Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2020

22.01.2020 | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Bochao Zhao, Wu Lv, Di Mei, Rui Luo, Shiyang Bao, Baojun Huang, Jie Lin

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery is becoming more popular with the development of laparoscopic devices. The objective of this study was to explore whether the 3D imaging system could improve surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer compared with the 2D imaging system.

Methods

Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases and relevant data were extracted. Surgical quality, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery groups were compared using a fixed or random effect model.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving 1456 patients (3D group 683 patients and 2D group 773 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that mean operation time was significantly shorter in 3D group than in 2D group (WMD, − 9.08; 95% CI, − 14.77, − 3.40; P = 0.002; I2 = 70.3%), especially for gastric cancer patients (WMD, − 14.61; 95% CI, − 26.00, − 3.23, P = 0.012; I2 = 74.1%). In addition, 3D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer had an advantage than 2D group in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss (WMD, − 13.60, 95% CI, − 21.48, − 5.72; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%). The number of retrieved lymph nodes in 3D group was not significantly different from that in 2D group, regardless of laparoscopic gastrectomy (WMD, 1.10; 95% CI, − 0.67, 2.88; P = 0.222; I2 = 18.8%) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (WMD, 0.55, 95% CI; − 1.99, 3.09; P = 0.671; I2 = 76.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for postoperative complications and postoperative recovery.

Conclusion

Main advantages of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer were that it could shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss. However, 3D laparoscopic surgery had no obvious advantage over 2D laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001346 CrossRefPubMed Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​sla.​0000000000001346​ CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(5):1695–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2658-9 CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(5):1695–1705. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-012-2658-9 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s1470-2045(10)70131-5 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji G, Qi S, Ji F, Tao Y, Ma C, Fang X (2016) Comparative study of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in short-term efficacy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19(5):545–548PubMed Ji G, Qi S, Ji F, Tao Y, Ma C, Fang X (2016) Comparative study of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in short-term efficacy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19(5):545–548PubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Su H, Jin W, Wang P, Bao M, Wang X, Zhao C, Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhou H (2019) Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis. OncoTargets Ther 12:669–675. https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.s187535 CrossRef Su H, Jin W, Wang P, Bao M, Wang X, Zhao C, Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhou H (2019) Comparing short-time outcomes of three-dimensional and two-dimensional totally laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer using overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis. OncoTargets Ther 12:669–675. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2147/​ott.​s187535 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossRef Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 355:i4919. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​i4919 CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernan MA, Hopewell S, Hrobjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Juni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 CrossRef Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernan MA, Hopewell S, Hrobjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Juni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 366:l4898. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​l4898 CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji F, Fang X, Fei B (2017) Comparative study of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 20(5):509–513PubMed Ji F, Fang X, Fei B (2017) Comparative study of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 20(5):509–513PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Harada H, Nishi M, Yamamoto M, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Kakeji Y (2017) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402(3):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1574-9 CrossRef Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Harada H, Nishi M, Yamamoto M, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Kakeji Y (2017) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 402(3):493–500. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00423-017-1574-9 CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta J, Lewis RS Jr, Mamtani R, Stripp D, Kelz RR, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC, Roses RE (2014) Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: a contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 120(18):2855–2865. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28780 CrossRefPubMed Datta J, Lewis RS Jr, Mamtani R, Stripp D, Kelz RR, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC, Roses RE (2014) Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: a contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 120(18):2855–2865. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​28780 CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hanggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13(5):469–472CrossRef Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hanggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13(5):469–472CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Bochao Zhao
Wu Lv
Di Mei
Rui Luo
Shiyang Bao
Baojun Huang
Jie Lin
Publikationsdatum
22.01.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01853-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.