Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017

17.06.2016 | Review

Conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis

verfasst von: Charlotte S. Loozen, Jelmer E. Oor, Bert van Ramshorst, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Djamila Boerma

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In medical practice, the tendency to remove an inflamed gallbladder is deeply rooted. Cholecystectomy, however, is associated with relatively high complication rates, and therefore the decision whether or not to perform surgery should be well considered. For some patients, the surgical risk–benefit profile may favour conservative treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the short- and long-term outcome of conservative treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Prospective studies reporting on the success rate of conservative treatment (i.e. non-invasive treatment) of acute cholecystitis during index admission were included, as well as prospective and retrospective studies reporting on the recurrence rate of gallstone-related disease during long-term follow-up (i.e. ≥12 months) after initial non-surgical management. Study selection was undertaken independently by two reviewers using predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed. The pooled success and mortality rate during index admission and the pooled recurrence rate of gallstone-related disease during long-term follow-up were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 1841 patients were included in 10 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized studies. Conservative treatment during index admission was successful in 87 % of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and in 96 % of patients with mild disease. In the long term, 22 % of the patients developed recurrent gallstone-related disease. Pooled analysis showed a success rate of 86 % (95 % CI 0.8–0.9), a mortality rate of 0.5 % (95 % CI 0.001–0.009) and a recurrence rate of 20 % (95 % CI 0.1–0.3).

Discussion

Conservative treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis during index admission seems feasible and safe, especially in patients with mild disease. During long-term follow-up, less than a quarter of the patients appear to develop recurrent gallstone-related disease, although this outcome is based on limited data.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O’Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG (2010) Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:79–109. doi:10.1089/sur.2009.9930 CrossRef Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O’Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG (2010) Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:79–109. doi:10.​1089/​sur.​2009.​9930 CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, Pitt HA, Garden OJ, Kiriyama S, Hata J, Gabata T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Okamoto K, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Yamashita Y, Dervenis C, Chan AC, Lau WY, Supe AN, Belli G, Hilvano SC, Liau KH, Kim MH, Kim SW, Ker CG, Committee Tokyo Guidelines Revision (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:35–46. doi:10.1007/s00534-012-0568-9 CrossRefPubMed Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, Pitt HA, Garden OJ, Kiriyama S, Hata J, Gabata T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Okamoto K, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Yamashita Y, Dervenis C, Chan AC, Lau WY, Supe AN, Belli G, Hilvano SC, Liau KH, Kim MH, Kim SW, Ker CG, Committee Tokyo Guidelines Revision (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:35–46. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-012-0568-9 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayumi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Yoshida M, Sekimoto M, Miura F, Wada K, Hirota M, Yamashita Y, Nagino M, Tsuyuguchi T, Tanaka A, Gomi H, Pitt HA (2007) Results of the Tokyo consensus meeting Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:114–121. doi:10.1007/s00534-006-1163-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mayumi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Yoshida M, Sekimoto M, Miura F, Wada K, Hirota M, Yamashita Y, Nagino M, Tsuyuguchi T, Tanaka A, Gomi H, Pitt HA (2007) Results of the Tokyo consensus meeting Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:114–121. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-006-1163-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 CrossRefPubMed Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–34. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2009.​06.​006 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med 3:e123–e130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med 3:e123–e130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​d5928 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazeh H, Mizrahi I, Dior U, Simanovsky N, Shapiro M, Freund HR, Eid A (2012) Role of antibiotic therapy in mild acute calculus cholecystitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36:1750–1759. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1572-6 CrossRefPubMed Mazeh H, Mizrahi I, Dior U, Simanovsky N, Shapiro M, Freund HR, Eid A (2012) Role of antibiotic therapy in mild acute calculus cholecystitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36:1750–1759. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-012-1572-6 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18:1323–1327. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9230-6 CrossRefPubMed Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18:1323–1327. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-003-9230-6 CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vetrhus M, Soreide O, Nesvik I, Sondenaa K (2003) Acute cholecystitis: delayed surgery or observation. A randomized clinical trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 38:985–990PubMed Vetrhus M, Soreide O, Nesvik I, Sondenaa K (2003) Acute cholecystitis: delayed surgery or observation. A randomized clinical trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 38:985–990PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, Sanidas E, Chrysos E, Chalkiadakis G, Tsiftsis D, Gourtsoyiannis NC (2002) Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 12:1778–1784. doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1247-4 CrossRefPubMed Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, Sanidas E, Chrysos E, Chalkiadakis G, Tsiftsis D, Gourtsoyiannis NC (2002) Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 12:1778–1784. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-001-1247-4 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Barak O, Elazary R, Appelbaum L, Rivkind A, Almogy G (2009) Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis: clinical and radiographic predictors of failure. Isr Med Assoc J 11:739–743PubMed Barak O, Elazary R, Appelbaum L, Rivkind A, Almogy G (2009) Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis: clinical and radiographic predictors of failure. Isr Med Assoc J 11:739–743PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Paran H, Zissin R, Rosenberg E, Griton I, Kots E, Gutman M (2006) Prospective evaluation of patients with acute cholecystitis treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg 4:101–105. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.001 CrossRefPubMed Paran H, Zissin R, Rosenberg E, Griton I, Kots E, Gutman M (2006) Prospective evaluation of patients with acute cholecystitis treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg 4:101–105. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijsu.​2006.​01.​001 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR (2003) Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:71–75CrossRefPubMed Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR (2003) Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:71–75CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vracko J, Markovic S, Wiechel KL (2006) Conservative treatment versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the initial management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients at high surgical risk. Endoscopy 38:773–778. doi:10.1055/s-2006-925448 CrossRefPubMed Vracko J, Markovic S, Wiechel KL (2006) Conservative treatment versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the initial management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients at high surgical risk. Endoscopy 38:773–778. doi:10.​1055/​s-2006-925448 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Zoller WG, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258:385–393. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Zoller WG, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258:385–393. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182a1599b​ CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt M, Sondenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE (2011) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of observation versus surgery for acute cholecystitis: non-operative management is an option in some patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 46:1257–1262. doi:10.3109/00365521.2011.598548 CrossRefPubMed Schmidt M, Sondenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE (2011) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of observation versus surgery for acute cholecystitis: non-operative management is an option in some patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 46:1257–1262. doi:10.​3109/​00365521.​2011.​598548 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC, Arruabarrena A, Sanchez-Moreno L, Gonzalez-Sanchez F, Herrera LA, Gomez-Fleitas M (2012) Acute cholecystitis in high surgical risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy or emergency cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 204:54–59. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.013 CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC, Arruabarrena A, Sanchez-Moreno L, Gonzalez-Sanchez F, Herrera LA, Gomez-Fleitas M (2012) Acute cholecystitis in high surgical risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy or emergency cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 204:54–59. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2011.​05.​013 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-0985-y CrossRefPubMed Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-011-0985-y CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Griniatsos J, Petrou A, Pappas P, Revenas K, Karavokyros I, Michail OP, Tsigris C, Giannopoulos A, Felekouras E (2008) Percutaneous cholecystostomy without interval cholecystectomy as definitive treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients. South Med J 101:586–590. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181757b77 CrossRefPubMed Griniatsos J, Petrou A, Pappas P, Revenas K, Karavokyros I, Michail OP, Tsigris C, Giannopoulos A, Felekouras E (2008) Percutaneous cholecystostomy without interval cholecystectomy as definitive treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients. South Med J 101:586–590. doi:10.​1097/​SMJ.​0b013e3181757b77​ CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegard J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV (2015) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 17:326–331. doi:10.1111/hpb.12360 CrossRef Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegard J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV (2015) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 17:326–331. doi:10.​1111/​hpb.​12360 CrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Barre K, Suarez L, Hall MR, Kaml GJ, Davis KA, Longo WE (2012) Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg 99:1254–1261. doi:10.1002/bjs.8836 CrossRefPubMed McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Barre K, Suarez L, Hall MR, Kaml GJ, Davis KA, Longo WE (2012) Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg 99:1254–1261. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​8836 CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Andren-Sandberg A, Haugsvedt T, Larssen TB, Sondenaa K (2001) Complications and late outcome following percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder in acute calculous cholecystitis. Dig Surg 18:393–398. doi:10.1159/000050180 CrossRefPubMed Andren-Sandberg A, Haugsvedt T, Larssen TB, Sondenaa K (2001) Complications and late outcome following percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder in acute calculous cholecystitis. Dig Surg 18:393–398. doi:10.​1159/​000050180 CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Li M, Li N, Ji W, Quan Z, Wan X, Wu X, Li J (2013) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in elderly high-risk patients. Am Surg 79:524–527PubMed Li M, Li N, Ji W, Quan Z, Wan X, Wu X, Li J (2013) Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in elderly high-risk patients. Am Surg 79:524–527PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikarinen H (2006) Diagnostic imaging of carcinomas of the gallbladder and the bile ducts. Acta Radiol 47:345–358CrossRefPubMed Oikarinen H (2006) Diagnostic imaging of carcinomas of the gallbladder and the bile ducts. Acta Radiol 47:345–358CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, Davidson BR (2010) Cost-utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:210–219. doi:10.1002/bjs.6872 CrossRefPubMed Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, Davidson BR (2010) Cost-utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 97:210–219. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6872 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis
verfasst von
Charlotte S. Loozen
Jelmer E. Oor
Bert van Ramshorst
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
Djamila Boerma
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5011-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.