Zum Inhalt

Comprehensive Analysis of Congenital Aniridia and Differential Diagnoses: Genetic Insights and Clinical Manifestations

  • Open Access
  • 26.03.2025
  • REVIEW
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Introduction

Congenital aniridia (CA) is a severe and complex disorder involving the entire eye, primarily characterized by iris anomalies alongside other clinical features that pose significant risks to vision. This study seeks to offer a comprehensive overview of CA by detailing its clinical presentations, genetic underpinnings, associated phenotypes, and differential diagnoses. Additionally, it proposes a diagnostic framework to distinguish CA from other conditions that present with similar iris abnormalities.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature review to compile and analyze clinical and genetic data related to CA and its differential diagnoses. We included all studies describing the clinical characteristics, pathogenic variants, and associated syndromes of congenital aniridia.

Results

CA presents a wide range of ocular symptoms. Pathogenic variants in the PAX6 gene are the primary genetic cause of CA, though variations in other genes, including FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXD3, PITX3, CPAMD8, ITPR1, TENM3, TRIM44, COL4A1, CRYAA, and PXDN may also be implicated. The differential diagnosis of CA requires careful consideration of conditions with overlapping symptoms, such as WAGR syndrome (which involves deletions affecting the PAX6 and WT1 genes on chromosome 11p13, and potentially BDNF on 11p14.1), Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome (FOXC1/PITX2), ring-chromosome 6 syndrome (which involves FOXC1 microdeletion), COL4A1-related anterior segment dysgenesis, Gillespie syndrome (ITPR1 gene) or Peters anomaly. Accurate diagnosis can be achieved by evaluating specific clinical features—including iris anomalies, aniridia-associated keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus, and optic nerve head abnormalities—supplemented by genetic testing.

Conclusions

Understanding the diverse clinical presentations and genetic basis of diseases associated with iris abnormalities is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management. Integrating genetic diagnostics into the evaluation process enables the development of tailored treatment strategies, which can significantly improve patient outcomes.
Key Summary Points
Congenital aniridia is a complex eye disorder primarily characterized by iris anomalies and significant vision risks. It is important to differentiate its clinical features, genetic basis, associated phenotypes, and differential diagnoses.
A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze clinical and genetic data, highlighting congenital aniridia’s characteristics, pathogenic variants, and related syndromes.
Congenital aniridia presents a wide range of ocular symptoms. Pathogenic variants in the PAX6 gene are the primary genetic cause of CA, though variants in other genes, including FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXD3, PITX3, CPAMD8, ITPR1, TENM3, TRIM44, COL4A1, CRYAA and PXDN may also be causal. Differential diagnosis of CA requires careful consideration of conditions with overlapping symptoms, such as WAGR syndrome (the WT1 and BDNF genes), Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome (FOXC1/PITX2), Peters anomaly, Gillespie syndrome (the ITPR1 gene), Ring-chromosome 6 syndrome (which involves FOXC1 deletion), COL4A1-related anterior segment dysgenesis, among others.
Understanding the diverse clinical presentations and genetic foundations of congenital aniridia, combined with integrating genetic diagnostics into the evaluation process, is crucial for accurate diagnosis, tailored treatment strategies, and improved patient outcomes.

Introduction

Congenital aniridia (CA) is a rare, severe, inherited ocular disorder characterized by the iris's total or partial bilateral absence. CA can be regarded as a panocular disease with ocular manifestations and complications that extend beyond iris abnormalities, including nystagmus, foveal hypoplasia, optic nerve anomalies, aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK), cataract, lens subluxation and glaucoma, resulting in reduced visual acuity (usually 20/100–20/200) [1, 2].
Aniridia or its precursor term, irideremia, was first reported in the 1830s, amongst others by Anton Gescheidt [3, 4]. The prevalence of CA ranges between 1:64,000 and 1:100,000 while no distinct correlation with gender or ethnicity was identified [57].
Classical aniridia is a congenital, panocular disorder primarily characterized by the partial or complete absence of the iris, resulting from pathogenic variants in the paired box protein 6 (PAX6) gene or related chromosomal abnormalities. These are heterozygous, de novo or inherited variants corresponding to an autosomal dominant transmission pattern [8]. More than 700 PAX6 pathogenic variants have been found to result in CA [9]. In addition, several other genes such as forkhead box C1 (FOXC1), paired like homeodomain 2 (PITX2), cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1), forkhead box D3 (FOXD3), Paired-like Homeodomain Transcription Factor 3 (PITX3), C3 and PZP-like Alpha-2-Macroglobulin Domain-containing protein 8 (CPAMD8), Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Type 1 (ITPR1), teneurin transmembrane protein 3 (TENM3), tripartite motif containing 44 (TRIM4), Collagen Type IV Alpha 1 Chain (COL4A1), Crystallin Alpha A (CRYAA) and Peroxidasin (PXDN) have been found implicated in iris hypoplasia mimicking classical CA [1013].
Aniridia can present with various groups of diseases and syndromes. These include, in particular, WAGR (Wilms tumor, aniridia, genitourethral anomalies, retardation) [14], WAGRO (WAGR + obesity) [15, 16], Aniridia-intellectual disability syndrome [17], Peters anomaly [18, 19], Gillespie syndrome [20], Ring-chromosome 6 syndrome [21].
Therefore, CA can be caused by different pathogenic variants in different genes, mostly with different inheritance patterns, and can present both isolated and in the context of other diseases and syndromes. This review aims to reflect the current state of knowledge on CA, including clinical and genetic features, as well as the phenotypes and associated syndromes that may be associated with this presentation. Subsequently, we illustrate a diagnostic table, which is intended to serve as a guide to correctly classify existing CA and to allow choosing the best possible management accordingly.

Ethical Approval

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Clinical Manifestations of Isolated Aniridia

Iris Hypoplasia and Iris Malformation

In CA, the extent of iris tissue absence varies significantly between individuals, even among those with the same causative genetic variant. This variability ranges from mild iris hypoplasia, increased transillumination, abnormal pupil configuration, and atypical coloboma or ectropion uveae to the complete absence of the iris [2]. However, even in severe cases that appear to involve a complete absence of the iris, a remnant of iridian tissue is typically present. This can be identified through gonioscopy, anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and histopathological evaluation [11, 22, 23].

Aniridia-Associated Keratopathy

Findings of keratopathy in CA are commonly referred to as aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK) (Fig. 1). AAK is prevalent, affecting 70–80% of patients, and can significantly impair visual acuity [7]. The prevalence and severity of AAK increase with patient age [24]. Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) is recognized as a critical factor in its development. The Palisades of Vogt, a clinical marker for LSCD, are initially altered and eventually absent in eyes with congenital aniridia [25]. At birth, the cornea is either clear or exhibits peripheral thickening and peripheral pannus [26, 27]. Corneal neovascularization initially presents more prominently in the superior and inferior regions but may later progress to a circumferential pattern [28]. Over time, progressive corneal opacification extending from the periphery to the center, pannus formation, and epithelial erosions become apparent [29, 30]. The migration of blood and lymphatic vessels, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and alterations in corneal nerves can be detected. These changes are observable through slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) [31, 32].
Fig. 1
Classical aniridia with PAX6 haploinsufficiency, including aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK), limbal stem cell deficiency, corneal vascularizations, opacification, pannus, and calcification. This is AAK Grade 4, according to Lagali et al. (30)
Bild vergrößern
Furthermore, intraocular surgery in patients with congenital aniridia has been shown to exacerbate the severity of keratopathy (IVCM) [31, 33]. Additionally, microcornea is more commonly observed in congenital aniridia eyes.
The prevalence of dry eye syndrome is notably high among individuals with diagnosed congenital aniridia. Clinical studies have demonstrated a loss and dysfunction of meibomian glands, along with increased osmolarity and tear film instability [34, 35]. Dry eye disease (DED) and AAK appear to be interrelated, with each condition contributing to the progression of the other [35].

Secondary Glaucoma

The incidence of secondary glaucoma in patients with CA is notably high, affecting more than half of all patients, often manifesting during adolescence or early adulthood [7, 36]. The reported prevalence of aniridia-associated glaucoma varies widely, ranging from 6 to 75% [37]. Glaucoma is typically diagnosed at a mean age of 15 years, but approximately 15% of patients with CA are diagnosed before the age of 10 [38]. In children with CA, gonioscopy reveals progressive changes in the iridocorneal angle. Over time, attachments of the iris stroma gradually obstruct the trabecular meshwork, forming a membrane-like structure that leads to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [23, 39]. Prolonged elevated baseline IOP and repeated surgical interventions are associated with poorer visual outcomes [40]. In most cases of aniridia-associated glaucoma, topical treatments eventually become inadequate, necessitating surgical intervention. Undetected secondary glaucoma poses the greatest risk for irreversible vision loss in patients with aniridia [28].

Congenital and Juvenile Cataract, Lens Subluxation, and Other Lens Developmental Abnormalities

Minor lens opacities are often detectable from birth in congenital aniridia, typically located at the anterior or posterior pole [28]. However, cataract-associated visual impairment tends to manifest later. According to a large survey, the median age of cataract diagnosis in congenital aniridia is 14 years, highlighting juvenile cataracts as a common feature of the condition [41]. Most cataracts develop within the first two decades of life, as evidenced by a recent study involving 556 eyes with CA [7]. Overall, lens opacities are observed in 50–90% of patients with congenital aniridia [37, 42]. In the cohort of 556 eyes, with a mean age of 20 years, cataracts were found in 40% of eyes, pseudophakia in 23%, and aphakia in 6%. Additional lens abnormalities included lens subluxation, occurring in approximately 2% of eyes, and aphakia in 6% [7]. Rarely reported lens abnormalities include lens coloboma, posterior lenticonus, and microspherophakia in congenital aniridia [43].
It has been reported that the risk of complications during cataract surgery in patients with congenital aniridia is elevated due to factors such as lens capsule fragility, weak zonules, or lens subluxation [44]. Additionally, the lens capsule in younger patients with CA appears to be significantly thinner [45]. Furthermore, cataract surgery in patients with CA may trigger the onset or exacerbation of AAK and ocular hypertension [33, 46].

Foveal Hypoplasia

Foveal hypoplasia (FH) is the most common finding in CA following iris anomalies occurring in approximately 70 to 90% of patients [7, 4648]. Foveal hypoplasia is associated with nystagmus and contributes to decreased visual acuity [38]. The underdevelopment of the fovea leads to characteristic features such as a diminished foveal reflex, absence of a foveal pit, macular hypopigmentation, and retinal vessels encroaching upon the avascular zone [2]. Additionally, the retina in congenital aniridia eyes typically exhibits hypopigmentation [43]. Patients with CA demonstrate varying degrees of foveal hypoplasia on macular optical coherence tomography (OCT), which can serve as a predictor of visual acuity in children. Notably, foveal minimum and central macular thickness are increased in these patients [49, 50]. Both full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG) are affected in individuals with CA, reflecting widespread retinal dysfunction [51, 52].

Nystagmus

The prevalence of nystagmus in congenital aniridia is remarkably high, affecting up to 95% of patients [7, 48]. Most cases manifest as pendular horizontal nystagmus [26]. Nystagmus in CA is strongly associated with the grade of foveal hypoplasia and with a significantly reduced visual outcome [7, 48].

Optic Nerve Head Developmental Anomalies

Optic nerve hypoplasia is observed in approximately 10% of patients with congenital aniridia. It may occur in isolation or in conjunction with foveal hypoplasia [53]. In 1974, the first authors to describe optic nerve anomalies in CA suggested that this condition might result from incomplete retinal development, as the iris pigment epithelium, iris musculature, and retina all originate from the neuroectoderm [54]. The specific impact of optic nerve hypoplasia on visual impairment in CA remains unclear. Other optic nerve anomalies, such as optic nerve dysplasia and a small optic nerve head, are also frequently reported in congenital aniridia [7, 28, 55].

Extra-Ocular/Systemic Manifestations in Classical PAX6-Associated Aniridia

Classical PAX6-associated aniridia is not solely an extensive ophthalmological condition but is often accompanied by systemic abnormalities and disorders that can profoundly affect the quality of life of those affected. Metabolic issues, including thyroid dysfunction, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, are frequently observed in individuals with congenital aniridia. Moreover, neurological conditions such as autism, epilepsy, structural brain anomalies, auditory processing disorders, and disturbances in the sleep–wake cycle have been increasingly reported [56]. Therefore, early genetic diagnosis and comprehensive systemic evaluation are crucial for individuals with classical PAX6-associated aniridia.

Molecular Basis of Congenital Aniridia and Genotype–Phenotype Associations

PAX6-Associated Classical Congenital Aniridia

In over 95% of cases, CA is caused by haploinsufficiency of the transcription factor Paired box-6 gene (PAX6), typically resulting from heterozygous pathogenic variants that lead to reduced gene dosage [57]. Identified in 1991, PAX6 plays a pivotal role in neurogenesis and oculogenesis across evolutionary scales [58]. In ocular development, PAX6 is expressed early in the optic vesicle and optic cup, contributing to the formation of the neural and pigmentary retina. It is also expressed in the surface ectoderm of the crystalline vesicle and differentiating cells of the conjunctiva, cornea, ciliary body, and lens [59]. Beyond the eye, PAX6 expression extends to the forebrain, ventral spinal cord, olfactory system, and endocrine pancreas, underlining its broad developmental significance. Haploinsufficiency of PAX6 results in diverse phenotypes. In mouse models, such as the Small eye (Sey) model, this manifests as microphthalmia, whereas in humans, it predominantly causes hypoplasia of the iris and fovea. These findings underscore the critical regulatory function of PAX6 in both eye-specific and systemic developmental processes [60].
The PAX6 gene is located in 11p13.3 [61] and consists of 14 exons (11 of which are coding) that produce at least two main protein isoforms comprising 422 and 436 amino-acids, respectively. These isoforms feature two DNA-binding domains: a conserved 128-amino-acid paired domain characteristic of the Pax family of transcription factors and a homeodomain [57, 62].
The expression of PAX6 is tightly regulated by numerous regulatory elements located downstream (3’), intragenically, and upstream (5’). The most critical regulatory elements for ocular development are in the downstream regulatory region (DRR), which resides in introns 7–9 of the adjacent ELP4 gene, approximately 150 kb downstream of PAX6.
PAX6-associated aniridia results from heterozygous pathogenic variants or chromosomal rearrangements within the 11p13.3–11p14 region. These pathogenic variants are either inherited, displaying autosomal-dominant inheritance in about two-thirds of cases, or de novo with a sporadic appearance in approximately one-third of the cases [2]. Biallelic pathogenic variants in PAX6—either compound heterozygous or homozygous—completely disrupt eye development, leading to anophthalmia and in utero death, due to associated central nervous system defects [6264].
To date, over 700 PAX6 pathogenic variants have been identified. The former Human PAX6 Mutation Database listed 491 distinct variants in its last update in August 2018. Since then, more than 250 additional variants have been reported [9, 6570]. Unfortunately, no comprehensive pathogenic variants database currently exists to document the full mutational spectrum of PAX6-associated congenital aniridia.
Approximately 96% of disease-causing variants are intragenic mutations, found in 70–80% of patients. The remaining 4% involve microdeletions of varying sizes, which may encompass partial or complete deletions of PAX6 and potentially affect neighboring genes [8]. These may be associated with syndromic conditions such as WAGR syndrome (involving the WT1 gene) or the rarer WAGRO syndrome (involving the BDNF gene).
In some patients, PAX6 haploinsufficiency is associated with transcriptional deregulation mediated by the DRR. This is most commonly linked to 3' microdeletions of approximately 500–600 kb, affecting the DRR within the ELP4 gene, as well as other downstream genes such as IMMP1L, DNAJC24 and DCDC1 [7175]. Additionally, PAX6 deregulation can arise through other mechanisms. These include direct disruption of DRR-associated regulatory elements, "positional effects" caused by chromosomal translocations or inversions that physically separate the DRR from PAX6, and point variants within specific regulatory elements such as SIMO (a DRR-located regulatory element) [76, 77]. Rarely, chromosomal rearrangements, such as inversions involving intragenic regions of PAX6, have also been described [76].
Overall, chromosomal rearrangements involving the PAX6 locus at 11p13 are found in 25–30% of patients, including cases with WAGR-associated microdeletions [8]. These rearrangements underscore the intricate mechanisms underlying PAX6-associated aniridia and its related syndromic conditions.
Overall, approximately 80% of PAX6 pathogenic variants are coding variants that result in a premature termination codon (PTC), leading to haploinsufficiency and to the manifestation of classical aniridia [48, 78].
Approximately 96% of PAX6 pathogenic variants are intragenic. The remaining 4% involve complete gene deletions or pathogenic variants located in the 5' and 3' regulatory regions. These non-intragenic alterations can disrupt the gene's expression and contribute to the development of PAX6-associated conditions [8].
Using the last updated version of the discontinued Human PAX6 Mutation Database, Lima-Cunha et al. reported the frequency distribution of intragenic pathogenic variants associated with the aniridia phenotype as follows: nonsense variants (39%), frameshift indels (27%), splice variants (15%), missense variants (12%), C-terminal extension (CTE) mutations (2%), and in-frame indels (2%) [8]. These non-intragenic alterations can disrupt the gene's expression and contribute to the development of PAX6-associated conditions. Studies by Plaisancie & Tarilonte et al. uncovered variants in 5' UTRs and intronic regions in several PAX6-negative cases [77]. Further research has confirmed that these variants disrupt transcriptional regulation or splicing processes, contributing to the development of aniridia and related phenotypes [66, 77, 79].
Even though PAX6 proteins variants with C-terminal deletions show dominant negative activity, the associated phenotypes are not suggestive of increased severity [78, 80, 81]. Another report suggests that CTE pathogenic variants as well as loss-of-function pathogenic variants cause more severe phenotypes [48]. In a few reports, exudative retinopathy or chorioretinal degenerative abnormalities have been documented in patients with CTE pathogenic variants. On the other hand, missense pathogenic variants were found to be associated to rather mild phenotypes [48, 82, 83]. Very few patients have been described with biallelic PAX6 variants [62, 84, 85]. This condition is typically lethal or associated with severe central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities and other systemic disorders, reflecting the critical role of PAX6 in developmental processes.
The severity of aniridia phenotypes can vary widely, even among family members carrying the same disease-causing PAX6 variants, while showing less variability between the two eyes of an individual patient [83]. This variable intrafamiliar expressivity may be explained by several hypotheses, including mosaicism—the presence of somatic PAX6 variants at variable frequencies (< 50%) that arise post-zygotically in an individual [86, 87]. Some mosaic patients exhibit atypical or incomplete forms of congenital aniridia or may even remain asymptomatic. These asymptomatic individuals can still transmit the pathogenic variants to one or more offspring, contributing to the variability observed in familial cases [86].

Other Genes to be Considered for Differential Diagnosis

Initial and progressive signs and symptoms of congenital aniridia (CA) significantly overlap with those of other congenital ocular diseases [88]. In particular, atypical forms of CA may be associated with severe iris hypoplasia, which can also occur in certain cases of anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD). This overlap underscores the importance of careful differentiation, as will be further discussed in the next section.
FOX Genes
Pathogenic variants in several Forkhead box (FOX) genes, which encode evolutionarily conserved transcription factors, play a critical role in embryogenesis and tissue-specific gene expression [89, 90]. These pathogenic variants are associated with a wide range of ocular abnormalities, particularly affecting the eyelids and the anterior segment of the eye [91] (Fig. 2). Their involvement highlights the importance of FOX genes in eye development and pathology.
Fig. 2
Central corneal opacification (pannus) with vascularization of the right (A) and left (B) eye of a patient with FOXC1 mutation
Bild vergrößern
Interestingly, FOXC1, located on chromosome 6p25, and FOXE3, have critical roles in neural crest specification [92] and have been implicated in congenital aniridia. Disease-causing FOXC1 variants, including point mutations and microdeletions, are associated with a wide and variable spectrum of anterior segment anomalies such as Axenfeld anomaly (AA), Rieger anomaly (RA), Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome (ARS), primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), Peters anomaly (PA), and iris hypoplasia [9396]. Notably, causative FOXC1 pathogenic variants have been identified in patients with aniridia who tested negative for PAX6 pathogenic variants [9799]. The systemic manifestations of FOXC1 pathogenic variants are also highly variable [100], including conditions such as hypodontia, umbilical hernia, Dandy–Walker syndrome, and intracranial anomalies [26].
FOXE3, essential for eye development, is another gene with broad phenotypic variability. Both recessive and dominant variants in FOXE3 are often associated with aniridia or severe iris hypoplasia [101]. These findings underscore the significance of FOXC1 and FOXE3 in CA and related anterior segment disorders, particularly in cases where PAX6 is not implicated.
PITX2
PITX2, another gene associated with ASD, is located on chromosome 4q25 and encodes a transcription factor with a DNA-binding homeodomain. It plays a critical regulatory role in the development of the anterior segment of the eye [90, 102, 103]. Alongside FOXC1, heterozygous PITX2 variants are among the most common genetic causes of ASD (Fig. 3) and are frequently associated with the development of secondary glaucoma [104, 105]. Several studies have identified PITX2 pathogenic variants in PAX6-negative cases presenting with aniridia [97, 105, 106]. Beyond ocular anomalies, PITX2 pathogenic variants are linked to extraocular manifestations, including dental hypoplasia, craniofacial dysmorphism, abnormalities in visceral symmetry, and umbilical disorders [107109]. These findings highlight the broad phenotypic impact of PITX2 pathogenic variants in both ocular and systemic contexts.
Fig. 3
Slit-lamp images of the right (A) and left (B) eye of a patient with Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome, with PITX2 mutation. There is posterior embryotoxon (arrows) (A, B), corectopy (A, B), and polycoria (B)
Bild vergrößern
CYP1B1
CYP1B1, located on chromosome 2p21–22 [110], encodes a cytochrome P450 enzyme that is expressed in the ciliary body, iris, cornea, and retina. It is the principal gene implicated in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) [111114] (Fig. 4). Notably, the majority of PCG cases are associated with biallelic CYP1B1 variants, with over 80% of autosomal recessive familial cases and about 20% of sporadic cases showing causative pathogenic variants [115]. CYP1B1 pathogenic variants can also result in PCG combined with aniridia, representing an extreme form of anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD). While such cases are rare, they have been reported in a few individuals [10]. Studies underscore the significance of CYP1B1 not only in PCG but also as part of the broader spectrum of ASD-related phenotypes.
Fig. 4
Slit-lamp images of the right (A) and left (B) eye of a patient with primary congenital glaucoma, with CYP1B1 mutation. There is posterior embryotoxon (arrows) (A, B), corectopy (A, B), and polycoria (B), beside the observed cataract (A, B)
Bild vergrößern
Further Rare Genetic Causes of Nonclassical Congenital Aniridia
In recent years, additional potential causes of congenital aniridia (CA) have been identified through screenings of PAX6-negative patients.
Biallelic variants in CPAMD8 have been associated with a spectrum of ASD. Some patients exhibit severe iris hypoplasia that mimics aniridia [116].
Missense heterozygous variants in COL4A1 are linked to a range of vascular disorders, with some patients presenting congenital ocular anomalies. These ocular manifestations may be isolated and include features resembling CA, such as cataracts, ASD, glaucoma, and optic nerve hypoplasia [117, 118]. Disease-causing variants in COL4A1 have been described in some PAX6-negative cases.
De novo C-terminal extension (CTE) pathogenic variants in CRYAA have been reported in two unrelated patients with a pan-ocular phenotype, including aniridia, aphakia, and foveal hypoplasia [119, 120].
Variants in PXDN, another ASD-related gene, have been linked to presentations of aniridia/iris hypoplasia [121123].
These findings broaden the understanding of genetic contributors to CA-like phenotypes, especially in PAX6-negative cases, emphasizing the need for comprehensive genetic testing to identify alternative causal genes.
Furthermore, several genes are under investigation for their potential association with aniridia, including FOSL2, TENM3, TRIM44, and FOXD3 [124].
FOSL2 is a direct target of PAX6 and has recently been associated with corneal opacity. It regulates other genes involved in corneal diseases, suggesting a possible role in ocular anomalies linked to aniridia [124].
Pathogenic variants in TENM3 have been associated with microphthalmia, coloboma, and congenital cataract—features that overlap with clinical presentations of congenital aniridia. Ten cases have been reported to date, some of which also involve developmental delays [125].
Part of the TRIM protein family, TRIM44 is involved in cellular processes such as immune response and antiviral activity. Located on chromosome 11p13, it is in proximity to the PAX6 locus. While its role in eye development has been minimally explored, Zhang et al. identified TRIM44 pathogenic variants that inhibit PAX6 expression, potentially leading to aniridia [126]. Nevertheless, since its initial description, no additional cases of aniridia associated with a TRIM44 pathogenic variant have been reported. In addition, TRIM44 upregulation has been associated with various carcinomas, suggesting broader biological significance [127130].
FOXD1 is implicated in neural crest development and may influence eye formation and anterior segment dysgenesis. Its role in aniridia-like phenotypes remains to be clarified [131].
These genes represent promising candidates for further research into the genetic underpinnings of aniridia and related ocular conditions, particularly in PAX6-negative cases.

Differential Diagnoses of Classical CA from ASDs and Syndromes with Systemic Manifestations

The following section will address the various differential diagnoses of classical isolated congenital aniridia, with syndromes also involving systemic manifestations, as summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of clinical features and related genes of congenital aniridia and differential diagnoses
 
Classical aniridia (CA)
WAGR/WAGRO
Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome
Peters anomaly
Gillespie syndrome
Cornea
Aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK), dry eye syndrome, microcornea
Same as CA
Posterior embryotoxon, otherwise normal, megalo- or microcornea
Central opacification
Iris
Wide range: hypoplasia, atypical coloboma, ectropion uveae, pupil defects, aniridia
Same as CA
Iridocorneal adhesions, hypoplasia, corectopia, polycoria
Iris strands reaching to the cornea
Hypoplasia, aplasia of central iris tissue, mydriasis, partial or complete aniridia
Glaucoma
Secondary glaucoma, > 50% in total, 15% under 15 years, iris stroma attachments blocking trabecular meshwork
Same as CA
50% develop glaucoma
Common
Lens
Minor opacities at birth; presenile cataract within the first 2 decades of life; rare: coloboma, lenticonus posterior, subluxation
Same as CA
Early-onset or congenital cataract frequent; occasionally ectopia,
Corneolenticular adhesions (type II); congenita cataract possible
Retina
Foveal hypoplasia (around 80%), macular hypopigmentation
Same as CA
Foveal hypoplasia, foveal atrophy, chorioretinal coloboma possible
Retinal detachment described (not common)
Optic nerve
Hypoplasia (10%)
Same as CA
Coloboma, hypo- and dysplasia possible
Nystagmus
Very frequent (up to 95%); pendular horizontal
Same as CA
Possible
Strabismus
Frequent (around 60%)
Same as CA
Possible, rare
Possible
Systemic
Wilms tumor, genitourinary abnormalities, mental disorders/WGRO + obesity
Craniofacial, dental, periumbilical skin disorders
Craniofacial disorders, short stature (Peters plus)
Cerebellar ataxia, oligophrenia, congenital hypotonia
Laterality
Bilateral
Same as CA
Bilateral
Bi- or unilateral
Usually bilateral
Genes
PAX6, FOXC1, PITX2, CYP1B1, FOXD3, TRIM44, COL4A1, FOSL2, TENM3 etc
PAX6 and WT1
FOXC1, PITX2, often unknown
PAX6, PITX2, CYP1B1
ITPR1

WAGR and WAGRO Syndrome

WAGR syndrome derives its name from the primary clinical features: Wilms tumor (nephroblastoma), aniridia, genitourinary abnormalities, and mental retardation/range of developmental delays. This association was first described in 1964 [14]. It is a contiguous gene syndrome resulting from the deletion of genes on chromosome 11p13, most notably PAX6 and WT1 (Wilms' tumor) [132, 133].
Congenital aniridia is present in almost all cases. The clinical diagnosis of WAGR is confirmed when at least one additional primary WAGR feature accompanies congenital aniridia [133]. In patients with WAGR, the prevalence of specific features is as follows: Wilms tumor in 47%, congenital aniridia in 98%, genitourinary anomalies in 59% (males 85%, females 59%) and cognitive issues in 89% of the patients [134]. In cases where Wilms tumor develops, it typically manifests between the first and fifth year of life in 80–100% of affected individuals, with a median age of around 19 months at diagnosis [28, 134].
The proportion of sporadic aniridia is notably higher than familial cases in patients with WAGR. Individuals with sporadic aniridia face a 67-fold increased risk of developing Wilms tumor compared to the general population [135]. Notably, about 30% of sporadic aniridia cases are eventually diagnosed as WAGR syndrome [37, 75, 133].
WAGRO syndrome extends the WAGR acronym by including obesity as a common feature. Obesity is observed in a significant proportion of patients with WAGR, with prevalence ranging from 19 to 67%, depending on the study [133, 134, 136]. These findings highlight the complex and variable clinical presentation of WAGR syndrome and its related forms.

Axenfeld–Rieger Syndrome

Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome (ARS) encompasses a spectrum of anomalies that were originally described independently by Axenfeld, who identified posterior embryotoxon in 1920, and Rieger, who documented mesodermal dysgenesis in 1935 [119, 120]. The condition is rare, with a prevalence estimated at 1 in 50,000 to 100,000 [137].
ARS is characterized by bilateral ocular manifestations involving the iris, peripheral cornea, and chamber angle. A hallmark feature is posterior embryotoxon (Fig. 3), which results from anterior displacement of Schwalbe’s line and can vary in prominence. While the cornea is typically normal, abnormalities such as megalocornea or microcornea are sometimes observed. Gonioscopy often reveals tissue strands forming iridocorneal adhesions [138]. Iris abnormalities are a key feature of ARS, with findings such as iris hypoplasia, corectopia (pupil displacement frequently associated with high myopia or ectopia lentis), and polycoria (multiple pupil openings) [137]. Congenital or early-onset cataracts are also common in ARS [139]. Unlike CA, patients with ARS often exhibit posterior embryotoxon, relatively good visual acuity, and an absence of nystagmus, which can aid in distinguishing between the two conditions [83]. Glaucoma is a significant complication in ARS, affecting approximately 50% of patients with ARS, often leading to progressive visual loss [140]. In addition to ocular findings, ARS is associated with systemic abnormalities, including craniofacial features such as hypertelorism, dental anomalies such as hypodontia or microdontia, and distinctive periumbilical skin abnormalities [141]. Genetically, FOXC1 and PITX2 pathogenic variants are the most frequently identified causes of ARS. However, in approximately 60% of cases, the genetic basis remains undetected, highlighting the complexity of the condition [137]. The variability in both clinical presentation and genetic findings emphasizes the need for comprehensive evaluations to differentiate ARS from other anterior segment dysgenesis disorders, including classical CA.

Peters Anomaly and Peters-Plus Syndrome

Peters anomaly (PA) was first described in 1906 [18] and has since been categorized into subtypes based on clinical presentation. Type I is the milder form, characterized by central corneal opacity and iris strands that extend to the corneal endothelium. Type II, a more severe form, presents with central corneal opacity and lens abnormalities, including cataracts or adhesions between the lens and cornea [142]. Type I is more common than type II, and the ocular manifestations of PA can occur either unilaterally or bilaterally [143]. A frequent complication in PA is developmental glaucoma, which significantly impacts visual outcomes [144, 145].
Peters-plus syndrome is a condition in which PA is combined with systemic features such as craniofacial abnormalities, short stature, and developmental delay [146].
While PAX6 pathogenic variants are implicated in some cases of PA, pathogenic variants in other genes such as CYP1B1 and PITX2 are also known to cause the condition. Interestingly, a rare case has been reported in which PA co-occurred with congenital aniridia (CA) in a patient with a causative PAX6 pathogenic variants [147]. Most cases of PA are sporadic; however, it can be inherited in both autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive patterns [141, 148152]. These findings highlight the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of PA, as well as its overlap with other anterior segment dysgenesis disorders.

Gillespie Syndrome

Gillespie syndrome (GS) was first described by Frederick Gillespie in 1965. It is characterized by the combination of congenital aniridia/iris hypoplasia, cerebellar ataxia, intellectual disability (oligophrenia), and congenital hypotonia [20].
The aniridia associated with GS is typically bilateral and partial, characterized by aplasia of the centrally located iris tissue. Affected individuals often have fixed dilated pupils due to the impaired development of the iris sphincter and stromal tissues, leading to functional deficits in iris control [116]. GS is a rare disorder, with just over twenty families reported to date, and is caused by pathogenic variants in the ITPR1 gene [153].
Unlike classic aniridia, which is associated with a broader range of ocular abnormalities, iris abnormalities are the sole ocular manifestation in GS [116]. This distinction underscores the importance of genetic and clinical evaluation to differentiate GS from other forms of aniridia.

Ring-Chromosome 6 Syndrome

The presence of ring chromosomes is a rare phenomenon, with only a few reported cases of patients with Ring Chromosome 6 syndrome (RC6S). This condition is associated with a wide range of clinical features, including growth retardation, microcephaly, psychomotor retardation, and various ocular abnormalities [154]. Among the ocular manifestations, iris coloboma, strabismus, nystagmus, microphthalmia, optic nerve atrophy, posterior embryotoxon, and megalocornea have been reported [155158]. In one notable case, Zhang et al. identified FOXC1 pathogenic variants associated with RC6S, further linking the condition to anterior segment dysgenesis disorders [154]. These findings highlight the genetic and phenotypic complexity of RC6S, which encompasses both systemic and ocular abnormalities.

Molecular Diagnosis of Congenital Aniridia

Molecular studies in patients with congenital aniridia focus on identifying PAX6 variants to confirm the clinical diagnosis, facilitate the early detection of WAGR syndrome in sporadic cases, and thus identify individuals at an increased risk of developing renal Wilms tumor, as summarized in Table 2. Additionally, these studies aim to provide genetic counseling to families and enable options for prenatal or preimplantation genetic testing [65]. Figure 5 summarizes a genetic testing schema in subjects with congenital aniridia/anterior segment dysgenesis.
Table 2
Genetical testing in classical aniridia and in aniridia like-syndromes
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40123-025-01122-1/MediaObjects/40123_2025_1122_Tab2_HTML.png
PAX6 paired box protein 6; FOXC1 forkhead box C1, PITX2 paired like homeodomain 2; CYP1B1 cytochrome P450 1B1; FOXD3 forkhead box D3; PITX3 paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 3; CPAMD8 C3 and PZP-like alpha-2-macroglobulin domain-containing protein 8; ITPR1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1; TENM3 teneurin transmembrane protein 3; TRIM4 tripartite motif containing 44; COL4A1 collagen type IV alpha 1 chain; CRYAA crystallin alpha A; PXDN peroxidasin, MLPA multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique; CGH-array comparative genomic hybridization arrays; NGS next generation sequencing; FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization; CES clinical exome sequencing; WES whole exome sequencing; WGS whole genome sequencing
Fig. 5
Genetic testing schema in subjects with congenital aniridia/ anterior segment dysgenesis
Bild vergrößern
Genetic diagnostics are critical in newborns and children under 5–10 years of age to rule out deletions affecting PAX6 and its neighboring gene WT1, particularly in the context of WAGR syndrome. For this purpose, 11p13 microdeletions should be screened in specialized genetic laboratories using advanced molecular techniques, with a preference for comparative genomic hybridization arrays (CGH-array). In addition to commercial CGH-array options, some custom designs enriched for the WAGR locus provide advantages, such as improved sensitivity for delineating the size of deletions [159]. Other genetic methods for detecting 11p13 deletions include the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique, which utilizes commercially available designs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches, such as panel-based sequencing or exome sequencing, may also detect 11p13 microdeletions, but their sensitivity depends on the specific methodology and the captured genomic regions. However, these molecular approaches are unable to detect inversions, translocations, or balanced rearrangements. In such cases, cytogenetic techniques, such as high-resolution karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), can be valuable.
Recently, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and optical genome mapping (OGM) have emerged as effective alternatives for detecting all types of structural variants. WGS, whether based on short-read sequencing [160] or more advanced third-generation sequencing based on long-read sequencing, has uncovered cryptic structural variants, such as inversions and translocations, that result in PAX6 haploinsufficiency in patients who lack detectable PAX6 pathogenic variants [161]. These innovative technologies provide comprehensive solutions for identifying complex genetic rearrangements.
In the diagnostic algorithm for aniridia, particularly in sporadic non-syndromic cases, in patients older than 10 years, or those with a family history, screening for specific genetic variants should be prioritized. Traditionally, this was achieved by sequencing coding exons and canonical splicing regions of PAX6 using Sanger sequencing [159, 162]. However, with the rapid adoption of NGS technologies over the past decade, PAX6 screening is now routinely performed in many laboratories using capture-based NGS approaches.
Over time, the methods for PAX6 analysis via NGS have evolved alongside reductions in the cost of this technology. Initially, several laboratories developed customized designs to capture PAX6 regions, some of which included comprehensive locus screening by targeting non-coding regions (such as introns, UTRs, and regulatory regions) [77]. Other panel-based designs have expanded to include genes implicated in anterior segment dysgenesis (e.g., CPAMD8) and even broader ocular malformations [12, 116, 163], facilitating a differential diagnosis within the same analysis [65, 77].
Currently, exome sequencing (WES) is becoming more routine and cost-effective for identifying PAX6 pathogenic variants and related variants. Additionally, WGS is increasingly employed, particularly for PAX6-negative patients, as it extends screening to non-coding regions and provides higher specificity for detecting structural variants.
Looking ahead, the future of genetic testing for aniridia lies in the widespread implementation of WGS as a single molecular testing approach. This would encompass comprehensive screening for all patients with CA or related anterior segment anomalies, improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling better management of these conditions.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Foundation for its support.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jonathan Hall, Marta Corton, Fabian Norbert Fries, Jessica Obst, Clara Grünauer-Kloevekorn, Berthold Seitz, Maria della Volpe Waizel, Eszter Jávorszky, Kálmán Tory, Erika Maka, Maryam Amini, Shweta Suiwal, Tanja Stachon and Nóra Szentmáry have no conflict of interests to declare. Nóra Szentmáry is an Editorial Board member of Ophthalmology and Therapy. Nóra Szentmáry was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions.

Ethical Approval

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Download
Titel
Comprehensive Analysis of Congenital Aniridia and Differential Diagnoses: Genetic Insights and Clinical Manifestations
Verfasst von
Jonathan Hall
Marta Corton
Fabian Norbert Fries
Jessica Obst
Clara Grünauer-Kloevekorn
Berthold Seitz
Maria della Volpe Waizel
Eszter Jávorszky
Kálmán Tory
Erika Maka
Maryam Amini
Shweta Suiwal
Tanja Stachon
Nóra Szentmáry
Publikationsdatum
26.03.2025
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Ophthalmology and Therapy / Ausgabe 5/2025
Print ISSN: 2193-8245
Elektronische ISSN: 2193-6528
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01122-1
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoi T, Nishina S, Fukami M, et al. Genotype–phenotype correlation of PAX6 gene mutations in aniridia. Hum Genome Var. 2016;3(1):15052.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(10):1011–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gescheidt A. Die Irideremie, das Iridoschis-ma und die Corectopie, die drei wesentlichs-ten Bildungsfehler der Iris. Journ Chir Augenheilkunde (C F von Graefe). 1834;22:267–300.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrbach JM. Zur Geschichte der Aniridie. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018;235(03):324–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvão-Pires P, Santos-Silva R, Falcão-Reis F, Rocha-Sousa A. Congenital aniridia: clinic, genetics, therapeutics, and prognosis. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014: 305350.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Käsmann-Kellner B, Fries FN, Latta L, Seitz B. Aniridie bei PAX6-Syndrom: Eine potenziell zur Erblindung führende Erkrankung Etablierung eines Deutschen Aniridie-Registers. 2019:12–8.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fries FN, Naray A, Munteanu C, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of 556 eyes entering the Homburg Aniridia Center. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024;241(3):275–82.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lima Cunha D, Arno G, Corton M, Moosajee M. The spectrum of PAX6 mutations and genotype–phenotype correlations in the eye. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(12):1050.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagali N, Wowra B, Fries FN, et al. PAX6 mutational status determines aniridia-associated keratopathy phenotype. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(2):273–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Alzuhairy S, Abu-Amero KK, Al-Shahwan S, Edward DP. A novel CYP1B1 mutation with congenital glaucoma and total aniridia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(1):89–91.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tibrewal S, Ratna R, Gour A, et al. Clinical and molecular aspects of congenital aniridia - a review of current concepts. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(7):2280–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel A, Hayward JD, Tailor V, et al. The Oculome Panel Test: next-generation sequencing to diagnose a diverse range of genetic developmental eye disorders. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(6):888–907.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonet-Fernández JM, Aroca-Aguilar JD, Corton M, et al. CPAMD8 loss-of-function underlies non-dominant congenital glaucoma with variable anterior segment dysgenesis and abnormal extracellular matrix. Hum Genet. 2020;139(10):1209–31.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller RW, Fraumeni JF, Manning MD. Association of Wilms’s tumor with aniridia, hemihypertrophy and other congenital malformations. N Engl J Med. 1964;270(18):922–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Marlin S, Couet D, Lacombe D, Cessans C, Bonneau D. Obesity: a new feature of WAGE (del 11p) syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol. 1994;3(3):255–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bremond-Gignac D, Crolla JA, Copin H, et al. Combination of WAGR and Potocki-Shaffer contiguous deletion syndromes in a patient with an 11p11.2–p14 deletion. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13(4):409–13.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker FA, Dyson C. Dominantly inherited aniridia associated with mental retardation and other eye abnormalities. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1974;10(7):147–9.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters A. Ueber angeborene defektbildung der descemetschen membran. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1906;44:27–40.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl ED. Anterior segment dysgenesis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2014;54(3):95–104.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillespie FD. Aniridia, cerebellar ataxia, and oligophrenia in siblings. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73:338–41.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chitayat D, Hahm SY, Iqbal MA, Nitowsky HM. Ring chromosome 6: report of a patient and literature review. Am J Med Genet. 1987;26(1):145–51.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Margo CE. Congenital aniridia: a histopathologic study of the anterior segment in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1983;20(5):192–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant WM, Walton DS. Progressive changes in the angle in congenital aniridia, with development of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;78(5):842–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Eden U, Riise R, Tornqvist K. Corneal involvement in congenital aniridia. Cornea. 2010;29(10):1096–102.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishida K, Kinoshita S, Ohashi Y, Kuwayama Y, Yamamoto S. Ocular surface abnormalities in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(3):368–75.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Samant M, Chauhan BK, Lathrop KL, Nischal KK. Congenital aniridia: etiology, manifestations and management. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11(2):135–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagali N, Wowra B, Fries FN, et al. Early phenotypic features of aniridia-associated keratopathy and association with PAX6 coding mutations. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(1):130–40.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Käsmann-Kellner B, Seitz B. Aniridia syndrome: clinical findings, problematic courses and suggestions for optimization of care (“aniridia guide”). Ophthalmologe. 2014;111(12):1145–56.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramaesh K, Ramaesh T, Dutton GN, Dhillon B. Evolving concepts on the pathogenic mechanisms of aniridia related keratopathy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37(3):547–57.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagali N, Eden U, Utheim TP, et al. In vivo morphology of the limbal palisades of Vogt correlates with progressive stem cell deficiency in aniridia-related keratopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5333–42.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagali N, Wowra B, Dobrowolski D, Utheim TP, Fagerholm P, Wylegala E. Stage-related central corneal epithelial transformation in congenital aniridia-associated keratopathy. Ocul Surf. 2018;16(1):163–72.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Csorba A, Kormányos K, Csidey M, et al. Examination of subbasal nerve plexus and central corneal stromal microstructure in subjects with congenital aniridia, using in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy. Curr Eye Res. 2024;49(6):582–90.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Náray A, Fries FN, Munteanu C, Csidey M, Stachon T, Lagali N, Langenbucher A, Kasmann-Kellner B, Seitz B, Szentmáry N. The effect of lens properties on visual acuity, aniridia-associated keratopathy and secondary glaucoma in congenital aniridia subjects. Curr Eye Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2438687.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jastaneiah S, Al-Rajhi AA. Association of aniridia and dry eyes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(9):1535–40.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Landsend ECS, Pedersen HR, Utheim ØA, et al. Meibomian gland dysfunction and keratopathy are associated with dry eye disease in aniridia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(1):119–24.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gramer E, Reiter C, Gramer G. Glaucoma and frequency of ocular and general diseases in 30 patients with aniridia: a clinical study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(1):104–10.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson LB, Spaeth GL, Nowinski TS, Margo CE, Jackson L. Aniridia. A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28(6):621–42.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Landsend ECS, Lagali N, Utheim TP. Congenital aniridia - a comprehensive review of clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66(6):1031–50.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler PAG, W.M. Lectures on Glaucoma. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1965.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain A, Gupta S, James MK, Dutta P, Gupta V. Aniridic glaucoma: long-term visual outcomes and phenotypic associations. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(7):539–42.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh B, Mohamed A, Chaurasia S, et al. Clinical manifestations of congenital aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014;51(1):59–62.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Edén U, Lagali N, Dellby A, et al. Cataract development in Norwegian patients with congenital aniridia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(2):e165–7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Gour A, Tibrewal S, Garg A, Vohra M, Ratna R, Sangwan VS. New horizons in aniridia management: clinical insights and therapeutic advances. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023;13(4):467–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SH, Park YG, Lee MY, Kim MS. Clinical features of Korean patients with congenital aniridia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(5):291–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider S, Osher RH, Burk SE, Lutz TB, Montione R. Thinning of the anterior capsule associated with congenital aniridia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(3):523–5.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Yu YS. Congenital aniridia: long-term clinical course, visual outcome, and prognostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28(6):479–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta SK, De Becker I, Tremblay F, Guernsey DL, Neumann PE. Genotype/phenotype correlations in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(2):203–10.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hingorani M, Williamson KA, Moore AT, van Heyningen V. Detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of 43 individuals with PAX6 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2581–90.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmström G, Eriksson U, Hellgren K, Larsson E. Optical coherence tomography is helpful in the diagnosis of foveal hypoplasia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(4):439–42.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas MG, Kumar A, Mohammad S, et al. Structural grading of foveal hypoplasia using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a predictor of visual acuity? Ophthalmology. 2011;118(8):1653–60.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Tremblay F, Gupta SK, De Becker I, Guernsey DL, Neumann PE. Effects of PAX6 mutations on retinal function: an electroretinographic study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(2):211–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Dangremond T, Wang K, Helms M, Bhattarai S, Pfeifer W, Drack AV. Correlation between electroretinography, foveal anatomy and visual acuity in aniridia due to PAX6 mutations. Doc Ophthalmol. 2021;143(3):283–95.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat McCulley TJ, Mayer K, Dahr SS, Simpson J, Holland EJ. Aniridia and optic nerve hypoplasia. Eye (Lond). 2005;19(7):762–4.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Layman PR, Anderson DR, Flynn JT. Frequent occurrence of hypoplastic optic disks in patients with aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77(4):513–6.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt AW, Kearns LS, Jamieson RV, Williamson KA, van Heyningen V, Mackey DA. PAX6 mutations may be associated with high myopia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2007;28(3):179–82.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Obst J, Fries FN, Amini M, Naray A, Munteanu C, Stachon T, Suiwal S, Lagali N, Seitz B, Käsmann-Kellner B, Szentmáry N. Systemic diseases in patients with congenital aniridia – a report from the Homburg Registry for Congenital Aniridia. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01084-w.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser T, Walton DS, Maas RL. Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and aniridia mutations in the human PAX6 gene. Nat Genet. 1992;2(3):232–9.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Walther C, Gruss P. Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development. 1991;113(4):1435–49.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishina S, Kohsaka S, Yamaguchi Y, et al. PAX6 expression in the developing human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(6):723–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Latta L, Figueiredo FC, Ashery-Padan R, et al. Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy: developmental aspects and unanswered questions. Ocul Surf. 2021;22:245–66.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan T, Hanson I, Zaletayev D, et al. The human PAX6 gene is mutated in two patients with aniridia. Nat Genet. 1992;1(5):328–32.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser T, Jepeal L, Edwards JG, Young SR, Favor J, Maas RL. PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects. Nat Genet. 1994;7(4):463–71.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu HE, Rould MA, Xu W, Epstein JA, Maas RL, Pabo CO. Crystal structure of the human Pax6 paired domain-DNA complex reveals specific roles for the linker region and carboxy-terminal subdomain in DNA binding. Genes Dev. 1999;13(10):1263–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn JC, West JD, Hill RE. Multiple functions for Pax6 in mouse eye and nasal development. Genes Dev. 1996;10(4):435–46.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanco-Kelly F, Tarilonte M, Villamar M, et al. Genética y epidemiología de la aniridia congénita: actualización de buenas prácticas para el diagnóstico genético. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2021;96:4–14.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Filatova AY, Vasilyeva TA, Marakhonov AV, Voskresenskaya AA, Zinchenko RA, Skoblov MY. Functional reassessment of PAX6 single nucleotide variants by in vitro splicing assay. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(3):488–93.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson KA, Hall HN, Owen LJ, et al. Recurrent heterozygous PAX6 missense variants cause severe bilateral microphthalmia via predictable effects on DNA-protein interaction. Genet Med. 2020;22(3):598–609.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Cross E, Duncan-Flavell PJ, Howarth RJ, Crooks RO, Thomas NS, Bunyan DJ. Screening of a large PAX6 cohort identified many novel variants and emphasises the importance of the paired and homeobox domains. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63(7): 103940.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Suh Y, Jeong H, et al. Aberrant expression of PAX6 gene associated with classical aniridia: identification and functional characterization of novel noncoding mutations. J Hum Genet. 2021;66(3):333–8.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C, Yang W, Li X, et al. A novel PAX6 frameshift mutation identified in a large Chinese family with congenital aniridia. J Pers Med. 2023;13(3):442.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Lauderdale JD, Wilensky JS, Oliver ER, Walton DS, Glaser T. 3’ deletions cause aniridia by preventing PAX6 gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(25):13755–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayrakli F, Guney I, Bayri Y, et al. A novel heterozygous deletion within the 3’ region of the PAX6 gene causing isolated aniridia in a large family group. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(12):1610–4.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng F, Song W, Kang Y, Yu S, Yuan H. A 556 kb deletion in the downstream region of the PAX6 gene causes familial aniridia and other eye anomalies in a Chinese family. Mol Vis. 2011;17:448–55.PubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Wawrocka A, Budny B, Debicki S, Jamsheer A, Sowinska A, Krawczynski MR. PAX6 3’ deletion in a family with aniridia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2012;33(1):44–8.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Wawrocka A, Krawczynski MR. The genetics of aniridia - simple things become complicated. J Appl Genet. 2018;59(2):151–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatia S, Bengani H, Fish M, et al. Disruption of autoregulatory feedback by a mutation in a remote, ultraconserved PAX6 enhancer causes aniridia. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93(6):1126–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Plaisancié J, Tarilonte M, Ramos P, et al. Implication of non-coding PAX6 mutations in aniridia. Hum Genet. 2018;137(10):831–46.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzoulaki I, White IM, Hanson IM. PAX6 mutations: genotype–phenotype correlations. BMC Genet. 2005;6:27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamayo A, Núñez-Moreno G, Ruiz C, et al. Minigene splicing assays and long-read sequencing to unravel pathogenic deep-intronic variants in PAX6 in congenital aniridia. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021562.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Tang HK, Lee JY, Saunders GF. Truncation mutations in the transactivation region of PAX6 result in dominant-negative mutants. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(34):21531–41.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan MK, Cvekl A, Li X, Piatigorsky J. Truncated forms of Pax-6 disrupt lens morphology in transgenic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(2):464–73.PubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal S, Jinda W, Limwongse C, Atchaneeyasakul LO, Phadke SR. Run-on mutation in the PAX6 gene and chorioretinal degeneration in autosomal dominant aniridia. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1305–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Moosajee M, Hingorani M, Moore AT. PAX6-related aniridia. 2003 (Updated 2018 Oct 18). In: GeneReviews ((R)) [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle. Last accessed: December 19th 2024 - Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1360/.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt-Sidor B, Szymańska K, Williamson K, et al. Malformations of the brain in two fetuses with a compound heterozygosity for two PAX6 mutations. Folia Neuropathol. 2009;47(4):372–82.PubMed
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon BD, Pineda-Alvarez DE, Balog JZ, et al. Compound heterozygosity for mutations in PAX6 in a patient with complex brain anomaly, neonatal diabetes mellitus, and microophthalmia. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(11):2543–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarilonte M, Morín M, Ramos P, et al. Parental mosaicism in PAX6 causes intra-familial variability: implications for genetic counseling of congenital aniridia and microphthalmia. Front Genet. 2018;9:479.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Lima Cunha D, Owen N, Tailor V, Corton M, Theodorou M, Moosajee M. PAX6 missense variants in two families with isolated foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus: evidence of paternal postzygotic mosaicism. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(2):349–55.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma AS, Grigg JR, Jamieson RV. Phenotype–genotype correlations and emerging pathways in ocular anterior segment dysgenesis. Hum Genet. 2019;138(8–9):899–915.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Myatt SS, Lam EW. The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(11):847–59.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Tümer Z, Bach-Holm D. Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome and spectrum of PITX2 and FOXC1 mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(12):1527–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann OJ, Sowden JC, Carlsson P, Jordan T, Bhattacharya SS. Fox’s in development and disease. Trends Genet. 2003;19(6):339–44.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Kloss BA, Reis LM, Brémond-Gignac D, Glaser T, Semina EV. Analysis of FOXD3 sequence variation in human ocular disease. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1740–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishimura DY, Swiderski RE, Alward WL, et al. The forkhead transcription factor gene FKHL7 is responsible for glaucoma phenotypes which map to 6p25. Nat Genet. 1998;19(2):140–7.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Mears AJ, Jordan T, Mirzayans F, et al. Mutations of the forkhead/winged-helix gene, FKHL7, in patients with Axenfeld–Rieger anomaly. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(5):1316–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishimura DY, Searby CC, Alward WL, et al. A spectrum of FOXC1 mutations suggests gene dosage as a mechanism for developmental defects of the anterior chamber of the eye. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(2):364–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis LM, Tyler RC, Volkmann Kloss BA, et al. PITX2 and FOXC1 spectrum of mutations in ocular syndromes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(12):1224–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansari M, Rainger J, Hanson IM, et al. Genetic analysis of “PAX6-negative” individuals with Aniridia or Gillespie syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4): e0153757.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito YA, Footz TK, Berry FB, et al. Severe molecular defects of a novel FOXC1 W152G mutation result in aniridia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(8):3573–9.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Al-Amri A. Heterozygous FOXC1 mutation (M161K) associated with congenital glaucoma and aniridia in an infant and a milder phenotype in her mother. Ophthalmic Genet. 2008;29(2):67–71.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis LM, Maheshwari M, Capasso J, et al. Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome: more than meets the eye. J Med Genet. 2023;60(4):368–79.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis LM, Sorokina EA, Dudakova L, et al. Comprehensive phenotypic and functional analysis of dominant and recessive FOXE3 alleles in ocular developmental disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2021;30(17):1591–606.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray JC, Bennett SR, Kwitek AE, et al. Linkage of Rieger syndrome to the region of the epidermal growth factor gene on chromosome 4. Nat Genet. 1992;2(1):46–9.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Semina EV, Reiter R, Leysens NJ, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel bicoid-related homeobox transcription factor gene, RIEG, involved in Rieger syndrome. Nat Genet. 1996;14(4):392–9.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Protas ME, Weh E, Footz T, et al. Mutations of conserved non-coding elements of PITX2 in patients with ocular dysgenesis and developmental glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(18):3630–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Perveen R, Lloyd IC, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Phenotypic variability and asymmetry of Rieger syndrome associated with PITX2 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(9):2456–60.PubMed
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Law SK, Sami M, Piri N, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Asymmetric phenotype of Axenfeld–Rieger anomaly and aniridia associated with a novel PITX2 mutation. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1231–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Semina EV. pitx2 deficiency results in abnormal ocular and craniofacial development in zebrafish. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1): e30896.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Mucchielli ML, Mitsiadis TA, Raffo S, Brunet JF, Proust JP, Goridis C. Mouse Otlx2/RIEG expression in the odontogenic epithelium precedes tooth initiation and requires mesenchyme-derived signals for its maintenance. Dev Biol. 1997;189(2):275–84.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CR, Kioussi C, O’Connell S, et al. Pitx2 regulates lung asymmetry, cardiac positioning and pituitary and tooth morphogenesis. Nature. 1999;401(6750):279–82.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang YM, Wo YY, Stewart J, et al. Isolation and characterization of the human cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(45):28324–30.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Bejjani BA, Lewis RA, Tomey KF, et al. Mutations in CYP1B1, the gene for cytochrome P4501B1, are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(2):325–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Bejjani BA, Stockton DW, Lewis RA, et al. Multiple CYP1B1 mutations and incomplete penetrance in an inbred population segregating primary congenital glaucoma suggest frequent de novo events and a dominant modifier locus. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(3):367–74.PubMedCrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarfarazi M, Akarsu AN, Hossain A, et al. Assignment of a locus (GLC3A) for primary congenital glaucoma (buphthalmos) to 2p21 and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Genomics. 1995;30(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Doshi M, Marcus C, Bejjani BA, Edward DP. Immunolocalization of CYP1B1 in normal, human, fetal and adult eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82(1):24–32.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarfarazi M, Stoilov I. Molecular genetics of primary congenital glaucoma. Eye. 2000;14(3):422–8.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall HN, Williamson KA, FitzPatrick DR. The genetic architecture of Aniridia and Gillespie syndrome. Hum Genetics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1934-8.CrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao M, Smith RS, Alavi MV, et al. Strain-dependent anterior segment dysgenesis and progression to glaucoma in Col4a1 mutant mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6823–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Alavi MV, Mao M, Pawlikowski B, et al. Col4a1 mutations cause progressive retinal neovascular defects and retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Axenfeld T. Embryotoxon corneae posterius. Ber Deutsh Ophthalmol Gesellsch. 1920;42:301–2.
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieger H. Dysgenesus mesodermalis corneae etiridis. Z Augenheilkd. 1935;86:333.
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Zazo-Seco C, Plaisancié J, Bitoun P, et al. Novel PXDN biallelic variants in patients with microphthalmia and anterior segment dysgenesis. J Hum Genet. 2020;65(5):487–91.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Zucco J, Baldan F, Allegri L, et al. A bird’s eye view on the use of whole exome sequencing in rare congenital ophthalmic diseases. J Hum Genet. 2024;69(6):271–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma A, Yousoof S, Grigg JR, et al. Revealing hidden genetic diagnoses in the ocular anterior segment disorders. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1623–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Smits JG, Cunha DL, Amini M, et al. Multi-omics analyses identify transcription factor interplay in corneal epithelial fate determination and disease. bioRxiv. 2023;18:180.
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu F, Xu X, Zheng B, et al. Case Report: expansion of phenotypic and genotypic data in TENM3-related syndrome: report of two cases. Front Pediatr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1111771.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Qin G, Chen G, et al. Variants in TRIM44 cause Aniridia by impairing PAX6 expression. Hum Mutat. 2015;36(12):1164–7.PubMedCrossRef
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Carthagena L, Bergamaschi A, Luna JM, et al. Human TRIM gene expression in response to interferons. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3): e4894.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Z, Lin T-C, Bi X, et al. TRIM44 promotes quiescent multiple myeloma cell occupancy and survival in the osteoblastic niche via HIF-1α stabilization. Leukemia. 2019;33(2):469–86.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashimoto K, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Overexpression of TRIM44 contributes to malignant outcome in gastric carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(11):2021–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaguchi T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, et al. Overexpression of TRIM44 is related to invasive potential and malignant outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2017;39(6):1010428317700409.CrossRef
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasai N, Mizuseki K, Sasai Y. Requirement of FoxD3-class signaling for neural crest determination in Xenopus. Development. 2001;128(13):2525–36.PubMedCrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Riccardi VM, Sujansky E, Smith AC, Francke U. Chromosomal imbalance in the aniridia-Wilms’ tumor association: 11p interstitial deletion. Pediatrics. 1978;61(4):604–10.PubMedCrossRef
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbach B, Trout KL, Lewis JB, Luis CA, Sika M. WAGR syndrome: a clinical review of 54 cases. Pediatrics. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0467.CrossRefPubMed
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy KA, Trout KL, Gunckle JM, Krantz SM, Morris J, Kalish JM. Results from the WAGR syndrome patient registry: characterization of WAGR spectrum and recommendations for care management. Front Pediatr. 2021;9: 733018.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Grønskov K, Olsen JH, Sand A, et al. Population-based risk estimates of Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia. A comprehensive mutation screening procedure of PAX6 identifies 80% of mutations in aniridia. Hum Genet. 2001;109(1):11–8.PubMedCrossRef
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Han JC, Liu QR, Jones M, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and obesity in the WAGR syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):918–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifi M, Walter MA. Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome. Clin Genet. 2018;93(6):1123–30.PubMedCrossRef
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Shields MB, Buckley E, Klintworth GK, Thresher R. Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome. A spectrum of developmental disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1985;29(6):387–409.PubMedCrossRef
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Michels K, Bohnsack BL. Ophthalmological manifestations of Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:819–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Sowden JC. Molecular and developmental mechanisms of anterior segment dysgenesis. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(10):1310–8.PubMedCrossRef
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito YA, Walter MA. Genomics and anterior segment dysgenesis: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42(1):13–24.PubMedCrossRef
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaidman GW, Flanagan JK, Furey CC. Long-term visual prognosis in children after corneal transplant surgery for Peters anomaly type I. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(1):104–8.PubMedCrossRef
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Elbaz U, Ali A, Strungaru H, Mireskandari K. Phenotypic spectrum of Peters anomaly: implications for management. Cornea. 2022;41(2):192–200.PubMedCrossRef
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhandari R, Ferri S, Whittaker B, Liu M, Lazzaro DR. Peters anomaly: review of the literature. Cornea. 2011;30(8):939–44.PubMedCrossRef
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozeki H, Shirai S, Nozaki M, et al. Ocular and systemic features of Peters’ anomaly. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(10):833–9.PubMedCrossRef
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Buy Wenniger-Prick LJJMMD, Hennekam RCM. The Peters’ plus syndrome: a review. Ann Genet. 2002;45(2):97–103.CrossRef
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawada M, Sato M, Hikoya A, et al. A case of aniridia with unilateral Peters anomaly. J AAPOS. 2011;15(1):104–6.PubMedCrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanson IM, Fletcher JM, Jordan T, et al. Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters’ anomaly. Nat Genet. 1994;6(2):168–73.PubMedCrossRef
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanjo Y, Kawasaki S, Mori K, Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Kinoshita S. A novel mutation in the alternative splice region of the PAX6 gene in a patient with Peters’ anomaly. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(5):720–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent A, Billingsley G, Priston M, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity of CYP1B1: mutations in a patient with Peters’ anomaly. J Med Genet. 2001;38(5):324–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Doward W, Perveen R, Lloyd IC, Ridgway AE, Wilson L, Black GC. A mutation in the RIEG1 gene associated with Peters’ anomaly. J Med Genet. 1999;36(2):152–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Weisschuh N, Wolf C, Wissinger B, Gramer E. A novel mutation in the FOXC1 gene in a family with Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome and Peters’ anomaly. Clin Genet. 2008;74(5):476–80.PubMedCrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber S, Alzayady KJ, Bürglen L, et al. Recessive and dominant de novo ITPR1 mutations cause Gillespie syndrome. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2016.
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang HZ, Li P, Wang D, et al. FOXC1 gene deletion is associated with eye anomalies in ring chromosome 6. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A(3):280–7.PubMedCrossRef
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Salamanca-Gonez F, Nava S, Armendares S. Ring chromosome 6 in a malformed boy. Clin Genet. 1975;8(5):370–5.PubMedCrossRef
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore CM, Heller RH, Thomas GH. Developmental abnormalities associated with a ring chromosome 6. J Med Genet. 1973;10(3):299–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Berghe H, Fryns JP, Cassiman JJ, David G. [Ring chromosome 6. Karotype 46, XY, r (6)-45, XY,-6]. Ann Genet. 1974;17(1):29–35.PubMed
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishi Y, Yoshimura O, Ohama K, Usui T. Ring chromosome 6: case report and review. Am J Med Genet. 1982;12(1):109–14.PubMedCrossRef
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanco-Kelly F, Villaverde-Montero C, Lorda-Sánchez I, Millán JM, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ayuso C. Guidelines for genetic study of aniridia. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2013;88(4):145–52.PubMedCrossRef
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall HN, Parry D, Halachev M, et al. Short-read whole genome sequencing identifies causative variants in most individuals with previously unexplained aniridia. J Med Genet. 2024;61(3):250–61.PubMedCrossRef
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Damián A, Núñez-Moreno G, Jubin C, et al. Long-read genome sequencing identifies cryptic structural variants in congenital aniridia cases. Hum Genomics. 2023;17(1):45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson R, Hingorani M, Van Heyningen V, Gregory-Evans C, Moosajee M. Clinical utility gene card for: Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Bateman B, Maumenee I. Re: Patel et al.: The Oculome Panel Test: next-generation sequencing to diagnose a diverse range of genetic developmental eye disorders (Ophthalmology. 2019;126:888–907). Ophthalmology. 2020;127(4):e22.PubMedCrossRef

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Jede zehnte tödliche Verlauf einer Infektion durch Adipositas bedingt

Je höher der BMI, umso höher ist das Risiko, bei einer Infektion zu sterben. Das gilt nicht nur für Covid-19, sondern für Infektionen allgemein. Bei einer Grad-III-Adipositas ist die Mortalität während einer Infektion sogar verdreifacht. Darauf deuten Daten aus Finnland und Großbritannien.

Fazialisparese in der Liquordiagnostik aufgeklärt

Periphere Fazialisparesen sollten nicht vorschnell als idiopathisch klassifiziert werden. Vor allem bei atypischen Manifestationen gilt es, auf dem Quivive zu sein. Der Fall einer 73-Jährigen zeigt, warum.

Demografische Variablen mit dem Rezidivrisiko bei Darmpolypen assoziiert

Bei der Festlegung der Intervalle für Kontrollkoloskopien nach einer Polypektomie sollten nicht ausschließlich polypenbezogene Merkmale berücksichtigt werden. Wie eine internationale Studie zeigt, beeinflussen auch individuelle demografische Faktoren, wie Geschlecht, Body-Mass-Index und Ethnie, das Rezidivrisiko.

Ist die Mundmikrobiota mit Pankreaskrebs assoziiert?

In einer Kohortenstudie wurde ein Zusammenhang zwischen oralen Bakterien und Pilzen und dem Auftreten von Pankreaskarzinomen gesehen. Diese Assoziation könnte helfen, Patientinnen und Patienten für gezielte Vorsorgeuntersuchungen ausfindig zu machen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Lumbalpunktion/© Felipe Caparrós / stock.adobe.com, Vorbereitung für Koloskopie/© Eugene Nekrasov / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Eine Speichelprobe wird entnommen/© Animaflora PicsStock / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell)