Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 9/2016

04.05.2016

Comparison of Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates Among Low-Risk Women in Urban and Rural Hospitals in Hawaii

verfasst von: Ann Lee Chang, Misty Pacheco, Kurt Yoshino, Jill Miyamura, Jay Maddock

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine primary cesarean delivery rates among women with low risk pregnancies in urban and rural hospitals in Hawaii. Methods This is a retrospective study of all low-risk women (term, vertex, singleton) who had a primary cesarean delivery in any Hawaii hospital from 2010 to 2011 using a statewide health information database. Hospitals were divided into two categories: rural and urban. Results Of the 27,096 women who met criteria for this study, 7105 (26.2 %) delivered in a rural hospital. Low-risk women who delivered in a rural hospital had a primary cesarean delivery rate of 18.5 % compared to 11.8 % in the urban hospitals, p < .0001. Low-risk women who delivered at rural hospitals had significantly higher unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for cesarean delivery. The association with rural hospital was stronger after adjusting for confounders, aOR 2.47 (95 % CI 2.23–2.73) compared to unadjusted OR 1.70 (95 % CI 1.58–1.83) for primary cesarean delivery. Conclusions on practice In a geographically isolated population, rates of primary cesarean delivery among low-risk women are significantly higher in rural hospitals. This disparity should be investigated further.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, A. B., Cahill, A. G., Guise, J. M., & Rouse, D. J. (2014). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, A. B., Cahill, A. G., Guise, J. M., & Rouse, D. J. (2014). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2014.​01.​026.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng, Y. W., Snowden, J. M., Handler, S., Tager, I. B., Hubbard, A., & Caughey, A. B. (2013). Clinicians’ practice environment is associated with a higher likelihood of recommending cesarean deliveries. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.860440.PubMedCentral Cheng, Y. W., Snowden, J. M., Handler, S., Tager, I. B., Hubbard, A., & Caughey, A. B. (2013). Clinicians’ practice environment is associated with a higher likelihood of recommending cesarean deliveries. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. doi:10.​3109/​14767058.​2013.​860440.PubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, E. A. S., & Silver, R. M. (2011). Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(6), S2–S10.CrossRefPubMed Clark, E. A. S., & Silver, R. M. (2011). Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(6), S2–S10.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2011). Births: Preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 60(2), 1–72.PubMed Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2011). Births: Preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 60(2), 1–72.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozhimannil, K. B., Hung, P., Prasad, S., Casey, M., & Moscovice, I. (2014). Rural-urban differences in obstetrics care, 2002–2010, and implications for the future. Medical Care, 52(1), 4–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kozhimannil, K. B., Hung, P., Prasad, S., Casey, M., & Moscovice, I. (2014). Rural-urban differences in obstetrics care, 2002–2010, and implications for the future. Medical Care, 52(1), 4–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Osterman, M. J. K., & Martin, J. A. (2014). Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2013. National Vital Statistics Report, 63(6), 1–16. Osterman, M. J. K., & Martin, J. A. (2014). Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2013. National Vital Statistics Report, 63(6), 1–16.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieck, C. (1997). Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma. Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association, 90(8), 444–449.PubMed Sieck, C. (1997). Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma. Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association, 90(8), 444–449.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasmeen, S., Sl, Romano P., El, Schembri M., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001.CrossRefPubMed Yasmeen, S., Sl, Romano P., El, Schembri M., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates Among Low-Risk Women in Urban and Rural Hospitals in Hawaii
verfasst von
Ann Lee Chang
Misty Pacheco
Kurt Yoshino
Jill Miyamura
Jay Maddock
Publikationsdatum
04.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2012-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Maternal and Child Health Journal 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe