To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up.
This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1–4 years, 5–15 years) was performed.
Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0–15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and “well child”, more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases.
ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
The Alma-Ata conference on primary health care. WHO Chron. 1978;32(11):409-30. http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf?ua=1.
Primary health care—now more than ever. The World Health Report 2008. World Health Organization; 2008. http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.
van Esso D, del Torso S, Hadjipanayis A, Biver A, Jaeger-Roman E, Wettergren B, Nicholson A, Primary-Secondary Working Group (PSWG) of European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP). Paediatric primary care in Europe: variation between countries. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(10):791–5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.178459. Epub 2010 Apr 19. CrossRefPubMed
Boyle S. United Kingdom (England): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1–483. xix-xx. PubMed
Ferre F, de Belvis AG, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, Ricciardi W, Maresso A. Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(4):1–168. PubMed
Osgood K, Bunch GP, Shonick W. The impact of a pediatric practice on hospital admissions in rural areas. Am J Publ Health. 1980;70(10):1100. CrossRef
Duff R, Cook CH, Wanerka G, Rowe D, Dolan TH. Use of utilization review to assess the quality of pediatric inpatient care. Pediatrics. 1972;49(2):169. PubMed
Hashikawa AN, Brousseau DC, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. Emergency Department and Urgent Care for Children Excluded From Child Care. Pediatrics. 2014.
Asthma UK. The asthma divide: inequalities in emergency care for people with asthma in England. 2007.
Gill PJ, Goldacre MJ, Mant D, Heneghan C, Thomson A, Seagroatt V, Harnden A. Increase in emergency admissions to hospital for children aged under 15 in England, 1999-2010: national database analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(5):328–34. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302383. Epub 2013 Feb 11. CrossRefPubMed
- Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Pädiatrie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II