Purpose
To compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (TARE), and transarterial ethanol ablation (TEA) for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in treatment responses and long-term survival outcomes.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study approved by institutional committee, inclusion criteria were tumour ≥ 10 cm, newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, Child A, Performance Score 0 or 1, no venous invasion or extrahepatic disease on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. There were 107 patients (Supportive Care [SC] 17, TACE 54, TARE 17, TEA 19). Survival outcomes of SC and TACE were compared (TACE selected as benchmark for transarterial treatments). Tumour response and overall survival (OS) of the three groups were compared.
Results
OS of TACE (vs. SC) was significantly longer (9.9 [5.9, 24.1] months versus 2.8 [1.5, 10.2], p = 0.001). Complete response of TEA was significantly better (TEA 10/19 [52.6%] versus TARE 2/17 [12.5%], p = 0.013, versus TACE 9/54 [16.7%], p = 0.002). OS of TEA (vs. TACE) was significantly longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 9.9 [5.9, 24.1], p = 0.014, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1). OS of TEA (vs. TARE) was longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 11.9 [7, 28.7], p = 0.082, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) in favour of TEA).
Conclusion
In patients with huge HCC, transarterial treatment as represented by TACE had a survival benefit over supportive care. In this retrospective analysis, TEA was associated with better tumour response and survival outcome as compared to TACE or TARE; therefore, transarterial treatment could be useful for prolonging patient survival, and TEA could be a preferred option.
