Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2020

12.11.2019 | Original Article

Comparison of biting force when using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate versus two miniplates for fixation of parasymphyseal mandibular fracture: the use of microplates for parasymphyseal mandibular fracture

verfasst von: Magdy Mohamed Zaky, Nabila Ali Fayed, Mohamed Farid Shehab

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study was to assess the efficiency of using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate for management of patients with parasymphyseal mandibular fractures versus two miniplates through measurement of the biting force.

Patients and methods

The study sample consisted of sixteen patients with an isolated mandibular fracture and randomly divided into two groups; group I was managed using two miniplates, while group II was managed using a combination of one microplate at subapical region and one miniplate at the inferior border of the mandible. The biting force was measured at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months follow-up visits. A control group consisted of 40 healthy adult volunteers was selected to measure the normal biting force.

Results

The mean of the normal biting force of the control group was 435 N ± 219, 103.2 N ± 4.8, and 390.6 N ± 195.4 at right molar, incisor, and left molar regions respectively. There was a statistically non-significant difference regarding the bite force of both study groups, with a progressive increase through the different follow-up visits and a period of 3 months is sufficient for recovery of patients to regain their normal biting force.

Conclusion

Consequently a combination of one microplate and one miniplate is efficient for the management of isolated parasymphyseal mandibular fracture in the same way as two miniplates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanson J, Lovald S, Cowgill I, Erdman M, Dianond B (2011) National hardware removal rate associated with internal fixation of facial fractur. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1152–1158CrossRef Hanson J, Lovald S, Cowgill I, Erdman M, Dianond B (2011) National hardware removal rate associated with internal fixation of facial fractur. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1152–1158CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadeghi N, Motamedi M, Parandoosh P (2019) Patterns of maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review. Trauma Mon 24:e87169CrossRef Sadeghi N, Motamedi M, Parandoosh P (2019) Patterns of maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review. Trauma Mon 24:e87169CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahim AUR, Warraich RA (2009) Mandibular fracture osteosynthesis: a comparison of three techniques. Pakistan Oral Dent J 29:201–206 Rahim AUR, Warraich RA (2009) Mandibular fracture osteosynthesis: a comparison of three techniques. Pakistan Oral Dent J 29:201–206
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Abreu MER, Viegas VN, Ibrahim D et al (2009) Treatment of comminuted mandibular fractures: a critical review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14:E247–E251PubMed Abreu MER, Viegas VN, Ibrahim D et al (2009) Treatment of comminuted mandibular fractures: a critical review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14:E247–E251PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirani NN, Pujara N (2015) Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation in case of symphysis and parasymphysis mandible fracture. Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 4:2129–2131CrossRef Hirani NN, Pujara N (2015) Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation in case of symphysis and parasymphysis mandible fracture. Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 4:2129–2131CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Binahmed A, Sansalone C, Garbedian J, Sándor GKB (2007) The lingual splint: an often forgotten method for fixating pediatric mandibular fractures. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 73:521–524 Binahmed A, Sansalone C, Garbedian J, Sándor GKB (2007) The lingual splint: an often forgotten method for fixating pediatric mandibular fractures. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 73:521–524
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalifa M, Elhawary H, Hussein M (2012) Titanium three dimensional miniplate versus conventional titanium miniplate in fixation of anterior mandibular fractures. Life Sci J 9:1006–1010 Khalifa M, Elhawary H, Hussein M (2012) Titanium three dimensional miniplate versus conventional titanium miniplate in fixation of anterior mandibular fractures. Life Sci J 9:1006–1010
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Betharia AR, Dolas R (2016) Efficacy of the Lag screw fixation for the treatment of anterior mandibular fracture. Int Dent J Students Res 4:111–115 Betharia AR, Dolas R (2016) Efficacy of the Lag screw fixation for the treatment of anterior mandibular fracture. Int Dent J Students Res 4:111–115
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Frisken KW, Dandie GW, Lugowski S, Jordan G (2002) A study of titanium release into body organs following the insertion of single threaded screw implants into the mandibles of sheep. Aust Dent J 47:214–217CrossRef Frisken KW, Dandie GW, Lugowski S, Jordan G (2002) A study of titanium release into body organs following the insertion of single threaded screw implants into the mandibles of sheep. Aust Dent J 47:214–217CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed SS, Rehman SA, Ansari MK, Khan AA, Farooq O, Khan AH (2016) A comparative study on evaluation of role of 1.5 mm microplates and 2.0 mm standard miniplates in management of mandibular fractures using bite force as indicator of recommendation. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 7:39–44CrossRef Ahmed SS, Rehman SA, Ansari MK, Khan AA, Farooq O, Khan AH (2016) A comparative study on evaluation of role of 1.5 mm microplates and 2.0 mm standard miniplates in management of mandibular fractures using bite force as indicator of recommendation. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 7:39–44CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Anand D, Prasad K, Lalitha RMRK, Rajnikanth BR, Munoyath SK, Parimala Sagar VK, Sridhar P (2018) Bite force assessment of mandibular interforaminal fractures treated with combination of microplate and miniplate—a randomized control study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr Open 2:e1–e8CrossRef Anand D, Prasad K, Lalitha RMRK, Rajnikanth BR, Munoyath SK, Parimala Sagar VK, Sridhar P (2018) Bite force assessment of mandibular interforaminal fractures treated with combination of microplate and miniplate—a randomized control study. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr Open 2:e1–e8CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakaguchi M, Ono N, Turuta H, Yoshiike JOT (1996) Development of new handy type occlusal force gauge. Jpn J Med Electron Biol Eng 34:53–55 Sakaguchi M, Ono N, Turuta H, Yoshiike JOT (1996) Development of new handy type occlusal force gauge. Jpn J Med Electron Biol Eng 34:53–55
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal S, Gupta DS, Khare G, Kukrega P, Satish K, Khan M (2017) Efficiency of open reduction and internal fixation in unilateral mandibular anterior fracture by using single miniplate with arch bar: a clinical study. TMU J Dent 4:133–137 Agarwal S, Gupta DS, Khare G, Kukrega P, Satish K, Khan M (2017) Efficiency of open reduction and internal fixation in unilateral mandibular anterior fracture by using single miniplate with arch bar: a clinical study. TMU J Dent 4:133–137
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Raut R, Keerthi R, Vaibhav N, Ghosh A, Kamath Kateel S (2017) Single miniplate fixation for mandibular symphysis and parasymphysis fracture as a viable alternative to conventional plating based on Champy’s principles: a prospective comparative clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 16:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0919-1 CrossRefPubMed Raut R, Keerthi R, Vaibhav N, Ghosh A, Kamath Kateel S (2017) Single miniplate fixation for mandibular symphysis and parasymphysis fracture as a viable alternative to conventional plating based on Champy’s principles: a prospective comparative clinical study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 16:113–117. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12663-016-0919-1 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of biting force when using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate versus two miniplates for fixation of parasymphyseal mandibular fracture: the use of microplates for parasymphyseal mandibular fracture
verfasst von
Magdy Mohamed Zaky
Nabila Ali Fayed
Mohamed Farid Shehab
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00810-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.