Skip to main content

10.05.2016 | Original Paper | Ausgabe 1/2017

International Ophthalmology 1/2017

Comparison of distance and near visual acuity in patients with vision loss due to cataract

International Ophthalmology > Ausgabe 1/2017
Carmel L. Mercado, Pavle Doroslovački, Jiangxia Wang, Aazim A. Siddiqui, Andrew F. Kolker, Richard J. Kolker


The purpose of this study was to assess whether there is a disparity in distance and near best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in cataract eyes. 102 patients with cataract (N = 121 eyes) were seen in clinic between January and November 2013 at the Wilmer Eye Institute Comprehensive Eye Service. An age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) group (N = 27 eyes) was also identified for comparison. Distance and near BCVA were measured as part of the standard ophthalmic evaluation. Snellen measurements were converted to their LogMAR equivalents for statistical analysis. Near was better than distance BCVA with mean difference of 1.38 lines (P < 0.001) in the cataract eyes. This disparity was not seen in the ARMD eyes. Near–distance BCVA disparity is a statistically significant finding seen with cataracts. This may have further implications in patients with both cataract and ARMD as the presence of disparity may suggest a cataract etiology playing a greater role in vision loss. This comparison may be useful for surgical prognostication and as a quick triage tool in conjunction with, or in place of, a potential acuity meter and dilated near-pinhole test.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

International Ophthalmology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

28.08.2020 | Leitthema | Ausgabe 10/2020

Künstliche Intelligenz in der Augenheilkunde

Leitfaden für Ärzte zur kritischen Bewertung von Studien