Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2014

01.02.2014 | Original Article

Comparison of Efficacy of Three Suture Materials, i.e., Poliglecaprone 25, Polyglactin 910, Polyamide, as Subcuticular Skin Stitches in Post-Cesarean Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

verfasst von: Urvashi Vats, Narayan Pandit Suchitra

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of three suture materials, i.e., poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, and polyamide, as subcuticular skin stitches in post-cesarean women.

Study Design

This was a randomized clinical trial.

Population

The study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a tertiary institute, LTMMC, Sion, Mumbai, India. Only those women undergoing emergency cesarean section were included.

Methods

The study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a tertiary institute, LTMMC, Sion, Mumbai, India. 90 women undergoing emergency cesarean section were included and divided into three groups. In group 1, poliglecaprone 25 was used as subcuticular skin stitches; in group 2, polyglactin 910 was used as subcuticular skin stitches; and in group 3, polyamide was used as subcuticular skin stitches.

Results

Thirty percentage of the patients in group 3 had discomfort on day 10, while it was only 3.3 % in group 1. In group 1, 6.6 % patients had swelling and indurations, while it was 33.3 % in group 2 on day 4. Wound dehiscence was present in 3.3 % patients in group 1, 26.6 % in group 2, and 6.6 % in group 3. Regarding wound healing, 93.3 % patients had excellent wound healing in group 1, 66.6 % in group 2, and 86.6 % in group 3.

Conclusions

The results were almost similar with poliglecaprone and polyamide, except for discomfort which was present more in patients in group 3.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, et al. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:475–85.CrossRef Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, et al. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:475–85.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn JV, Drzwiecki AE, Stiell IG, et al. ElmslieTJ. appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:229–31.PubMedCrossRef Quinn JV, Drzwiecki AE, Stiell IG, et al. ElmslieTJ. appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:229–31.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat LaBagnara J Jr. A review of absorbable suture material in head and neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture. Ear Nose Throat J. 1995;74:409–15.PubMed LaBagnara J Jr. A review of absorbable suture material in head and neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture. Ear Nose Throat J. 1995;74:409–15.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gys T, Hubens A. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure. Acta Chir Belg. 1989;89:265–70.PubMed Gys T, Hubens A. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure. Acta Chir Belg. 1989;89:265–70.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyuron B, Vaugahn C. A comparision of absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials for skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:234–6.PubMedCrossRef Guyuron B, Vaugahn C. A comparision of absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials for skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:234–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Canarelli JP, Ricard J, Collet LM, et al. Use of fast absorbable material for skin closure in young children. Int Surg. 1988;73:151–2.PubMed Canarelli JP, Ricard J, Collet LM, et al. Use of fast absorbable material for skin closure in young children. Int Surg. 1988;73:151–2.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheety PC, Dicksheet S, Scalea TM. Emergency department repair of hand lacerations using absorbable vicryl sutures. J Emerg Med. 1997;15:673–4.CrossRef Sheety PC, Dicksheet S, Scalea TM. Emergency department repair of hand lacerations using absorbable vicryl sutures. J Emerg Med. 1997;15:673–4.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Breed CM, Van der Biezen JJ, Marck KW, et al. Comparision of two absorbable suture materials on the formation of scar tissue, in patients who had undergone reduction mammoplasty. Euro J Plast surg. 1998;22:251–4.CrossRef Breed CM, Van der Biezen JJ, Marck KW, et al. Comparision of two absorbable suture materials on the formation of scar tissue, in patients who had undergone reduction mammoplasty. Euro J Plast surg. 1998;22:251–4.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Osther PJ, Gjode P, Mortensen PB, et al. Randomised comparision of polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1080–2.PubMedCrossRef Osther PJ, Gjode P, Mortensen PB, et al. Randomised comparision of polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1080–2.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Parell GJ, Becker GD. Comparision of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:488–90.PubMedCrossRef Parell GJ, Becker GD. Comparision of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:488–90.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Efficacy of Three Suture Materials, i.e., Poliglecaprone 25, Polyglactin 910, Polyamide, as Subcuticular Skin Stitches in Post-Cesarean Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial
verfasst von
Urvashi Vats
Narayan Pandit Suchitra
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0448-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Instrument Review

OptiSpec®

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.