Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 8/2018

18.07.2018 | Urology - Original Paper

Comparisons of percutaneous versus retroperitoneoscopic cryoablation for renal masses

verfasst von: Hui-Ying Liu, Shu-Huei Shen, Lin-Nei Hsu, Po-Hui Chiang

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Preserving renal function and controlling oncological outcomes are pertinent while managing renal tumours. We compared outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) and retroperitoneoscopic cryoablation (RCA) in patients with renal neoplasms.

Methods

We identified 108 patients with renal tumours at two medical centres, where 63 patients received PCA and 45 patients underwent RCA from August 2009 to July 2015, and they were followed up until February 2017. We compared preoperative and postoperative parameters, namely gender, systemic diseases, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index (BMI), haemoglobin, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumour size, operative time, tumour type, Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications, and tumour recurrence, by using an independent sample t test, Pearson’s Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, a Mann–Whitney test, and a generalised linear model.

Results

Based on baseline characteristics, we found that the patients in the PCA group were older and had higher BMI than those in the RCA group, whereas the patients in the RCA group had more comorbidities than those in the PCA group. Retroperitoneoscopic and percutaneous methods had similar operative times, blood transfusion rates, postoperative fever episodes, and complication rates for either minor or major complications. However, the percutaneous method was associated with a shorter length of stay. No patient experienced deterioration in renal function until 2 years after both procedures. Impaired renal function was found in both groups in the 3-year follow-up. In both groups, tumour recurrence was significant for tumours > 4 cm.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that both cryoablation methods (PCA and RCA) are safe and effective for renal cell carcinoma. Favourable oncological control was achieved in both groups if the renal tumour size was ≤ 4 cm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kane CJ et al (2008) Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 113(1):78–83CrossRefPubMed Kane CJ et al (2008) Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 113(1):78–83CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahni VA, Silverman SG (2014) Imaging management of incidentally detected small renal masses. Semin Interv Radiol 31(1):9–19CrossRef Sahni VA, Silverman SG (2014) Imaging management of incidentally detected small renal masses. Semin Interv Radiol 31(1):9–19CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Remzi M, Javadli E, Ozsoy M (2010) Management of small renal masses: a review. World J Urol 28(3):275–281CrossRefPubMed Remzi M, Javadli E, Ozsoy M (2010) Management of small renal masses: a review. World J Urol 28(3):275–281CrossRefPubMed
4.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mennitto A et al (2017) Multimodal treatment of advanced renal cancer in 2017. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 10(12):1395–1402CrossRefPubMed Mennitto A et al (2017) Multimodal treatment of advanced renal cancer in 2017. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 10(12):1395–1402CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klatte T et al (2011) Laparoscopic cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses: systematic review and cumulative analysis of observational studies. Eur Urol 60(3):435–443CrossRefPubMed Klatte T et al (2011) Laparoscopic cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses: systematic review and cumulative analysis of observational studies. Eur Urol 60(3):435–443CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason RJ et al (2017) Renal functional outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for a solitary renal mass. BJU Int 120(4):544–549CrossRefPubMed Mason RJ et al (2017) Renal functional outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for a solitary renal mass. BJU Int 120(4):544–549CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai WJ et al (2015) Percutaneous computed tomography-guided cryoablation for renal tumor: experience in 30 cases. J Chin Med Assoc 78(5):308–315CrossRefPubMed Lai WJ et al (2015) Percutaneous computed tomography-guided cryoablation for renal tumor: experience in 30 cases. J Chin Med Assoc 78(5):308–315CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhindi B et al (2018) Outcomes after cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for sporadic renal tumors in a solitary kidney: a propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 73(2):254–259CrossRefPubMed Bhindi B et al (2018) Outcomes after cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for sporadic renal tumors in a solitary kidney: a propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 73(2):254–259CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brashears JH 3rd et al (2005) Renal cryoablation and radio frequency ablation: an evaluation of worst case scenarios in a porcine model. J Urol 173(6):2160–2165CrossRefPubMed Brashears JH 3rd et al (2005) Renal cryoablation and radio frequency ablation: an evaluation of worst case scenarios in a porcine model. J Urol 173(6):2160–2165CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaf ME et al (2005) Pain control requirements for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation-initial observations. Radiology 237(1):366–370CrossRefPubMed Allaf ME et al (2005) Pain control requirements for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation-initial observations. Radiology 237(1):366–370CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell SC et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182(4):1271–1279CrossRefPubMed Campbell SC et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182(4):1271–1279CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson CJ, Havranek EG (2004) Minimally invasive ablative techniques in renal cancer. BJU Int 93(6):707–709CrossRefPubMed Anderson CJ, Havranek EG (2004) Minimally invasive ablative techniques in renal cancer. BJU Int 93(6):707–709CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger A et al (2008) Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. Curr Opin Urol 18(5):462–466CrossRefPubMed Berger A et al (2008) Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. Curr Opin Urol 18(5):462–466CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haramis G et al (2012) Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small (< 3.5 cm) cortical renal masses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(2):152–157CrossRefPubMed Haramis G et al (2012) Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small (< 3.5 cm) cortical renal masses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(2):152–157CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad M et al (2017) Cryoablation of renal angiomyolipoma: an evaluation of safety and efficacy. J Endourol 31(11):1117–1122CrossRef Ahmad M et al (2017) Cryoablation of renal angiomyolipoma: an evaluation of safety and efficacy. J Endourol 31(11):1117–1122CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Azevedo AAP et al (2018) Image-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation: five years experience, results and follow-up. Eur J Radiol 100:14–22CrossRefPubMed Azevedo AAP et al (2018) Image-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation: five years experience, results and follow-up. Eur J Radiol 100:14–22CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegarty NJ et al (2006) Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology 68(1 Suppl):7–13CrossRefPubMed Hegarty NJ et al (2006) Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology 68(1 Suppl):7–13CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gage AA, Baust J (1998) Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology 37(3):171–186CrossRefPubMed Gage AA, Baust J (1998) Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. Cryobiology 37(3):171–186CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang J et al (2015) The application of PADUA scoring system for predicting complications of laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Int Urol Nephrol 47(5):781–788CrossRefPubMed Zhuang J et al (2015) The application of PADUA scoring system for predicting complications of laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Int Urol Nephrol 47(5):781–788CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiang PH, Su HH (2013) Randomized and prospective trial comparing tract creation using plasma vaporization with balloon dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 112(1):89–93CrossRefPubMed Chiang PH, Su HH (2013) Randomized and prospective trial comparing tract creation using plasma vaporization with balloon dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 112(1):89–93CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoun HD et al (2017) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: is it time for a new paradigm shift? J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(10):1363–1370CrossRefPubMed Aoun HD et al (2017) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: is it time for a new paradigm shift? J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(10):1363–1370CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanagho YS et al (2013) Renal cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Washington university long-term experience. J Endourol 27(12):1477–1486CrossRefPubMed Tanagho YS et al (2013) Renal cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Washington university long-term experience. J Endourol 27(12):1477–1486CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Aron M et al (2010) Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol 183(3):889–895CrossRefPubMed Aron M et al (2010) Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol 183(3):889–895CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Finley DS et al (2008) Percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal masses. J Urol 180(2):492–498 discussion 498CrossRefPubMed Finley DS et al (2008) Percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal masses. J Urol 180(2):492–498 discussion 498CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffey B et al (2012) Intermediate-term outcomes after renal cryoablation: results of a multi-institutional study. J Endourol 26(1):15–20CrossRefPubMed Duffey B et al (2012) Intermediate-term outcomes after renal cryoablation: results of a multi-institutional study. J Endourol 26(1):15–20CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman DS et al (2008) First prize (tie): laparoscopic renal cryoablation: efficacy and complications for larger renal masses. J Endourol 22(6):1123–1127CrossRefPubMed Lehman DS et al (2008) First prize (tie): laparoscopic renal cryoablation: efficacy and complications for larger renal masses. J Endourol 22(6):1123–1127CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparisons of percutaneous versus retroperitoneoscopic cryoablation for renal masses
verfasst von
Hui-Ying Liu
Shu-Huei Shen
Lin-Nei Hsu
Po-Hui Chiang
Publikationsdatum
18.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1925-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

International Urology and Nephrology 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.