Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Chest

Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening

verfasst von: Ernst Th. Scholten, Nanda Horeweg, Harry J. de Koning, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Matthijs Oudkerk, Willem P. Th. M. Mali, Pim A. de Jong

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To analyse computed tomography (CT) findings of interval and post-screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening.

Methods

Consecutive interval and post-screen carcinomas from the Dutch–Belgium lung cancer screening trial were included. The prior screening and the diagnostic chest CT were reviewed by two experienced radiologists in consensus with knowledge of the tumour location on the diagnostic CT.

Results

Sixty-one participants (53 men) were diagnosed with an interval or post-screen carcinoma. Twenty-two (36 %) were in retrospect visible on the prior screening CT. Detection error occurred in 20 cancers and interpretation error in two cancers. Errors involved intrabronchial tumour (n = 5), bulla with wall thickening (n = 5), lymphadenopathy (n = 3), pleural effusion (n = 1) and intraparenchymal solid nodules (n = 8). These were missed because of a broad pleural attachment (n = 4), extensive reticulation surrounding a nodule (n = 1) and extensive scarring (n = 1). No definite explanation other than human error was found in two cases. None of the interval or post-screen carcinomas involved a subsolid nodule.

Conclusions

Interval or post-screen carcinomas that were visible in retrospect were mostly due to detection errors of solid nodules, bulla wall thickening or endobronchial lesions. Interval or post-screen carcinomas without explanation other than human errors are rare.

Key points

• 22 % of missed carcinomas originally presented as bulla wall thickening on CT.
• 22 % of missed carcinomas originally presented as endobronchial lesions on CT.
• All malignant endobronchial lesions presented as interval carcinomas.
• In the NELSON trial subsolid nodules were not a source of missed carcinomas.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874PubMedCrossRef van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black W et al (2011) The national lung screening trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black W et al (2011) The national lung screening trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen JH, Ashraf H, Dirksen A et al (2009) The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial–overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol 4:608–614PubMedCrossRef Pedersen JH, Ashraf H, Dirksen A et al (2009) The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial–overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol 4:608–614PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Infante M, Lutman FR, Cavuto S et al (2008) Lung cancer screening with spiral CT: baseline results of the randomized DANTE trial. Lung Cancer 59:355–363PubMedCrossRef Infante M, Lutman FR, Cavuto S et al (2008) Lung cancer screening with spiral CT: baseline results of the randomized DANTE trial. Lung Cancer 59:355–363PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M et al (2009) Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 64:34–40PubMedCrossRef Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M et al (2009) Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 64:34–40PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781PubMedCrossRef Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardanesh M, White C (2012) Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 33:280–287PubMedCrossRef Fardanesh M, White C (2012) Missed lung cancer on chest radiography and computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 33:280–287PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al (1999) Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Radiology 212:61–66PubMedCrossRef Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al (1999) Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Radiology 212:61–66PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG 3rd, Doi K (2002) Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 225:673–683PubMedCrossRef Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG 3rd, Doi K (2002) Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 225:673–683PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A et al (2006) Pulmonary nodules: estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT—effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists. Radiology 239:276–284PubMedCrossRef Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A et al (2006) Pulmonary nodules: estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT—effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists. Radiology 239:276–284PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, Itoh S, Ishigaki T (2001) Automated detection of pulmonar nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:595–604PubMedCrossRef Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, Itoh S, Ishigaki T (2001) Automated detection of pulmonar nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:595–604PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Armato SG 3rd, Roy AS, Macmahon H et al (2005) Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1). Acad Radiol 12:337–346PubMedCrossRef Armato SG 3rd, Roy AS, Macmahon H et al (2005) Evaluation of automated lung nodule detection on low-dose computed tomography scans from a lung cancer screening program(1). Acad Radiol 12:337–346PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Giger ML, Bae KT, MacMahon H (1994) Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images. Investig Radiol 29:459–465CrossRef Giger ML, Bae KT, MacMahon H (1994) Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images. Investig Radiol 29:459–465CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Q, Li F, Doi K (2008) Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. Acad Radiol 15:165–175PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Li Q, Li F, Doi K (2008) Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. Acad Radiol 15:165–175PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Godoy MC, Cooperberg PL, Maizlin ZV et al (2008) Detection sensitivity of a commercial lung nodule CAD system in a series of pathologically proven lung cancers. J Thorac Imaging 23:1–6PubMedCrossRef Godoy MC, Cooperberg PL, Maizlin ZV et al (2008) Detection sensitivity of a commercial lung nodule CAD system in a series of pathologically proven lung cancers. J Thorac Imaging 23:1–6PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan R, Vos PM, Cooperberg PL (2006) Computer-aided detection in screening CT for pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 186:1280–1287CrossRef Yuan R, Vos PM, Cooperberg PL (2006) Computer-aided detection in screening CT for pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 186:1280–1287CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldin JG, Brown MS, Petkovska I (2008) Computer-aided diagnosis in lung nodule assessment. J Thorac Imaging 23:97–104PubMedCrossRef Goldin JG, Brown MS, Petkovska I (2008) Computer-aided diagnosis in lung nodule assessment. J Thorac Imaging 23:97–104PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Vliegenthart R et al (2013) Volumetric computer tomography screening for lung cancer: three rounds of the NELSON trial. Eur Respir J 42:1659–1667PubMedCrossRef Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Vliegenthart R et al (2013) Volumetric computer tomography screening for lung cancer: three rounds of the NELSON trial. Eur Respir J 42:1659–1667PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat White CS, Romney BM, Mason AC, Austin JH, Miller BH, Protopapas Z (1996) Primary carcinoma of the lung overlooked at CT: analysis of findings in 14 patients. Radiology 199:109–115PubMedCrossRef White CS, Romney BM, Mason AC, Austin JH, Miller BH, Protopapas Z (1996) Primary carcinoma of the lung overlooked at CT: analysis of findings in 14 patients. Radiology 199:109–115PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe H, Dinkel HP, Thoeny H, Gugger M, Vock P (2002) Virtuelle Endoskopie der oberen, zentralen und peripheren Atemwege mit Mehrzeilen-Spiral-CT. Radiologe 42:703–711PubMedCrossRef Hoppe H, Dinkel HP, Thoeny H, Gugger M, Vock P (2002) Virtuelle Endoskopie der oberen, zentralen und peripheren Atemwege mit Mehrzeilen-Spiral-CT. Radiologe 42:703–711PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O 3rd (2001) Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training. Chest 120:1333–1339PubMedCrossRef Colt HG, Crawford SW, Galbraith O 3rd (2001) Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulation: a revolution in procedural training. Chest 120:1333–1339PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneda M, Tarukawa T, Watanabe F, Adachi K, Sakai T, Nakabayashi H (2010) Clinical features of primary lung cancer adjoining pulmonary bulla. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:940–944PubMedCrossRef Kaneda M, Tarukawa T, Watanabe F, Adachi K, Sakai T, Nakabayashi H (2010) Clinical features of primary lung cancer adjoining pulmonary bulla. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:940–944PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Farooqi CM, Zhang L et al (2012) Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. Am J Roentgenol 199:781–786CrossRef Farooqi CM, Zhang L et al (2012) Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. Am J Roentgenol 199:781–786CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2012) No benefit for consensus double reading at baseline screening for lung cancer with the use of semiautomated volumetry software. Radiology 262:320–326PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2012) No benefit for consensus double reading at baseline screening for lung cancer with the use of semiautomated volumetry software. Radiology 262:320–326PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening
verfasst von
Ernst Th. Scholten
Nanda Horeweg
Harry J. de Koning
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Matthijs Oudkerk
Willem P. Th. M. Mali
Pim A. de Jong
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3394-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

European Radiology 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.