Erschienen in:
28.09.2018 | Original Article
Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis
verfasst von:
Leon Guchlerner, Julian Lukas Wichmann, Patricia Tischendorf, Moritz Albrecht, Thomas Josef Vogl, Sebastian Wutzler, Hanns Ackermann, Katrin Eichler, Claudia Frellesen
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
|
Ausgabe 1/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To compare thick (5 mm) and thin slice images (1.5 mm) of lung, soft tissue, and bone window in thoracoabdominal trauma computed tomography.
Materials and methods
167 Patients that underwent thoracoabdominal trauma CT between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. CT data were reconstructed in a transverse direction with 5 mm and 1.5 mm slice images of lung, soft tissue, and bone window. Two blinded raters (radiologists) evaluated the collected data by detecting predefined injuries in different organ areas. Reconstruction and evaluation times as well as detected injuries were noted and compared.
Results
Reconstruction and evaluation times were significantly higher with 1.5 mm thin-slice images, and the effect strength according to Rosenthal displayed a strong effect of 0.61 (< 0.1 small effect, 0.3 middle effect, and > 0.5 strong effect). Average evaluation time differences were 62.7 s (33.9 s–91.5 s) in bone window between 1.5 mm and 3 mm for rater 1 (p < 0.001) and 71.4 s (43.1 s–99.7 s) for rater 2 (p < 0.001). Average time differences between 1.5 mm and 5 mm were 68,7 s (43.9 s–93.5 s) for rater 1 and 75.3 s (44.7 s–105.9 s) for rater 2 in lung window (p < 0.001) and 66.6 s (28.8 s–104.4 s) for rater 1 and 114 s (74.4 s–153.6 s) for rater 2 in soft-tissue window (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding soft-tissue and lung injuries, except non-significant improvement in the detection of bone fractures.
Conclusion
Thin-slice images do not bring any significant benefit in thoracoabdominal trauma CT of soft-tissue and lung injuries, but they can be helpful for the diagnosis of bone fractures and incidental findings.