nach oben

International Urogynecology Journal

Erschienen in:

01.09.2020 | Original Article

Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience

verfasst von: Sybil Mairesse, Emmanuel Chazard, Géraldine Giraudet, Michel Cosson, Stéphanie Bartolo

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is associated with specific complications. Our primary objective was to assess the recurrence requiring reoperation after prolapse surgery, and our secondary objectives were to assess the early complications and secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

Methods

Retrospective study of a population-based cohort of all hospital or outpatient stays including POP surgery from 2008 to 2014, using the French nationwide discharge summary database. We calculated the rates of hospital readmission following surgery as well as the rates of reoperation for recurrent prolapse and subsequent procedures performed for urinary incontinence.

Results

A total of 310,938 patients had undergone surgery for POP. Two hundred fourteen (0.07%) patients died, and 0.45% were admitted to an intensive care unit; 4.4% of the patients underwent surgery for the recurrence of prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy in the first surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of POP surgery recurrence: (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.51 [0.49; 0.53]). A total of 1386 (2.5%) patients were readmitted to the hospital for early (30-day) complications of prolapse surgery. The most frequent reasons for early readmission were local infection (32.8%), hemorrhage (21.4%) and pain (17.2%). Risk factors for complications were obesity, hospitals with low levels of activity and associated incontinence surgery; 4.6% of the patients required secondary surgery for urinary incontinence; obesity was a risk factor (HR [95% CI] = 1.12 [1.01; 1.24]), and the vaginal route was a protective factor (odds ratio = 1.86 for laparoscopy, 1.44 for laparotomy and 1.25 for multiple approaches).

Conclusions

POP surgery is associated with low rates of complication and recurrence. Complications occurred most commonly following combined surgeries for both prolapse and incontinence and in hospitals with low surgical volumes. Concomitant hysterectomy appears to be protective for the need for additional prolapse surgery, and the vaginal route leads to a lower frequency of secondary surgery for urinary incontinence.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Maher CF, Baessler KK, Barber MD, Cheong C, Consten ECJ, Cooper KG, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Climacteric J Int Menopause Soc. 2019;22:229–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1551348.CrossRef

Abbott S, Unger CA, Evans JM, Jallad K, Mishra K, Karram MM, et al. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:163.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.012.CrossRef

Barski D, Deng DY. Management of mesh complications after SUI and POP repair: review and analysis of the current literature. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:831285. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/831285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hokenstad ED, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Occhino JA. Readmission and reoperation after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:131–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000379.CrossRefPubMed

Barski D, Otto T, Gerullis H. Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014;24:217–24.PubMed

For the Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:789–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1384-5.CrossRef

Kasyan G, Abramyan K, Popov AA, Gvozdev M, Pushkar D. Mesh–related and intraoperative complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair. Cent Eur J Urol. 2014;67:296–301. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art17.CrossRef

Boudemaghe T, Belhadj I. Data resource profile: the French National Uniform Hospital Discharge Data set Database (PMSI). Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:392–392d. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw359.CrossRefPubMed

WHO | International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). WHO n.d. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed 31 July 2019.

10.

Social Security. French comon classification of medical procedures - CCAM n.d. n.d. http://www.ameli.fr/accueil-de-la-ccam/index.php. Accessed 31 July 2019.

11.

Lucot J-P, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Salet-Lizée D, et al. Safety of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy for cystocele repair: results of the prosthetic pelvic floor repair randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74:167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.044.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Salvatore S, Siesto G, Serati M. Risk factors for recurrence of genital prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:420–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833e4974.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Salvatore S, Athanasiou S, Digesu GA, Soligo M, Sotiropoulou M, Serati M, et al. Identification of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:301–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20639.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dallas K, Elliott CS, Syan R, Sohlberg E, Enemchukwu E, Rogo-Gupta L. Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100,000 women. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:1328–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002913.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Meriwether KV, Balk EM, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Murphy M, et al. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:505–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Balk EM, Murphy M, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219:129–146.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

17.

de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girão MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1617–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Vandendriessche D, Sussfeld J, Giraudet G, Lucot J-P, Behal H, Cosson M. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:231–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3093-6.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Warembourg S, Labaki M, de Tayrac R, Costa P, Fatton B. Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1139–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3256-5.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Alas AN, Chinthakanan O, Espaillat L, Plowright L, Davila GW, Aguilar VC. De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:583–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3149-7.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Leruth J, Fillet M, Waltregny D. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with negative preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:485–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1888-7.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ennemoser S, Schönfeld M, von Bodungen V, Dian D, Friese K, Jundt K. Clinical relevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:851–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1765-4.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Al-Mandeel H, Ross S, Robert M, Milne J. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence following vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse in objectively continent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:390–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20947.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Guillibert F, Chêne G, Fanget C, Huss M, Seffert P, Chauleur C. Risk factors of mesh exposure after transvaginal repair of genital prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37:470–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.010.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sabadell J, Salicrú S, Montero-Armengol A, Rodriguez-Mias N, Gil-Moreno A, Poza JL. External validation of de novo stress urinary incontinence prediction model after vaginal prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1719–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3805-1.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Khayyami Y, Elmelund M, Lose G, Klarskov N. De novo urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery-a national database study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04041-5.

Titel: Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience
verfasst von: Sybil Mairesse
Emmanuel Chazard
Géraldine Giraudet
Michel Cosson
Stéphanie Bartolo
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04210-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Prevalence of symptomatic urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse among women in rural Nepal

Risk factors and prevalence of urinary incontinence in mid-life Singaporean women: the Integrated Women’s Health Program

Effects of mechanical trauma on the differentiation and ArfGAP3 expression of C2C12 myoblast and mouse levator ani muscle

Impact of the EPISCISSORS-60 mediolateral episiotomy scissors on obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a 2-year data review in the United Kingdom

The mechanics and biomechanics of OASIS POP and incontinence—is active management of labour protective?

Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie