Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2010

01.10.2010 | Original Article

Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma

verfasst von: Sally F. Barrington, Wendi Qian, Edward J. Somer, Antonella Franceschetto, Bruno Bagni, Eva Brun, Helén Almquist, Annika Loft, Liselotte Højgaard, Massimo Federico, Andrea Gallamini, Paul Smith, Peter Johnson, John Radford, Michael J. O’Doherty

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 10/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if PET reporting criteria for the Response Adapted Treatment in Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL) trial could enable satisfactory agreement to be reached between ‘core’ laboratories operating in different countries.

Methods

Four centres reported scans from 50 patients with stage II–IV HL, acquired before and after two cycles of Adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine. A five-point scale was used to score response scans using ‘normal’ mediastinum and liver as reference levels. Centres read scans independently of each other. The level of agreement between centres was determined assuming (1) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than liver uptake represented disease (conservative reading), and (2) that uptake in sites involved at diagnosis that was higher than mediastinal uptake represented disease (sensitive reading).

Results

There was agreement that the response scan was ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ for lymphoma in 44 patients with a conservative reading and in 41 patients with a sensitive reading. Kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.74–0.96) for conservative reading and 0.79 (95% CI 0.67–0.90) for sensitive reading. Agreement was reached in 46 and 44 patients after discussion for the conservative and sensitive readings, respectively.

Conclusion

The criteria developed for reporting in the RATHL trial are sufficiently robust to be used in a multicentre setting.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchings M, Barrington SF. PET/CT for therapy response assessment in lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2009;50:21S–30S.CrossRefPubMed Hutchings M, Barrington SF. PET/CT for therapy response assessment in lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2009;50:21S–30S.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L, Specht L, Merli F, Hansen M, et al. Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3746–52.CrossRefPubMed Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L, Specht L, Merli F, Hansen M, et al. Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3746–52.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchings M, Mikhaeel NG, Fields PA, Nunan T, Timothy AR. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1160–8.CrossRefPubMed Hutchings M, Mikhaeel NG, Fields PA, Nunan T, Timothy AR. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1160–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1514–23.CrossRefPubMed Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR. FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1514–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Horning SJ, Juweid ME, Schoder H, Wiseman G, McMillan A, Swinnen LJ, et al. Interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. Blood 2010;115:775–7.CrossRefPubMed Horning SJ, Juweid ME, Schoder H, Wiseman G, McMillan A, Swinnen LJ, et al. Interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. Blood 2010;115:775–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG. Some common problems in medical research. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1999. p. 396–439. Altman DG. Some common problems in medical research. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1999. p. 396–439.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zijlstra JM, Comans EF, van Lingen A, Hoekstra OS, Gundy CM, Willem Coebergh J, et al. FDG PET in lymphoma: the need for standardization of interpretation. An observer variation study. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:798–803.CrossRef Zijlstra JM, Comans EF, van Lingen A, Hoekstra OS, Gundy CM, Willem Coebergh J, et al. FDG PET in lymphoma: the need for standardization of interpretation. An observer variation study. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:798–803.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiti A. Evaluation of response: is 18F-FDG PET the answer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:733–4.CrossRefPubMed Chiti A. Evaluation of response: is 18F-FDG PET the answer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:733–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O'Doherty MJ, Hofman MS, et al. Observer variation in FDG PET-CT for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:194–9.CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O'Doherty MJ, Hofman MS, et al. Observer variation in FDG PET-CT for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:194–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:52–9.CrossRefPubMed Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:52–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Han HS, Escalon MP, Hsiao B, Serafini A, Lossos IS. High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens. Ann Oncol 2009;20:309–18.CrossRefPubMed Han HS, Escalon MP, Hsiao B, Serafini A, Lossos IS. High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens. Ann Oncol 2009;20:309–18.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Ralfkiaer E, Specht L, Hutchings M, et al. Different histopathological subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma show significantly different levels of FDG uptake. Hematol Oncol 2006;24:146–50.CrossRefPubMed Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Ralfkiaer E, Specht L, Hutchings M, et al. Different histopathological subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma show significantly different levels of FDG uptake. Hematol Oncol 2006;24:146–50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallamini A, Rigacci L, Merli F, Nassi L, Bosi A, Capodanno I, et al. The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. Haematologica 2006;91:475–81.PubMed Gallamini A, Rigacci L, Merli F, Nassi L, Bosi A, Capodanno I, et al. The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. Haematologica 2006;91:475–81.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ, Leonard JP, Christos P, Furman RR, Atasever T, et al. FDG-PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin disease. Cancer 2006;107:2678–87.CrossRefPubMed Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ, Leonard JP, Christos P, Furman RR, Atasever T, et al. FDG-PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin disease. Cancer 2006;107:2678–87.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Querellou S, Valette F, Bodet-Milin C, Oudoux A, Carlier T, Harousseau JL, et al. FDG-PET/CT predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. Ann Hematol 2006;85:759–67.CrossRefPubMed Querellou S, Valette F, Bodet-Milin C, Oudoux A, Carlier T, Harousseau JL, et al. FDG-PET/CT predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. Ann Hematol 2006;85:759–67.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, Mottaghy FM, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, et al.; Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:571–8.CrossRefPubMed Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, Mottaghy FM, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, et al.; Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:571–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50:1257–60.CrossRefPubMed Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2009;50:1257–60.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, Petegnief Y, Luciani A, Dupuis J, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1626–32.CrossRefPubMed Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, Petegnief Y, Luciani A, Dupuis J, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1626–32.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Itti E, Lin C, Dupuis J, Paone G, Capacchione D, Rahmouni A, et al. Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment at 4 cycles of chemotherapy. J Nucl Med 2009;50:527–33.CrossRefPubMed Itti E, Lin C, Dupuis J, Paone G, Capacchione D, Rahmouni A, et al. Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment at 4 cycles of chemotherapy. J Nucl Med 2009;50:527–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Hojgaard L. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167–75.CrossRefPubMed Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Hojgaard L. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167–75.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Vigil B, Gomez-Leon N, Pinilla I, Hernandez-Maraver D, Coya J, Martin-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed Rodriguez-Vigil B, Gomez-Leon N, Pinilla I, Hernandez-Maraver D, Coya J, Martin-Curto L, et al. PET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1643–8.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Elstrom RL, Leonard JP, Coleman M, Brown RKJ. Combined PET and low-dose, noncontrast CT scanning obviates the need for additional diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients undergoing staging or restaging for lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1770–3.CrossRefPubMed Elstrom RL, Leonard JP, Coleman M, Brown RKJ. Combined PET and low-dose, noncontrast CT scanning obviates the need for additional diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients undergoing staging or restaging for lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1770–3.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrington SF, O'Doherty MJ. Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:S117–27.CrossRefPubMed Barrington SF, O'Doherty MJ. Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:S117–27.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Karam M, Roberts-Klein S, Shet N, Chang J, Feustel P, Karam M, et al. Bilateral hilar foci on 18F-FDG PET scan in patients without lung cancer: variables associated with benign and malignant etiology. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1429–36.CrossRefPubMed Karam M, Roberts-Klein S, Shet N, Chang J, Feustel P, Karam M, et al. Bilateral hilar foci on 18F-FDG PET scan in patients without lung cancer: variables associated with benign and malignant etiology. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1429–36.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O'Doherty MJ. Observer variation in interpreting 18F-FDG PET/CT findings for lymphoma staging. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1594–7.CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O'Doherty MJ. Observer variation in interpreting 18F-FDG PET/CT findings for lymphoma staging. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1594–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher BD, Glicksman AS, Gieser P. Interobserver variability in the detection of cervical-thoracic Hodgkin's disease by computed tomography. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2153.PubMed Fletcher BD, Glicksman AS, Gieser P. Interobserver variability in the detection of cervical-thoracic Hodgkin's disease by computed tomography. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2153.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma
verfasst von
Sally F. Barrington
Wendi Qian
Edward J. Somer
Antonella Franceschetto
Bruno Bagni
Eva Brun
Helén Almquist
Annika Loft
Liselotte Højgaard
Massimo Federico
Andrea Gallamini
Paul Smith
Peter Johnson
John Radford
Michael J. O’Doherty
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 10/2010
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1490-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2010

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2010 Zur Ausgabe