Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv 3/2017

14.07.2017 | Original Article

Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer

verfasst von: Maura Bríd Cotter, Alex Dakin, Aoife Maguire, Janice M. Walshe, M. John Kennedy, Barbara Dunne, Ciarán Ó. Riain, Cecily M. Quinn

Erschienen in: Virchows Archiv | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Oncotype DX® is a gene expression assay that quantifies the risk of distant recurrence in patients with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer, publicly funded in Ireland since 2011. The aim of this study was to correlate Oncotype DX® risk groupings with traditional histopathological parameters and the results of other risk assessment tools including Recurrence Score-Pathology-Clinical (RSPC), Adjuvant Risk Index (Adj RI), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and the Adjuvant! Online 10-year score (AO). Patients were retrospectively identified from the histopathology databases of two Irish hospitals and patient and tumour characteristics collated. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated with Pearson’s chi-square test. Correlations were calculated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient and concordance using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22.0.
In our 300 patient cohort, Oncotype DX® classified 59.7% (n = 179) as low, 30% (n = 90) as intermediate, and 10.3% (n = 31) as high risk. Overall concordance between the RS and RSPC, Adj RI, NPI, and AO was 67.3% (n = 202), 56.3% (n = 169), 59% (n = 177), and 36.3% (n = 109), respectively. All risk assessment tools classified the majority of patients as low risk apart from the AO 10-year score, with RSPC classifying the highest number of patients as low risk. This study demonstrates that there is good correlation between the RS and scores obtained using alternative risk tools. Concordance with NPI is strong, particularly in the low-risk group. NPI, calculated from traditional clinicopathological characteristics, is a reliable alternative to Oncotype DX® in the identification of low-risk patients who may avoid adjuvant chemotherapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth L, Watson G, Walsh EM, Kelly CM, Keane M, Kennedy MJ et al (2015) Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early-stage breast cancer in Ireland. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153(3):573–582CrossRefPubMed Smyth L, Watson G, Walsh EM, Kelly CM, Keane M, Kennedy MJ et al (2015) Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early-stage breast cancer in Ireland. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153(3):573–582CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Blamey RW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Lee AH, Macmillan RD, Morgan DA et al (2007) Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999. Eur J Cancer 43(10):1548–1555CrossRefPubMed Blamey RW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Lee AH, Macmillan RD, Morgan DA et al (2007) Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999. Eur J Cancer 43(10):1548–1555CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundquist M, Thorstenson S, Brudin L, Nordenskjold B (1999) Applying the Nottingham Prognostic Index to a Swedish breast cancer population. South East Swedish Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast Cancer Rest Treat 53:1–8CrossRef Sundquist M, Thorstenson S, Brudin L, Nordenskjold B (1999) Applying the Nottingham Prognostic Index to a Swedish breast cancer population. South East Swedish Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast Cancer Rest Treat 53:1–8CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Eredita G, Giardina C, Martellotta M, Natale T, Ferrarese F (2001) Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. Eur J Cancer 37:591–596CrossRefPubMed D’Eredita G, Giardina C, Martellotta M, Natale T, Ferrarese F (2001) Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. Eur J Cancer 37:591–596CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Lee AH, Elston CW, Grainge MJ, Hodi Z, Blamey RW, Ellis IO (2008) Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3153–3158CrossRef Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Lee AH, Elston CW, Grainge MJ, Hodi Z, Blamey RW, Ellis IO (2008) Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3153–3158CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B20. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1677–1683CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B20. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1677–1683CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1134–1150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34(10):1134–1150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang G, Cuzick J, Costantino JP, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Crager M et al (2011) Risk of recurrence and chemotherapy benefit for patients with node negative, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: recurrence score alone and integrated with pathologic and clinical factors. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4365–4372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang G, Cuzick J, Costantino JP, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Crager M et al (2011) Risk of recurrence and chemotherapy benefit for patients with node negative, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: recurrence score alone and integrated with pathologic and clinical factors. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4365–4372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE et al (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(1):133–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE et al (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(1):133–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014 Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF et al (2015) Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373(21):2005–2014
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(27):2817–2826CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J et al (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, Forbes J, Mallon EA, Salter J et al (2010) Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1829–1834CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivotto IA, Bajdik CD, Ravdin PM, Speers CH, Coldman AJ, Norris BD et al (2005) Population based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2716–2725CrossRefPubMed Olivotto IA, Bajdik CD, Ravdin PM, Speers CH, Coldman AJ, Norris BD et al (2005) Population based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2716–2725CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Partin JF, Mamounas EP (2011) Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(12):3399–3406CrossRefPubMed Partin JF, Mamounas EP (2011) Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18(12):3399–3406CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haybittle JL, Blamey RW, Elston CW, Johnson J, Doyle PJ, Campbell FC et al (1982) A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 45(3):361–366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haybittle JL, Blamey RW, Elston CW, Johnson J, Doyle PJ, Campbell FC et al (1982) A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 45(3):361–366CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Hinton CP et al (1987) Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56(4):489–492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Todd JH, Dowle C, Williams MR, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Hinton CP et al (1987) Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56(4):489–492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Gospodarowic MK, Wittekind C (2009) International union against cancer (UICC) Tnm classification of malignant tumours. Wiley-Blackwell, New York Sobin LH, Gospodarowic MK, Wittekind C (2009) International union against cancer (UICC) Tnm classification of malignant tumours. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SBD et al (2010) In: BD ES, Compton C, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New York Edge SBD et al (2010) In: BD ES, Compton C, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New York
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRefPubMed Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ (2011) Strategies for subtypes dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ (2011) Strategies for subtypes dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanpaolo P, Barbieri V, Genovesi D (2011) Prognostic value of breast cancer sutbypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:876–882CrossRefPubMed Sanpaolo P, Barbieri V, Genovesi D (2011) Prognostic value of breast cancer sutbypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:876–882CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A et al (2003) Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10393–10398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A et al (2003) Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10393–10398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J et al (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1671–1676CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek AM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract/ASCO 3(4):182–186CrossRef Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek AM (2007) Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract/ASCO 3(4):182–186CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Albanell J, Gonzalez A, Ruiz-Borrego M, Alba E, García-Saenz JA, Corominas JM et al (2012 Mar) (2012) Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed Albanell J, Gonzalez A, Ruiz-Borrego M, Alba E, García-Saenz JA, Corominas JM et al (2012 Mar) (2012) Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(3):625–631CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaafar H, Bashir MA, Taher A, Qawasmeh K, Jaloudi M (2014) Impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center study in the United Arab Emirates. Asia Pacific J of Clin Oncol 10(4):354–360CrossRef Jaafar H, Bashir MA, Taher A, Qawasmeh K, Jaloudi M (2014) Impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center study in the United Arab Emirates. Asia Pacific J of Clin Oncol 10(4):354–360CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Oratz R, Kim B, Chao C, Skrzypczak S, Ory C, Bugarini R et al (2011) Physician survey of the effect of the 21-gene recurrence score assay results on treatment recommendations for patients with lymph node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 7(2):94–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oratz R, Kim B, Chao C, Skrzypczak S, Ory C, Bugarini R et al (2011) Physician survey of the effect of the 21-gene recurrence score assay results on treatment recommendations for patients with lymph node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 7(2):94–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, Childs BH, Yoshizawa C, Rowley S et al (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21 gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4063–4071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, Childs BH, Yoshizawa C, Rowley S et al (2008) Prognostic utility of the 21 gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4063–4071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf I, Ben-Baruch N, Shapira-Frommer R, Rizel S, Goldberg H, Yaal-Hahoshen N et al (2008) Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Cancer 112(4):731–736CrossRefPubMed Wolf I, Ben-Baruch N, Shapira-Frommer R, Rizel S, Goldberg H, Yaal-Hahoshen N et al (2008) Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Cancer 112(4):731–736CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22(3):207–219CrossRefPubMed Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO (1992) The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 22(3):207–219CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown J, Jones M, Benson EA (1993) Comment on the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Breast Cancer Res Treat 25(3):283CrossRefPubMed Brown J, Jones M, Benson EA (1993) Comment on the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Breast Cancer Res Treat 25(3):283CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Balslev I, Axelsson CK, Zedeler K, Rasmussen BB, Carstensen B, Mouridsen HT (1994) The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Breast Cancer Res Treat 32(3):281–290CrossRefPubMed Balslev I, Axelsson CK, Zedeler K, Rasmussen BB, Carstensen B, Mouridsen HT (1994) The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Breast Cancer Res Treat 32(3):281–290CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna MG, Bleiweiss IJ, Nayak A and Jaffer S (2017) Correlation of Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score with histomorphology and immunohistochemistry in over 500 patients. Int J Breast Cancer: 1257078. doi:10.1155/2017/1257078. Epub 2017 Jan 12 Hanna MG, Bleiweiss IJ, Nayak A and Jaffer S (2017) Correlation of Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score with histomorphology and immunohistochemistry in over 500 patients. Int J Breast Cancer: 1257078. doi:10.​1155/​2017/​1257078. Epub 2017 Jan 12
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Acs G, Kiluk J, Loftus L, Laronga C (2013) Comparison of Oncotype DX and mammostrat risk estimations and correlations with histologic tumor features in low-grade, estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast carcinomas. Mod Pathol 26(11):1451–1460 Acs G, Kiluk J, Loftus L, Laronga C (2013) Comparison of Oncotype DX and mammostrat risk estimations and correlations with histologic tumor features in low-grade, estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast carcinomas. Mod Pathol 26(11):1451–1460
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE et al (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, Chicago Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE et al (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, Chicago
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM, Beriwal S, Bhargava R (2008) Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score. Mod Pathol 21:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM, Beriwal S, Bhargava R (2008) Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score. Mod Pathol 21:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner BM, Skinner KA, Tang P, Jackson MC, Soukiazian N, Shayne M et al (2015) Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 28(7):921–931CrossRefPubMed Turner BM, Skinner KA, Tang P, Jackson MC, Soukiazian N, Shayne M et al (2015) Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 28(7):921–931CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS, Umbricht CB, Illei PB, Cimino-Mathews A, Cho S, Chowdhury N et al (2016) Optimizing the use of gene expression profiling in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(36):4390–4397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim HS, Umbricht CB, Illei PB, Cimino-Mathews A, Cho S, Chowdhury N et al (2016) Optimizing the use of gene expression profiling in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(36):4390–4397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Orucevic A, Bell JL, McNabb AP, Heidel RE (2017) Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163(1):51–61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orucevic A, Bell JL, McNabb AP, Heidel RE (2017) Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163(1):51–61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, Agarwal D, Green AR, Ashankyty I, Ellis IO, Ball G et al (2017) Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer. Histopathology 70(4):622–631CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, Agarwal D, Green AR, Ashankyty I, Ellis IO, Ball G et al (2017) Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer. Histopathology 70(4):622–631CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DP, Petkov VI, Shak S (2017) The performance of the 21-gene assay standard cutpoints of 18 and 31 in HR+, HER2- invasive breast cancer (BC), while waiting for TAILORx mid-range recurrence score results. J Clin Oncol 35(suppl; abstr 537) Miller DP, Petkov VI, Shak S (2017) The performance of the 21-gene assay standard cutpoints of 18 and 31 in HR+, HER2- invasive breast cancer (BC), while waiting for TAILORx mid-range recurrence score results. J Clin Oncol 35(suppl; abstr 537)
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer
verfasst von
Maura Bríd Cotter
Alex Dakin
Aoife Maguire
Janice M. Walshe
M. John Kennedy
Barbara Dunne
Ciarán Ó. Riain
Cecily M. Quinn
Publikationsdatum
14.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Virchows Archiv / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2184-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Virchows Archiv 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Invited Editorial

Quality in pathology

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie