Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2019

22.04.2019 | Original Article

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses

verfasst von: Kosuke Minaga, Tomoe Yoshikawa, Yukitaka Yamashita, Hiroko Akamatsu, Maiko Ikenouchi, Tatsuya Ishii, Hisakazu Matsumoto, Hiroyoshi Iwagami, Yasuki Nakatani, Keiichi Hatamaru, Mamoru Takenaka, Takuji Akamatsu, Yoshito Uenoyama, Tomohiro Watanabe, Kazuo Ono, Yasutaka Chiba, Masatoshi Kudo

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) has been widely used for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, the ability to obtain adequate pancreatic tumor tissue needs to be improved.

Aims

This study was performed to compare a newly designed 21-gauge needle (EUS Sonopsy CY; Hakko Medical, Nagano, Japan) and a standard 22-gauge needle for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses.

Methods

Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent EUS–FNA with either the EUS Sonopsy CY or the 22-gauge needle from June 2014 to December 2016 were enrolled. The primary outcome was comparison of the diagnostic yield of the FNA samples. The secondary outcomes were comparison of technical success, diagnostic ability for malignancy, and complications.

Results

A total of 93 patients (40.9% female; mean age, 70.1 years) underwent EUS–FNA with the EUS Sonopsy CY (n = 47) or the standard 22-gauge needle (n = 46). The technical success rate was 100% in both groups, and the overall diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was similar between the groups (100% in the EUS Sonopsy CY group vs. 95.7% in the 22-gauge needle group, P = 0.242). Nevertheless, the EUS Sonopsy CY resulted in significantly higher scores for cellularity (P = 0.006) and lower scores for blood contamination (P < 0.001). The procedure-related complication rate was comparable between the groups (P = 0.148).

Conclusions

The EUS Sonopsy CY provided higher-quality specimens for histological evaluation in terms of both sample cellularity and blood contamination for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

Trial registration

The study was registered in a clinical trial registry, No. UMIN000032598
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th ed.; Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2017. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th ed.; Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Voss M, Hammel P, Molas G, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. 2000;46:244–249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Voss M, Hammel P, Molas G, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. 2000;46:244–249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011;43:897–912.CrossRefPubMed Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011;43:897–912.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–331.CrossRefPubMed Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–331.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen G, Liu S, Zhao Y, Dai M, Zhang T. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:298–304.CrossRefPubMed Chen G, Liu S, Zhao Y, Dai M, Zhang T. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:298–304.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20–26.CrossRefPubMed Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20–26.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Banafea O, Mghanga FP, Zhao J, Zhao R, Zhu L. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration for histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Banafea O, Mghanga FP, Zhao J, Zhao R, Zhu L. Endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration for histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:172–173.CrossRefPubMed Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:172–173.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:277–282.CrossRefPubMed Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:277–282.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Caudill JL, et al. False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factors. Gut. 2010;59:586–593.CrossRefPubMed Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Caudill JL, et al. False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factors. Gut. 2010;59:586–593.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner BG, Cizginer S, Agarwal D, Yang J, Pitman MB, Brugge WR. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:91–98.CrossRefPubMed Turner BG, Cizginer S, Agarwal D, Yang J, Pitman MB, Brugge WR. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:91–98.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–1710.CrossRefPubMed Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–1710.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jani BS, Rzouq F, Saligram S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review of technical and procedural variables. N Am J Med Sci. 2016;8:1–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jani BS, Rzouq F, Saligram S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review of technical and procedural variables. N Am J Med Sci. 2016;8:1–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatia V, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition: how to achieve excellence. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:417–430.CrossRefPubMed Bhatia V, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition: how to achieve excellence. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:417–430.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat James TW, Baron TH. A comprehensive review of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy needles. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15:127–135.CrossRefPubMed James TW, Baron TH. A comprehensive review of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy needles. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15:127–135.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, Trevino JM, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, Trevino JM, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:185–190.CrossRefPubMed Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:185–190.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384–390.CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384–390.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:321–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:321–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3733–3738.CrossRefPubMed Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3733–3738.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1056–1062.CrossRefPubMed Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1056–1062.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamata K, Kitano M, Yasukawa S, et al. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016;48:632–638.CrossRefPubMed Kamata K, Kitano M, Yasukawa S, et al. Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016;48:632–638.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1017–1024.CrossRefPubMed Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1017–1024.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishioka N, Ogura T, Kurisu Y, et al. Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS–FNA of pancreatic lesions. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4125–4131.CrossRefPubMed Nishioka N, Ogura T, Kurisu Y, et al. Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS–FNA of pancreatic lesions. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4125–4131.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.PubMed Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1432–1438.CrossRefPubMed Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1432–1438.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelfatah MM, Grimm IS, Gangarosa LM, Baron TH. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:495–500.CrossRefPubMed Abdelfatah MM, Grimm IS, Gangarosa LM, Baron TH. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:495–500.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Attili F, Rimbaş M, Fantin A, et al. Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy: a retrospective multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:469–474.CrossRefPubMed Attili F, Rimbaş M, Fantin A, et al. Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy: a retrospective multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:469–474.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Naveed M, Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, et al. A multicenter comparative trial of a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore™) with the 22-gauge needle in patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:34–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Naveed M, Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, et al. A multicenter comparative trial of a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore™) with the 22-gauge needle in patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7:34–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Kim EY, Cho J, et al. Risk factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee KH, Kim EY, Cho J, et al. Risk factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–290.CrossRefPubMed Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–290.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Minaga K, Takenaka M, Katanuma A, et al. Needle tract seeding: an overlooked rare complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Oncology. 2017;93:107–112.CrossRefPubMed Minaga K, Takenaka M, Katanuma A, et al. Needle tract seeding: an overlooked rare complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Oncology. 2017;93:107–112.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses
verfasst von
Kosuke Minaga
Tomoe Yoshikawa
Yukitaka Yamashita
Hiroko Akamatsu
Maiko Ikenouchi
Tatsuya Ishii
Hisakazu Matsumoto
Hiroyoshi Iwagami
Yasuki Nakatani
Keiichi Hatamaru
Mamoru Takenaka
Takuji Akamatsu
Yoshito Uenoyama
Tomohiro Watanabe
Kazuo Ono
Yasutaka Chiba
Masatoshi Kudo
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05624-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

PROFILES AND PERSPECTIVES

DDS Profile: Sonia Friedman, MD

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.