Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2016

07.08.2015 | Original Article

Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics

verfasst von: Maximilian Kollmuss, Stefan Kist, Julia Eliette Goeke, Reinhard Hickel, Karin Christine Huth

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

There are many ways to produce all-ceramic crowns. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) procedures compete against conventional fabricated restorations. As different methods of production may produce variable results, this study aims to compare chairside and laboratory-based CAD/CAM systems to conventional crowns regarding their similarity to original tooth morphology, number of occlusal contacts, occlusal adjustment time, and subjective aesthetic perception.

Material and methods

Impressions of caries-free jaws were taken, and the resulting gypsum casts were scanned with a laboratory scanner. Preparations for all-ceramic full crowns were performed on first molars, and three different restorations were made: CEREC restorations (CER), laboratory-produced CAD/CAM crowns (LABCAD), and conventional waxed-up/pressed ceramic crowns (CONV). Time for occlusal adaptation and the number of occlusal contacts were noted. Two dentists performed aesthetic gradings of restorations. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA with least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test, t test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

Metrical deviations of the re-scanned crowns to the original, unprepared tooth surface were 220.55 ± 54.31 μm for CER, 265.94 ± 61.39 for LABCAD, and 252.44 ± 68.77 μm for CONV group. One-way ANOVA showed significant lower deviations for the CER group. LABCAD crowns showed significantly more occlusal contacts, whereas CONV crowns required the least time for occlusal adaptation and showed excellent aesthetic gradings.

Conclusion

All three methods had pros and cons regarding different parameters. Further improvements of CAD/CAM software shall lead to restorations comparable to conventional restorations in all aspects, especially in aesthetics.

Clinical relevance

All tested methods of production for all-ceramic crowns produced clinically acceptable results. Thus, in an individual case, the method chosen can be determined by the dentist’s preference.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y (2009) A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28:44–56CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y (2009) A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28:44–56CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos GC Jr, Santos MJ Jr, Rizkalla AS, Madani DA, El-Mowafy O (2013) Overview of CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Gen Dent 61:36–40PubMed Santos GC Jr, Santos MJ Jr, Rizkalla AS, Madani DA, El-Mowafy O (2013) Overview of CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Gen Dent 61:36–40PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreiotelli M, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G (2013) Digital data management for CAD/CAM technology. An update of current systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 21:9–15PubMed Andreiotelli M, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G (2013) Digital data management for CAD/CAM technology. An update of current systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 21:9–15PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fasbinder DJ (2013) Computerized technology for restorative dentistry. Am J Dent 26:115–120PubMed Fasbinder DJ (2013) Computerized technology for restorative dentistry. Am J Dent 26:115–120PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, Mehl AC, Probst FA (2013) Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians’ design. Clin Oral Invest 17:491–496CrossRef Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, Mehl AC, Probst FA (2013) Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians’ design. Clin Oral Invest 17:491–496CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kollmuss M, Jakob FM, Kirchner HG, Ilie N, Hickel R, Huth KC (2013) Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology. Clin Oral Invest 17:851–857CrossRef Kollmuss M, Jakob FM, Kirchner HG, Ilie N, Hickel R, Huth KC (2013) Comparison of biogenerically reconstructed and waxed-up complete occlusal surfaces with respect to the original tooth morphology. Clin Oral Invest 17:851–857CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) Biogeneric tooth: a new mathematical representation for tooth morphology in lower first molars. Eur J Oral Sci 113:333–340CrossRefPubMed Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) Biogeneric tooth: a new mathematical representation for tooth morphology in lower first molars. Eur J Oral Sci 113:333–340CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ender A, Mörmann WH, Mehl A (2011) Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology. Clin Oral Invest 15:283–289CrossRef Ender A, Mörmann WH, Mehl A (2011) Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology. Clin Oral Invest 15:283–289CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich S, Brungsberg B, Teschner H, Frankenberger R (2010) The occlusal precision of laboratory versus CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic crowns. Am J Dent 23:53–56PubMed Reich S, Brungsberg B, Teschner H, Frankenberger R (2010) The occlusal precision of laboratory versus CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic crowns. Am J Dent 23:53–56PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss B (2012) Cerec 4.0: articulation and more. Int J Comput Dent 15:137–148PubMed Reiss B (2012) Cerec 4.0: articulation and more. Int J Comput Dent 15:137–148PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahlers MO, Mörig G, Blunck U, Hajtó J, Pröbster L, Frankenberger R (2009) Guidelines for the preparation of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns. Int J Comput Dent 12:309–325PubMed Ahlers MO, Mörig G, Blunck U, Hajtó J, Pröbster L, Frankenberger R (2009) Guidelines for the preparation of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns. Int J Comput Dent 12:309–325PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Begazo CC, van der Zel JM, van Waas MA, Feilzer AJ (2004) Effectiveness of preparation guidelines for an all-ceramic restorative system. Am J Dent 17:437–424PubMed Begazo CC, van der Zel JM, van Waas MA, Feilzer AJ (2004) Effectiveness of preparation guidelines for an all-ceramic restorative system. Am J Dent 17:437–424PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) A new mathematical process for the calculation of average forms of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 94:561–566CrossRefPubMed Mehl A, Blanz V, Hickel R (2005) A new mathematical process for the calculation of average forms of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 94:561–566CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter J, Mehl A (2006) Evaluation for the fully automatic inlay reconstruction by means of the biogeneric tooth model. Int J Comput Dent 9:101–111PubMed Richter J, Mehl A (2006) Evaluation for the fully automatic inlay reconstruction by means of the biogeneric tooth model. Int J Comput Dent 9:101–111PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (1997) A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 76:1799–1807CrossRefPubMed Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (1997) A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 76:1799–1807CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476:307–310CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476:307–310CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellerbrock C, Kordass B (2011) Comparison of computer generated occlusal surfaces with functionally waxed-on surfaces. Int J Comput Dent 14:23–31PubMed Ellerbrock C, Kordass B (2011) Comparison of computer generated occlusal surfaces with functionally waxed-on surfaces. Int J Comput Dent 14:23–31PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartung F, Kordass B (2006) Comparison of the contact surface pattern between virtual and milled Cerec 3D full-ceramic crowns. Int J Comput Dent 9:129–136PubMed Hartung F, Kordass B (2006) Comparison of the contact surface pattern between virtual and milled Cerec 3D full-ceramic crowns. Int J Comput Dent 9:129–136PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich S, Trentzsch L, Gozdowski S, Krey KF (2009) In vitro analysis of laboratory-processed and CAD/CAM-generated occlusal onlay surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 22:620–622PubMed Reich S, Trentzsch L, Gozdowski S, Krey KF (2009) In vitro analysis of laboratory-processed and CAD/CAM-generated occlusal onlay surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 22:620–622PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nemli SK, Wolfart S, Reich S (2012) InLab and cerec connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts—an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 15:23–31PubMed Nemli SK, Wolfart S, Reich S (2012) InLab and cerec connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts—an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 15:23–31PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gozdowski S, Reich S (2009) A comparison of the fabrication times of all-ceramic partial crowns: cerec 3D vs IPS empress. Int J Comput Dent 12:279–289PubMed Gozdowski S, Reich S (2009) A comparison of the fabrication times of all-ceramic partial crowns: cerec 3D vs IPS empress. Int J Comput Dent 12:279–289PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics
verfasst von
Maximilian Kollmuss
Stefan Kist
Julia Eliette Goeke
Reinhard Hickel
Karin Christine Huth
Publikationsdatum
07.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1554-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.