Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2019 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2019 Open Access

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2019

Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversions after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in females with bladder cancer

Zeitschrift:
World Journal of Surgical Oncology > Ausgabe 1/2019
Autoren:
Liyuan Wu, Feiya Yang, Liming Song, Zejun Xiao, Sujun Han, Song Wu, Sai Liu, Qingbao He, Nianzeng Xing
Wichtige Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abbreviations
EBL
Estimated blood loss
ECUD
Extracorporeal urinary diversion
ICUD
Intracorporeal urinary diversion
LRC
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy
MIBC
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
NMIBC
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Introduction

Primary bladder cancer is a serious worldwide health issue [ 1], with the male to female morbidity being 3:1 [ 2]. A radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is considered the standard operative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Compared with open surgery, a laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) is a safe and feasible alternative with fewer complications, reliable pathology and oncologic efficacy, and faster recoveries [ 3]. Although extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) after LRC has met the standard of care in medical centres for a long time, intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) has gained popularity since the procedure was first described by Gill et al., in 2000 [ 4]. While traditional surgeries for female patients with MIBC involves anterior exenteration with dissection of the bladder, urethra, uterus, vagina, and both ovaries [ 5], there is significant controversy regarding which diversion is more beneficial for women after LRC. This article aims to compare ICUDs and ECUDs following LRCs in female patients by analysing their demographics, peri-operative outcomes, and oncological follow-ups.

Materials and methods

Patients

From February 2008 to October 2018, 38 female patients with bladder cancer received LRCs with urinary diversions, of whom 19 patients underwent LRCs with ECUDs and 19 underwent LRCs with ICUDs. All operations were performed by an experienced surgeon in a single centre. Indications included muscle invasive bladder cancer, T1G3 and recurrent superficial bladder cancer, or extensive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that could not be controlled by transurethral resection bladder cancer and intravesical treatments. All patients received pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or enhanced computed tomography examinations before their surgeries. No distant metastases were identified on bone scans, chest X-rays, and sonographies. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess postoperative complications [ 6].

Surgical technique

Under intravenous anaesthesia, patients were placed in lithotomy positions. We used a five-port transperitoneal approach. The first 10-mm trocar (for the camera) was placed at the 2–4 cm upper level of the umbilicus. Two 12-mm trocars were placed at the bilateral external rectus line, and two 5-mm trocars were placed at the 3-cm interior bilateral anterior superior iliac spines, at the same level as the first trocar.

Anterior pelvic exenteration

Laparoscopic dissection began with generous mobilisation of the suspensory ligament of the ovary. The suspensory ligaments were transected with Ligasure TM (Valleylab, USA). The bilateral ureters were then divided at the common iliac artery bifurcation and the umbilical arteries were dissected using Hem-O-Lok clips. The broad ligaments of the uterus were disassociated along the pelvic wall and the cardinal ligament of the uterus was cut off. The fornix of the vagina was incised transversely until reaching the posterior urethra, after lifting the uterus and bilateral attachments using forceps. Subsequently, the endopelvic fascia was dissected at both sides, and the dorsal vein complex (DVC) was ligated with 2-0 V-Loc sutures to avoid using instruments that caused heat damage, thereby preserving sexual function. The anterior urethra was separated along the bladder neck and removed using scissors in a ‘cone shape’ to protect the internal urethral sphincter. Hem-O-Lok clips were used to close the urethra. The ureters were also closed using Hem-O-Lok clips (two towards the bladder and one towards the proximal end) and were then transected down the middle using scissors. Frozen section examinations of the ends of the urethra and the distal ureter were subsequently performed. The bladder and the female reproductive organs were placed into an EndoCatch bag and were removed together through the vagina, which was later closed with a running suture.

Pelvic lymph node dissection

The external iliac artery sheath was cut from the iliac artery branch to the distal end. Dissections of the internal iliac lymph nodes, pre-sacral lymph nodes, obturator fossa lymph nodes, and external iliac lymph nodes were then performed. Distinct area lymph nodes were marked and removed for pathological examination.

Urinary diversion

For ECUDs, the ileum was extracted through the 10–15-cm incision below the umbilicus. For ileal conduits [ 7], a 15-cm-long ileal segment was isolated about 20 cm proximally to the ileocaecum; for orthotopic ileal neobladders [ 8], we choose a 60-cm-long ileal segment. The ileal segments were detubularised along their anti-mesenteric border to form a new reservoir outside the abdominal cavity. Before the suturing of the new reservoir was complete, both ureters were spatulated for approximately 3 cm and Mono-J ureteric stents (6F) were inserted in both ureters. The ureters were then anastomosed with the proximal end of reservoir end-to-end. Finally, a circular disc of skin was excised at the right 12-mm port, and the outflow limb was fixed with fascia and skin. For ICUDs, the above urinary diversion was completed in the abdominal cavity. Nineteen patients underwent ECUD and 19 patients underwent ICUD.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were analysed using mean values with standard deviations and compared by Student’s t tests. Categorical data were analysed using medians and ranges and compared with the test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival probabilities. All statistics were performed using SPSS v. 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, body mass indices, Charlson comorbidity indices, American Society of Anaesthesiologists scores, pre-creatinine, and pre-operative stage distributions, etc. (Table  1).
Table 1
Patients demographics
Variables
Extracorporeal
Intracorporeal
P
Patients, n
19
19
 
Age (mean ± SD), year
62.5 ± 8.54
67.9 ± 11.40
0.173
BMI (mean ± SD), kg/m 2
25.5 ± 2.97
25.3 ± 2.74
0.867
Charlson comorbidity index (median [range])
4 [2–9]
3 [2–5]
0.548
ASA score, n
   
> 0.9
 1–2
17 (89%)
17 (89%)
 
 3
2 (11%)
2 (11%)
 
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
4 (21%)
3 (16%)
> 0.9
Pre-eGFR (mean ± SD), mL/(min·1.73 m 2)
86.3 ± 28.87
85.9 ± 34.57
0.972
Pre-Hb (mean ± SD), g/L
116.9 ± 16.81
118.6 ± 13.94
0.765
Preoperative diagnosis, n
   
> 0.9
 NMIBC
7 (37%)
8 (42%)
 
 MIBC
12 (63%)
11 (58%)
 
Clinical stage
   
0.720
 T a/T 1/T is
7 (37%)
8 (42%)
 
 T 2
9 (47%)
5 (26%)
 
 T 3
3 (16%)
5 (26%)
 
 T 4
0 (0%)
1 (5%)
 
Clinical stage
   
0.405
 N 0
17 (89%)
14 (74%)
 
 N 1
2 (11%)
5 (26%)
 
BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, Pre-eGFR pre-estimated glomerular filtration rate, MIBC muscle-invasive bladder cancer, NMIBC non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
A total of 38 patients underwent LRCs with ICUDs or ECUDs: 19 had ECUDs (11 conduits and 8 neobladders), and 19 had ICUDs (13 conduits and 6 neobladders) (Table  2). There were significant differences in ECUDs and ICUDs for mean operative times (364.6 ± 72.30 vs. 297.1 ± 48.24 min, p = 0.007), transfusion rates (37% vs. 5%, p = 0.042), time to flatus (5 vs. 3 days, p = 0.020), time to ambulation (2 vs. 1 days, p = 0.022), and duration of postoperative hospital stays (22 vs. 13 days, p = 0.002). However, there were no statistical differences in estimated blood loss (EBL) (393.1 ± 387.46 vs. 267.0 ± 205.69, p = 0.252), intensive care unit (ICU) stay rates post-surgery (10% vs. 5%, p > 0.9), onset of liquid diets (5 vs. 4 days, p = 0.087), and length of time before Jackson-Pratt drains were removed (14 vs. 10 days, p = 0.549). Overall, there were no significant differences in pathologic stages ( p = 0.527). Mean lymph node yield was 12.9 in the ECUD group and 18.6 in the ICUD group ( p = 0.140). Seven out of 19 patients (37%) in the ECUD group and 6 out of 19 patients (32%) in the ICUD group had positive lymph nodes ( p > 0.9). Two out of 19 patients in the ECUD group (11%) and 4 of 19 patients in the ICUD group (21%) had positive surgical margins ( p = 0.660).
Table 2
Surgical outcomes for female patients
Variables
Extracorporeal ( n = 19)
Intracorporeal ( n = 19)
P
Diversion type, n (%)
   
0.737
 Ileal conduit
11 (58%)
13 (68%)
 
 Neobladder
8 (42%)
6 (32%)
 
Operative time (mean ± SD), min
364.6 ± 72.30
297.1 ± 48.24
0.007
EBL (mean ± SD), mL
393.1 ± 387.46
267.0 ± 205.69
0.252
Transfusion, n (%)
7 (37%)
1 (5%)
0.042
ICU stay after surgery, n (%)
2 (10%)
1 (5%)
> 0.9
Time to flatus (median [range]), days
5 [3–9]
3 [1–6]
0.020
Time to intake of liquid diet (median [range]), days
5 [4–8]
4 [2–18]
0.087
Time to ambulation (median [range]), days
2 [0–5]
1 [1–3]
0.022
Time to remove Jackson-Pratt drain (median [range]), days
14 [5–23]
10 [4–30]
0.549
Length of hospital stay after surgery (median [range]), days
22 [14–45]
13 [7–22]
0.002
Final pathologic stage
   
0.527
 T a/T 1/T is
10 (53%)
9 (47%)
 
 T 2
6 (32%)
4 (21%)
 
 T 3
2 (10%)
5 (26%)
 
 T 4
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
 
Pathologic stage
   
0.631
 N 0
13 (68%)
13 (68%)
 
 N 1
3 (16%)
0 (0%)
 
 N 2
3 (16%)
3 (16%)
 
 N 3
0 (0%)
3 (16%)
 
Lymph node yield (mean ± SD), n
12.9 ± 7.81
18.6 ± 11.51
0.140
Lymph node positive patients, n (%)
7 (37%)
6 (32%)
> 0.9
Positive surgical margin, n (%)
2 (11%)
4 (21%)
0.660
EBL estimated blood loss
For ileal conduits, there were statistical differences between ECUD and ICUD transfusion rates (46% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.048); however, there were no statistical differences in the mean operative times (330.0 ± 53.67 vs. 288.5 ± 45.99 min, p = 0.101), EBLs (600.0 ± 485.80 vs. 242.7 ± 178.75, p = 0.134), postoperative ICU stay rates (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.435), time to flatus (4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.099), onset of liquid diets (5 vs. 4 days, p = 0.169), time to ambulation (1 vs. 1 days, p = 0.052), time before removal of the Jackson-Pratt drains (12 vs. 8 days, p = 0.758), and duration of postoperative hospital stays (15 vs. 14 days, p = 0.234) (Table  3). For neobladder reconstructions, there were statistical differences in the duration of postoperative hospital stays (23 days [ECUD] vs. 10 days [ICUD], p = 0.039). There were no statistical differences in any other categories (Table  4).
Table 3
Surgical outcomes for ileal conduit
Variables
Extracorporeal ( n = 11)
Intracorporeal ( n = 13)
P
Operative time (mean ± SD), min
330.0 ± 53.67
288.5 ± 45.99
0.101
EBL (mean ± SD), mL
600.0 ± 485.80
242.7 ± 178.75
0.134
Transfusion, n (%)
5 (46%)
1 (7.7%)
0.048
ICU stay after surgery, n (%)
2 (18%)
1 (8%)
0.435
Time to flatus (median [range]), days
4 [3–7]
3 [1–6]
0.099
Time to intake of liquid diet (median [range]), days
5 [4–8]
4 [2–18]
0.169
Time to ambulation (median [range]), days
1 [0–2]
1 [1–3]
0.052
Time to remove Jackson-Pratt drain (median [range]), days
12 [7–17]
8 [4–30]
0.758
Length of hospital stay after surgery (median [range]), days
15 [14–23]
14 [7–22]
0.234
Lymph node yield (mean ± SD), n
9.8 ± 10.15
20.2 ± 11.08
0.070
Lymph node positive patients, n (%)
5 (46%)
5 (39%)
0.527
Positive surgical margin, n (%)
2 (18%)
3 (23%)
0.585
Table 4
Surgical outcomes for neobladder
Variables
Extracorporeal ( n = 8)
Intracorporeal ( n = 6)
P
Operative time (mean ± SD), min
394.3 ± 76.35
352.5 ± 10.61
0.486
EBL (mean ± SD), mL
230.0 ± 158.01
425.0 ± 388.91
0.606
Transfusion, n (%)
2 (25%)
0 (0%)
0.308
ICU stay after surgery, n (%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
.
Time to flatus (median [range]), days
5 [3–9]
2 [3–5]
0.361
Time to intake of liquid diet (median [range]), days
5 [4–6]
4 [3–5]
0.280
Time to ambulation (median [range]), days
2 [1–5]
2 [2–3]
0.190
Time to remove Jackson-Pratt drain (median [range]), days
16 [5–23]
18 [8–28]
0.769
Length of hospital stay after surgery (median [range]), days
23 [20–45]
10 [7–15]
0.039
Lymph node yield (mean ± SD), n
15.4 ± 4.39
8.5 ± 12.02
0.562
Lymph node positive patients, n (%)
2 (25%)
1 (17%)
0.615
Positive surgical margin, n (%)
0 (0%)
1 (17%)
0.429
Complete continence in the daytime, n (%)
6 (75%)
6 (100%)
0.308
Complete continence at night, n (%)
6 (75%)
3 (50%)
0.343
Overall, there were no statistical differences in the rates of minor and major 30 days or 90 days complications (Table  5). In the ECUD group, 10 patients (52%) presented with at least one complication within 30 days, and 9 of these patients (47%) had minor complications (grades 1–2). Similarly, 6 patients (37%) in the ICUD group presented with at least one complication and 1 (5%) had a Clavien grade V complication who later died due to multiple organ failure resulting from a myocardial infarction within 30 days. Interestingly, there were significant differences at Clavien grade II (ECUD 8, ICUD 2; p = 0.026) within 30 days. The most common complications in the ECUD group were haematological diseases, while infections were the most common in the ICUD group (Tables  6 and 7).
Table 5
Follow-up data
Variables
Extracorporeal ( n = 19)
Intracorporeal ( n = 19)
P
Follow-up time (mean ± SD), months
48.7 ± 30.58
26.4 ± 8.29
0.329
Post- eGFR (mean ± SD), mL/(min·1.73 m 2)
79.0 ± 19.95
86.2 ± 34.7
0.516
30-day complication rates, n (%)
   
0.227
 Minor (I–II)
9 (47%)
5 (32%)
0.313
 Major (III–V)
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
> 0.9
90-day complication rates, n (%)
   
0.142
 Minor (I–II)
1 (5%)
2 (11%)
> 0.9
 Major (III–V)
0 (0%)
2 (11%)
0.486
Metastasis, n (%)
2 (11%)
5 (26%)
0.405
Overall survival, n (%)
16 (84%)
17 (89%)
> 0.9
Post-eGFR post-estimated glomerular filtration rate
Table 6
Complications classified by Clavien grade
Clavien grade
30 days
90 days
ECUD
ICUD
P
ECUD
ICUD
P
1
1
3
0.302
0
1
> 0.9
2
8
2
0.026
1
1
> 0.9
3
1
0
> 0.9
0
1
> 0.9
4
0
0
 
0
0
 
5
0
1
> 0.9
0
1
> 0.9
Table 7
Complications by system
 
ECUD
ICUD
 
0–30 days
30–90 days
0–30 days
30–90 days
Haematological ( n = 11)
       
 Hypoproteinemia
8
1
0
0
 Great saphenous varicosity
1
0
0
0
 Deep venous thrombosis
0
0
1
0
Infectious ( n = 5)
       
 Wound infection
0
0
1
0
 Pneumonia
1
0
0
1
 Vaginitis
0
0
2
0
Gastrointestinal ( n = 3)
       
 Ileus
0
0
1
2
Multiple organ failure ( n = 1)
0
0
1
0
Pulmonary metastasis ( n = 1)
0
0
0
1

Follow-up data

The mean follow-up times were 48.7 and 26.4 months for the ECUD and ICUD groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate postoperatively ( p = 0.516). Seven patients had disease metastases (ECUD 2 out of 19, ICUD 5 out of 19; p = 0.405) and 5 died (ECUD 3 out of 19, ICUD 2 out of 19; p > 0.9). There was no recurrence. There was no statistical differences in oncologic outcomes (recurrence, metastasis, or overall mortality) (Table  5) or Kaplan-Meier analyses between the two groups (Fig.  1).

Discussion

An LRC with an ICUD is technically challenging and requires extensive operative experience. The procedure has seldomly been reported since the first two cases reported by Gill et al. [ 9]. Recently, with the popularisation and improvement of laparoscopic techniques, LRCs and urinary diversions have become more popular in female patients, although females, with their distinctive pelvic anatomies, have many surgical differences in radical cystectomies compared with males. While limited reports on laparoscopic radical cystectomies in females have begun to emerge, this is the first paper comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversions after LRCs in women. These operations were performed entirely by one surgeon in a single centre.
Hussein et al. [ 10] retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomies with ICUDs ( n = 1094) and ECUDs ( n = 1031) from 26 institutions since 2005. Patients having ICUDs showed shorter operative times (357 min vs. 400 min, p < 0.001), less blood loss (300 mL vs. 350 mL, p < 0.001), and fewer received blood transfusions (5% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), suggesting that the complete laparoscopic approach was technically more efficient. Similarly, in our study, the mean operative time between the ECUD and ICUD groups (364.6 ± 72.30 vs. 297.1 ± 48.24 min, p = 0.007), transfusion rates (37% vs. 5%, p = 0.042), and EBLs (400.8 mL vs. 267.0 mL, p = 0.252) showed advantages for ICUDs to some extent. The time to flatus (3 days, p = 0.020), ambulation (1 days, p = 0.022), and durations of hospital stays (13 days, p = 0.002) postoperatively in the ICUD group were shorter than in the ECUD group. It was suggested that ICUDs were also associated with quicker recoveries. This may be partially due to decreased intestinal exposures, shorter operative times, and smaller EBLs. Additionally, enhanced recovery programmes, which we began in 2014 [ 11], were identified as an important part of postoperative treatments for radical cystectomies [ 12] that may have resulted in faster patient recoveries in the ICUD group in our study.
Ahmed et al. reported on 935 patients in 18 international centres who had undergone ICUDs or ECUDs following robot-assisted radical cystectomies resulting in 43% in the ECUD group and 35% in the ICUD group having complications within 30 days of surgery ( p = 0.07). The 90-day complication rate was not significant between the two groups (ICUD 41% vs. ECUD 49%, p = 0.055) [ 13]. In our study, Clavien grade II complications were significantly different at 30 days (ECUD 8, ICUD 2; p = 0.026) potentially indicating that the ICUD group was associated with decreased complication rates. Azzouni et al. studied 81 patients after robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduits (overall complication rate, 81%) and reported postoperative complications in the first 90 days, 15 patients of whom had high-grade complications (15%). A total of 164 complications were recorded with the most common complication being urinary tract infections [ 14]. Infections were also more common in the ICUD group in our study, with four patients having postoperative complications within 90 days (22%) and two patients having high-grade complications (11%). This indicates that our surgical technique could have had some benefits in terms of reducing postoperative complications and that robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduits are not better than laparoscopies for postoperative complications within 90 days.
In this group, orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstructions were performed in 14 cases, all of whom could urinate on their own 12 months postoperatively without catheterisation. The complete daytime continence rate was 88.9% and 77.8% at night. Orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstructions can maximally imitate the natural urination function and significantly improve the patients’ psychological acceptance of surgery. To some extent, it might ameliorate the postoperative quality of life. Our experience regarding orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstructions are as follows: (1) the procedure should comply with the principles of tumour resection, and the urethral autonomic nerve should be preserved to the greatest extent; (2) the bladder neck should be separated close to the bladder wall; and (3) the bilateral tissue of the anterior vaginal wall should be preserved. Overall, the patients were satisfied with their postoperative urinary continence based on the follow-up results.
This study also had several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small; thus, it was difficult to arrive at a definitive conclusion. Secondly, this was a cohort study and not a randomised trial; therefore, there were selection biases and limited information.

Conclusion

ICUD after LRC in women is technically feasible. Understanding the female pelvic anatomy and mastering the techniques are helpful to optimise surgical procedures and greatly decrease complications. Compared with ECUDs, ICUDs are potentially beneficial due to smaller incisions, faster recoveries, and decreased complication rates.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional research committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All the patients in this study provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise