Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 7/2016

01.07.2016 | Original Paper

Comparison of KRAS mutation status between primary tumor and metastasis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients

verfasst von: Zhe-Zhen Li, Long Bai, Feng Wang, Zi-Chen Zhang, Fang Wang, Zhao-Lei Zeng, Jun-Bo Zeng, Dong-Sheng Zhang, Feng-Hua Wang, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Yu-Hong Li, Jian-Yong Shao, Rui-Hua Xu

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Detection of KRAS mutation status is a routine clinical procedure for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Previous studies showed high concordance of KRAS mutation status in primary lesion and corresponding metastatic sites in CRC. However, the data were mostly from Caucasians. The aim of this study is to compare KRAS mutation and other molecules mutation status between primary tumor and corresponding metastatic lesion in Chinese patients with CRC. In this retrospective study, Chinese CRC patients with paired samples of primary tumor and metastatic site were detected for KRAS codon 12 and 13 with quantitative real-time PCR, or detected for OncoCarta™ panel of 19 genes with MassARRAY® technique, including KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA et al. Forty-eight paired CRC samples were analyzed for KRAS codon 12 and 13 using quantitative real-time PCR. Ten paired samples were analyzed by 19 genes OncoCarta™ Panel with MassARRAY® technique. KRAS mutation was found in 15 (25.9 %) primary tumors and 18 (31.0 %) metastases. The discordance of KRAS was observed in 11 (19.0 %) patients. Alteration of mutation points in primary site with mutant KRAS was not observed. In the 10 patients with multiple gene detection, PIK3CA mutation showed concordant mutation status in primary tumor and metastatic site, whereas discordance in BRAF, NRAS and AKT1 was detected. A concordance rate of 81.0 % was detected in KRAS mutation between primary tumor and metastatic lesion in Chinese patients with CRC. Discordance of BRAF, NRAS and AKT1 mutation status in primary tumor and metastases was observed.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, BDCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge SB, BDCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook AD, Single R, McCahill LE. Surgical resection of primary tumors in patients who present with stage IV colorectal cancer: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data, 1988 to 2000. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):637–45. doi:10.1245/ASO.2005.06.012.CrossRefPubMed Cook AD, Single R, McCahill LE. Surgical resection of primary tumors in patients who present with stage IV colorectal cancer: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data, 1988 to 2000. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):637–45. doi:10.​1245/​ASO.​2005.​06.​012.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasan H, Meade AM, Adams R, Wilson R, Pugh C, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):631–9. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70106-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wasan H, Meade AM, Adams R, Wilson R, Pugh C, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):631–9. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70106-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1346–55. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu141.CrossRefPubMed Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1346–55. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdu141.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0805019.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa0805019.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1658–64. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1658–64. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​08.​1620.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Morvillo M, Bergamo F, Zoratto F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90. doi:10.1002/ijc.28955.CrossRefPubMed Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Morvillo M, Bergamo F, Zoratto F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​28955.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Allegra CJ, Rumble RB, Hamilton SR, Mangu PB, Roach N, Hantel A, et al. Extended RAS gene mutation testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion Update 2015. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(2):179–85. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9674.CrossRefPubMed Allegra CJ, Rumble RB, Hamilton SR, Mangu PB, Roach N, Hantel A, et al. Extended RAS gene mutation testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion Update 2015. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(2):179–85. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​63.​9674.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Colon cancer [version 2. 2016]. 2015; 2015(30 Nov). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Colon cancer [version 2. 2016]. 2015; 2015(30 Nov).
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D, Group EGW. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl 3):i1–9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu260.CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D, Group EGW. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl 3):i1–9. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdu260.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Harle A, Salleron J, Perkins G, Pilati C, Blons H, Laurent-Puig P, et al. Expression of pEGFR and pAKT as response-predictive biomarkers for RAS wild-type patients to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancers. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(4):680–5. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.250.CrossRefPubMed Harle A, Salleron J, Perkins G, Pilati C, Blons H, Laurent-Puig P, et al. Expression of pEGFR and pAKT as response-predictive biomarkers for RAS wild-type patients to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancers. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(4):680–5. doi:10.​1038/​bjc.​2015.​250.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–12. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0786.CrossRefPubMed Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–12. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2008.​18.​0786.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian S, Simon I, Moreno V, Roepman P, Tabernero J, Snel M, et al. A combined oncogenic pathway signature of BRAF, KRAS and PI3KCA mutation improves colorectal cancer classification and cetuximab treatment prediction. Gut. 2013;62(4):540–9. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302423.CrossRefPubMed Tian S, Simon I, Moreno V, Roepman P, Tabernero J, Snel M, et al. A combined oncogenic pathway signature of BRAF, KRAS and PI3KCA mutation improves colorectal cancer classification and cetuximab treatment prediction. Gut. 2013;62(4):540–9. doi:10.​1136/​gutjnl-2012-302423.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753–62. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3.CrossRefPubMed De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753–62. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(10)70130-3.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zito Marino F, Liguori G, Aquino G, La Mantia E, Bosari S, Ferrero S, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of ALK-rearrangements and homogeneity of EGFR-mutations in mixed lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e139264. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139264. Zito Marino F, Liguori G, Aquino G, La Mantia E, Bosari S, Ferrero S, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of ALK-rearrangements and homogeneity of EGFR-mutations in mixed lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e139264. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0139264.
25.
27.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber JC, Meyer N, Pencreach E, Schneider A, Guerin E, Neuville A, et al. Allelotyping analyses of synchronous primary and metastasis CIN colon cancers identified different subtypes. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(3):524–32. doi:10.1002/ijc.22343.CrossRefPubMed Weber JC, Meyer N, Pencreach E, Schneider A, Guerin E, Neuville A, et al. Allelotyping analyses of synchronous primary and metastasis CIN colon cancers identified different subtypes. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(3):524–32. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​22343.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, Francois E, Formento P, Renee N, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4906.CrossRefPubMed Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, Francois E, Formento P, Renee N, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-07-4906.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JH, Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, Jeong SY, Park KJ, et al. Analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PTEN, IGF1R, EGFR intron 1 CA status in both primary tumors and paired metastases in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in colon cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;68(4):1045–55. doi:10.1007/s00280-011-1586-z.CrossRefPubMed Park JH, Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, Jeong SY, Park KJ, et al. Analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PTEN, IGF1R, EGFR intron 1 CA status in both primary tumors and paired metastases in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in colon cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;68(4):1045–55. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-011-1586-z.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldus SE, Schaefer KL, Engers R, Hartleb D, Stoecklein NH, Gabbert HE. Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(3):790–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2446.CrossRefPubMed Baldus SE, Schaefer KL, Engers R, Hartleb D, Stoecklein NH, Gabbert HE. Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(3):790–9. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-09-2446.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K, et al. Heterogeneity of KRAS status may explain the subset of discordant KRAS status between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(9):1170–8. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d37a3.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K, et al. Heterogeneity of KRAS status may explain the subset of discordant KRAS status between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(9):1170–8. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0b013e31821d37a3​.CrossRefPubMed
35.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B, Floriani I, Stasi I, Canestrari E, et al. High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1270–5. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0181.CrossRefPubMed Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B, Floriani I, Stasi I, Canestrari E, et al. High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1270–5. doi:10.​1634/​theoncologist.​2008-0181.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Albanese I, Scibetta AG, Migliavacca M, Russo A, Bazan V, Tomasino RM, et al. Heterogeneity within and between primary colorectal carcinomas and matched metastases as revealed by analysis of Ki-ras and p53 mutations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;325(3):784–91. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.111.CrossRefPubMed Albanese I, Scibetta AG, Migliavacca M, Russo A, Bazan V, Tomasino RM, et al. Heterogeneity within and between primary colorectal carcinomas and matched metastases as revealed by analysis of Ki-ras and p53 mutations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;325(3):784–91. doi:10.​1016/​j.​bbrc.​2004.​10.​111.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Thierry AR, Mouliere F, El MS, Mollevi C, Lopez-Crapez E, Rolet F, et al. Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):430–5. doi:10.1038/nm.3511.CrossRefPubMed Thierry AR, Mouliere F, El MS, Mollevi C, Lopez-Crapez E, Rolet F, et al. Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):430–5. doi:10.​1038/​nm.​3511.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, Di Bartolomeo M, Borgonovo K, Maggi C, et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(5):587–94. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.054.CrossRefPubMed Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, Di Bartolomeo M, Borgonovo K, Maggi C, et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(5):587–94. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2015.​01.​054.CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Baisse B, Bouzourene H, Saraga EP, Bosman FT, Benhattar J. Intratumor genetic heterogeneity in advanced human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001;93(3):346–52.CrossRefPubMed Baisse B, Bouzourene H, Saraga EP, Bosman FT, Benhattar J. Intratumor genetic heterogeneity in advanced human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001;93(3):346–52.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouchahda M, Karaboue A, Saffroy R, Innominato P, Gorden L, Guettier C, et al. Acquired KRAS mutations during progression of colorectal cancer metastases: possible implications for therapy and prognosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66(3):605–9. doi:10.1007/s00280-010-1298-9.CrossRefPubMed Bouchahda M, Karaboue A, Saffroy R, Innominato P, Gorden L, Guettier C, et al. Acquired KRAS mutations during progression of colorectal cancer metastases: possible implications for therapy and prognosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;66(3):605–9. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-010-1298-9.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Gattenlohner S, Etschmann B, Kunzmann V, Thalheimer A, Hack M, Kleber G, et al. Concordance of KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer before and after Anti-EGFR Therapy. J Oncol. 2009;2009:831626. doi:10.1155/2009/831626.CrossRefPubMed Gattenlohner S, Etschmann B, Kunzmann V, Thalheimer A, Hack M, Kleber G, et al. Concordance of KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer before and after Anti-EGFR Therapy. J Oncol. 2009;2009:831626. doi:10.​1155/​2009/​831626.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of KRAS mutation status between primary tumor and metastasis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients
verfasst von
Zhe-Zhen Li
Long Bai
Feng Wang
Zi-Chen Zhang
Fang Wang
Zhao-Lei Zeng
Jun-Bo Zeng
Dong-Sheng Zhang
Feng-Hua Wang
Zhi-Qiang Wang
Yu-Hong Li
Jian-Yong Shao
Rui-Hua Xu
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0787-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Medical Oncology 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.