In scope of the presented tests, the dedicated thrombus aspiration catheters led to significantly better results in terms of the duration of the procedure and the amount of removed clots. While use of the JET device led to the most effective thrombectomy, considerably high aspiration rates were observed. In a clinical setting, lower aspiration rates might be advantageous, since serious blood loss can result if the active tip of the device is not embedded properly inside the embolus [
11,
12]. Although less effective, standard catheters with a simple customization proved useful for fragmentation of large thrombus burden PE by achieving full or at least partial recanalization of the PA.
Considering their handling, PIG and MPY revealed limitations as their size (pigtail curve, deflection curvature) made fragmentation within model PA branches of smaller diameter difficult. Similar results have been reported in a clinical study [
21]. Also the generation of larger thrombus fragments capable of obstructing pulmonary branches is consistent with clinical observation [
14,
21].
The new test rig offers an increased level of anatomical and patho-physiological resemblance, allowing to generate PE by washing in consistent blood clots and to adjust near patho- physiological pressure and pulsatile flow values. Thus, our setup can simulate clinically observed phenomena that increase procedure time, such as difficult catheter positioning maneuvers, repositioning due to catheter dislocation, dislocation of embolus fragments, and treatment of embolus parts that moved to distal sections. The anatomical detailing of our model differs from that of published setups, for instance the investigation of the thrombectomy properties of the Straub Rotarex® Catheter (Straub Medical, Wangs, Switzerland) used a simple model with straight tubes and a straight access [
22]. In the M
üller-H
ülsbeck model that has been used in different studies [
23‐
25], a thrombus is cultivated inside a straight silicone tube to mimic PA embolism. With this simplified model, low intervention times have been reported for different catheters, e.g., for the Amplatz Thrombectomy Device [
23], that do not correlate with clinical reports [
26].
Study Limitations
All procedures were performed under direct visual control. However, as this simplified framework applied equally to all catheters, it should not have significantly affected the comparison. As an improvement of the setup, the implementation of sight restriction in combination with x-ray fluoroscopy could be useful in future trials. Furthermore, the components of the test rig representing the PA and the right heart did not account for ventricle contraction, physiological vessel compliance or vasoconstriction. Also, the procedure-related risk of wall injury could not be evaluated. Furthermore, wall friction is artificial and may influence catheter handling. In future, it could be expedient to fabricate the anatomical structures out of elastic polymer to account for compliance. Moreover, a right heart model with a pumping function by external compression of an elastic ventricle [
27] would eliminate the need for an additional pumping device. Because of the test rig’s volume (and the need to refill after each trial), water was selected as flow medium. Since pure water impairs the structural integrity of the thrombus, isotonic saline solution would be preferable. However, considering the short time frame of the tests presented, no severe impact on thrombus consistency was expected.
For future studies, blood could be considered as flow medium to include the effect of drug thrombolytic agents in the experimental setup. Additional thrombolytic therapy may be supportive in the case of fragmentation, as the thrombus surface area is increased by mechanical treatment [
14,
15]. Not only blood is crucial, but also the endothelial layer of a natural vascular system and humoral factors, e.g., of an in-vivo intrinsic coagulation system, which makes it difficult to model drug thrombolysis experimentally and in-vitro.
Moreover, there was no intention of fully covering all available mechanical systems in this study. In clinical settings, large-bore thrombectomy devices with a diameter of 20-F have shown promising results [
18]. The intention of our study was to create comparable framework conditions, also with regard to sheath size, which was limited to 8-F, with one exception of 10-F for the ASP catheter. A system with a catheter/sheath size of 20/22-F obviously provides better aspiration properties. However, in the clinical setting, larger system calibers may be associated with higher complication rates such as vascular injury, arrhythmia, and even ventricular fibrillation of a stressed right ventricle [
17].
In our experimental setup, clot preparation was aimed at a thrombus with increased consistency and thus increased resistance to aspiration and fragmentation, although this method could not reproduce a partially organized thrombus. So far, no histological examination has been conducted to verify the exact mechanism of consolidation. The important point is that all clots were prepared according to the same protocol, so that comparability between different catheter systems is given. The need for comparability was paramount in our study, so the investigation of very different, old organized or mixed-structured clots, as found in PE in a clinical setting and certainly affecting treatability by catheter systems, was not considered.
Finally, it must be considered that regeneration after PE is a complex process that does not necessarily correlate linearly with pulmonary recanalization by catheter treatment and may be delayed. However, such a regeneration process affects treatment with all catheter systems and unfortunately cannot be reproduced in an in-vitro model.
Despite all these limitations, our setup allowed a comparison of the recanalization properties of the investigated catheters under standardized conditions. The test rig may be also applicable for training and teaching. Procedures can be performed with a direct view onto the transparent vessels or, as an improvement, under sight restriction and with the model placed in a fluoroscopy unit.