Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016

21.04.2016 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes

verfasst von: Hongyi Yang, Qingling Yang, Shanjun Dai, Gang Li, Haixia Jin, Guidong Yao, Yingpu Sun

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Whether there are differences in the pregnancy outcomes of blastocysts cryopreserved during different developmental stages remains under debate because the results among studies are inconsistent. We analyzed blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcomes by considering blastocyst euploidy and investigated the differences in the development potential between blastocysts of different developmental stages (frozen-thawed day 5 [D5] and day 6 [D6] cycles) and their relationship with clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

In total, 1374 D5 and 255 D6 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the chromosome euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates of 237 blastocysts from 50 pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGS) cycles were statistically analyzed. The corresponding euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes of the D5 and D6 blastocyst transfers were also compared.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate (47.2 vs 40.0 %; P = 0.04) and implantation rate (34.2 vs 28.8 %; P = 0.03) of the D5 blastocysts were higher than were those of the D6 blastocysts. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (52.4 vs 52.6 %; P = 0.97) and implantation rate (38.9 vs 35.6 %; P = 0.39) of the high-quality D5 blastocysts did not significantly differ from those of the high-quality D6 blastocysts. Analysis of blastocyst euploidy in 237 blastocysts examined in 50 PGS cycles showed that the euploidy rates of the D5 and D6 blastocysts were both 48.1 % (P = 0.99). The clinical pregnancy rate of the D5 blastocysts (48.5 vs 17.6 %; P = 0.03) was higher than that of the D6 blastocysts. The euploidy rates (55.2 vs 55.3 %; P = 0.99) and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0 vs 42.9 %; P = 0.77) of the high-quality D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. The euploidy rate (55.3 vs 41.5 %, P = 0.03) and clinical pregnancy rate (54.5 vs 25.0 %, P = 0.03) of the high-quality blastocysts were higher than were those of the poor-quality blastocysts.

Conclusions

The euploidy rates between the D5 and D6 blastocysts did not differ. High-quality D6 blastocysts in frozen-thawed cycles had similar developmental potential and pregnancy outcomes compared to those of high-quality D5 blastocysts. The quality of the blastocysts was an important factor that affected the pregnancy outcomes of the frozen-thawed cycles.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.PubMed Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrenetxea G, Lopez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jimenez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49–53.CrossRefPubMed Barrenetxea G, Lopez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jimenez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49–53.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1598–603.CrossRefPubMed Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1598–603.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:20–6.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):31–2.CrossRefPubMed Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):31–2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marek DM, Langley MT, McKean C, et al. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) of day 5 blastocyst embryos compared to transfer of day 6 blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):S52–3.CrossRef Marek DM, Langley MT, McKean C, et al. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) of day 5 blastocyst embryos compared to transfer of day 6 blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):S52–3.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovalevsky G, Carney SM, Morrison LS, et al. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1008–12.CrossRefPubMed Kovalevsky G, Carney SM, Morrison LS, et al. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1008–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.CrossRefPubMed Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Miyazaki M, Fukunaga E, Horiuchi T. Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2009;6:4.PubMedPubMedCentral Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Miyazaki M, Fukunaga E, Horiuchi T. Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2009;6:4.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Levens E, Whitcomb B, Hennessy S, James A, Yauger B, Larsen F. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2138–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Levens E, Whitcomb B, Hennessy S, James A, Yauger B, Larsen F. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2138–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.CrossRefPubMed Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukaida T, Goto OC, et al. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoels using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Repord. 2006;21(12):3246–52.CrossRef Mukaida T, Goto OC, et al. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoels using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Repord. 2006;21(12):3246–52.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–8.CrossRefPubMed Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, He N, Jin H, Liu Y, et al. The influence of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based molecular karyotype on preimplantation embryonic development potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li G, He N, Jin H, Liu Y, et al. The influence of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based molecular karyotype on preimplantation embryonic development potential. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4328.PubMed Liebermann J. Vitrification of human blastocysts: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4328.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebermann J, Tucker M. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:20–6.CrossRefPubMed Liebermann J, Tucker M. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen thawed transfer cycles. BJOG. 2011;118:1551–6.CrossRefPubMed El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen thawed transfer cycles. BJOG. 2011;118:1551–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunkara S, Siozos A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed Sunkara S, Siozos A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1906–15.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes
verfasst von
Hongyi Yang
Qingling Yang
Shanjun Dai
Gang Li
Haixia Jin
Guidong Yao
Yingpu Sun
Publikationsdatum
21.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.