Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Rheumatology International 12/2020

29.07.2020 | Cohort Studies

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of biologic agents between elderly-onset and young-onset RA patients: the ANSWER cohort study

verfasst von: Sadao Jinno, Akira Onishi, Maureen Dubreuil, Kengo Akashi, Motomu Hashimoto, Wataru Yamamoto, Koichi Murata, Tohru Takeuchi, Takuya Kotani, Yuichi Maeda, Kosuke Ebina, Yonsu Son, Hideki Amuro, Ryota Hara, Masaki Katayama, Jun Saegusa, Akio Morinobu

Erschienen in: Rheumatology International | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA) patients. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged ≧18 years enrolled in a Japanese multicenter observational registry between 2009 and 2018 who had moderate or high disease activity when initiating bDMARDs were included. EORA was defined as RA with onset at 60 or over. After propensity score weighting for differences in confounding factors, generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between the age of RA onset and bDMARD clinical effectiveness at 48 weeks after starting a bDMARD. Among a total of 7183 patients in the registry, 2815 (39.2%) were identified as EORA. The proportion of patients on bDMARDs was lower in the EORA as compared to the YORA (18.3% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001). Of the 989 bDMARD initiators, 364 (36.8%) were identified as EORA. The median follow-up duration was 48 weeks both in the EORA and in the YORA. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics between the two age groups, there was no significant difference in Clinical Disease Activity Index scores at 48 weeks (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI = − 0.62 to 2.64, p = 0.22). There was a non-significant trend toward lower remission in EORA (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.24–1.14, p = 0.10), and low disease activity/remission was similar (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.29–2.52, p = 0.77). Drug retention (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.55–1.35, p = 0.78) and discontinuations due to adverse events (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38–1.18, p = 0.22) were similar between the two age groups after adjustment for confounders. In RA patients initiating bDMARDs, improvements in clinical disease at 48 weeks were similar between EORA and YORA. Drug retention and adverse events discontinuation were similar between the two age groups.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, Van der Heijde D, Tesser JR, Peloso PM, Chon Y et al (2006) Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 33:234–243PubMed Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, Van der Heijde D, Tesser JR, Peloso PM, Chon Y et al (2006) Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 33:234–243PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chevillotte-Maillard H, Ornetti P, Mistrih R, Sidot C, Dupuis J, Dellas JA et al (2005) Survival and safety of treatment with infliximab in the elderly population. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:695–696CrossRef Chevillotte-Maillard H, Ornetti P, Mistrih R, Sidot C, Dupuis J, Dellas JA et al (2005) Survival and safety of treatment with infliximab in the elderly population. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:695–696CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabay C, Riek M, Scherer A, Finckh A, SCQM Collaborating Physicians (2015) Effectiveness of biologic DMARDs in monotherapy versus in combination with synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev019CrossRef Gabay C, Riek M, Scherer A, Finckh A, SCQM Collaborating Physicians (2015) Effectiveness of biologic DMARDs in monotherapy versus in combination with synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:1664–1672. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​rheumatology/​kev019CrossRef
11.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hetland ML, Christensen IJ, Tarp U, Dreyer L, Hansen A, Hansen IT et al (2010) Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Arthritis Rheum 62:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27227CrossRefPubMed Hetland ML, Christensen IJ, Tarp U, Dreyer L, Hansen A, Hansen IT et al (2010) Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Arthritis Rheum 62:22–32. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​art.​27227CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorgensen TS, Kristensen LE, Christensen R, Bliddal H, Lorenzen T, Hansen MS et al (2015) Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:2156–2165. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev216CrossRef Jorgensen TS, Kristensen LE, Christensen R, Bliddal H, Lorenzen T, Hansen MS et al (2015) Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:2156–2165. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​rheumatology/​kev216CrossRef
17.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawahito Y (2016) Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Nihon Rinsho 74:939–943PubMed Kawahito Y (2016) Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Nihon Rinsho 74:939–943PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Migliore A, Bizzi E, Lagana B, Altomonte L, Zaccari G, Granata M et al (2009) The safety of anti-TNF agents in the elderly. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 22:415–426CrossRefPubMed Migliore A, Bizzi E, Lagana B, Altomonte L, Zaccari G, Granata M et al (2009) The safety of anti-TNF agents in the elderly. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 22:415–426CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller RB, Kaegi T, Finckh A, Haile SR, Schulze-Koops H, von Kempis J et al (2014) Is radiographic progression of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis different from young-onset rheumatoid arthritis? Results from the Swiss prospective observational cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53:671–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket399CrossRef Mueller RB, Kaegi T, Finckh A, Haile SR, Schulze-Koops H, von Kempis J et al (2014) Is radiographic progression of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis different from young-onset rheumatoid arthritis? Results from the Swiss prospective observational cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53:671–677. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​rheumatology/​ket399CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A et al (2020) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655CrossRefPubMed Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A et al (2020) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutuncu Z, Reed G, Kremer J, Kavanaugh A (2006) Do patients with older-onset rheumatoid arthritis receive less aggressive treatment? Ann Rheum Dis 65:1226–1229CrossRefPubMed Tutuncu Z, Reed G, Kremer J, Kavanaugh A (2006) Do patients with older-onset rheumatoid arthritis receive less aggressive treatment? Ann Rheum Dis 65:1226–1229CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Heijde DM, van Riel PL, van Leeuwen MA, vant Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB (1991) Older versus younger onset rheumatoid arthritis: results at onset and after 2 years of a prospective followup study of early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 18:1285–1289PubMed van der Heijde DM, van Riel PL, van Leeuwen MA, vant Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB (1991) Older versus younger onset rheumatoid arthritis: results at onset and after 2 years of a prospective followup study of early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 18:1285–1289PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of biologic agents between elderly-onset and young-onset RA patients: the ANSWER cohort study
verfasst von
Sadao Jinno
Akira Onishi
Maureen Dubreuil
Kengo Akashi
Motomu Hashimoto
Wataru Yamamoto
Koichi Murata
Tohru Takeuchi
Takuya Kotani
Yuichi Maeda
Kosuke Ebina
Yonsu Son
Hideki Amuro
Ryota Hara
Masaki Katayama
Jun Saegusa
Akio Morinobu
Publikationsdatum
29.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Rheumatology International / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04660-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Rheumatology International 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Acknowledgement to Referees

Acknowledgement to referees

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.