nach oben

01.12.2015 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between aspiration pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Zeitschrift:: BMC Pulmonary Medicine > Ausgabe 1/2015

Autoren:: Yasuhiro Yamauchi, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Wakae Hasegawa, Taisuke Jo, Kazutaka Takami, Kiyohide Fushimi, Takahide Nagase

Ergänzende Inhalte

» Zur Zusammenfassung PDF-Version jetzt herunterladen

Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0064-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YY: study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript preparation. HY: study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript preparation. HM: data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation. WH: study design and data interpretation. TJ: study design and data interpretation. KT: study design and data interpretation. KF: data collection and data interpretation. TN: study design, data interpretation, and supervision of the study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CAP

Community-acquired pneumonia

AsP

Aspiration pneumonia

ICD-10

International classification of disease and related health problems 10th revision

ICU

Intensive care unit

BMI

Body mass index

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the world [ 1]. COPD is characterized by persistent airflow limitation associated with chronic airway inflammation [ 2]. Often, exacerbation of COPD occurs in the clinical course of the disease, accelerates the rate of decline in lung function [ 3], and is associated with significant mortality, particularly in patients requiring hospitalization [ 4]. The most common cause of exacerbation appears to be respiratory tract infection; it has been reported that exacerbation is caused by bacterial infection in approximately 50 % of cases [ 5]. Further, COPD is one of the most frequent co-morbid conditions associated with the development of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [ 6]; COPD is the most common underlying disease in patients with CAP who require hospitalization [ 7], and such patients have increased mortality [ 8, 9]. Thus, CAP should be considered as a cause of exacerbation in the differential diagnosis and treated appropriately if present [ 2].

Aspiration pneumonia (AsP) is assumed to be one of the phenotypes of CAP. AsP demonstrates specific clinical features [ 10, 11], such as frequent occurrence in elderly patients, greater severity of pneumonia, and poorer long-term mortality compared with CAP [ 11– 13]. COPD patients have been reported to have increased risk of dysphagia, which is related to the occurrence of AsP. This dysphagia is due to ageing [ 13] and also to the presence of cerebrovascular disease [ 11] and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease [ 14] as co-morbidities of COPD. COPD patients have reduced laryngopharyngeal sensitivity and impaired swallowing function compared with healthy age-matched controls [ 15, 16]. AsP should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis in COPD patients with exacerbation who require hospitalization.

However, there is little information about the clinical features of COPD patients with AsP compared with those with CAP—particularly with respect to in-hospital mortality. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes between AsP and CAP in COPD patients using a national inpatient database in Japan. We also aimed to evaluate factors that affect in-hospital mortality in the AsP and CAP patient groups.

Methods

Data source

This study used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. The database includes administrative claims data and discharge abstract data. With this database, the primary diagnosis on admission, co-morbidities present, and complications during hospitalization are recorded using the International Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes accompanied by text data in Japanese. The database also contains the following details: patient’s age, sex, body height, and weight; severity of dyspnea based on the Hugh-Jones dyspnea scale (details of dyspnea scale appear in Additional file 1: Additional Information); level of consciousness based on the Japan Coma Scale [ 17, 18] on admission (details of the Japan Coma Scale are shown in Additional file 1: Additional Information); grades of activities of daily life on admission converted to the Barthel index [ 19] (details of the Barthel index appear in Additional file 1: Additional Information); severity of pneumonia based on the A-DROP score (details of the A-DROP scoring system are shown in Additional file 1: Additional Information); admission to intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization; mechanical ventilation; outcome; and discharge status. Body mass index (BMI) was defined as body weight (kg) divided by the square of body height (m ²; details of BMI categorization appear in Additional file 1: Additional Information).

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Tokyo. The board waived the requirement for patient informed consent because of the anonymous nature of the data.

Patient selection

We retrospectively collected data for patients aged over 40 years who had been admitted to hospital because of AsP (ICD-10 code J69) or pneumonia caused by microbes (J10–J18) as the main diagnosis on admission, who had a diagnosis of COPD (J41–J44), and who were discharged between 1 July 2010 and 31 March 2013. To preclude hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, we excluded patients who had pneumonia recorded as a post-admission complication. The presence of COPD was based on physician diagnosis. We divided the patients into those with AsP and CAP.

Co-morbidities on admission

We identified co-morbidities on admission using ICD-10 codes (detailed ICD-10 codes appear in Additional file 1: Additional Information): interstitial pneumonia; lung cancer; heart failure; ischemic heart disease; cardiac arrhythmia; pulmonary embolism; cor pulmonale; cerebrovascular disease; chronic liver disease; chronic renal failure; anxiety; depression; and bone fracture.

A-DROP score

We evaluated the severity of pneumonia using the A-DROP score, which is a scoring system for the clinical severity of community-acquired pneumonia adopted by the Japanese Respiratory Society; it is similar to the CURB-65 of the British Thoracic Society [ 20]. We categorized the severity of pneumonia into four classes using the A-DROP score: mild, 0; moderate, 1–2; severe, 3; and extremely severe, 4–5.

Clinical outcomes

The outcomes of this study were all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (days), length of ICU stay (days), requirement of mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation (days), and mortality of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation.

Statistical analysis

We used the chi-square test to compare proportions, the two-sample t test to compare average values, and the Mann–Whitney test to compare the median values between the groups. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between patient-level factors and mortality in the following COPD patients—after adjustment for within-hospital clustering by means of a generalized estimating equation [ 21]: (1) all patients with pneumonia, including both AsP and CAP; (2) patients with AsP alone; and (3) those with CAP alone. The threshold for significance was a value of p < 0.05. We performed all statistical analyses using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Comparison of clinical characteristics between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

We identified 87,330 patients with COPD (age ≥40 years) who were admitted for pneumonia; 16,388 had AsP, and 70,942 had CAP. The patient characteristics appear in Table 1. The average age in the AsP group was 82.7 years, which was significantly older than that in the CAP group (77.4 years). The average BMI in the AsP group was 18.5 kg/m ², which was significantly lower than that in the CAP group (19.9 kg/m ²). The proportion of patients with severe dyspnea grade, low level of consciousness, and low Barthel index on admission was higher in the AsP group than in the CAP group; thus, the general condition on admission was poorer in the AsP group than in the CAP group. Regarding severity of pneumonia, the median A-DROP score in the AsP group was 2 (interquartile range; IQR, 2–3), which was higher than that in the CAP group (2, IQR, 1–3); the proportion of severe pneumonia was higher in the AsP group than in the CAP group. Co-morbidities on admission are presented in Table 2. The proportion of cerebrovascular disease in the AsP group was approximately 3-fold that in the CAP group. The proportion of bone fractures in the AsP group was 2-fold that in the CAP group.

Table 1

Patient backgrounds on admission

	AsP (n = 16,388)		CAP (n = 70,942)		p
Age (years) †	82.7 ± 8.0		77.4 ± 9.5		<0.001
40–64	426	(2.6)	7,318	(10.3)
65–74	1,851	(11.3)	16,562	(23.3)
75–84	6,935	(42.3)	30,759	(43.4)
≥85	7,176	(43.8)	16,303	(23.0)
Sex					<0.001
Male	13,328	(81.3)	58,815	(82.9)
Female	3060	(18.7)	12,127	(17.1)
Body mass index (kg/m ²)†	18.5 ± 3.6		19.9 ± 3.8		<0.001
<18.5	7,196	(54.9)	23,835	(39.0)
18.5–24.9	5,338	(40.7)	31,964	(52.3)
25.0–29.9	512	(3.9)	4,684	(7.7)
>30	58	(0.4)	631	(1.0)
Dyspnea scale					<0.001
I	562	(3.8)	6159	(9.4)
II	966	(6.5)	8,991	(13.7)
III	1,239	(8.4)	9,001	(13.7)
IV	2,509	(16.9)	16,277	(24.8)
V	4,284	(28.9)	16,885	(25.7)
Unspecified	5,273	(35.5)	8,348	(12.7)
Level of consciousness					<0.001
Alert	10,233	(62.5)	60,993	(86.0)
Dull	4,048	(24.7)	7,220	(10.2)
Somnolence	1,379	(8.4)	1,610	(2.3)
Coma	724	(4.4)	1,116	(1.6)
ADL level					<0.001
20	1,633	(11.2)	23,281	(37.8)
15–19	1,124	(7.7)	8,462	(13.7)
10–14	1,614	(11.1)	9,887	(16.0)
5–9	1,590	(10.9)	6,113	(9.9)
0–4	8,598	(59.1)	13,927	(22.6)
A-DROP score ‡	2 [ 2, 3]		2 [ 1– 3]		<0.001
Mild	175	(1.9)	4,293	(8.8)
Moderate	4,833	(53.7)	31,067	(63.6)
Severe	2,352	(26.1)	9,630	(19.7)
Extremely severe	1,641	(18.2)	3,868	(7.9)

Data are expressed as numbers (%), unless otherwise indicated; † data are expressed as averages ± standard deviation; ‡ data are expressed as medians [interquartile range]. Abbreviations: AsP aspiration pneumonia, CAP community-acquired pneumonia, ADL activities of daily life

Table 2

Co-morbidities on admission

	AsP		CAP		p
	n = 16,388	(%)	n = 70,942	(%)	p
Interstitial pneumonia	357	(2.2)	3,619	(5.1)	<0.001
Lung cancer	728	(4.4)	6,983	(9.8)	<0.001
Heart failure	3,350	(20.4)	12,704	(17.9)	<0.001
Ischemic heart disease	998	(6.1)	4,619	(6.5)	0.048
Cardiac arrhythmia	880	(5.4)	3,560	(5.0)	0.065
Pulmonary embolism	31	(0.2)	206	(0.3)	0.025
Cor pulmonale	110	(0.7)	806	(1.1)	<0.001
Cerebrovascular disease	2,816	(17.2)	3,992	(5.6)	<0.001
Chronic liver disease	171	(1.0)	1,102	(1.6)	<0.001
Chronic renal failure	345	(2.1)	1,525	(2.1)	0.723
Anxiety/depression	227	(1.4)	1,025	(1.4)	0.562
Bone fracture	353	(2.2)	812	(1.1)	<0.001

Data are expressed as numbers (%) in each category. Abbreviations: AsP aspiration pneumonia, CAP community-acquired pneumonia

Comparison of outcomes between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

The outcomes appear in Table 3. All-cause in-hospital mortality in the AsP group was 22.7 %, whereas it was 12.2 % in the CAP group. Hospital stay in the AsP group was longer than in the CAP group. The proportions of ICU admission and requirement of mechanical ventilation in the AsP group were higher than in the CAP group. The length of ICU stay was similar in the two groups. The mortality rate in patients who required mechanical ventilation in the AsP group was 51.8 % (n = 1,010/1,951), which was significantly higher than in the CAP group (41.4 %, n = 3,036/7,339).

Table 3

Clinical outcomes

		AsP (n = 16,388)		CAP (n = 70,942)		p
Death		3,726	(22.7)	8,671	(12.2)	<0.001
Length of stay (days)		21.0 [12–40]		15.0 [ 10– 26]		<0.001
ICU admission		522	(3.2)	2021	(2.8)	0.021
Length of ICU stay (days)		4.0 [ 2– 10]		4.0 [ 2– 9]		0.527
Mechanical ventilation		1,951	(11.9)	7,339	(10.3)	<0.001
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)		6.0 [ 1– 21]		7.0 [ 2– 20]		0.001
	Death†	1,010	(51.8)	3,036	(41.4)	<0.001

Data are expressed as numbers (%) or medians [interquartile range];†% indicates the proportion of patients who died, among those who underwent mechanical ventilation. Abbreviations: AsP aspiration pneumonia, CAP community-acquired pneumonia, ICU intensive care unit

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for all-cause in-hospital mortality

The results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis for all-cause in-hospital mortality are presented in Table 4. In the analysis for all patients (left-hand column, Table 4), AsP was significantly associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95 % confidence interval, 1.08–1.31; p = 0.001) than CAP. Higher mortality was associated with older age, male gender, lower BMI, more severe dyspnea scale, worse level of consciousness, worse level of activities of daily life, and more severe pneumonia. Higher mortality was also associated with several co-morbidities on admission, including interstitial pneumonia, lung cancer, heart failure, cor pulmonale, chronic renal failure, and bone fracture.

Table 4

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for in-hospital death

		All		AsP		CAP
		aOR	95 % CI	aOR	95 % CI	aOR	95 % CI
Type of pneumonia
	AsP	1.19**	1.08–1.31
	CAP	Ref.
Age (years)
	40–64	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	65–74	1.13	0.93–1.38	1.43	0.75–2.71	1.09	0.87–1.35
	75–84	1.28*	1.05–1.56	1.52	0.80–2.91	1.22	0.98–1.52
	>85	1.45**	1.18–1.77	1.58	0.83–2.97	1.41**	1.12–1.77
Sex
	Male	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	Female	0.60**	0.54–0.67	0.66**	0.52–0.83	0.58**	0.52–0.66
Body mass index (kg/m ²)
	<18.5	1.70**	1.58–1.83	1.72**	1.50–1.96	1.69**	1.55–1.84
	18.5–24.9	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	25–29.9	0.77**	0.65–0.93	0.73	0.48–1.12	0.77*	0.63–0.95
	>30	0.88	0.56–1.38	0.79	0.24–2.55	0.90	0.52–1.47
Dyspnea grade by Hugh-Jones classification
	I	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	II	1.23	0.89–1.68	0.64	0.33–1.22	1.42	1.00–2.02
	III	1.51**	1.13–2.01	0.90	0.51–1.58	1.68**	1.21–2.34
	IV	2.26**	1.74–2.96	1.30	0.76–2.22	2.57**	1.89–3.50
	V	5.44**	4.19–7.08	2.60**	1.55–4.37	6.42**	4.72–8.72
	Unspecified	5.54**	4.20–7.29	2.47**	1.46–4.19	6.90**	4.99–9.53
Level of consciousness
	Alert	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	Dull	0.96	0.86–1.07	0.88	0.75–1.03	1.00	0.88–1.14
	Somnolence	1.09	0.94–1.27	0.82	0.64–1.04	1.38**	1.12–1.70
	Coma	1.46**	1.19–1.80	1.22	0.88–1.68	1.62**	1.24–2.10
Level of ADL scored by Barthel index
	20	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	15–19	1.26**	1.09–1.45	1.07	0.73–1.59	1.26**	1.07–1.48
	10–14	1.54**	1.34–1.76	1.33	0.93–1.90	1.51**	1.31–1.75
	5–9	1.90**	1.65–2.20	1.22	0.85–1.75	1.99**	1.69–2.35
	0–4	3.04**	2.67–3.46	1.94**	1.43–2.63	3.21**	2.76–3.71
A-DROP score
	Mild	Ref.		Ref.		Ref.
	Moderate	1.64**	1.24–2.17	3.22*	1.15–9.00	1.48*	1.09–2.01
	Severe	2.86**	2.12–3.85	5.11**	1.78–14.65	2.67**	1.94–3.68
	Extremely severe	7.84**	5.74–10.70	14.18**	4.85–41.41	7.22**	5.15–10.12
Co-morbidities on admission
	IP	2.21**	1.88–2.60	1.69*	1.12–2.55	2.32**	1.95–2.76
	Lung cancer	2.80**	2.45–3.20	1.88**	1.40–2.52	3.00**	2.59–3.48
	Heart failure	1.16**	1.06–1.27	1.27**	1.06–1.53	1.14*	1.00–1.24
	IHD	0.80**	0.69–0.93	0.93	0.69–1.25	0.76**	0.63–0.90
	Arrhythmia	1.15	0.99–1.33	1.34*	1.01–1.78	1.07	8.9–.128
	PE	0.91	0.44–1.90	1.20	0.11–12.56	0.84	0.40–1.75
	Cor pulmonale	1.42*	1.02–1.99	1.77	0.80–3.89	1.35	0.93–1.l97
	CVD	0.94	0.84–1.06	0.99	0.84–1.16	0.92	0.79–1.07
	CLD	1.23	0.93–1.64	1.51	0.81–2.81	1.13	0.81–1.57
	CRF	1.65**	1.35–2.02	1.56*	1.08–2.27	1.68**	1.35–2.09
	ANX/DEP	0.90	0.64–1.28	1.53	0.92–2.53	0.67	0.43–1.05
	Bone fracture	1.66**	1.29–2.13	1.20	0.80–1.82	1.90**	1.41–2.56

* p value <0.05, ** p value <0.01. Abbreviations: AsP aspiration pneumonia, CAP community-acquired pneumonia, aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref. reference, ADL activities of daily life, IP interstitial pneumonitis IHD ischemic heart disease, PE pulmonary embolism, CVD cerebrovascular disease, CLD chronic liver disease, CRF chronic renal failure, ANX/DEP anxiety and depression

Subgroup analyses of the AsP and CAP groups (center and right-hand columns, Table 4) showed that higher mortality was commonly associated in both groups with male gender, underweight, dyspnea, physical disability, severe pneumonia, interstitial pneumonitis, lung cancer, heart failure, and chronic renal failure. Further, older age and worse level of consciousness were associated with higher mortality in the CAP group, whereas those were not associated with mortality in the AsP group.

Discussion

Using a national inpatient database in Japan, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD. The AsP group was more likely to be older, male, have lower BMI, more severe dyspnea, worse levels of consciousness, worse activities of daily life level, and greater severity of pneumonia than the CAP group. Mortality in the AsP group was significantly higher than in the CAP group—even after adjustment for patient backgrounds.

It is well known that there is a high incidence of aspiration in the elderly, and it is an important risk factor in CAP [ 22]. One study has reported the incidence of aspiration in elderly CAP patients to be 71 %, which was significantly higher than control subjects without acute disease (10 %) [ 23]. In addition, COPD patients have been found to have a high incidence of impairment of the swallowing reflex, which is a risk factor for exacerbation of COPD [ 14, 24] and is related to the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as a co-morbidity [ 14, 25]. Further, COPD patients have increased risk of mild cognitive impairment [ 26], which is associated with swallowing difficulties [ 27]. Moreover, patients with COPD have impaired laryngopharyngeal sensitivity, which leads to inability to detect pharyngeal residue and subsequent aspiration of pharyngeal contents [ 15]. Thus, COPD patients have increased risk of AsP.

AsP is believed to be one of the phenotypes of CAP. Although there are no definitive diagnostic criteria of AsP, it is generally characterized by aspiration of oropharyngeal contents into the larynx and lower respiratory tract [ 10, 28]. Previous studies have demonstrated that AsP has distinct clinical characteristics: compared with CAP, it appears at an older age in individuals with lower BMI and is associated with greater severity of pneumonia and increased long-term mortality [ 11, 12]. The present study found the clinical characteristics on admission in the AsP group to be similar to those reported in previous investigations [ 11, 12], and AsP in COPD patients also has distinct clinical features.

Regarding mortality, it is controversial whether or not the presence of AsP in the general population is an independent short-term prognostic factor. After adjusting for co-morbidities and severity of pneumonia, some studies [ 11, 12] have found that AsP was not associated with short-term mortality. Adopting a strict diagnosis for AsP, another investigation [ 29] has demonstrated that AsP is an independent prognostic factor for short-term mortality in pneumonia patients. Our search of the medical literature revealed no report that focused on AsP mortality in COPD patients. The present study showed AsP in COPD patients to be associated with higher short-term mortality—even after adjustment for patient backgrounds. The association between AsP in COPD and mortality could be attributed to the following: AsP patients easily develop recurrent pneumonia [ 11], which causes a deterioration in lung function in COPD patients [ 3]; because COPD patients have increased risk of aspiration, COPD patients with AsP have more repetitive aspiration events—even during hospitalization [ 29]. Thus, AsP in COPD patients would appear to be associated with higher mortality.

The length of hospital stay in the AsP group was significantly greater than in the CAP group, which is consistent with the results of previous studies that focused on AsP. [ 11, 12, 30] Likewise, the proportions of ICU admission and requirement of mechanical ventilation were higher in the AsP than in the CAP group, which is a similar finding to that reported elsewhere [ 11, 30]. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined AsP mortality in COPD patients who require mechanical ventilation. One investigation on mortality in CAP patients undergoing mechanical ventilation found an overall mortality rate of 32 % [ 31]; the mortality in the AsP group in the present study was 51.8 %, which is much higher than the earlier figure.

This study has several limitations. The diagnoses of COPD, AsP, and CAP were based on physician-based assessments. The accuracy of the diagnosis was not certified by specialists. However, in normal clinical settings, these diseases are not always diagnosed by specialists, and so we believe the data relating to physician-based diagnosis to be meaningful. In addition, cases of pneumonia not having been diagnosed on admission but being diagnosed within the first 48 hours after admission may have been excluded in this study: such cases may not have appeared in the category of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Thus, AsP and CAP may have been underestimated in the present study. Further, the degree of airflow limitation was not evaluated in this study: the database does not include the stages of COPD severity or details of pulmonary function tests, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second and other indices. Thus, we cannot evaluate the association between mortality and degree of lung function.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that AsP has different characteristics to CAP and that AsP is associated with higher in-hospital mortality than CAP in COPD patients.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant to the Respiratory Failure Research Group) and grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan.

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Additional file 1: Additional Information.

World Health Organization, The top 10 causes of death [ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/] Accessed 14 March 2014.

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, GOLD: Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and prevention of COPD [ http://www.goldcopd.org/Guidelines/guidelines-resources.html] Accessed November 23 2014.

Donaldson GC, Seemungal TA, Bhowmik A, Wedzicha JA. Relationship between exacerbation frequency and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2002;57:847–52. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Connors Jr AF, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell Jr FE, Desbiens N, Fulkerson WJ, et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:959–67. CrossRefPubMed

Sethi S, Murphy TF. Infection in the pathogenesis and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2355–65. CrossRefPubMed

Torres A, Dorca J, Zalacain R, Bello S, El-Ebiary M, Molinos L, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1456–61. CrossRefPubMed

Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ferrer A, Jimenez P, Celis R, Cobo E, et al. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Epidemiology and prognostic factors. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:312–8. CrossRefPubMed

Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Pugh JA, Anzueto A. COPD is associated with increased mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:346–51. CrossRefPubMed

Holguin F, Folch E, Redd SC, Mannino DM. Comorbidity and mortality in COPD-related hospitalizations in the United States, 1979 to 2001. Chest. 2005;128:2005–11. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Marik PE. Pulmonary aspiration syndromes. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011;17:148–54. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Taylor JK, Fleming GB, Singanayagam A, Hill AT, Chalmers JD. Risk factors for aspiration in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of a hospitalized UK cohort. Am J Med. 2013;126:995–1001. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Hayashi M, Iwasaki T, Yamazaki Y, Takayasu H, Tateno H, Tazawa S, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of aspiration pneumonia compared with non-aspiration pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:436–42. CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cabre M. Pneumonia in the elderly. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009;15:223–9. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Terada K, Muro S, Ohara T, Kudo M, Ogawa E, Hoshino Y, et al. Abnormal swallowing reflex and COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2010;137:326–32. CrossRefPubMed

15.

Clayton NA, Carnaby GD, Peters MJ, Ing AJ. Impaired laryngopharyngeal sensitivity in patients with COPD: The association with swallow function. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16:615–23. CrossRefPubMed

16.

Clayton NA, Carnaby-Mann GD, Peters MJ, Ing AJ. The effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on laryngopharyngeal sensitivity. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012;91:370–2. 374 passim. PubMed

17.

Ohta T, Waga S, Handa W, Saito I, Takeuchi K. [New grading of level of disordered consiousness (author's transl)]. No Shinkei Geka. 1974;2:623–7. PubMed

18.

Todo T, Usui M, Takakura K. Treatment of severe intraventricular hemorrhage by intraventricular infusion of urokinase. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:81–6. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5. PubMed

20.

Shindo Y, Sato S, Maruyama E, Ohashi T, Ogawa M, Imaizumi K, et al. Comparison of severity scoring systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for community-acquired pneumonia. Respirology. 2008;13:731–5. CrossRefPubMed

21.

Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, Van der Laan M, Lippman SA, Jewell N, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology. 2010;21:467–74. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Dang TT, Majumdar SR, Marrie TJ, Eurich DT. Recurrent pneumonia: a review with focus on clinical epidemiology and modifiable risk factors in elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2015;32:13–9. CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kikuchi R, Watabe N, Konno T, Mishina N, Sekizawa K, Sasaki H. High incidence of silent aspiration in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:251–3. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kobayashi S, Kubo H, Yanai M. Impairment of the swallowing reflex in exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2007;62:1017. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Stein M, Williams AJ, Grossman F, Weinberg AS, Zuckerbraun L. Cricopharyngeal dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1990;97:347–52. CrossRefPubMed

26.

Singh B, Mielke MM, Parsaik AK, Cha RH, Roberts RO, Scanlon PD, et al. A prospective study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk for mild cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:581–8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Moon HI, Pyun SB, Kwon HK. Correlation between Location of Brain Lesion and Cognitive Function and Findings of Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36:347–55. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:665–71. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Komiya K, Ishii H, Umeki K, Mizunoe S, Okada F, Johkoh T, et al. Impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Respirology. 2013;18:514–21. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Reza Shariatzadeh M, Huang JQ, Marrie TJ. Differences in the features of aspiration pneumonia according to site of acquisition: community or continuing care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:296–302. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Tejerina E, Frutos-Vivar F, Restrepo MI, Anzueto A, Palizas F, Gonzalez M, et al. Prognosis factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia needing mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2005;20:230–8. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between aspiration pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Autoren:: Yasuhiro Yamauchi
Hideo Yasunaga
Hiroki Matsui
Wakae Hasegawa
Taisuke Jo
Kazutaka Takami
Kiyohide Fushimi
Takahide Nagase
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0064-5
Verlag: BioMed Central
Zeitschrift: BMC Pulmonary Medicine BMC series – open, inclusive and trusted
Ausgabe 1/2015
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2466

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

01.03.2021 | Thorakale und kardiale Radiologie | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Bildnachweise

Mail Icon II

Springer Medizin

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between aspiration pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Electronic supplementary material

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Background

Methods

Data source

Patient selection

Co-morbidities on admission

A-DROP score

Clinical outcomes

Statistical analysis

Results

Comparison of clinical characteristics between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

Comparison of outcomes between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for all-cause in-hospital mortality

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

CT-Schema zur Emphysemprognose von Rauchern

So gefährlich sind schwere COVID-19-Verläufe in der Schwangerschaft!

EKG-Pflaster deckt asymptomatisches Vorhofflimmern auf

Verdächtiger Mammografie-Befund? Covid-19-Impfung!

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Electronic supplementary material

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Background

Methods

Data source

Patient selection

Co-morbidities on admission

A-DROP score

Clinical outcomes

Statistical analysis

Results

Comparison of clinical characteristics between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

Comparison of outcomes between AsP and CAP in patients with COPD

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for all-cause in-hospital mortality

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Serological assessment of neutrophil elastase activity on elastin during lung ECM remodeling

Short-term effects of a nicotine-free e-cigarette compared to a traditional cigarette in smokers and non-smokers

A functional genomic model for predicting prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

IL-27 alleviates the bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by regulating the Th17 cell differentiation

Evaluation of the factors affecting the maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes in different histological types of non-small cell lung cancer on PET-CT

Working with argan cake: a new etiology for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

CT-Schema zur Emphysemprognose von Rauchern

So gefährlich sind schwere COVID-19-Verläufe in der Schwangerschaft!

EKG-Pflaster deckt asymptomatisches Vorhofflimmern auf

Verdächtiger Mammografie-Befund? Covid-19-Impfung!

Newsletter