Skip to main content
main-content

17.09.2016 | Original Paper | Ausgabe 4/2017

International Ophthalmology 4/2017

Comparison of the silicone oil removal rate between vitrectomy and manual syringe negative pressure approach

Zeitschrift:
International Ophthalmology > Ausgabe 4/2017
Autoren:
Zhong Lin, Rong Han Wu, Ye Hui Zhou

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the silicone oil removal rate between vitrectomy and manual syringe negative pressure approach. Thirty-five silicone oil-filled eyes were enrolled and allocated for manual (n = 19) and vitrectomy (n = 16) removal approaches. For manual approach, a 10-ml syringe was connected to the 23-gauge cannula through a short section of blood transfusion tube. Removal was started after pulling and fixing the plunger to the end part. The syringe was pulled away immediately once the residual of silicone oil cannot be observed through the cornea. For vitrectomy approach, the only difference was the source of negative pressure, i.e., the blood transfusion tube was connected to the cannula directly to remove the silicone oil. Silicone oil removal rate was defined as the volume of silicone oil divided by the time taken for removal. The mean time taken for silicone oil removal was faster for manual approach than vitrectomy approach (4.13 ± 1.41 vs. 6.14 ± 1.49, p = 0.001). Furthermore, the silicone oil removal rate was larger for manual approach (1.42 ± 0.30 vs. 0.90 ± 0.16 ml/min, p < 0.001). No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted for both approaches. The mean IOP at day 1 after surgery was significantly lower than that at baseline in both groups (manual group 10.2 ± 4.5 vs. 17.6 ± 5.9, p < 0.001, vitrectomy group 15.1 ± 7.5 vs. 8.3 ± 1.9, p < 0.002). All the eyes were recovered at 1 week after surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity (LogMar) at 1 month postoperatively improved compared to that preoperative for both approaches (manual group: 1.10 ± 0.62 vs. 1.47 ± 0.76, p = 0.07; vitrectomy group: 1.10 ± 0.47 vs. 1.11 ± 0.50, p = 0.62). Both approaches are safe for silicone oil removal. The manual approach is more convenient and efficient.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

International Ophthalmology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

07.09.2018 | Video plus | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einseitige kombinierte Augenmuskeloperation zur Korrektur der Esotropie

Videobeitrag zur Rücklagerung des M. rectus medialis und Faltung des M. rectus lateralis

24.08.2018 | Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen | Ausgabe 10/2018

Stellungnahme von BVA, DOG und RG zur intravitrealen Therapie des visusmindernden Makulaödems bei retinalem Venenverschluss

Therapeutische Strategien, Stand 24.04.2018

20.08.2018 | Rehabilitation | CME | Ausgabe 10/2018 Open Access

Aktuelle Möglichkeiten der visuellen Rehabilitation

17.08.2018 | Das therapeutische und diagnostische Prinzip | Ausgabe 11/2018

Suprachoroidale Hydrogelplombe