Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017

01.12.2017 | Original Article

Comparison of fracture risk assessment tools in older men without prior hip or spine fracture: the MrOS study

verfasst von: Margaret L. Gourlay, Victor S. Ritter, Jason P. Fine, Robert A. Overman, John T. Schousboe, Peggy M. Cawthon, Eric S. Orwoll, Tuan V. Nguyen, Nancy E. Lane, Steven R. Cummings, Deborah M. Kado, Jodi A. Lapidus, Susan J. Diem, Kristine E. Ensrud, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), age plus femoral neck BMD T score, and three externally generated fracture risk tools had similar accuracy to identify older men who developed osteoporotic fractures. Risk tools with femoral neck BMD performed better than those without BMD. The externally developed risk tools were poorly calibrated.

Introduction

We compared the performance of fracture risk assessment tools in older men, accounting for competing risks including mortality.

Methods

A comparative ROC curve analysis assessed the ability of the QFracture, FRAX® and Garvan fracture risk tools, and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T score with or without age to identify incident fracture in community-dwelling men aged 65 years or older (N = 4994) without hip or clinical vertebral fracture or antifracture treatment at baseline.

Results

Among risk tools calculated with BMD, the discriminative ability to identify men with incident hip fracture was similar for FRAX (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.73, 0.81), the Garvan tool (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.74, 0.82), age plus femoral neck BMD T score (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.75, 0.83), and femoral neck BMD T score alone (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72, 0.81). Among risk tools calculated without BMD, the discriminative ability to identify hip fracture was similar for QFracture (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.66, 0.73), FRAX (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.66, 0.73), and the Garvan tool (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.67, 0.74). Correlated ROC curve analyses revealed better diagnostic accuracy for risk scores calculated with BMD compared with QFracture (P < 0.0001). Calibration was good for the internally generated BMD T score predictor with or without age and poor for the externally developed risk tools.

Conclusion

In untreated older men without fragility fractures at baseline, an age plus femoral neck BMD T score classifier identified men with incident hip fracture as accurately as more complicated fracture risk scores.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. (2017) FRAX: WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [Internet]. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Available from http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX. Accessed 12 September 2017 World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. (2017) FRAX: WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [Internet]. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Available from http://​www.​shef.​ac.​uk/​FRAX. Accessed 12 September 2017
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporosis International: a Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 19(10):1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0 CrossRefPubMed Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporosis International: a Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 19(10):1431–1444. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00198-008-0588-0 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Lewis C, Cawthon PM, Marcus R, Marshall LM, McGowan J, Phipps K, Sherman S, Stefanick ML, Stone K (2005) Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study—a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 26(5):569–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.05.006 CrossRefPubMed Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Lewis C, Cawthon PM, Marcus R, Marshall LM, McGowan J, Phipps K, Sherman S, Stefanick ML, Stone K (2005) Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study—a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 26(5):569–585. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​cct.​2005.​05.​006 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. Assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical report series no. 843. Geneva: World Health Organization 1994 World Health Organization. Assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical report series no. 843. Geneva: World Health Organization 1994
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11657-013-0136-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Looker A, Wahner H, Dunn W, Calvo M, Harris T, Heyse S, Johnston C Jr, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed Looker A, Wahner H, Dunn W, Calvo M, Harris T, Heyse S, Johnston C Jr, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1980) A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A10:1043–1069CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1980) A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A10:1043–1069CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16(9):965–980CrossRefPubMed Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16(9):965–980CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ettinger B, Ensrud KE, Blackwell T, Curtis JR, Lapidus JA, Orwoll ES, Osteoporotic Fracture in Men Study Research Group (2013) Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. Osteoporos Int 24(4):1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2215-3 CrossRefPubMed Ettinger B, Ensrud KE, Blackwell T, Curtis JR, Lapidus JA, Orwoll ES, Osteoporotic Fracture in Men Study Research Group (2013) Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. Osteoporos Int 24(4):1185–1193. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00198-012-2215-3 CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, DeLaet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg M-A, LaCroix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott A, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts N, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, DeLaet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg M-A, LaCroix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott A, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts N, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Browner WS (2007) Predicting fracture risk: tougher than it looks. IBMS BoneKEy 4(8):226–230CrossRef Browner WS (2007) Predicting fracture risk: tougher than it looks. IBMS BoneKEy 4(8):226–230CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen S, Reginster JY, Kaufman JM, Lippuner K, Zanchetta J, Langdahl B, Rizzoli R, Lipschitz S, Dimai HP, Witvrouw R, Eriksen E, Brixen K, Russo L, Claessens F, Papanastasiou P, Antunez O, Su G, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Hruska J, Incera E, Vanderschueren D, Orwoll E (2012) Fracture risk and zoledronic acid therapy in men with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 367(18):1714–1723. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1204061 CrossRefPubMed Boonen S, Reginster JY, Kaufman JM, Lippuner K, Zanchetta J, Langdahl B, Rizzoli R, Lipschitz S, Dimai HP, Witvrouw R, Eriksen E, Brixen K, Russo L, Claessens F, Papanastasiou P, Antunez O, Su G, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Hruska J, Incera E, Vanderschueren D, Orwoll E (2012) Fracture risk and zoledronic acid therapy in men with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 367(18):1714–1723. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1204061 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of fracture risk assessment tools in older men without prior hip or spine fracture: the MrOS study
verfasst von
Margaret L. Gourlay
Victor S. Ritter
Jason P. Fine
Robert A. Overman
John T. Schousboe
Peggy M. Cawthon
Eric S. Orwoll
Tuan V. Nguyen
Nancy E. Lane
Steven R. Cummings
Deborah M. Kado
Jodi A. Lapidus
Susan J. Diem
Kristine E. Ensrud
for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0389-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.