Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2016

01.02.2016

Complementary value of pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient in rectal cancer for predicting tumor recurrence

verfasst von: Sung Jun Moon, Seung Hyun Cho, Gab Chul Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Hye Jung Kim, Kyung-Min Shin, So Mi Lee, Jun Seok Park, Gyu-Seog Choi, See Hyung Kim

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the complementary prognostic value of pre-treatment tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the prediction of tumor recurrence in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

From March 2012 to March 2013, a total of 128 patients with mid/lower rectal cancer who underwent pre-treatment rectal MRI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists in consensus evaluated conventional imaging features (Cimg) in pre-treatment rectal MRI: tumor height from anal verge (≤5 cm vs. >5 cm), T stage (high vs. low), the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, mesorectal fascia invasion, and extramural venous invasion. The mean tumor ADC values (TumorADC) based on high b-value (0, 1000 × 10−3 mm2/s) diffusion weight images were extracted. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard (CPH) regression was performed to evaluate the association of Cimg and TumorADC with the 3-year local recurrence (LR) rate. Predictive performance of two multivariate CPH models (Cimg only vs. Cimg + TumorADC) was compared using Harrell’s c index (HCI).

Results

TumorADC (Adjusted HR, 7.830; 95% CI 3.937–15.571) and high T stage (Adjusted HR, 8.039; 95% CI 2.405–26.874) were independently associated with the 3-year LR rate. The CPH model generated with T stage + TumorADC (HCI, 0.820; 95% CI 0.708–0.932) showed significantly higher HCI than that with T stage only (HCI, 0.742; 95% CI 0.594–0.889) (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

In patients with mid/lower rectal cancer, integrating TumorADC to Cimg increases predictive performance of the CPH model than that with Cimg alone for the prediction of LR within 3 years after surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SH, Lee JM, Hong SH, et al. (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy. Radiology 253(1):116–125. doi:10.1148/radiol.2532090027 CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Lee JM, Hong SH, et al. (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy. Radiology 253(1):116–125. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2532090027 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ippolito D, Monguzzi L, Guerra L, et al. (2012) Response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 18FDG PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 37(6):1032–1040. doi:10.1007/s00261-011-9839-1 CrossRefPubMed Ippolito D, Monguzzi L, Guerra L, et al. (2012) Response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 18FDG PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 37(6):1032–1040. doi:10.​1007/​s00261-011-9839-1 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun YS, Zhang XP, Tang L, et al. (2010) Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology 254(1):170–178. doi:10.1148/radiol.2541082230 CrossRefPubMed Sun YS, Zhang XP, Tang L, et al. (2010) Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology 254(1):170–178. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2541082230 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmi A, Hedgire SS, Covarrubias D, et al. (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clinical Radiol 68(10):e524–e531. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.094 CrossRef Elmi A, Hedgire SS, Covarrubias D, et al. (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clinical Radiol 68(10):e524–e531. doi:10.​1016/​j.​crad.​2013.​05.​094 CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie H, Sun T, Chen M, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting the response to chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(6):e517. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000517 CrossRef Xie H, Sun T, Chen M, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting the response to chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(6):e517. doi:10.​1097/​MD.​0000000000000517​ CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosawa J, Tawada K, Mikata R, et al. (2015) Prognostic relevance of apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI in pancreatic cancer. J Magn Resonan Imaging: JMRI. doi:10.1002/jmri.24939 Kurosawa J, Tawada K, Mikata R, et al. (2015) Prognostic relevance of apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI in pancreatic cancer. J Magn Resonan Imaging: JMRI. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​24939
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Akashi M, Nakahusa Y, Yakabe T, et al. (2014) Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors. Acta Radiol 55(5):524–531. doi:10.1177/0284185113503154 CrossRefPubMed Akashi M, Nakahusa Y, Yakabe T, et al. (2014) Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors. Acta Radiol 55(5):524–531. doi:10.​1177/​0284185113503154​ CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, et al. (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 35(6):1365–1371. doi:10.1002/jmri.23589 CrossRefPubMed Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, et al. (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 35(6):1365–1371. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​23589 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Minami M (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging findings of mucinous carcinoma arising in the ano-rectal region: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient with that of tubular adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 30(2):120–127. doi:10.1007/s11604-011-0023-x CrossRefPubMed Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Minami M (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging findings of mucinous carcinoma arising in the ano-rectal region: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient with that of tubular adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 30(2):120–127. doi:10.​1007/​s11604-011-0023-x CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Maas M, et al. (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 23(9):2522–2531. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2864-4 CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Maas M, et al. (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 23(9):2522–2531. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-013-2864-4 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu J, Khong PL, Wang S, et al. (2011) Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol 13(5):1020–1028. doi:10.1007/s11307-010-0433-7 CrossRefPubMed Gu J, Khong PL, Wang S, et al. (2011) Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol 13(5):1020–1028. doi:10.​1007/​s11307-010-0433-7 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn B, Lim JS, Kim H, et al. (2015) MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor for synchronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 25(5):1347–1355. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3527-9 CrossRefPubMed Sohn B, Lim JS, Kim H, et al. (2015) MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor for synchronous metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 25(5):1347–1355. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3527-9 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227(2):371–377. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272011747 CrossRefPubMed Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227(2):371–377. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2272011747 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al. (2014) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol 32(1):34–43. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3258 CrossRefPubMed Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al. (2014) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol 32(1):34–43. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2012.​45.​3258 CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried DV, Mawlawi O, Zhang L, et al. (2015) Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic value of FDG PET quantitative imaging features combined with clinical prognostic factors. Radiology 142920. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142920 Fried DV, Mawlawi O, Zhang L, et al. (2015) Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic value of FDG PET quantitative imaging features combined with clinical prognostic factors. Radiology 142920. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2015142920
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Newson R (2010) Comparing the predictive power of survival models using Harrell’s c or Somers’ D. Stata J 10(3):339–358. Newson R (2010) Comparing the predictive power of survival models using Harrell’s c or Somers’ D. Stata J 10(3):339–358.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sala E, Micco M, Burger IA, et al. (2015) Complementary prognostic value of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the pretreatment assessment of patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(8):1461–1467. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000519 CrossRefPubMed Sala E, Micco M, Burger IA, et al. (2015) Complementary prognostic value of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the pretreatment assessment of patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(8):1461–1467. doi:10.​1097/​IGC.​0000000000000519​ CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollineni VR, Kramer G, Liu Y, Melidis C, deSouza NM (2015) A literature review of the association between diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness in pelvic cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 41(6):496–502. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.010 CrossRefPubMed Bollineni VR, Kramer G, Liu Y, Melidis C, deSouza NM (2015) A literature review of the association between diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness in pelvic cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 41(6):496–502. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ctrv.​2015.​03.​010 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Complementary value of pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient in rectal cancer for predicting tumor recurrence
verfasst von
Sung Jun Moon
Seung Hyun Cho
Gab Chul Kim
Won Hwa Kim
Hye Jung Kim
Kyung-Min Shin
So Mi Lee
Jun Seok Park
Gyu-Seog Choi
See Hyung Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0648-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Abdominal Radiology 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.