Introduction
Hyaline articular cartilage is a tissue designed for weight bearing, shock absorption and providing the gliding surfaces needed for movement of joints. Since the self-renewal and repair capabilities of cartilage are very limited [
1], even small injuries to articular cartilage can cause degeneration that eventually requires surgical management at later stages of cartilage destruction [
2]. Current surgical treatments include tissue response techniques (for example, Pridie drilling, microfracturing), osteochondral transplantation and ultimately the implantation of artificial joints.
An additional treatment, the autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) technique, was introduced more than a decade ago [
3,
4]. This technique is based on the isolation of chondrocytes from a small piece of knee cartilage taken from a non-load-bearing area, followed by
in vitro expansion of these cells and their re-implantation into the defect area [
5]. Guidelines of medical societies based on clinical experience suggest that larger defects (≥4 cm
2) should be treated using the ACT method [
6]. Since patients diagnosed with degenerative arthritis generally have larger cartilage defects in the patellofemoral contact area, ACT would be the preferred treatment for the regeneration of such large defects. While current International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) criteria do not recommend ACT as a therapeutic option for elderly patients or patients suffering from degenerative, reactive or inflammatory arthritis, a recent study using ACT to treat patients suffering from early degenerative arthritis indicates that this method might indeed be a therapeutic option for osteoarthritic lesions [
7]. One major question remaining is whether osteoarthritic chondrocytes are changed irreversibly or, upon expansion under optimized conditions, are comparable with those cells that are currently used for ACT and are able to generate hyaline cartilage.
Molecular strategies for monitoring the gene expression patterns of chondrocytes destined for ACT were developed recently for the quality management of therapeutic cell culture and the safety of ACT patients [
8,
9]. To evaluate whether fundamental differences exist between osteoarthritic chondrocytes and cells currently used for the ACT procedure, we employed these quality management regimens and compared the expression of key factors for cartilage regeneration, including type I and II collagens, aggrecan, IL-1β and activin-like kinase (ALK)-1. We compared chondrocytes from osteoarthritis (OA) patients to chondrocytes from healthy donors directly after cell harvest (
ex vivo) and to those from patients undergoing ACT after primary
in vitro expansion (P0 cells) and first subculture (P1 cells). ALK-1 is a receptor involved in TGF-β signalling [
10] and is proposed to be a marker for irreversible chondrocyte dedifferentiation [
11]. The OA chondrocytes were prepared and expanded under the same good manufacturing practice protocols applied for ACT, except that autologous serum was not available from OA patients due to the regulations imposed by the local ethics committee. Therefore, clinical grade human AB serum was used instead of autologous serum for the
in vitro culture of chondrocytes.
To determine whether OA chondrocytes were still capable of in vivo cartilage formation, we implantated collagen scaffolds seeded with these chondrocytes ectopically into severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice. The formation of type II collagen and proteoglycan-rich hyaline cartilage-like tissue could be shown using histochemistry and immunohistochemical staining of implant sections.
We report that OA chondrocytes generated a proteoglycan and type II collagen-rich cartilaginous tissue when seeded onto a collagen scaffold at higher densities. We conclude that OA chondrocytes might be able to regenerate cartilage when applied under suitable conditions.
Materials and methods
Donors
Chondrocytes from OA patients were obtained from macroscopically intact cartilage areas of 29 patients undergoing knee joint implant surgery. Samples were taken from the intercondylar femoral notch (fossa intercondylica). The average age of the OA patients at the time of surgery was 67.2 ± 10.1 years (minimum 46 years, maximum 89 years). To compare the status of these cells with cells that are actually used for ACT, chondrocytes obtained from human articular cartilage biopsies from the femoral notch of 41 patients undergoing ACT were included in this study. All procedures followed the guidelines for ACT to treat chondral defects [
6]. ACT surgery was performed as described previously [
3]. The average age of the patients at the time of ACT was 32.3 ± 10.0 years (minimum 16 years, maximum 57 years).
Since all the chondrocytes from the ACT patients had to be used for expansion and transplantation, no ACT cells were available for analysis ex vivo. As a surrogate for ACT ex vivo controls, chondrocytes were obtained from the cartilage of six knee joints of individuals without any osteoarthritic symptoms (36.6 ± 12.5 years, minimum 23 years, maximum 50 years) either post mortem (n = 1) or after amputation (n = 5). The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Chondrocyte isolation and in vitroexpansion
Cartilage samples, excluding the mineralized cartilage and the subchondral bone, were washed twice in PBS (BioWhittaker, Verviers, Belgium) and then minced. Extracellular matrix was enzymatically degraded overnight by incubation in DMEM/Ham's F12 medium (BioWhittaker; Verviers, Belgium) containing 2.5 mg/ml type II collagenase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and 5% serum at 37°C. Cell culture medium for ACT chondrocytes was supplemented with autologous serum, culture medium for OA chondrocytes with human AB serum. Isolated chondrocytes were resuspended by pipetting up and down several times and then filtered through a 100 μm mesh to remove undigested cartilage fragments and extracellular matrix debris. After centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in DMEM/Ham's F12 cell culture medium supplemented with either 10% autologous or AB serum and plated in cell culture flasks (BD Falcon, Heidelberg, Germany) at an initial density of 1,500 cells/cm2. At this point, some of the cells were harvested to provide ex vivo cells.
Chondrocytes were cultured at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cells were harvested after 10 to 12 days of expansion by trypsin-EDTA (BioWhittaker) treatment. Cell yields and viability were monitored by trypan blue staining using a Neubauer hematocytometer. At this time, cells were removed to determine gene expression patterns after primary expansion (P0), used for in vivo experiments, or cultured for an additional 12 to 14 days to provide first subculture (P1) cells. All procedures were performed according to the good manufacturing practice guidelines required for tissue engineering.
Gene expression analysis
RNA was extracted and isolated from chondrocytes using the RNeasy mini kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). To isolate RNA from the cell-seeded scaffolds that were implanted into SCID mice, the scaffolds were frozen in 350 μl RLT buffer (Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit) supplemented with 10 μl/ml β-mercaptoethanol. Scaffolds were then homogenized using a micropestle (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and samples were frozen at -80°C until further isolation.
Complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained by reverse transcription of 1 μg total RNA using oligo-dT primers and MuMLV reverse transcriptase (BD Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed in a total volume of 20 μl at 42°C for 1 h in a thermocycler (Whatman Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). Expression of mRNA/cDNA levels was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; LightCycler
®, Roche) using specific target primers (Table
1) and FastStart DNA SybrGreen reagents (Roche) according to the protocols provided. The amplification of cDNA was performed in 35 PCR cycles: after 5 initial cycles (95°C 10 s, 68°C 10 s, 72°C 16 s, temperature transition rate 20°C/s) the annealing temperature was dropped in consecutive cycles to 60°C with a step size of 0.5°C.
Table 1
PCR primer sequences
Collagen I(a2) | Up: 5'-CTGGTCCTTCTGGTCCTGTTG | NM_000089 | 3,413 | |
| Low: 5'-GTGCGAGCTGGGTTCTTTCTA | | 3,957 | 544 |
Collagen II(a1) | Up: 5'-CTGGCTCCCAACACTGCCAACGTC | NM_033150 | 4,070 | |
| Low: 5'-TCCTTTGGGTTTGCAACGGATTGT | | 4,483 | 413 |
Collagen X | Up: 5'-ACCCAAGAGGTGCCCCTGGAATAC | NM_000493.2 | 1,416 | |
| Low: 5'-CCTGAGAAAGAGGAGTGGACATAC | | 2,117 | 701 |
Aggrecan | Up:5'-AGCTGGGTTCGGGGCATCT | NM_013227 | 6,039 | |
| Low:5'-TGGTAGTCTTGGGCATTGTTGTTGA | | 6,839 | 800 |
IL-1β | Up:5'-ATGGCAGAAGTACCTAAGCTCGC | NM_000576 | 87 | |
| Low:5'-ACACAAATTGCATGGTGAAGTCAGTT | | 889 | 802 |
ALK-1 | Up: 5'-CGGCTCCCTCTACGACTTTCT | Z_22533 | 1,128 | |
| Low: 5'-CAGCACTCCCGCATCATCT | | 1,479 | 570 |
GAPDH | Up: 5'-TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT | NM_002046 | 113 | |
| Low: 5'-CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCCACCAC | | 1,095 | 983 |
To monitor the specificity of the amplification, melting curve analysis was performed after each PCR. In addition, some samples were separated by electrophoresis and visualized on agarose gels to confirm the size and purity of the PCR products. Amplification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) encoding cDNA and serial dilutions of a recombinant standard with a known DNA concentration (Roche) served as controls in each PCR. Data show the mean of the mRNA expression levels of the gene investigated normalized by the respective GAPDH signal and recombinant standard in each individual sample and PCR reaction. To show the relative copy numbers of the different genes investigated (ranging from more than 106 to less than 1 copy/μl cDNA) qRT-PCR data are shown on a log scale. This required an adjustment of all normalized values by a factor of 100,000. Statistical evaluation of the data was performed by a Mann-Whitney U test. Groups were considered statistically different when the probability values p were equal to or smaller than 0.05.
To investigate the capability of OA chondrocytes to form cartilage under in vivo conditions, primary culture cells (P0 cells) from three osteoarthritic donors (OA donor 1, age 78 years; OA donor 2, age 68 years; OA donor 3, 50 years) and two healthy donors (healthy donor 1, age 50 years; healthy donor 2, age 42 years) were harvested by mild enzymatic detachment, washed, counted, resuspended in cell culture medium and seeded onto a biphasic collagen matrix (Jotec AG, Hechingen, Germany). The scaffold consisted of a bovine collagen membrane on one side and a porous collagen sponge on the other side. The sponge side of the scaffold was seeded with 1 × 106 or 3 × 106 OA chondrocytes/cm2 or 1 × 106 healthy chondrocytes/cm2.
The cell-scaffold constructs were then cultured in vitro for an additional 4 days, after which they were implanted subcutaneously into female CB-17/Lcr SCID mice aged 10 to 12 weeks (Charles-River Wiga, Sulzfeld, Germany; n = 3 per group). The mice were anesthetized using ketamine and xylazine (1 ml 10% ketamine (WDT eG, Garbsen, Germany) and 1 ml xylazine (Rompun®, WDT eG) in sterile PBS; 0.1 ml/10 g body weight subcutaneously). Two scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously at the back of each mouse through a small incision in the neck region. Empty scaffolds were used as controls. The mice were kept in isolator cages in an air-conditioned specific pathogen free facility on an unrestricted diet. After 8 weeks the mice were sacrificed using CO2, and the constructs were harvested and fixed in 10% formalin buffered with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). All procedures were approved by the local animal care committee.
In an additional experiment, scaffolds seeded with cells from four OA patients or three ACT patients were implanted into the mice and harvested after eight weeks for mRNA isolation.
Histological analysis
After fixation, the constructs were embedded in Tissue Tec compound (Sakura, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands) and 7 μm sections were cut with a cryomicrotome (Jung/Leica Instruments, Nussloch, Germany). To determine if synthesis of cartilage-like tissue had occurred, we stained sections with safranin O/fast green to show the presence of proteoglycans. Type I and type II collagen was also visualized using standard immunohistochemistry. Type I collagen was detected using the 1-855 monoclonal antibody (IgG2a, ICN Pharmaceuticals, Aurora, OH, USA), type II collagen using the II-II6B3 monoclonal antibody (IgG1, kappa light chain) [
12] followed by a biotin-labeled horse anti-mouse serum (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). A biotin-streptavidin detection system (Vectastain Elite Kit, Vector) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The II-II6B3 antibody was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank maintained by the Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, under contract NO1-HD-2-3144 from the NICHD.
Hypertrophic chondrocytes were detected by staining for alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Sections were washed in ALP buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.1 M NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, pH 9.0) and then incubated with 3.5 μl 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (50 mg/ml, Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) and 4.5 μl nitroblue tetrazolium (50 mg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) per ml ALP buffer. The reaction was stopped by washing with PBS.
Discussion
The advent of reliable cell culture techniques raised hopes that tissue engineering might be able to cure any type of cartilage damage, regardless of pathology, degeneration of tissue, health status and age of patient [
13]. In a recent study, regeneration of cartilaginous tissue was reported using chondrocytes from elderly donors [
14] and ACT can be successful in certain patients suffering from early stage arthritis [
7]. This encouraged us to investigate whether OA chondrocytes might possibly be used for ACT.
Our data suggest that OA chondrocytes
ex vivo are in a differentiation state similar to that of healthy chondrocytes, as shown by their low expression levels of ALK-1, similar expression levels of type I collagen, and high expression of type II collagens and aggrecan mRNA. But OA chondrocytes
ex vivo contain significantly more IL-1β encoding mRNA. This could cause major problems for their use in the ACT procedure, since IL-1β is known to induce chondrocyte-mediated cartilage degradation [
15,
16] and to reduce type II collagen expression [
17]. Factors activating IL-1β expression
in vivo – as reflected by the highly elevated IL-1β mRNA amounts found
ex vivo – may contribute not only to the degradation of articular cartilage during OA but at the same time induce a catabolic situation in a transplant after ACT. Therefore, treatment of the osteoarthritic joint prior to and directly after ACT by blocking inflammatory processes or inhibiting catabolic factors should be taken into consideration.
Upon primary culture of the OA chondrocytes, a strong reduction of IL-1β expression was accompanied by an increase in type II collagen expression, even exceeding the levels found in ACT chondrocytes cultured under the same conditions. It is unclear whether this increase in type II collagen expression results from a loss of an inhibitory effect of IL-1β or if this reflects a general activation of gene expression described in OA chondrocytes
in vivo and
ex vivo [
18]. In addition to an increase in type II collagen expression upon culture of the OA cells, we also observed an increase in type I collagen and ALK-1. In an earlier study [
19], chondrocytes from OA patients in first or second passage cultures did not differ significantly from chondrocytes obtained from healthy donors with respect to their type II and type I collagen expression patterns. In first passage cells, the expression of transcription factors regulating collagen, including SOX-5, -6, and -9, appeared to be even higher in OA chondrocytes. These findings are consistent with our data, as a significantly lower ALK-1 expression and collagen ratio were observed. However, an upregulation of type X collagen expression has been reported in OA cells in comparison with healthy chondrocytes [
19]. This suggests that OA chondrocytes in primary culture show fewer signs of dedifferentiation but rather move towards a more hypertrophic phenotype, which might limit their use for tissue engineering. However, in our
in vivo experiments, the cells did not show any ALP activity, which is another marker for hypertrophic chondrocytes [
20]. This finding argues against a progression of the cells towards a stage of hypertrophy. Further differences in the expression of type X collagen between cells from ACT and OA patients were not observed. Our results also show that the production of high-quality ACT cells from osteoarthritic cartilage does not necessarily require additional manipulation of the cells such as alginate or agarose culture to stabilize the chondrogenic phenotype in these cells [
21,
22].
The downregulation of IL-1β expression in OA chondrocytes upon expansion implies that these cells are not irreversibly changed. It is possible that the osteoarthritic tissue induced the elevated IL-1β expression observed
ex vivo. For example, chondrocytes are known to upregulate the production of their own pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α, under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines present in the synovial tissues of patients with early OA [
23,
24], mechanical stress [
25], and breakdown products from the cartilage matrix [
26,
27]. At the same time, their responsiveness to IL-1β is reduced [
28], making these cells less sensitive to autocrine IL-1β during
in vitro expansion. This may contribute to a normalization of IL-1β expression
in vitro as well. Interestingly, in cells seeded onto the type I collagen scaffold, IL-1β mRNA was basically below detection levels eight weeks after implantation. Therefore, to ensure the success of ACT in OA joints, the control of articular environment will be of the utmost importance. Control of inflammatory stimuli in the affected joint and the removal of any degenerated cartilage surrounding the primary defect probably will be as important as the expansion of high quality autologous cells.
Using the SCID mouse model, we were able to show that OA chondrocytes seeded onto collagen scaffolds were capable of producing a hyaline cartilage
in vivo. However, higher seeding densities (3 × 10
6 cells/cm
2) were needed than those currently used for ACT procedures (1 × 10
6 cells/cm
2). Similar results were found by Tallheden and colleagues [
29] using a scaffold based on hyaluronic acid. Although the reason for this phenomenon is unclear, the higher inoculation density might compensate for reduced mitotic activity, lower metabolic activity or elevated cell death of OA cells in the scaffolds [
30,
31].
However, it seems that patient age by itself is not a major factor for tissue formation using OA chondrocytes. The chondrocytes from one patient included in this study (78 years of age) showed better in vivo tissue formation at lower inoculation density than those of younger donors (68 and 50 years of age). However, the influence of donor age on cartilage regeneration must be addressed in more detail in future studies.
Although our data suggest that chondrocytes from macroscopically intact cartilage of OA patients are of sufficient quality themselves, a number of additional problems will need to be solved before the ACT technique can become a viable treatment option for osteoarthritic cartilage. For example, OA defects are likely to be larger in size than most lesions currently treated with ACT. This means that greater numbers of cells are needed for the repair of cartilage damage in OA. We confirmed that extended expansion of OA chondrocytes beyond the P0 stage was marked by a strong reduction in type II collagen expression, upregulation of type I collagen expression and a slightly higher expression of ALK-1, showing ongoing dedifferentiation
in vitro. Since redifferentiation of dedifferentiated, ALK-1
high chondrocytes resulted in a fibrous repair tissue [
11], passaged OA chondrocytes are more likely to regenerate a fibrous cartilage. Here, the harvest of additional donor cells from the respective joint might be a better way of increasing the number of cells available for expansion in order to cover the rather large defects seen in OA. However, the additional damage to the joint resulting from the larger number of biopsies will have to be balanced carefully against the benefits of such an operation.
Furthermore, the challenge of preparing enough donor cells from an osteoarthritic joint and additional problems, such as joint stability, bone changes, and synovial inflammation, will have to be addressed to optimize cartilage regeneration. One subgroup of OA patients in which these problems might be more solvable comprise patients with a unilateral, varus or valgus OA of the knee. In these patients, sufficient cartilage is available to be used as donor material, the joint environment is probably not as catabolic as in end-stage OA, and most importantly, it is possible to correct the cause of the OA by adjusting the joint axis through osteotomy. Therefore, this group of patients might benefit from treatment using the ACT method.
Competing interests
TETEC AG is a tissue engineering company. CG and JF have stock holdings in TETEC and have received salaries from the company. RS and WKA have received research funding and royalties, respectively. The terms of the financial support from TETEC included freedom for authors to reach their own conclusions, and an absolute right to publish the results of their research, irrespective of any conclusions reached. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
RS participated in the design of the study, carried out animal experiments, evaluated histology and drafted part of the manuscript. DA collected human cartilage samples and participated in the animal experiments. TF performed part of the qRT-PCR analyses. CG, JF and MR collected human cartilage samples and contributed to the interpretation and discussion of data. WKA conceived the study, performed the gene profiling and drafted part of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.