Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Computed tomography (CT) is more accurate than plain pelvic radiography (PXR) for evaluating acetabular fracture reduction. As yet unknown is whether CT-based assessment is more predictive for clinical outcome. We determined the independent association between reduction quality according to both methods and native hip survivorship following acetabular fracture fixation.
Retrospectively, 220 acetabular fracture patients were reviewed. Reductions on PXR were graded as adequate or inadequate (0–1 mm or > 1 mm displacement) (Matta’s criteria). For CT-based assessment, adequate reductions were defined as < 1 mm step and < 5 mm gap, and inadequate reductions as ≥ 1 mm step and/or ≥ 5 mm gap displacement. Predictive values and Kaplan–Meier hip survivorship curves were compared and risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were identified.
Mean follow-up was 8.9 years (SD 5.6, range 0.5–23.3 years), and 52 patients converted to THA (24%). Adequate reductions according to CT versus PXR assessment were associated with higher predictive values for native hip survivorship (92% vs. 82%; p = 0.043). Inadequate reductions were equally predictive for conversion to THA (33% for CT and 30% for PXR; p = 0.623). For both methods, survivorship curves of adequate versus inadequate reductions were significantly different (p = 0.030 for PXR, p < 0.001 for CT). Only age ≥ 50 years (p < 0.001) and inadequate reductions as assessed on CT (p = 0.038) were found to be independent risk factors for conversion to THA. Reduction quality as assessed on PXR was not found to be independently predictive for this outcome (p = 0.585).
Native hip survivorship is better predicted based on postoperative CT imaging as compared to PXR assessment. Predicting need for THA in patients with inadequate reductions based on both assessment methods remains challenging. While both PXR and CT-based methods are associated with hip survivorship, only an inadequate reduction according to CT assessment was an independent risk factor for conversion to THA.
Clarke-Jenssen J, Roise O, Storeggen SAO, Madsen JE (2017) Long-term survival and risk factors for failure of the native hip joint after operatively treated displaced acetabular fractures. Bone Jt J 99(6):834–840 CrossRef
Haefeli PC, Marecek GS, Keel MJ, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2017) Patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of acetabular fractures show favourable long-term outcome. Bone Jt J 99-b(4):508–515. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b4.37681 CrossRef
Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM (2012) Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(17):1559–1567 CrossRef
Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M (2011) Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years' follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(2):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24056 CrossRef
Giannoudis PV, Nikolaou VS, Kheir E, Mehta S, Stengel D, Roberts CS (2009) Factors determining quality of life and level of sporting activity after internal fixation of an isolated acetabular fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(10):1354–1359 CrossRef
Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(11):1632–1645 CrossRef
Moed BR, WillsonCarr SE, Watson JT (2002) Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A(5):752–758 CrossRef
Letournel E Jr (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum. In: Elson RA (ed) Translation of Les fractures du cotyle, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Borrelli J Jr, Ricci WM, Steger-May K, Totty WG, Goldfarb C (2005) Postoperative radiographic assessment of acetabular fractures: a comparison of plain radiographs and CT scans. J Orthop Trauma 19(5):299–304
Moed BR, Carr SE, Gruson KI, Watson JT, Craig JG (2003) Computed tomographic assessment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum after operative treatment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(3):512–522 CrossRef
Borrelli J Jr, Goldfarb C, Ricci W, Wagner JM, Engsberg JR (2002) Functional outcome after isolated acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16(2):73–81 CrossRef
Miller AN, Prasarn ML, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2010) The radiological evaluation of acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92(4):560–564 CrossRef
Carroll EA, Huber FG, Goldman AT, Virkus WW, Pagenkopf E, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2010) Treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population. J Orthop Trauma 24(10):637–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ceb685 CrossRef
Helfet DL, Borrelli J Jr, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (1992) Stabilization of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 74(5):753–765 CrossRef
Helfet DL, Schmeling GJ (1994) Management of complex acetabular fractures through single nonextensile exposures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:58–68 CrossRef
Jeffcoat DM, Carroll EA, Huber FG, Goldman AT, Miller AN, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2012) Operative treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population through a limited ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma 26(5):284–289 CrossRef
Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(1):2–9 CrossRef
Archdeacon MT, Dailey SK (2015) Efficacy of routine postoperative CT scan after open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma 29(8):354–358 CrossRef
Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Stuby FM (2010) Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury 41(8):839–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.010 CrossRef
- Computed tomography versus plain radiography assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is more predictive for native hip survivorship
Diederik O. Verbeek
Jelle P. van der List
David L. Helfet
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Including Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II