Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2015 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2015

Comparison of perceptions of obesity among adults with central obesity with and without additional cardiometabolic risk factors and among those who were formally obese, 3 years after screening for central obesity

Zeitschrift:
BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2015
Autoren:
Corine den Engelsen, Rimke C. Vos, Mieke Rijken, Guy E. H. M. Rutten
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CdE collected, analysed and interpreted data, searched literature, and generated tables. RCV prepared additional analysis, generated tables and interpreted data. MR interpreted data. GEHMR designed the study and interpreted data. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published version.

Abstract

Background

Perceptions of illness are important determinants of health behaviour. A better understanding of perceptions of obesity might allow more effective interventions that challenge these perceptions through lifestyle modification programs. Although several studies have evaluated causal attributions with regard to obesity, other domains of illness perception, such as the perceived consequences of obesity and perceived controllability, have not yet been studied. The aim of the current study was to explore perceptions regarding causes, consequences, control, concerns and time course of obesity of centrally obese adults, with and without an elevated cardiometabolic risk and with or without weight loss, 3 years after screening for metabolic syndrome, and to compare these perceptions.

Methods

Three groups were selected from a longitudinal study dependent on the baseline and 3-year follow-up profiles: individuals with central obesity and metabolic syndrome at both time points (‘persistent cardiometabolic-risk group’, n = 80), those with central obesity but without metabolic syndrome on either occasion (‘persistent obese group’, n = 63), and formerly obese individuals (‘improved cardiometabolic-risk group’, n = 49). Perceptions of obesity were assessed using an adapted version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ, range 0–10). Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare the ‘persistent cardiometabolic risk’ group with the other two groups with regard to patient characteristics and BIPQ scores.

Results

Both males and females who improved their cardiometabolic risk perceived their obesity as shorter (median (IQR): 3.0 (4.0) vs. 6.0 (3.0), p < 0.001) and experienced greater personal control over their weight (7.0 (3.0) vs. 5.0 (3.0), p = 0.002) compared to those who did not improve. Females who improved their cardiometabolic risk experienced fewer identity and illness concerns, this was not found for males. Other scores did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Obese adults with an improved cardiometabolic risk profile felt greater personal control and considered their obesity to be of shorter duration. Persistence of central obesity with additional cardiometabolic risk factors had a larger impact on female than male participants with respect to identity and illness concerns. Whether discussing ‘personal control’ is a favourable element in lifestyle intervention should now be assessed in the setting of a controlled trial.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe