Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 5/2020

01.05.2020 | Original Paper

Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging modes

verfasst von: Yo Sep Yoon, Chang Uk Park, Jun Ho Song, Jung Kee Min

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the retinal layer thickness values obtained using two swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) wide modes.

Methods

This study included fifty-four healthy eyes. Three-dimensional (3D) wide and 12 radial wide OCT scans were performed in each eye on the same day. Full retinal, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GC–IPL) thicknesses with fully automated segmentation obtained in 3D wide mode, and with semi-automated correction and fully automated segmentation obtained in 12 radial wide scan.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients for full retinal thickness measurements obtained by the two protocols with fully automated segmentation were from 0.958 to 0.996, 0.754–0.918 for GC–IPL thickness measurements, and 0.013–0.727 for RNFL thickness measurements, in the nine ETDRS subfields.

Conclusions

The full retinal thickness measurements determined using both fully automated segmentation algorithms were reliable and clinically acceptable. However, segmentation errors are shown when using the 12 radial wide scanning protocol with fully automated segmentation for measurement of RNFL and GC–IPL thickness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B et al (2010) Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5260–5266CrossRef Esmaeelpour M, Povazay B, Hermann B et al (2010) Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:5260–5266CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CS, Ngo WK, Cheong KX (2015) Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 99:354–358CrossRef Tan CS, Ngo WK, Cheong KX (2015) Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 99:354–358CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ, Marchase N, Weinreb RN (2014) Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1022–1032CrossRef Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ, Marchase N, Weinreb RN (2014) Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1022–1032CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CS, Chan JC, Cheong KX, Ngo WK, Sadda SR (2015) Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46:172–179CrossRef Tan CS, Chan JC, Cheong KX, Ngo WK, Sadda SR (2015) Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46:172–179CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Copete S, Flores-Moreno I, Montero JA, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2014) Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 98:334–338CrossRef Copete S, Flores-Moreno I, Montero JA, Duker JS, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2014) Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 98:334–338CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M, Terasaki H (2013) Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7630–7636CrossRef Matsuo Y, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Tomita M, Shirasawa M, Terasaki H (2013) Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7630–7636CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, Khwarg SI, Kim DM (2005) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 112:2157–2163CrossRef Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, Khwarg SI, Kim DM (2005) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 112:2157–2163CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma. Ophthalmology 116:2294–2299CrossRef Chang RT, Knight OJ, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma. Ophthalmology 116:2294–2299CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HJ, Kim MS, Jo YJ, Kim JY (2015) Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4554–4559CrossRef Lee HJ, Kim MS, Jo YJ, Kim JY (2015) Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4554–4559CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS (2005) Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2012–2017CrossRef Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, Beaton S, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS (2005) Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2012–2017CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mwanza JC, Durbin MK, Budenz DL et al (2012) Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology 119:1151–1158CrossRef Mwanza JC, Durbin MK, Budenz DL et al (2012) Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology 119:1151–1158CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Shiraga F (2013) Correlation between the ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3046–3051CrossRef Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Shiraga F (2013) Correlation between the ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3046–3051CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Min JK, Lee S, Kim JS, Woo JM, Yang HS (2017) Effects of diabetic macular edema on repeatability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements at the macular and peripapillary area using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 42:307–314CrossRef Min JK, Lee S, Kim JS, Woo JM, Yang HS (2017) Effects of diabetic macular edema on repeatability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements at the macular and peripapillary area using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 42:307–314CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging modes
verfasst von
Yo Sep Yoon
Chang Uk Park
Jun Ho Song
Jung Kee Min
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01276-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

International Ophthalmology 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.