Introduction
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication following surgery and is accompanied by a high mortality rate [
1]. The incidence of VTEs ranges from 0.8–3.2% after bariatric surgery [
2]. Risk factors for VTE include surgery, old age, cancer, trauma, personal history of VTE, and obesity [
3]. Many surgical patients have a moderate to high risk for developing VTE, so chemoprophylaxis is indicated. Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), is one of the most common drugs used for thromboprophylaxis [
4]. For most normal-weight surgical patients, a fixed dosage of 40 mg enoxaparin subcutaneously is sufficient for reliable thromboprophylaxis [
5]. In patients with obesity, there is insufficient evidence on the optimal dosage for thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin, though they have an increased risk for VTE [
6]. VTEs are cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [
3], and the risk for CVDs, including VTEs, is sex-specific [
7].
Sex has a major impact on many different pharmacological responses, yet it has not been recognized as important factor. Many different aspects could influence pharmacokinetics in a sex-specific way, such as differences in total water, plasma volume, metabolism, or muscle content between men and women [
8]. Fat distribution throughout the human body also shows sexual dimorphism [
9,
10]. Male and female tissues show sex-specific differences, including in adipose tissue, where some metabolic genes are more highly expressed in females [
11]. Enoxaparin is injected subcutaneously, and all of these factors might be able to influence the anti-factor Xa (aFXa) activity level in a sex-specific way.
Therefore, we investigated whether the application of the same enoxaparin dose leads to similar anti-factor Xa levels in male and female patients with obesity. We also sought to determine the possible factors that influence the aFXa level.
Discussion
Recurring VTEs are more frequent in men [
22]. Recently, evidence has emerged that men have a higher risk of VTE than women [
7]. Considering the differences in total water, plasma volume, metabolism, muscle content, or adipose tissue distribution between men and women [
8], it is natural to assume that men and women also have different aFXa levels after enoxaparin application. Therefore, the main research question we asked was whether male and female patients undergoing bariatric surgery have similar aFXa levels. Initially, we found that females had higher aFXa levels. Because females were significantly lighter than males, we matched males and females based on anthropometric measurements. Ultimately, after matching, we detected almost identical aFXa levels between men and women. We concluded that males and females with obesity indeed have similar anti-factor Xa activity levels after enoxaparin application.
Many previous studies have tested different dosages of enoxaparin for patients with obesity [
12‐
14,
19,
23,
24]. Most of them focused on the optimal dosage regimen while not taking sex into account. Only Gelikas et al. reported that females had significantly higher aFXa levels than men. As in our study, the female population of Gelikas et al. was significantly lighter, which led them to conclude that this difference might be due to different weights [
12], but they lacked proof of this claim. By matching the males and females of our study cohort, we indeed showed that there was no difference in aFXa levels between males and females with obesity. This is a very important finding, considering that the “best dosage” for patients with obesity has yet to be determined [
12‐
14]. Future studies should now be able to determine the best dosing strategy without having to account for the different sexes.
Most of our subjects achieved our target range of 0.1–0.4 U/ml. Previous studies used different prophylactic ranges from ours, some of them starting at 0.2 U/ml [
13] or even 0.5 U/ml [
12]. The optimal prophylactic aFXa range is under debate [
15]. Undisputedly, patients undergoing bariatric surgery need postoperative thromboprophylaxis and should be treated for another 28 days. Otherwise, their risk for VTEs is high even after discharge [
25]. If patients do not reach the desired level, the consequences of this failure are not completely understood. Karcutskie et al. observed no difference in the incidence of VTE in trauma patients who reached their target compared to those who did not [
26]. However, a better marker has yet to be established, and an aFXa level of 0.1 U/ml might be just as good as 0.2 U/ml [
27].
Our second aim was to detect VTEs and major bleeding events. None of our patients showed signs of bleeding. One patient developed symptomatic PE and needed therapeutic anticoagulation. Rocha et al. reported that the postoperative pulmonary embolism rate was between 0.8 and 3.2% in bariatric surgical patients [
2]. Although a rare event, PE and its consequences can be severe. The PE patient in our study had a history of DVT, but anticoagulation was no longer indicated. This patient had no other VTE risk factors and the aFXa level was above 0.2 U/ml. However, a DVT history, surgery, and obesity are all risk factors for developing VTE [
28]. Therefore, bariatric patients with additional risk factors should be monitored more closely. Additionally, clinicians should focus preoperatively on acquiring a complete patient history to know who is at risk. This PE event further underlines the need for another marker for thromboprophylaxis.
Lastly, we also showed that weight was a better predictor for aFXa than BMI, which is in line with previous studies [
12‐
14]. Enoxaparin’s volume of distribution is almost equal to the blood plasma [
29] and weight might simply be the best predictor even for patients with obesity. For patients with BMI above 60 kg/m
2, weight was not predictive of aFXa, and close surveillance seems to be indicated. We also wondered whether there might be a sex-specific effect present. We observed no significant relationship between aFXa and weight. However, by looking at both matched male and female graphs, it is evident that both have the same course as the overall cohort. Therefore, one can only conclude that this significant relationship should exist independently of sex. All graphs indicate that, with a weight above 150 kg, aFXa tends to be below 0.2 U/ml. Physicians should consider checking aFXa levels and signs of VTE regularly for patients with high weight (> 150 kg), BMI above 60 kg/m
2, or additional risk factors.
We are aware that this study has some limitations. The aFXa level might not be the best marker for measuring the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis. A more clinical approach might be better suited, for example, a comparison of the aFXa level with sonography of the major leg veins or even computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest. These approaches are time-consuming and expensive but also might mean unnecessary radiation exposure for the patient. Therefore, we chose to measure the aFXa level. Furthermore, group 2 consisted of only 11 patients. We are aware that drawing conclusions from a rather small number of patients is difficult, but our main finding that a sex-specific dosage regimen is not required is based on all 97 patients. Hence, this conclusion can be deemed robust.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.