nach oben

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Erschienen in:

11.07.2018 | Original Article

Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo)

verfasst von: Onofrio A. Catalano, Lale Umutlu, Niccolo Fuin, Matthew Louis Hibert, Michele Scipioni, Stefano Pedemonte, Mark Vangel, Andreea Maria Catana, Ken Herrmann, Felix Nensa, David Groshar, Umar Mahmood, Bruce R. Rosen, Ciprian Catana

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo).

Methods

MoCo PET/DCE-MRI of the upper abdomen was acquired in 44 consecutive oncologic patients and compared with non-MoCo PET/MRI. SUVmax and MTV of FDG-avid upper abdominal malignant lesions were assessed on MoCo and non-MoCo PET images. Image quality was compared between MoCo DCE-MRI and non-MoCo CE-MRI, and between fused MoCo PET/MRI and fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images.

Results

MoCo PET resulted in higher SUVmax (10.8 ± 5.45) than non-MoCo PET (9.62 ± 5.42) and lower MTV (35.55 ± 141.95 cm³) than non-MoCo PET (38.11 ± 198.14 cm³; p < 0.005 for both). The quality of MoCo DCE-MRI images (4.73 ± 0.5) was higher than that of non-MoCo CE-MRI images (4.53±0.71; p = 0.037). The quality of fused MoCo-PET/MRI images (4.96 ± 0.16) was higher than that of fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images (4.39 ± 0.66; p < 0.005).

Conclusion

MoCo PET/MRI provided qualitatively better images than non-MoCo PET/MRI, and upper abdominal malignant lesions demonstrated higher SUVmax and lower MTV on MoCo PET/MRI.

Polycarpou I, Tsoumpas C, King AP, Marsden PK. Impact of respiratory motion correction and spatial resolution on lesion detection in PET: a simulation study based on real MR dynamic data. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:697–713.CrossRefPubMed

Li G, Schmidtlein CR, Burger IA, Ridge CA, Solomon SB, Humm JL. Assessing and accounting for the impact of respiratory motion on FDG uptake and viable volume for liver lesions in free-breathing PET using respiration-suspended PET images as reference. Med Phys. 2014;41:091905.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Liu C, Pierce LA, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. The impact of respiratory motion on tumor quantification and delineation in static PET/CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:7345–62.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Callahan J, Kron T, Siva S, Simoens N, Edgar A, Everitt S, et al. Geographic miss of lung tumours due to respiratory motion: a comparison of 3D vs 4D PET/CT defined target volumes. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:291.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Kalantari F, Li T, Jin M, Wang J. Respiratory motion correction in 4D-PET by simultaneous motion estimation and image reconstruction (SMEIR). Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:5639–61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.CrossRefPubMed

Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D, Jaffe TA, Bashir MR. Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology. 2014;271:426–34.CrossRefPubMed

Davenport MS, Caoili EM, Kaza RK, Hussain HK. Matched within-patient cohort study of transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver: gadoxetate disodium versus gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2014;272:123–31.CrossRefPubMed

Schleyer PJ, O’Doherty MJ, Barrington SF, Marsden PK. Retrospective data-driven respiratory gating for PET/CT. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1935–50.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Fürst S, Grimm R, Hong I, Souvatzoglou M, Casey ME, Schwaiger M, et al. Motion correction strategies for integrated PET/MR. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:261–9.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hope TA, Verdin EF, Bergsland EK, Ohliger MA, Corvera CU, Nakakura EK. Correcting for respiratory motion in liver PET/MRI: preliminary evaluation of the utility of bellows and navigated hepatobiliary phase imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:21.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

12.

Petibon Y, Huang C, Ouyang J, Reese TG, Li Q, Syrkina A, et al. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging. Med Phys. 2014;41:042503.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

13.

Manber R, Thielemans K, Hutton BF, Barnes A, Ourselin S, Arridge S, et al. Practical PET respiratory motion correction in clinical PET/MR. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:890–6.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Balfour DR, Marsden PK, Polycarpou I, Kolbitsch C, King AP. Respiratory motion correction of PET using MR-constrained PET-PET registration. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14:85.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

15.

Rank CM, Heußer T, Wetscherek A, Freitag MT, Sedlaczek O, Schlemmer HP, et al. Respiratory motion compensation for simultaneous PET/MR based on highly undersampled MR data. Med Phys. 2016;43:6234.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Fuin N, Catalano OA, Scipioni M, Canjels LPW, Izquierdo D, Pedemonte S, et al. Concurrent respiratory motion correction of abdominal PET and DCE-MRI using a compressed sensing approach. J Nucl Med. 2018; https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.203943.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Catana C. Motion correction options in PET/MRI. Semin Nucl Med. 2015;45:212–23.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

18.

Chen KT, Salcedo S, Chonde DB, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Levine MA, Price JC. et al. MR-assisted PET motion correction in simultaneous PET/MRI studies of dementia subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Catana C, Benner T, van der Kouwe A, Byars L, Hamm M, Chonde DB, et al. MRI-assisted PET motion correction for neurologic studies in an integrated MR-PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:154–61.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Catana C, Guimaraes AR, Rosen BR. PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven? J Nucl Med. 2013;54:815–24.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bamrungchart S, Tantaway EM, Midia EC, Hernandes MA, Srirattanapong S, Dale BM, et al. Free breathing three-dimensional gradient echo-sequence with radial data sampling (radial 3D-GRE) examination of the pancreas: comparison with standard 3D-GRE volumetric interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:1572–7.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Azevedo RM, de Campos RO, Ramalho M, Herédia V, Dale BM, Semelka RC. Free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with radial data sampling in abdominal MRI: preliminary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:650–7.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kaltenbach B, Roman A, Polkowski C, Gruber-Rouh T, Bauer RW, Hammerstingl R, et al. Free-breathing dynamic liver examination using a radial 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence with moderate undersampling for patients with limited breath-holding capacity. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:26–32.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Reiner CS, Neville AM, Nazeer HK, Breault S, Dale BM, Merkle EM, et al. Contrast-enhanced free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence for hepatobiliary MRI in patients with breath-holding difficulties. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:3087–93.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lee CK, Seo N, Kim B, Huh J, Kim JK, Lee SS, et al. The effects of breathing motion on DCE-MRI images: phantom studies simulating respiratory motion to compare CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, radial-VIBE, and conventional VIBE. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18:289–98.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

26.

Ogawa M, Kawai T, Kan H, Kobayashi S, Akagawa Y, Suzuki K, et al. Shortened breath-hold contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver using a new parallel imaging technique, CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration): a comparison with conventional GRAPPA technique. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:3091–8.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Nyflot MJ, Lee TC, Alessio AM, Wollenweber SD, Stearns CW, Bowen SR, et al. Impact of CT attenuation correction method on quantitative respiratory-correlated (4D) PET/CT imaging. Med Phys. 2015;42:110–20.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Blackall JM, King AP, Penney GP, Adam A, Hawkes DJ. A statistical model of respiratory motion and deformation of the liver. In: Niessen WJ, Viergever MA, editors. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention – MICCAI 2001, vol. 2208. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. p. 1338–40.CrossRef

29.

Goerres GW, Kamel E, Seifert B, Burger C, Buck A, Hany TF, et al. Accuracy of image coregistration of pulmonary lesions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using an integrated PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1469–75.PubMed

30.

Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras G, et al. The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1287–92.PubMed

Titel: Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo)
verfasst von: Onofrio A. Catalano
Lale Umutlu
Niccolo Fuin
Matthew Louis Hibert
Michele Scipioni
Stefano Pedemonte
Mark Vangel
Andreea Maria Catana
Ken Herrmann
Felix Nensa
David Groshar
Umar Mahmood
Bruce R. Rosen
Ciprian Catana
Publikationsdatum: 11.07.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4084-2

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2018

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical treatment: prospective results in 314 patients

Performance of 111In-labelled PSMA ligand in patients with nodal metastatic prostate cancer: correlation between tracer uptake and histopathology from lymphadenectomy

Correction to: PET imaging of EGFR expression using an 18F-labeled RNA aptamer

Quantification of myocardial blood flow with dynamic SPECT acquisitions: ready for prime time?

Radiochemotherapy-induced reactivation of scar tissue on 18F-FDG PET/CT

Feasibility of dynamic stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography for quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease