Introduction
The American Cancer Society's most recent estimates for breast cancer in the United States for 2009 are as follows: 192,370 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,170 deaths of breast cancer. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States, other than skin cancer. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, after lung cancer [
1]. Breast cancer is particularly difficult to treat when it metastasizes and becomes resistant to antiestrogen therapies [
2].
The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that mediates uptake of iodide into cells, especially thyroid follicular cells [
3,
4]. The presence of NIS on the basolateral membrane of thyroid cells has been exploited for many years for diagnostic imaging purposes, as well as for ablative therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer by using radioactive iodide (
131I). This noninvasive therapy has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for thyroid cancer, even in advanced, metastatic disease [
5,
6]. To extend the use of NIS-mediated radioiodine therapy to other types of cancer, we successfully transferred and expressed the sodium-iodide symporter (
NIS) gene in prostate, colon, and breast cancer cells, both
in vivo and
in vitro, by using adenoviral vectors. Our experience with adenovirus-mediated
NIS transfer and radioiodine therapy was confirmed in a large animal model and has culminated in the opening of a phase I trial for prostate cancer that is currently in progress [
7‐
12].
MUC-1 is a highly glycosylated transmembrane mucin. Although MUC-1 is expressed at very low levels in normal tissues; it is overexpressed by most carcinomas, including breast cancers [
13]. Enhanced expression of
MUC-1 is regulated mostly at the level of transcription [
14]. The pronounced differential expression of MUC-1 in tumor versus normal tissues has been used in experimental developments of antitumor therapies, including MUC-1 vaccines and MUC-1 promoter-restricted antitumor-specific viruses [
15‐
17].
All gene-therapy approaches depend on the ability to deliver therapeutic genes to target cells. However, the limited ability to transduce tumors efficiently with effective levels of therapeutic transgenes has been identified as the fundamental barrier to effective cancer gene therapy [
18,
19]. To address this issue, conditionally replicating viruses, including adenovirus, have been constructed, and their efficacy, evaluated [
20‐
22].
Our approach to the current problems associated with virotherapy/gene therapy has been the development of tumor-specific, conditionally replicating adenoviral vectors that also harbor the NIS gene. We report here the development of a conditionally replicating adenovirus (CRAd) in which the E1a gene is driven by the tumor-specific promoter MUC-1. In addition, the transcriptional cassette RSV promoter-hNIScDNA-bGH polyA was inserted at the E3 region. Our results suggest that this CRAd may represent a novel approach to breast cancer gene therapy.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The breast cancer cell lines T47D and MDA-MB-231 were used to examine CRAd Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS specificity. Adenovirus infection was performed for 4 hours in serum-free media. Cells were then washed once with PBS and replenished with fresh culture media. The human embryonic kidney cell line stably expressing E1A (HEK 293) was obtained from Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA. Cells were cultured as described [
8,
23].
CRAd construct and cell lines
The E1A gene flanked by a 5' blunt end, and an
EcoRI 3' end was isolated from plasmid pCD512_F2 (a gift of Dr. Richard Vile, Mayo Clinic) and cloned into the Promega vector pGL3-Basic to yield pGL3E1. The MUC-1 promoter (a gift of Dr. Sandra Gendler, Mayo Clinic Arizona) was PCR amplified by using the forward primer
AAAAAGGTACCGGACCCTAGGGTTCATCGGAG and the reverse primer AAAAAAGATCTGATTCAGGCAGGCGCTGGCTGC from the plasmid pcDNA3 [
8]. The resulting PCR fragment 0.726 Kb spanning nt2188 to nt2914 was cloned into pGL3E1 to yield pGL3MUCH. The MUC-1 promoter-E1A-SV40 PolyA fragment was excised from pGL3MUCH by digestion with
EcoRI/
KpnI and cloned into the shuttle vector pVQA-PB-NIS [
23] restricted by
KpnI/
EcoRI and dephosphorylated with CIP to generated pVQAMUCH. The human
NIS cDNA under Rous Sarcoma Virus LTR promoter control was subcloned into an Ad5 genomic vector containing an E3-deleted version (ViraQuest, North Liberty, IA, USA). The pVQAMUCH shuttle vector and the
NIS-containing Ad5 genomic plasmid were recombined to yield the CRAd Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS. Plaques were grown, purified, and characterized by ViraQuest as previously described [
23]. The replication-incompetent Muc promoter-driven luciferase expression vector, AdEasyMucLuc, was constructed through homologous recombination in
Escherichia coli by using the AdEasy system [
24]. This vector has the transgene cassette in the E1 deleted region of an adenoviral vector backbone. The vector was constructed as follows: the MUC_1 promoter was derived from a plasmid pGL3MUCH and cloned into plasmid pShuttleGL3B [
25] by using
KpnI and
HindIII sites. The resultant plasmid, pShuttleMuc_GL3B, was linearized with
PmeI digestion and subsequently co-transformed into
E. coli BJ5183 with the pAdEasy-1 Ad backbone plasmid. After selection of recombinants in these bacteria, the recombinant DNA was linearized with
PacI digestion and transfected into 293 cells to generate AdEasyMucLuc. The virus was propagated in 293 cells, dialyzed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 10% glycerol, and stored at -80°C. Titering was performed with a plaque-forming assay by using 911 cells and optical density-based measurement.
MUC-1 flow cytometry
The 106 exponentially growing cells were washed with PBS containing 1 mmol/L EDTA and resuspended in PBS. Cells were incubated with 20 μg/ml mouse anti-human MUC-1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Inc. Beverly, MA, USA) 30 min at RT. Controls cells were processed equally, except that they were incubated with 20 μg/ml mouse anti-human (IgG1) TNP anti-isotype antibody control (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, SanDiego, CA, USA). Cells were then washed in PBS and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) (1:100) for 30 min at RT. Cells were then washed, resuspended in PBS, and immediately analyzed with a Becton Dickinson FACScan by using CELLQuest software.
Protein isolation and Western blots
For all Western blots, the protein concentration was measured in triplicate, and two gels were run. The first was developed with silver staining by using the PlusOne Silver Staining Kit, Protein (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instruction and quantitated by using the ImageJ software [
26]. This gel served as loading control (not shown). The second gel was blotted onto nitrocellulose and Western blotted. E1a and hexon extracts were prepared from 4 × 10
6 cells grown on 100-mm tissue-culture plates and infected at MOI 20. At noted time points, cells were rinsed twice in HBSS before lysis in 1 ml of the complete lysis-M reagent with supplied protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) on ice with shaking for 5 minutes and then quantified by using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Hercules, CA, USA). Membrane proteins extracts were prepared for NIS and CAR Western blotting as described [
27]. Lysate aliquots, 1 μg of protein, were electrophoresed by using I a X cell II Blot Module (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on 10% BIS-TRIS polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions at 200 V for 1 hour. Proteins were then blotted to nitrocellulose membranes at 25 V for 1 hour and processed with the ECL advanced Western blot detection kit (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions. E1A primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was diluted 1:20,000, and the anti-Ad5 hexon IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 1:100,000. Anti-CAR analyses were performed by running 5 μg of membrane protein or 1 μg of cell extract on a 10% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels under nonreducing conditions. Blocking steps were performed as described earlier. Blots were incubated with primary mouse Anti-CAR, clone RmcB (Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). The antibody was diluted 1:10,000 in TBS-T with 0.1% blocking reagent for 90 minutes. NIS Western blots were performed as previously described [
27].
Cytopathic effect assays
The 1 × 106 cells were infected at MOI 1. At noted time points, the cells were photographed under a light microscope at 100× magnification.
MTS assay
The 5 × 104 cells were seeded in 96-well tissue-culture plates and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 in triplicate. Twenty-four hours after plating, the cells were infected at the indicated MOI. The virus-containing medium was exchanged with fresh medium, and at each time point, 50 μl of CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was applied and then incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 2 hours. Absorbance was then read at 490 nm by using a plate spectrophotometer.
Replication assay of the CRAd vector
The 4 × 106 cells were plated in 150-cm2 culture flasks and infected at MOI 1 and MOI 0.1. Seventy-two hours after infection, virus was harvested from media and cells separately and purified by using the ViraBind Adenovirus Purification Kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA). Virus titers were quantified by plaque assay on HEK 293 cells.
125I uptake
Uptake of
125I by virus-infected cells was measured as described [
10,
28]. In brief, 1 × 10
6 cells/well were plated on 36-well tissue-culture plates and infected at MOI 0, 0.5, 5, 10, 20, and 50. At indicated time points, iodide-uptake measurement was performed in triplicate in HBSS supplemented with 10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.3, 10 μmol/L NaI, and 1 × 10
5 cpm of
125I. Control wells were incubated in the same buffer plus 10 μmol/L KClO
4. Plates were gently mixed and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO
2, for 45 minutes. After incubation, buffers were aspirated and the cells gently washed once with 4°C 10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.3 buffer. Cells were lysed in 1 ml 1 N NaOH with shaking for 20 minutes at RT, and lysates were assayed for
125I on a gamma counter.
Noninvasive imaging of xenografted tumors
All experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Xenografts derived from the T47D cell line were established on each flank of 6-week-old athymic nude Foxn1nu mice (Harlan, Madison, WI, USA) by subcutaneous injection of 4 × 10
6 cells resuspended in 0.125 μl media and 0.125 μl of BD Matrigel basement membrane matrix (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA). Mice were maintained on a low-iodine diet and T
4 supplementation (5 mg/L) in their drinking water throughout the duration of the experimentation to maximize radioisotope uptake in the tumor and minimize uptake by the thyroid [
8‐
10]. The mice were examined daily for tumor growth. Tumor volume was measured with calipers twice weekly and calculated by the formula:
When tumors reached 100 mm3, mice received one intratumoral (IT) injection of 1011 vp of the AdAMUCH_RSV-NIS CRAd on the left flank; the right flank served as control. Two days later, an intraperitoneal dose of 0.5 mCi of 123I sodium iodide was given, and 1 hour later, radioiodine imaging was performed by using a γ-camera equipped with a low-energy high-resolution collimator (VG System; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). Regions of uptake were quantified and expressed as a fraction of the total amount of the applied radioiodine.
Discussion
Although a number of gene-therapy approaches have been developed for many cancers, clinical trials completed to date have fallen short of expectations [
32‐
36], largely due to limited tumor transduction, and this limitation has been defined as the most important fundamental barrier to effective cancer gene therapy [
37]. Our approach to addressing the problem of low tumor transduction is to allow vector replication by using conditionally replicating adenovirus.
We used a transcriptional-regulation method placing the
E1A gene under control of the tumor-specific promoter MUC-1. The rationale for this choice is based on the observation that transcriptional-dependent regulation seems to be the most efficient strategy for CRAd development [
38]. In addition, we inserted the
NIS gene under control of the powerful but nonspecific RSV promoter. We used a truncated version of the MUC-1 promoter that was previously shown to be specifically active in MUC-1-positive breast cancer cell lines [
17]. The rationale and utility for use of this promoter is that more than 90% of breast tumors overexpress the MUC-1 gene [
13]. By this method, viral replication, and consequently extended
NIS expression, will target a wide spectrum of MUC-1-positive breast tumors.
In the present study, we confirmed that this MUC-1 promoter version restricts viral protein synthesis, cytopathic effect, cell lysis, and infectious viral progeny production to MUC-1-positive breast cancer cells. Moreover, the bulk of viral progeny produced by the MUC-1-positive breast cancer cell line T47D was found in the media, indicating that viral infection of T47D cells with the Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS CRAd resulted in cell lysis and subsequent release of infectious viral particles. We hypothesize that the release of infectious viral particles should allow wide viral spread within tumors. Virus specificity was demonstrated by using the MUC-1-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. The MDA-MB-231 cell line expresses cell-surface CAR receptor because we visualized CAR expression in membrane-bound electrophoresed proteins. It supports limited E1A and hexon expression and supports NIS expression. All these data confirm that MDA-MB-231 is infected by the Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS, yet it is resistant to CRAd-induced oncolysis or viral replication or both. These data demonstrate that the Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS CRAd is stringently dependent on MUC-1 overexpression and should not replicate within normal tissue, where MUC1 expression is minimal.
The NIS protein must be properly targeted to the cell plasma membrane to be functional [
39]. Our results also showed that the Ad5AMUC_RSV-NIS CRAd directs correct NIS expression and thus radioiodine uptake
in vitro and
in vivo. Under the control of the RSV promoter, the NIS protein was correctly targeted to the cell plasmamembrane, thereby promoting high levels of iodine uptake in T47D cells. Our results also show that in MUC-1-negative CAR-positive breast cancer tumors, the NIS gene also can be expressed, because it is under the control of the ubiquitous RSV promoter. Here, the cell line MDA-MB-231 showed very strong NIS protein expression by Western blot, which translated to robust radioiodine uptake (data not shown). Hence the Ad5AMUCH_RSV-NIS CRAd could be used as a non-replicating NIS-expressing vector.
However, in this case, NIS gene expression was transient, thus narrowing the window for radioiodine therapy and loss of the combined radiovirotherapy.
A discrepancy is apparent in the kinetics of NIS expression and luciferase expression that can be explained by several influencing factors; First, the luciferase gene was cloned at the E1 region of a nonreplicating adenovirus, under the control of the MUC-1 promoter, whereas the NIS gene was cloned at the E3 region of a replicating adenovirus under the RSV promoter. Second, the stability of two very different mRNAs and proteins cannot be assumed to be equal.
Finally, NIS is an integral membrane protein, whereas luciferase remains cytoplasmic. Therefore, the pattern of expression of luciferase and NIS under these conditions is not expected to overlap precisely.
NIS is already a therapeutic gene, in that its native expression in thyroid cells is used for therapy for thyroid cancer and hyperthyroidism, where its efficacy is very high [
6].
NIS expression could represent an ideal therapeutic gene for breast cancer therapy, because it allows a large bystander effect. Because of the physics of
131I decay, which occurs primarily through emission of a β particle that traverses up to 2 mm within the tissue. Thus, not every cell must be transfected and express NIS to be affected by radioiodine therapy. This is critical to the effectiveness of any cancer gene-therapy strategy because of the difficulty in achieving 100% transfection with the therapeutic gene, even in the case of a replicating virus. Moreover, NIS expression can be directly monitored and quantitated noninvasively. The uptake of radioiodine in tissues can be quantitated, and both the distribution and the quantity of NIS expression can be easily and safely monitored noninvasively.
The limited efficacy observed in clinical trials of cancer gene therapies to date has suggested that combinatorial therapies to treat cancer will likely be more effective and possibly required for complete tumor eradication. The hypothesis developed from this observation is that attacking tumor cells through different mechanisms of action may prevent tumor cells from developing resistance to the treatment combination and may more effectively induce immunity against the tumor [
40]. We hypothesize that, because Ad5AMUC_RSV-NIS CRAd harbors the
NIS gene, it should improve the therapeutic value of the CRAd by allowing multimodal therapy in a single agent combining viral-mediated tumor lysis as well as radioiodine-mediated therapy.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
MAT constructed the CRAd, participated in the design of the study, performed FACS analysis, luc assay, and cytopathic effect, supervised the work of MJO and ER, and drafted the manuscript. MJO performed MTS and cell-specific replication. JD constructed, amplified, and purified AdEasyGL3B-Muc with MY. EB performed Western blots and radioiodine uptake. MY constructed, amplified, and purified AdEasyGL3B-Muc AdEasyGL3B-Muc with JD. JCM conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript.