Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2014

01.10.2014

Computerized Breast Mass Detection Using Multi-Scale Hessian-Based Analysis for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

verfasst von: Yan-Hao Huang, Yeun-Chung Chang, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Jeon-Hor Chen, Ruey-Feng Chang

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate a computer-aided system for detecting breast masses using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for clinical use. Detection performance of the system was analyzed on 61 biopsy-confirmed lesions (21 benign and 40 malignant lesions) in 34 women. The breast region was determined using the demons deformable algorithm. After the suspicious tissues were identified by kinetic feature (area under the curve) and the fuzzy c-means clustering method, all breast masses were detected based on the rotation-invariant and multi-scale blob characteristics. Subsequently, the masses were further distinguished from other detected non-tumor regions (false positives). Free-response operating characteristics (FROC) curve and detection rate were used to evaluate the detection performance. Using the combined features, including blob, enhancement, morphologic, and texture features with 10-fold cross validation, the mass detection rate was 100 % (61/61) with 15.15 false positives per case and 91.80 % (56/61) with 4.56 false positives per case. In conclusion, the proposed computer-aided detection system can help radiologists reduce inter-observer variability and the cost associated with detection of suspicious lesions from a large number of images. Our results illustrated that breast masses can be efficiently detected and that enhancement and morphologic characteristics were useful for reducing non-tumor regions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 2011 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 2011
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90, 2011PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90, 2011PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C: Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Radiology 196:427–431, 1995PubMedCrossRef Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C: Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Radiology 196:427–431, 1995PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175, 2002PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ: Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 20:734–742, 2010PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ: Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 20:734–742, 2010PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mogatadakala KV, Donohue KD, Piccoli CW, Forsberg F: Detection of breast lesion regions in ultrasound images using wavelets and order statistics. Med Phys 33:840–849, 2006PubMedCrossRef Mogatadakala KV, Donohue KD, Piccoli CW, Forsberg F: Detection of breast lesion regions in ultrasound images using wavelets and order statistics. Med Phys 33:840–849, 2006PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Muradali D, Ghai S, Bukhanov K, Kulkarni S: Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 185:481–487, 2005CrossRef Muradali D, Ghai S, Bukhanov K, Kulkarni S: Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 185:481–487, 2005CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T, Vomweg TW, Schadmand S, Schmidt M, et al: Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology 224:881–888, 2002PubMedCrossRef Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T, Vomweg TW, Schadmand S, Schmidt M, et al: Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology 224:881–888, 2002PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742, 2004PubMedCrossRef Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742, 2004PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC, Di Prospero LS, Yaffe MJ, et al: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531, 2001PubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC, Di Prospero LS, Yaffe MJ, et al: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531, 2001PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh ED: Breast magnetic resonance imaging: current clinical indications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:155–169, 2010. viiPubMedCrossRef Yeh ED: Breast magnetic resonance imaging: current clinical indications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:155–169, 2010. viiPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin M, Chen J-H, Nalcioglu O, Su M-YL: Automatic template-based breast segmentation on MRI using nonrigid registration algorithms. In: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) conference, 2012, pp. 2569, City Lin M, Chen J-H, Nalcioglu O, Su M-YL: Automatic template-based breast segmentation on MRI using nonrigid registration algorithms. In: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) conference, 2012, pp. 2569, City
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, Rustin GJS, Bentzen S, Stirling JJ, et al: Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 15:132–142, 2002PubMedCrossRef Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, Rustin GJS, Bentzen S, Stirling JJ, et al: Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 15:132–142, 2002PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Su MY, Nie K, Chen JH, Chan S, Chau MKI, Yu HJ, et al: Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. Med Phys 35:5253–5262, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Su MY, Nie K, Chen JH, Chan S, Chau MKI, Yu HJ, et al: Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. Med Phys 35:5253–5262, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroon D-J, Slump CH: MRI modality transformation in demon registration. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI ‘09. IEEE Signal Processing Society, City, 2009, pp. 963–966 Kroon D-J, Slump CH: MRI modality transformation in demon registration. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI ‘09. IEEE Signal Processing Society, City, 2009, pp. 963–966
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayton P, Brady M, Tarassenko L, Moore N: Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement. Med Image Anal 1:207–224, 1997PubMedCrossRef Hayton P, Brady M, Tarassenko L, Moore N: Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement. Med Image Anal 1:207–224, 1997PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang YC, Huang YH, Huang CS, Chang PK, Chen JH, Chang RF: Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering. Magn Reson Imaging 20:312–322, 2012CrossRef Chang YC, Huang YH, Huang CS, Chang PK, Chen JH, Chang RF: Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering. Magn Reson Imaging 20:312–322, 2012CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA: Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Miccai‘98 1496, 1998, pp. 130–137 Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA: Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - Miccai‘98 1496, 1998, pp. 130–137
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiamin L, White JM, Summers RM: Automated detection of blob structures by Hessian analysis and object scale. In: Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on, City, 2010, pp. 841–844 Jiamin L, White JM, Summers RM: Automated detection of blob structures by Hessian analysis and object scale. In: Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on, City, 2010, pp. 841–844
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia T, Zhao D-Z, Wei Y, Zhu X-H, Wang X: Computer-aided lung nodule detection based on CT images. In: Complex Medical Engineering, 2007 CME 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on, City, 2007, pp. 816–819 Jia T, Zhao D-Z, Wei Y, Zhu X-H, Wang X: Computer-aided lung nodule detection based on CT images. In: Complex Medical Engineering, 2007 CME 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on, City, 2007, pp. 816–819
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Okada K, Akdemir U: Blob segmentation using joint space-intensity likelihood ratio test: application to 3D tumor segmentation. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005 CVPR 2005 I.E. Computer Society Conference on, vol. 2, City, 2005, pp. 437–444 Okada K, Akdemir U: Blob segmentation using joint space-intensity likelihood ratio test: application to 3D tumor segmentation. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005 CVPR 2005 I.E. Computer Society Conference on, vol. 2, City, 2005, pp. 437–444
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenfel A, Pfaltz JL: Sequential operations in digital picture processing. J ACM 13:471, 1966CrossRef Rosenfel A, Pfaltz JL: Sequential operations in digital picture processing. J ACM 13:471, 1966CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JH, Chang RF, Chang-Chien KC, Takada E, Huang CS, Chou YH, et al: Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound. Med Phys 37:2063–2073, 2010PubMedCrossRef Chen JH, Chang RF, Chang-Chien KC, Takada E, Huang CS, Chou YH, et al: Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound. Med Phys 37:2063–2073, 2010PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM: Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 58:562–571, 2007PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM: Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 58:562–571, 2007PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang RF, Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS, Chiang LR: Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:539–548, 2011PubMedCrossRef Chang RF, Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS, Chiang LR: Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:539–548, 2011PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Haralick RM: Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67:786–804, 1979CrossRef Haralick RM: Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67:786–804, 1979CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Field AP: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, London, 2009 Field AP: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications, London, 2009
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bengio Y, Grandvalet Y: No unbiased estimator of the variance of K-fold cross-validation. J Mach Learn Res 5:1089–1105, 2004 Bengio Y, Grandvalet Y: No unbiased estimator of the variance of K-fold cross-validation. J Mach Learn Res 5:1089–1105, 2004
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu SY, Guan L: A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:115–126, 2000PubMedCrossRef Yu SY, Guan L: A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:115–126, 2000PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty DP: Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 15:1554–1566, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Chakraborty DP: Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 15:1554–1566, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser RG: Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology 158:35–39, 1986PubMedCrossRef Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser RG: Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology 158:35–39, 1986PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimauchi A, Jansen SA, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Schmidt RA, Newstead GM: Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesions. Am J Roentgenol 194:1674–1679, 2010CrossRef Shimauchi A, Jansen SA, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Schmidt RA, Newstead GM: Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesions. Am J Roentgenol 194:1674–1679, 2010CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson BO, Shyyan R, Eniu A, Smith RA, Yip CH, Bese NS, et al: Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines. Breast J 12(Suppl 1):S3–S15, 2006PubMedCrossRef Anderson BO, Shyyan R, Eniu A, Smith RA, Yip CH, Bese NS, et al: Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines. Breast J 12(Suppl 1):S3–S15, 2006PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492, 2007PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492, 2007PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Renz DM, Bottcher J, Diekmann F, Poellinger A, Maurer MH, Pfeil A, et al: Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1077–1088, 2012PubMedCrossRef Renz DM, Bottcher J, Diekmann F, Poellinger A, Maurer MH, Pfeil A, et al: Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1077–1088, 2012PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246:376–383, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246:376–383, 2008PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JH, Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS, Luo SC, Kuzucan A, et al: Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. Med Phys 38:382–389, 2011PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Chen JH, Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS, Luo SC, Kuzucan A, et al: Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. Med Phys 38:382–389, 2011PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorr RT, Alberts DS: Quantitation of ellipsoid tumor areas using a circumferential measuring device. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 5:249–251, 1988PubMed Dorr RT, Alberts DS: Quantitation of ellipsoid tumor areas using a circumferential measuring device. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 5:249–251, 1988PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD: Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430, 2006PubMedCrossRef Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD: Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:426–430, 2006PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Computerized Breast Mass Detection Using Multi-Scale Hessian-Based Analysis for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
verfasst von
Yan-Hao Huang
Yeun-Chung Chang
Chiun-Sheng Huang
Jeon-Hor Chen
Ruey-Feng Chang
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9681-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.