Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2018

03.03.2018 | Oculoplastics and Orbit

Concerns of anophthalmic patients—a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers

verfasst von: Alexander C. Rokohl, Konrad R. Koch, Werner Adler, Marc Trester, Wolfgang Trester, Nicola S. Pine, Keith R. Pine, Ludwig M. Heindl

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the concerns of experienced cryolite glass and (poly)methyl methacrylate (PMMA) prosthetic eye wearers.

Methods

One hundred six experienced cryolite glass and 63 experienced PMMA prosthetic eye wearers completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding general and specific prosthetic eye concerns at least 2 years after natural eye loss. From these independent anophthalmic populations, we identified 34 case-control pairs matched for the known influencing demographic variables of gender, occupation, age, and time since natural eye loss.

Results

The levels of concern were significantly lower in the cryolite glass group than those in the PMMA group for the following: loss of balance (p < 0.001), phantom sight vision (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001), receiving good advice (p = 0.001), fullness of orbit (p = 0.001), size (p = 0.007), direction of gaze relative to the healthy fellow eye (p = 0.005), eye lid contour (p = 0.037), comfort of the prosthetic eye (p < 0.001), colour relative to the healthy fellow eye (p < 0.001), and retention of the prosthetic eye (p < 0.001). Concerns about watering, crusting, discharge, visual perception, appearance, movement of the prosthetic eye, and health of the remaining eye were not significantly different between both groups.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that many general and specific levels of concern were significantly lower for cryolite glass prosthetic eye wearers than for PMMA prosthetic eye wearers. The question of why there are significant differences and to what extent the material of the prosthesis (cryolite glass or PMMA) has an impact on various concerns remains unanswered and should be addressed in a prospective comparative multicentre trial.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ (2015) Clinical ocular prosthetics, 1st edn. Springer International 325 Publishing, Berlin, p 278 Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ (2015) Clinical ocular prosthetics, 1st edn. Springer International 325 Publishing, Berlin, p 278
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch KR, Trester W, Muller-Uri N, Trester M, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM (2016) Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications. Ophthalmologe 113(2):133–142CrossRefPubMed Koch KR, Trester W, Muller-Uri N, Trester M, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM (2016) Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications. Ophthalmologe 113(2):133–142CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Den Tonkelaar I, Henkes HE, van Leersum GK (1991) Herman Snellen (1834–1908) and Muller’s‚ reform-auge’. A short history of the artificial eye. Doc Ophthalmol 77:349–354 Den Tonkelaar I, Henkes HE, van Leersum GK (1991) Herman Snellen (1834–1908) and Muller’s‚ reform-auge’. A short history of the artificial eye. Doc Ophthalmol 77:349–354
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baino F, Perero S, Ferraris S et al (2014) Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Acta Biomater 10:1064–1087CrossRefPubMed Baino F, Perero S, Ferraris S et al (2014) Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Acta Biomater 10:1064–1087CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckel M, Bovet J (1992) The eye as an art form: the ocular prosthesis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 200:594–595CrossRefPubMed Buckel M, Bovet J (1992) The eye as an art form: the ocular prosthesis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 200:594–595CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanif S, Rowe F, O'Connor A (2009) A comparative analysis of monocular excursion measures. Strabismus 17(1):29–32CrossRefPubMed Hanif S, Rowe F, O'Connor A (2009) A comparative analysis of monocular excursion measures. Strabismus 17(1):29–32CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin K, Margolin CB, Finger PT (2006) Early ocular prosthesis insertion improves quality of life after enucleation. Optometry 77(2):71–75CrossRefPubMed Chin K, Margolin CB, Finger PT (2006) Early ocular prosthesis insertion improves quality of life after enucleation. Optometry 77(2):71–75CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicodemo D, Ferreira LM (2006) Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis. Arq Bras Oftalmol 69(4):463–470CrossRefPubMed Nicodemo D, Ferreira LM (2006) Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis. Arq Bras Oftalmol 69(4):463–470CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ (2012) Biosocial profile of New Zealand prosthetic eye wearers. NZ Med J 125(1363):29–38 Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ (2012) Biosocial profile of New Zealand prosthetic eye wearers. NZ Med J 125(1363):29–38
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Song JS, Oh J, Baek SH (2006) A survey of satisfaction in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(3):330–335CrossRefPubMed Song JS, Oh J, Baek SH (2006) A survey of satisfaction in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244(3):330–335CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen ML (2008) Complications from eye prosthesis. Ugeskr Laeger 170(33):2456–2458PubMed Rasmussen ML (2008) Complications from eye prosthesis. Ugeskr Laeger 170(33):2456–2458PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ (2011) Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 39(1):47–52PubMed Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ (2011) Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 39(1):47–52PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ (2012) A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge. Clin Ophthalmol 6:707–713PubMedPubMedCentral Pine K, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ (2012) A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge. Clin Ophthalmol 6:707–713PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ (2013) A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge. Med Hypotheses 81(2):300–305CrossRefPubMed Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ (2013) A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge. Med Hypotheses 81(2):300–305CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) The impact of eye loss and prosthetic eye wear on recreational, occupational and social areas of functioning. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci 2(1):1016 Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) The impact of eye loss and prosthetic eye wear on recreational, occupational and social areas of functioning. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci 2(1):1016
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) Time heals: an investigation into how anophthalmic patients feel about eye loss and wearing a prosthetic eye. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci. 2(2):1018 Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) Time heals: an investigation into how anophthalmic patients feel about eye loss and wearing a prosthetic eye. J Ophthalmol and Vis Sci. 2(2):1018
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers. Orbit 36(6):401–406CrossRefPubMed Pine NS, de Terte I, Pine KR (2017) An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers. Orbit 36(6):401–406CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinger PF, Parver L, Alfaro DV 3rd, Woods T, Abrams BS (1997) Shatter resistance of spectacle lenses. JAMA 277(2):142–144CrossRefPubMed Vinger PF, Parver L, Alfaro DV 3rd, Woods T, Abrams BS (1997) Shatter resistance of spectacle lenses. JAMA 277(2):142–144CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborn KL, Hettler D (2010) A survey of recommendations on the care of ocular prostheses. Optometry 81(3):142–145CrossRefPubMed Osborn KL, Hettler D (2010) A survey of recommendations on the care of ocular prostheses. Optometry 81(3):142–145CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ (2013) The development of measurement tools for prosthetic eye research. Clin Exp Optom 96(1):32–38CrossRefPubMed Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ (2013) The development of measurement tools for prosthetic eye research. Clin Exp Optom 96(1):32–38CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Concerns of anophthalmic patients—a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers
verfasst von
Alexander C. Rokohl
Konrad R. Koch
Werner Adler
Marc Trester
Wolfgang Trester
Nicola S. Pine
Keith R. Pine
Ludwig M. Heindl
Publikationsdatum
03.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3942-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.