Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2016

28.01.2016 | Knee

Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery

verfasst von: Kate E. Webster, Julian A. Feller

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the performance of the short form-12 (SF-12) health survey is comparable with the longer version SF-36 for measuring health-related quality of life over time in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have joint replacement surgery.

Methods

Four hundred and seven patients with knee osteoarthritis completed the SF-36 before surgery and at a minimum of 12 months following knee replacement. SF-12 item responses were obtained from the responses given to the SF-36 questionnaire. Correlation coefficients were calculated between SF-12 and SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores and the respective change in scores. Sensitivity to change was determined with the standardised response mean (SRM).

Results

PCS and MCS scores were highly correlated between SF-12 and SF-36 versions for both preoperative and post-operative measures (r = 0.90–0.96, p < 0.0001). Change scores (post-operative–preoperative) were also highly correlated (PCS: r = 0.88, p < 0.001; MCS: r = 0.93, p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was large for the PCS scale (all SRMs >1.0). Correlations above 0.7 were found between change scores for each SF-36 and SF-12 subscale except General Health (r = 0.55).

Conclusions

The SF-12 summary measures and component scores replicate well with the SF-36 and show similar responsiveness to change. The SF-12 appears to be an adequate alternative for use in patients with knee osteoarthritis who undergo replacement surgery, and its brevity should be attractive for both clinicians and patients.

Level of evidence

I.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3):339–344CrossRefPubMed Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3):339–344CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar A, Quintana J, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(3):273–280CrossRefPubMed Escobar A, Quintana J, Bilbao A, Aróstegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(3):273–280CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171–178CrossRefPubMed Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171–178CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P (1998) Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 37(8):862–869CrossRefPubMed Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P (1998) Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 37(8):862–869CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller S, Majkut T, Kosinski M, Ware JJ (1999) Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview. Med Care 37(5):MS1-9PubMed Keller S, Majkut T, Kosinski M, Ware JJ (1999) Monitoring health outcomes among patients with arthritis using the SF-36 Health Survey: overview. Med Care 37(5):MS1-9PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dempster M, Donnelly MA (2001) Comparative analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among ischaemic heart disease patients. J Health Psychol 6(6):707–711CrossRefPubMed Dempster M, Donnelly MA (2001) Comparative analysis of the SF-12 and the SF-36 among ischaemic heart disease patients. J Health Psychol 6(6):707–711CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, Brnabic AJ, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJ, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM (1999) Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171(5):235–238PubMed March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, Brnabic AJ, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJ, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM (1999) Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171(5):235–238PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich S (2004) Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 90(5):523–527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich S (2004) Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 90(5):523–527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2004) Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):801–808CrossRefPubMed Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ (2004) Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):801–808CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, Lau F, Noseworthy T (1999) Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke 30(6):1213–1217CrossRefPubMed Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, Lau F, Noseworthy T (1999) Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke 30(6):1213–1217CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine 31(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed Singh A, Gnanalingham K, Casey A, Crockard A (2006) Quality of life assessment using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with SF-36. Spine 31(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME (2007) User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey, 2nd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME (2007) User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey, 2nd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B (2002) How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B (2002) How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Webster KE, Feller JA (2014) Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1142–1148CrossRefPubMed Webster KE, Feller JA (2014) Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1142–1148CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery
verfasst von
Kate E. Webster
Julian A. Feller
Publikationsdatum
28.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3904-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.