Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2018

04.08.2017 | Head and Neck

Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck

verfasst von: Ryoji Mikayama, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Shinjiro Sonoda, Koji Kobayashi, Kazuya Nagatomo, Mitsuhiro Kimura, Satoshi Kawanami, Takeshi Kamitani, Seiji Kumazawa, Hiroshi Honda

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters between turbo spin-echo (TSE)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and echo-planar imaging (EPI)-DWI of the head and neck.

Methods

Fourteen volunteers underwent head and neck imaging using TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI. Distortion ratio (DR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), ADC and IVIM-derived parameters were compared between the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to analyse reproducibility between the quantitative parameters of TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI.

Results

DR of TSE-DWI was significantly smaller than that of EPI-DWI. SNR and CNR of TSE-DWI were significantly higher than those of EPI-DWI. ADC and IVIM-derived parameters of TSE-DWI showed higher values than those of EPI-DWI, although the difference was not significant. Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement between the two sequences.

Conclusion

TSE-DWI can produce better image quality than EPI-DWI, while TSE-DWI possibly exhibits different values of quantitative parameters. Therefore, TSE-DWI could be a good alternative to EPI-DWI for patients sensitive to distortion. However, it is not recommended to use both TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI on follow-up.

Key points

Head and neck DWI is especially sensitive to magnetic inhomogeneity.
The distortion of images was less with TSE-DWI than with EPI-DWI.
TSE-DWI can possibly exhibit higher ADC and IVIM-derived parameters than EPI-DWI.
Bland-Altman analysis showed unacceptable LoA in quantitative analysis between TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI.
It is not recommended to use both TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI for follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 217:331–345CrossRefPubMed Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 217:331–345CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H, Brown M, MacFall J (1994) MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion weighted echo planar pulse sequences. AJR 162:671–677CrossRefPubMed Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H, Brown M, MacFall J (1994) MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas: value of diffusion weighted echo planar pulse sequences. AJR 162:671–677CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Okamoto K, Ito J, Ishikawa K, Sakai K, Tokiguchi S (2000) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 10:1342–1350CrossRefPubMed Okamoto K, Ito J, Ishikawa K, Sakai K, Tokiguchi S (2000) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 10:1342–1350CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J (1999) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of encephalitis. AJR 173:1097–1099CrossRefPubMed Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J (1999) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of encephalitis. AJR 173:1097–1099CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 15:986–994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 15:986–994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F et al (2001) Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 220:621–630CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F et al (2001) Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 220:621–630CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Lavel-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Lavel-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T (2012) Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 263:770–777CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauser T, Essig M, Jensen A et al (2013) Characterization and therapy monitoring of head and neck carcinomas using diffusion-imaging-based intravoxel incoherent motion parameters – preliminary results. Neuroradiology 55:527–536CrossRefPubMed Hauser T, Essig M, Jensen A et al (2013) Characterization and therapy monitoring of head and neck carcinomas using diffusion-imaging-based intravoxel incoherent motion parameters – preliminary results. Neuroradiology 55:527–536CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Verhappen MH, Pouwels PJ, Ljumanovic R et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck cancer: comparison between half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and EPI techniques. AJNR 33:1239–1246CrossRefPubMed Verhappen MH, Pouwels PJ, Ljumanovic R et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck cancer: comparison between half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and EPI techniques. AJNR 33:1239–1246CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sigmund EE, Jensen J (2011) Basic physical principles of body diffusion-weighted MRI. In: Taouli B (ed) Extra-cranial Applications of Diffusion-weighted MRI. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–17 Sigmund EE, Jensen J (2011) Basic physical principles of body diffusion-weighted MRI. In: Taouli B (ed) Extra-cranial Applications of Diffusion-weighted MRI. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–17
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshino N, Yamada I, Ohbayashi N et al (2001) Salivary glands and lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficients with split-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging initial report. Radiology 221:837–842CrossRefPubMed Yoshino N, Yamada I, Ohbayashi N et al (2001) Salivary glands and lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficients with split-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging initial report. Radiology 221:837–842CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 263:19–32CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Pilet B et al (2006) Single-shot, turbo spin-echo, diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. AJNR 27:1480–1482PubMed De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Pilet B et al (2006) Single-shot, turbo spin-echo, diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. AJNR 27:1480–1482PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K, Nakaya Y, Terashima S, Hosokawa Y et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoshida T, Urikura A, Shirata K, Nakaya Y, Terashima S, Hosokawa Y et al (2016) Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study. Br J Radiol 89:20160512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Elefante A, Cavaliere M, Russo C et al (2015) Diffusion weighted MR imaging of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma: an assessment by readers with different expertise. Biomed Res Int: 1–7 Elefante A, Cavaliere M, Russo C et al (2015) Diffusion weighted MR imaging of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma: an assessment by readers with different expertise. Biomed Res Int: 1–7
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolff-Gart AS, Pouwels PJW, Noij DP et al (2015) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI system repeat session. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:384–390CrossRefPubMed Kolff-Gart AS, Pouwels PJW, Noij DP et al (2015) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI system repeat session. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:384–390CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamimura K, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion in normal pituitary gland: initial study with turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1–6 Kamimura K, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, et al (2016) Intravoxel incoherent motion in normal pituitary gland: initial study with turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1–6
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujima N, Yoshida D, Sakashita T et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 32:1206–1213CrossRefPubMed Fujima N, Yoshida D, Sakashita T et al (2014) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 32:1206–1213CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Koyasu S, Lima M, Umeoka S et al (2014) The clinical utility of reduced-distortion readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the head and neck region: initial experience. Eur Radiol 24:3088–3096CrossRefPubMed Koyasu S, Lima M, Umeoka S et al (2014) The clinical utility of reduced-distortion readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the head and neck region: initial experience. Eur Radiol 24:3088–3096CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon WJ (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratio in MR imaging with sensitivity encoding. Radiology 243:908–909CrossRefPubMed Moon WJ (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratio in MR imaging with sensitivity encoding. Radiology 243:908–909CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heverhagen JT (2007) Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. Radiology 245:638–639CrossRefPubMed Heverhagen JT (2007) Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. Radiology 245:638–639CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Marzi S, Piludu F, Vidiri A (2013) Assessment of diffusion parameters by intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. NMR Biomed 26:1806–1814CrossRefPubMed Marzi S, Piludu F, Vidiri A (2013) Assessment of diffusion parameters by intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. NMR Biomed 26:1806–1814CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancent 327:307–310CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancent 327:307–310CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy CJ, Rendington RW (1986) The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 3:604–618CrossRefPubMed Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy CJ, Rendington RW (1986) The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 3:604–618CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto J, Sasaki Y, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Nishikawa K, Sano T (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck with HASTE: influence of imaging parameters on image quality. Oral Radiol 28:87–94CrossRef Sakamoto J, Sasaki Y, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Nishikawa K, Sano T (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck with HASTE: influence of imaging parameters on image quality. Oral Radiol 28:87–94CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietrich O, Heiland S, Sartor K (2001) Noise correction for the exact determination of apparent diffusion coefficients at low SNR. Magn Reson Med 45:448–453CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Heiland S, Sartor K (2001) Noise correction for the exact determination of apparent diffusion coefficients at low SNR. Magn Reson Med 45:448–453CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ et al (2013) Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol 23:428–434CrossRefPubMed Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ et al (2013) Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol 23:428–434CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Suo S, Lin N, Wang H et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: Comparison of diffusion curve-fitting methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:362–370CrossRefPubMed Suo S, Lin N, Wang H et al (2015) Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: Comparison of diffusion curve-fitting methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:362–370CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Bihan D (2008) Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR inaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 249:748–752CrossRefPubMed Le Bihan D (2008) Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR inaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 249:748–752CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging between turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging of the head and neck
verfasst von
Ryoji Mikayama
Hidetake Yabuuchi
Shinjiro Sonoda
Koji Kobayashi
Kazuya Nagatomo
Mitsuhiro Kimura
Satoshi Kawanami
Takeshi Kamitani
Seiji Kumazawa
Hiroshi Honda
Publikationsdatum
04.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4990-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

European Radiology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.