Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende Patientenratgeber
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Erschienen in:

18.03.2021 | Original Article

Comparison of Ridge Mapping and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Determination of Alveolar Ridge Width

verfasst von: Sepehr Torabi, Mehrdad Panjnoush, Farzaneh Poursafar, Mina Taheri, Afshin Khorsand, Siamak Yaghobee

Erschienen in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ridge mapping for linear measurement of alveolar ridge width.

Materials and methods

In this cross-sectional study, 25 implant placement sites in 25 patients were selected and an acrylic stent was fabricated for each one. Three buccal–lingual point pairs were located on the stent at 4-, 7-, and 10-mm distances from the soft tissue summit of the alveolar ridge. The measurements were recorded by three examiners (two periodontists and one radiologist).

Results

Both techniques (CBCT and ridge mapping) overestimated alveolar ridge width compared to direct measurements, but mean differences compared to direct measurements (gold standard) were not statistically significant. The lowest mean difference compared to direct measurements was related to the ridge mapping technique, and CBCT measurements were less accurate to measure the alveolar ridge width.

Conclusion

In determining alveolar ridge width, ridge mapping and CBCT are both valid and useful. Ridge mapping provides high accuracy, simplicity, and lack of radiation exposure.
Literatur
1.
Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A (2012) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:22–38CrossRef
2.
Katsoulis J, Enkling N, Takeichi T, Urban IA, Mericske-Stern R, Avrampou M (2012) Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:e213–e223CrossRef
3.
Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A (2014) Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:690–695CrossRef
4.
Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R (2014) Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(Suppl):55–77CrossRef
5.
Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT et al (2012) Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the international congress of oral implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 21(2):78–86CrossRef
6.
Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M (2011) A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(2):67–75CrossRef
7.
Loubele M, Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D et al (2008) Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:512–518CrossRef
8.
Stratemann SA, Huang J, Maki K, Miller A, Hatcher D (2008) Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:80–93CrossRef
9.
Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A (2008) Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 10:226–230PubMed
10.
Chen L-C, Lundgren T, Hallström H, Cherel F (2008) Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 79:401–405CrossRef
11.
Kosalagood P, Silkosessak O, Pittayapat P, Pisarnturakit P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R (2014) Linear measurement accuracy of eight cone beam computed tomography scanners. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:1217–1227CrossRef
12.
Wilson DJ (1989) Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4(1):41–43PubMed
13.
Allen F, Smith DG (2000) An assessment of the accuracy of ridge-mapping in planning implant therapy for the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 11(1):34–38CrossRef
14.
Sümnig W (1990) Determining the alveolar ridge width in planning treatment with endosseous implants. Stomatol DDR 40(3):120–121PubMed
15.
Castro-Ruiz CT, Noriega J, Guerrero ME (2015) Validity of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography in dental implant therapy. J Indian Soc Periodontol 19(3):290–293CrossRef
16.
Amarnath GS, Kumar U, Hilal M, Muddugangadhar BC, Anshuraj K, Shruthi CS (2015) Comparison of cone beam computed tomography, orthopantomography with direct ridge mapping for pre-surgical planning to place implants in cadaveric mandibles: an ex-vivo study. J Int Oral Health 7(Suppl 1):38–42PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Eachempati P, Vynne OJ, Annishka A, Fickry FSS, Naurah MA, Idiculla JJ et al (2016) A comparative cross-sectional study of pre-implant site assessment using ridge mapping and orthopantomography (OPG) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 7:1185–1192
18.
Sutaria FB, Shah DN, Chauhan CJ, Solanki JS, Bhatti KA (2019) Comparative evaluation of various methods of assessing residual alveolar ridge width prior to dental implant placement: an in vivo study. J Dent Implant 9(1):12–19CrossRef
19.
Traxler M, Ulm C, Solar P, Lill W (1992) Sonographic measurement versus mapping for determination of residual ridge width. J Prosthet Dent 67(3):358–361CrossRef
20.
ten Bruggenkate CM, de Rijcke TB, Kraaijenhagen HA, Oosterbeek HS (1994) Ridge mapping. Implant Dent 3(3):179–182CrossRef
21.
Chugh A, Kalra D, Maggu S, Singh V, Bhisnoi P (2013) Comparative evaluation of three different methods for evaluating alveolar ridge dimension prior to implant placement: an in vivo study. J Dent Implant 3(2):101–110CrossRef
22.
Perez LA, Brooks SL, Wang HL, Eber RM (2005) Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(6):748–754CrossRef
23.
Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM (2018) Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 29(Suppl 16):393–415CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Ridge Mapping and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Determination of Alveolar Ridge Width
verfasst von
Sepehr Torabi
Mehrdad Panjnoush
Farzaneh Poursafar
Mina Taheri
Afshin Khorsand
Siamak Yaghobee
Publikationsdatum
18.03.2021
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01530-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Triple Assessment of a Palpable Parotid Lump in “One-Stop” Clinics

  • Original article

Comparative Evaluation of Implants with Different Surface Treatments Placed in Human Edentulous Mandibles: A 1-Year Prospective Study

  • Original article

Management of Maxillary Sagittal Fracture by using Pre-activated Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME)

  • Original Article

Time to Recurrence Associated With Poor Prognosis in Japanese Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

  • Original Article

Survival of Dental Implants on Irradiated Jaws: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review Paper

Assessment of Resorbable and Non-resorbable Fixation Systems in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: An In vitro Study

  • Original Article

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise