Skip to main content
main-content

08.01.2016 | Ausgabe 7/2016

Abdominal Radiology 7/2016

Comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in diagnosing appendicitis at 2-mSv CT

Zeitschrift:
Abdominal Radiology > Ausgabe 7/2016
Autoren:
Ji Hoon Park, Bohyoung Kim, Mi Sung Kim, Hyuk Jung Kim, Yousun Ko, Soyeon Ahn, Murat Karul, Joel G. Fletcher, Kyoung Ho Lee
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s00261-015-0632-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
For LOCAT Group.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare radiologists’ diagnostic performance and confidence, and subjective image quality between filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) at 2-mSv appendiceal CT.

Methods

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 107 adolescents and young adults (age, 29.8 ± 8.5 years; 64 females) undergoing 2-mSv CT for suspected appendicitis. Appendicitis was pathologically confirmed in 42 patients. Seven readers with different experience levels independently reviewed the CT images reconstructed using FBP and IR (iDose4, Philips). They rated both the likelihood of appendicitis and subjective image quality on 5-point Likert scales. Diagnostic confidence was assessed using the likelihood of appendicitis, proportion of indeterminate interpretations, and 3-point normal appendix visualization score. We used receiver operating characteristic analyses, Wilcoxon’s signed-rank tests, and McNemar’s tests.

Results

The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.96 for both FBP and IR (95% CI for the difference, −0.02, 0.02; P = 0.73). The AUC difference was not significant in any of the individual readers (P ≥ 0.21). For the majority of the readers, the diagnostic confidence was not significantly different between the two reconstruction methods. Subjective image quality tended to be higher with IR for all readers (P ≤ 0.70), showing significant differences for four readers (P ≤ 0.040).

Conclusion

When diagnosing appendicitis at 2-mSv CT in adolescents and young adults, FBP and IR were comparable in radiologists’ diagnostic performance and confidence while IR exhibited higher subjective image quality than FBP.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Nur für berechtigte Nutzer zugänglich
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Abdominal Radiology 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

  1. Sie können e.Med Radiologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Radiologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise