertion and withdrawal versus only withdrawal of colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 34:1377–1383CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SW, Chang JH, Ji JS, Maeong IH, Cheung DY, Kim JS, Cho YS, Chung WJ, Lee BI, Kim SW, Kim BW, Choi H, Choi MG (2016) Effect of dynamic position changes on adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol 111:63–69CrossRef Lee SW, Chang JH, Ji JS, Maeong IH, Cheung DY, Kim JS, Cho YS, Chung WJ, Lee BI, Kim SW, Kim BW, Choi H, Choi MG (2016) Effect of dynamic position changes on adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol 111:63–69CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar S, Thosani N, Ladabaum U, Friedland S, Chen AM, Kochar R, Banerjee S (2017) Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1273–1280CrossRef Kumar S, Thosani N, Ladabaum U, Friedland S, Chen AM, Kochar R, Banerjee S (2017) Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1273–1280CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharyya R, Chedgy F, Kandiah K, Fogg C, Higgins B, Haysom-Newport B, Gadeke L, Thursby-Pelham F, Ellis R, Goggin P, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P (2017) Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK bowel cancer screening programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial. Endoscopy 49:1043–1050CrossRef Bhattacharyya R, Chedgy F, Kandiah K, Fogg C, Higgins B, Haysom-Newport B, Gadeke L, Thursby-Pelham F, Ellis R, Goggin P, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P (2017) Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK bowel cancer screening programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial. Endoscopy 49:1043–1050CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai M, Sanchez-Yague A, Choudhary A, Pervez A, Gupta N, Vennalaganti P, Vennelaganti S, Fugazza A, Repici A, Hassan C, Sharma P (2017) Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 86:274–281CrossRef Desai M, Sanchez-Yague A, Choudhary A, Pervez A, Gupta N, Vennalaganti P, Vennelaganti S, Fugazza A, Repici A, Hassan C, Sharma P (2017) Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 86:274–281CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brand EC, Dik VK, van Oijen MGH, Siersema PD (2017) Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies. Gastrointest Endosc 86:376–385CrossRef Brand EC, Dik VK, van Oijen MGH, Siersema PD (2017) Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies. Gastrointest Endosc 86:376–385CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, Hinshaw JL, Barlow D, Jensen D, Reichelderfer M, Cash BD (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, Hinshaw JL, Barlow D, Jensen D, Reichelderfer M, Cash BD (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer MG, Bipat S, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J (2015) Evolution of screen-detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1682–1690CrossRef Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer MG, Bipat S, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J (2015) Evolution of screen-detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1682–1690CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Kim DH, Hassan C, Matkowskyj KA, Halberg RB (2018) The natural history of colorectal polyps: overview of predictive static and dynamic features. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 47:515–536CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Kim DH, Hassan C, Matkowskyj KA, Halberg RB (2018) The natural history of colorectal polyps: overview of predictive static and dynamic features. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 47:515–536CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
verfasst von
Tae-Geun Gweon
Seung-Woo Lee
Jeong-Seon Ji
Jeong Rok Lee
Joon Sung Kim
Byung-Wook Kim
Hwang Choi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07342-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Akute Cholezystitis bei multimorbiden Älteren: Operation nicht sofort ausschließen!

Bei älteren, multimorbiden Menschen mit akuter Cholezystitis wird eine Operation häufig nicht erwogen. Eine Studie aus Philadelphia zeigt nun jedoch, dass auch diese Patientinnen und Patienten von einer chirurgischen Therapie profitieren können.

Was geschehen muss, damit Prähabilitation in die Leitlinien kommt

Eine Prähabilitation vor einem viszeralchirurgischen Eingriff ist Experten zufolge äußerst sinnvoll, dennoch wird sie in Leitlinien derzeit nicht empfohlen. Beim DCK erklärte Prof. Tim Vilz aus Bonn, woran das liegt und was benötigt wird, um die Situation zu ändern.

Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom nur in Ausnahmefällen operieren!

Das Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom erfordert nur in ganz bestimmten Fällen ein operatives Vorgehen. Beim DCK wurde vor schwerwiegenden Komplikationen des anspruchsvollen Eingriffs gewarnt.

Statine: Was der G-BA-Beschluss für Praxen bedeutet

Nach dem G-BA-Beschluss zur erweiterten Verordnungsfähigkeit von Lipidsenkern rechnet die DEGAM mit 200 bis 300 neuen Dauerpatienten pro Praxis. Im Interview erläutert Präsidiumsmitglied Erika Baum, wie Hausärztinnen und Hausärzte am besten vorgehen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.