nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2017 | Original Article

Compliance to The Joint Commission proposed Core Measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015

verfasst von: Ma. Conchitina Fojas, Lauren T. Southerland, Laura S. Phieffer, Julie A. Stephens, Tanya Srivastava, Steven W. Ing

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

There are care gaps in the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture. The Joint Commission is considering adoption of core measures. We compared compliance between two secondary fracture prevention programs in our institution. Incorporating strengths of both may provide the best outcomes for secondary fracture prevention.

Purpose

There are significant care gaps in the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis after occurrence of fragility fracture. The Joint Commission is considering adoption of a core measure set on osteoporosis-associated fractures, including laboratory assessment, bone density testing, and osteoporosis pharmacologic therapy. We compared compliance to these proposed measures between two secondary fracture prevention programs in patients hospitalized for acute fracture in an open medical system.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, single center medical records review of a nurse practitioner-led Fracture Liaison Service (FLS), a physician-led Fracture Prevention Program (FPP), and a historical time without any secondary fracture prevention program (Usual Care) for baseline care. Primary outcomes were the completion of five laboratory tests (calcium, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, renal function, liver function, and complete blood count), order placement and completion of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan within 3 months, prescription of osteoporosis medication within 3 months, and medication adherence at 6 months after hospital discharge.

Results

Completion of all five laboratory tests was higher in FPP versus FLS (84.7 vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001). DXA scan completion was higher in FPP than FLS but not statistically significant (66.7 vs. 54.9%, p = 0.11). Medication prescription at 3 months and adherence at 6 months were significantly higher in FPP versus FLS (65.3 vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001 and 70.8 vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Incorporating strengths of both FLS (care coordination) and FPP (physician direction) may provide the best outcomes for secondary fracture prevention by ensuring laboratory and DXA testing and initiating osteoporosis medication.

Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. 2004: Rockville, MD

Burge R et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3):465–475CrossRefPubMed

Lindsay R et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285(3):320–323CrossRefPubMed

Magaziner J et al (2003) Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to community-dwelling aged. Am J Epidemiol 157(11):1023–1031CrossRefPubMed

Sobolev B et al (2015) Risk of second hip fracture persists for years after initial trauma. Bone 75:72–76CrossRefPubMed

Haentjens P et al (2010) Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med 152(6):380–390CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bynum JP et al (2016) Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture. Osteoporos Int 27(7):2207–2215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crandall CJ et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments to prevent fractures: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 161(10):711–723CrossRefPubMed

Bawa HS, Weick J, Dirschl DR (2015) Anti-osteoporotic therapy after fragility fracture lowers rate of subsequent fracture: analysis of a large population sample. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(19):1555–1562CrossRefPubMed

10.

National Committee for Quality Assurance (2015) HEDIS & Performance Measurement. Proposed Changes to Existing Measures for HEDIS 1 2015: Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture (OMW), Washington. 2015.

11.

Kim SC et al (2015) Use of osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a cross-national study. Am J Med 128(5):519–526 e1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Akesson K et al (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Cosman F et al (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Eisman JA et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27(10):2039–2046CrossRefPubMed

15.

Tosi LL et al (2008) The American Orthopaedic Association’s “own the bone” initiative to prevent secondary fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):163–173CrossRefPubMed

16.

Eekman DA et al (2014) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int 25(2):701–709CrossRefPubMed

17.

Greene D, Dell RM (2010) Outcomes of an osteoporosis disease-management program managed by nurse practitioners. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 22(6):326–329CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hawley S et al (2016) Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing 45(2):236–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Olenginski TP et al (2015) High-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): improving osteoporosis and postfracture care with an organized, programmatic approach. Osteoporos Int 26(2):801–810CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ruggiero C et al (2015) Fracture prevention service to bridge the osteoporosis care gap. Clin Interv Aging 10:1035–1042PubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Solomon DH et al (2014) The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system. J Bone Miner Res 29(7):1667–1674CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Yates CJ et al (2015) Bridging the osteoporosis treatment gap: performance and cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service. J Clin Densitom 18(2):150–156CrossRefPubMed

23.

Newman ED et al (2003) Osteoporosis disease management in a rural health care population: hip fracture reduction and reduced costs in postmenopausal women after 5 years. Osteoporos Int 14(2):146–151CrossRefPubMed

24.

National Quality Forum. NQF—Endorsed Measures for Endocrine Conditions: Cycle 1, 2014. 2015: Washington, DC.

25.

The Joint Commission (2007 and 2013) Improving and Measuring Osteoporosis Management and Osteoporosis-Associated Fracture Implementation Guide. http//www.jointcommission.org. (accessed Nov 2015).

26.

Kaji AH, Schriger D, Green S (2014) Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies. Ann Emerg Med 64(3):292–298CrossRefPubMed

27.

Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kanis JA et al (2010) Development and use of FRAX in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 21(Suppl 2):S407–S413CrossRefPubMed

29.

Fryar CD, Gu Q, Ogden CL (2012) Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007–2010. Vital Health Stat 11(252):1–48

30.

Harris PA et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed

31.

Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(9):1309–1317CrossRefPubMed

32.

Solomon DH et al Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. J Bone Miner Res, 2014 29(9):1929–1937

33.

Jha S et al (2015) Trends in media reports, oral bisphosphonate prescriptions, and hip fractures 1996–2012: an ecological analysis. J Bone Miner Res 30(12):2179–2187CrossRefPubMed

34.

Khosla S et al (2012) Benefits and risks of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(7):2272–2282CrossRefPubMed

35.

Siris ES et al (2011) Estimating bisphosphonate use and fracture reduction among US women aged 45 years and older, 2001–2008. J Bone Miner Res 26(1):3–11CrossRefPubMed

36.

Khosla S, Shane E (2016) A crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 31(8):1485–1487CrossRefPubMed

37.

Cosman, F., K. Nicpon, and J.W. Nieves, Results of a fracture liaison service on hip fracture patients in an open healthcare system. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2016.

38.

Edwards BJ et al (2011) Addressing secondary prevention of osteoporosis in fracture care: follow-up to “own the bone”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(15):e87CrossRefPubMed

39.

Chandran M et al (2016) Dropping the ball and falling off the care wagon. Factors correlating with nonadherence to secondary fracture prevention programs. J Clin Densitom 19(1):117–124CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wozniak, L.A., et al., Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment. Osteoporos Int, 2016.

41.

Cerda Gabaroi D et al (2010) Search for hidden secondary causes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Menopause 17(1):135–139CrossRefPubMed

42.

Marcucci G, Brandi ML (2015) Rare causes of osteoporosis. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 12(2):151–156PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Painter SE, Kleerekoper M, Camacho PM (2006) Secondary osteoporosis: a review of the recent evidence. Endocr Pract 12(4):436–445CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Compliance to The Joint Commission proposed Core Measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015
verfasst von: Ma. Conchitina Fojas
Lauren T. Southerland
Laura S. Phieffer
Julie A. Stephens
Tanya Srivastava
Steven W. Ing
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2017
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0307-6

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Compliance to The Joint Commission proposed Core Measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015

Abstract

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Comments on Sulimani et al.: A weekly 35,000 IU vitamin D supplementation improves bone turnover markers in vitamin D deficient Saudi adolescent females

Erratum to: Unmet needs and current and future approaches for osteoporotic patients at high risk of hip fracture

Psychometric performance of the Romanian version of the SarQoL®, a health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia

Do 6 months of whole-body vibration training improve lean mass and bone mass acquisition of adolescent swimmers?

Evaluation of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and applicability of the FRAX tool in Joinville City, Southern Brazil

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone turnover markers in Palestinian postmenopausal osteoporosis and normal women

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie