Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2018

13.02.2018 | Original Research

Comparison of Practice Guidelines, BRCAPRO, and Genetic Counselor Estimates to Identify Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer

verfasst von: Robert C. Grant, Spring Holter, Ayelet Borgida, Neesha C. Dhani, David W. Hedley, Jennifer J. Knox, Mohammad R. Akbari, George Zogopoulos, Steven Gallinger

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation carriers with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may benefit from precision therapies and their relatives should undergo tailored cancer prevention. In this study, we compared strategies to identify BRCA carriers with PDAC. Incident cases of PDAC were prospectively recruited for BRCA sequencing. Probands were evaluated using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) guidelines. The probability of each proband carrying a mutation was estimated by surveying genetic counselors and using BRCAPRO. BRCA mutations were detected in 22/484 (4.5%) probands. 152/484 (31.2%) and 16/484 (3.3%) probands met the NCCN and MOHLTC guidelines, respectively. The NCCN guidelines had higher sensitivity than the MOHLTC guidelines (0.864 versus 0.227, P < 0.001) but lower specificity (0.712 versus 0.976, P < 0.001). One hundred and nineteen genetic counselors completed the survey. Discrimination was similar between genetic counselors and BRCAPRO (area-under-the-curve: 0.755 and 0.775, respectively, P = 0.702). Genetic counselors generally overestimated (P = 0.008), whereas BRCAPRO severely underestimated (P < 0.001), the probability that each proband carried a mutation. Our results indicate that the NCCN guidelines and genetic counselors accurately identify BRCA mutations in PDAC, while the MOHLTC guidelines and BRCAPRO should be updated to account for the association between BRCA and PDAC.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Euhus, D. M., Smith, K. C., Robinson, L., Stucky, A., Olopade, O. I., Cummings, S., et al. (2002). Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(11), 844–851.CrossRefPubMed Euhus, D. M., Smith, K. C., Robinson, L., Stucky, A., Olopade, O. I., Cummings, S., et al. (2002). Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(11), 844–851.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, C., Kuchenbacker, K., Engel, C., Zachariae, S., Rhiem, K., Meindl, A., et al. (2013). Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Consortium. Journal of Medical Genetics, 50(6), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101415.CrossRefPubMed Fischer, C., Kuchenbacker, K., Engel, C., Zachariae, S., Rhiem, K., Meindl, A., et al. (2013). Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Consortium. Journal of Medical Genetics, 50(6), 360–367. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​jmedgenet-2012-101415.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2017). Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian (Version 1.2017). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2017). Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian (Version 1.2017).
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Practice Guidelines, BRCAPRO, and Genetic Counselor Estimates to Identify Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer
verfasst von
Robert C. Grant
Spring Holter
Ayelet Borgida
Neesha C. Dhani
David W. Hedley
Jennifer J. Knox
Mohammad R. Akbari
George Zogopoulos
Steven Gallinger
Publikationsdatum
13.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0212-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.