Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Esophagus 4/2016

16.06.2016 | Original Article

Comparison of the treatment results of involved-field and elective nodal irradiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer

verfasst von: Jeong Hoon Park, Woo Chul Kim, Hun Jung Kim

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In recent years, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become a standard treatment modality for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. On the other hand, there is no international consensus regarding an accurate definition of the clinical target volume (CTV). This study evaluated the clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated definitively with either (ENI) elective nodal irradiation or (IFI) involved-field irradiation.

Patients and methods

Retrospective analysis of the treatment results for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer between 2001.5 and 2013.5 was carried out. The eligible patients had T2-4N0-2M0 biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus and were treated with a curative aim. Patients treated with surgery or radiotherapy alone were excluded. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated based on the FDG-PET CT scans. Patients treated with ENI received radiotherapy on the supraclavicular or celiac area as the clinical target volume (CTV). For IFI planning, CTV is defined as a 3-cm superoinferior margin and a 1-cm lateral margin from the GTV. The 3-year progression-free survival, overall survival and patterns of the failures were analyzed.

Results

A total of 99 patients who completed CCRT were eligible for the analysis. Of the patients, 50 patients had ENI and 49 patients had IFI. The age, gender and staging were similar in both groups. The median follow-up was 21 months. Both groups showed a similar overall survival (p = 0.293). On the other hand, although not statistically significant, the IFI group showed a tendency for lower 3-year progression-free survival rates, particularly the non-surgery group (25 vs. 46 %, p = 0.075). The cumulative failure rates were significantly lower in the ENI group than in the IFI group. (35 vs. 56 %, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Definitive CCRT with ENI did not improve the survival and disease control for patients with esophageal SCC. The omission of ENI was associated with a higher failure rate, but it did not affect the survival time. PET-CT-guided involved-field irradiation is a reasonable option for most locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer but needs caution for patients who will not undergo surgery.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Li M, Meng X, et al. Involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang X, Li M, Meng X, et al. Involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita H, Omori M, Takenaka R, et al. Involved-field irradiation concurrently combined with nedaplatin/5-fluorouracil for inoperable esophageal cancer on basis of 18 FDG-PET scans: a phase II study. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:182–7.CrossRefPubMed Yamashita H, Omori M, Takenaka R, et al. Involved-field irradiation concurrently combined with nedaplatin/5-fluorouracil for inoperable esophageal cancer on basis of 18 FDG-PET scans: a phase II study. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:182–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma JB, Song YP, Yu JM, et al. Feasibility of involved-field conformal radiotherapy for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer. Onkologie. 2011;34:599–604.CrossRefPubMed Ma JB, Song YP, Yu JM, et al. Feasibility of involved-field conformal radiotherapy for cervical and upper-thoracic esophageal cancer. Onkologie. 2011;34:599–604.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang L, Zhao X, Meng X, et al. Involved field irradiation for the treatment of esophageal cancer: is it better than elective nodal irradiation? Cancer Lett. 2015;357:69–74.CrossRefPubMed Jiang L, Zhao X, Meng X, et al. Involved field irradiation for the treatment of esophageal cancer: is it better than elective nodal irradiation? Cancer Lett. 2015;357:69–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwee RM, Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, et al. PET with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18/computed tomography in the clinical management and patient outcomes of esophageal cancer. PET Clin. 2015;10:197–205.CrossRefPubMed Kwee RM, Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, et al. PET with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18/computed tomography in the clinical management and patient outcomes of esophageal cancer. PET Clin. 2015;10:197–205.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreurs LMA, Busz DM, Paardekooper GMRM, et al. Impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on computed tomography defined target volumes in radiation treatment planning of esophageal cancer: reduction in geographic misses with equal inter-observer variability. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:493–501.CrossRefPubMed Schreurs LMA, Busz DM, Paardekooper GMRM, et al. Impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on computed tomography defined target volumes in radiation treatment planning of esophageal cancer: reduction in geographic misses with equal inter-observer variability. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:493–501.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebermann-Meffert D. Anatomical basis for the approach and extent of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:81–4.CrossRefPubMed Liebermann-Meffert D. Anatomical basis for the approach and extent of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:81–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). JAMA. 1999;281:1623–7.CrossRefPubMed Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). JAMA. 1999;281:1623–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu FM, Lee JM, Huang PM, et al. Retrospective analysis of outcome differences in preoperative concurrent chemoradiation with or without elective nodal irradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e593–9.CrossRefPubMed Hsu FM, Lee JM, Huang PM, et al. Retrospective analysis of outcome differences in preoperative concurrent chemoradiation with or without elective nodal irradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e593–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita H, Takenaka R, Omori M, et al. Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for 239 esophageal cancers: a single institutional retrospective study. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamashita H, Takenaka R, Omori M, et al. Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for 239 esophageal cancers: a single institutional retrospective study. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumagai K, Mariosa D, Tsai JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2015;. doi:10.1111/dote.12399. Kumagai K, Mariosa D, Tsai JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the significance of salvage esophagectomy for persistent or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2015;. doi:10.​1111/​dote.​12399.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hategan M, Cook N, Prewett S, et al. Trimodality therapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2014;28:612–8.CrossRefPubMed Hategan M, Cook N, Prewett S, et al. Trimodality therapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2014;28:612–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao KL, Ma JB, Liu G, et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is elective nodal irradiation necessary? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:446–51.CrossRefPubMed Zhao KL, Ma JB, Liu G, et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is elective nodal irradiation necessary? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:446–51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Onozawa M, Nihei K, Ishikura S, et al. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:266–9.CrossRefPubMed Onozawa M, Nihei K, Ishikura S, et al. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:266–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:684–90.CrossRefPubMed Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:684–90.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang D, Yang J, Zhu J, et al. Elective lymph node irradiation late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang D, Yang J, Zhu J, et al. Elective lymph node irradiation late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh Y-G, Lee IJ, Koom WS, et al. High-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in stages II-III esophageal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:534–40.CrossRefPubMed Suh Y-G, Lee IJ, Koom WS, et al. High-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in stages II-III esophageal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:534–40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Muijs CT, Beukema JC, Pruim J, et al. A systematic review on the role of FDG-PET/CT in tumour delineation and radiotherapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:165–71.CrossRefPubMed Muijs CT, Beukema JC, Pruim J, et al. A systematic review on the role of FDG-PET/CT in tumour delineation and radiotherapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:165–71.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Devadas M, Mittal A, Lin M, et al. FDG-PET nodal staging does not correlate with histopathological nodal stage for oesophageal cancers. Int J Surg. 2015;20:113–7.CrossRefPubMed Devadas M, Mittal A, Lin M, et al. FDG-PET nodal staging does not correlate with histopathological nodal stage for oesophageal cancers. Int J Surg. 2015;20:113–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the treatment results of involved-field and elective nodal irradiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer
verfasst von
Jeong Hoon Park
Woo Chul Kim
Hun Jung Kim
Publikationsdatum
16.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-016-0545-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Esophagus 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.