Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2018

Open Access 04.07.2018 | Knee

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with increased anterior tibial translation and fewer meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 10/2018

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the influence of hyperextension of the contralateral healthy knee on anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the presence of associated injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee.

Methods

A local patient data register containing the surgical and clinical data of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction was analyzed. Patients were divided into groups according to the degree of hyperextension of the contralateral knee: normal (Group A ≤ 0°), mild (Group B 1°–5°), moderate (Group C 6°–10°), and severe (Group D > 10°). The ATT was measured in both knees preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using the KT-1000 arthrometer. The presence of associated meniscal and cartilage injuries was noted. Using multivariate analysis, Groups B, C, and D were compared with Group A, using this group as a reference.

Results

A total of 10,957 patients were available in the register and 8502 (Group A n = 4335, Group B n = 3331, Group C n = 771, Group D n = 65) were included in the final analysis. Groups B (10.3 mm; 95% CI 0.06–0.042, p < 0.0001) and C (10.6 mm; 95% CI 0.23–0.89, p = 0.006) showed significantly greater preoperative ATT in the injured knee compared with the control group (10.1 mm). Moreover, at the 6-month follow-up, greater ATT was observed for Groups B (8.5 mm; 95% CI 0.13–0.45, p < 0.0001), C (8.5 mm; 95% CI 0.02–0.60, p = 0.035), and D (9.1 mm; 95% CI − 0.08–1.77, p = 0.082) compared with Group A (8.2 mm). Meniscal injuries were less frequent in patients with contralateral hyperextension [Group B 903 (27.1%) p < 0.0001, Group C 208 (27.0%) p = 0.0003, and Group D 12 (18.5%), 0.012] compared with the control group [Group A 1479 (34.1%)].

Conclusion

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with greater pre- and postoperative ATT in the ACL-injured knee. In patients with contralateral knee hyperextension, concomitant injuries to the menisci are less frequent. Surgeons should consider grafts with superior properties regarding postoperative anteroposterior laxity to patients with contralateral knee hyperextension.

Level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study, Level IV

Introduction

To enhance our understanding of ACL injury causality, the risk factors for primary ACL injury and re-rupture have been the subject of vigorous interest in the research community during the last decade [13, 25]. Among other factors, generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and knee hyperextension have been found to be significant risk factors for sustaining a primary ACL injury in recent studies [18, 19, 21, 27]. Patients with hypermobility also run an increased risk of graft rupture and contralateral ACL rupture, as well as reporting inferior subjective outcome [13, 15]. Moreover, it has been suggested that knee hyperextension alone, without considering GJH, results in poorer clinical and patient-reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction [14]. The exact mechanism behind this connection is not known.
Generalized joint hypermobility is diagnosed using the Beighton Hypermobility Score [22]. Generalized joint hypermobility is merely a definition of the hypermobility of the synovial joints and is asymptomatic. If accompanied by arthralgia or other symptoms, it is instead part of a syndrome [20]. There is an overlap between GJH and connective tissue disorders like Joint Hypermobility Syndrome, Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome—Hypermobility Type, and also with rare hereditary afflictions like Marfan’s syndrome, osteogeneisis imperfecta, or other subtypes of the Ehler–Danlos spectrum [6]. There is diversity in the genetic causes of the above-mentioned syndromes, although deficiency of the connective tissues is regarded as a mutual biological cause [20]. The Beighton Hypermobility Score assesses particular synovial joints [4]. Knee hyperextension is an important part of GJH and its existence gives an indication of possible changes in connective tissue aggradation.
It has been shown that patients with knee hyperextension undergoing ACL reconstruction run an elevated risk of graft impingement [9, 16], an outcome that can cause graft rupture and joint instability [7, 8]. ACL impingement has been shown to increase linearly with increased knee extension, even in non-injured knees [10]. In spite of this, in a recent publication, hyperextension of the ACL-injured knee was not found to be predictive of either increased anterior tibial translation (ATT) or subsequent graft tear [5]. In the ACL-injured knee, however, concomitant cartilage or meniscus injuries can interfere with the range of motion, thereby possibly underestimating the preinjury degree of knee hyperextension in the ACL-injured knee. Moreover, the relationship between knee hyperextension and concomitant injuries to the menisci or cartilage is unclear. However, recent studies have not observed a significant effect on the frequency of meniscal or chondral injuries in patients with joint hypermobility [15, 26]. To our knowledge, no analyses of the degree of hyperextension in the contralateral knee with regard to ATT or concomitant meniscal or cartilage injuries have previously been conducted.
The main purpose of this study was to determine the association between hyperextension of the contralateral healthy knee and increased ATT in the ACL-injured knee. The second purpose of the study was to investigate the potential relationship between contralateral knee hyperextension and concomitant cartilage and meniscal injuries. It was hypothesized that increased hyperextension of the contralateral knee would be associated with an increase in ATT and with an increase in the frequency of concomitant injuries to the ACL-injured knee.

Materials and methods

Using a retrospective study design, a total of 10,957 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between February 1990 and December 2015 at the Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden were assessed for inclusion. Patients aged 14 or older who underwent ACL reconstruction using either a patellar tendon (PT) or a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft were eligible for inclusion. Patients who had suffered a previous ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury were excluded from the study. Meniscal or articular cartilage injuries did not disqualify patients from inclusion.

Surgical technique

The PT ACL reconstructions were performed by harvesting the central third of the patellar tendon with two bone blocks. The graft was fixed at both the tibial and the femoral sides using interference screws (Softsilk, Smith and Nephew, Andover, Mass, USA) or using an Endobutton fixation device (Smith and Nephew, Andover, Mass, USA) on the femoral side. The HT reconstructions were performed using a triple or quadruple semitendinosus tendon autograft. A supplementary gracilis tendon could be used and incorporated if the width of the semitendinosus graft was considered insufficient. The graft was fixed with an Endobutton fixation device on the femoral side and Ultrabraid (Smith and Nephew, Andover, Mass, USA) or Ethibond no. 2 sutures (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA) tied over an AO bicortical screw (AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland) with a washer on the tibial side. The existence of concomitant injuries to the menisci or the articular cartilage was determined intraoperatively. In the event of meniscal injuries regarded as suitable for suturing, an all-inside arthroscopic technique using a FAST-FIX suture anchor device (Smith and Nephew, Andover, Mass, USA) was used for tears located in the dorsal or central part of the meniscus. Meniscal lesions in the anterior part were repaired with an outside-in technique using PDS 0 (Ethicon, Inc, Sommerville, NJ, USA).

Rehabilitation

All the patients followed a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Immediate full weight-bearing and full range of motion (ROM) were encouraged if tolerated, for patients with meniscal resection or isolated ACL reconstruction. A reduction in postoperative swelling, gait correction, and the recovery of ROM was the aims in the early phase of rehabilitation. In the event of meniscal repair, patients were recommended a hinged knee brace with flexion limited from 0° to 30° for the first 2 weeks, from 0° to 60° for the 3rd and 4th weeks, and from 0° to 90° for the 5th and 6th weeks. Quadriceps strengthening was restricted to closed kinetic chain exercises in the first 3 months postoperatively. The timing of return to sports was individualized, depending on the type of activity and knee function. However, return to sports earlier than 6 months postoperatively was discouraged.

Physical examination and follow-up

Physical examinations were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Range of motion was assessed using a goniometer. To analyze the influence of a gradual increase in contralateral knee hyperextension in the ATT of the ACL-injured knee, four subgroups were created. The subgroups constituted patients with no hyperextension (Group A ≤ 0°), mild (Group B 1°–5°), moderate (Group C 6°–10°), and severe hyperextension (Group D > 10°). A 5° increment interval was chosen to detect a potential trend. The degree of extension of the contralateral knee was used to determine subgroup placement, since the contralateral knee was regarded as more representative of the preinjury knee extension level of the ACL-injured knee. Anterior tibial translation was measured preoperatively and at the 6-month postoperative follow-up using the KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric Corp, San Diego, CA, USA). A 134-N anterior load was applied with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion. At least three measurements were made on each knee and the median value was registered. The anterior tibial displacement was expressed in millimeters. Differences in ATT between the groups were also determined by observing side-to-side difference, meaning the difference in ATT between the injured and the contralateral knee. Finally, by analyzing the changes in pre- to postoperative side-to-side differences in ATT, a comparison between the subgroups regarding postoperative ATT reduction was possible.

Data management

All surgeons performing ACL reconstructions at the Capio Artro Clinic are obliged to report surgical and medical history data to the local register to proceed to the patient’s specific medical record. This organization ensures complete coverage of data relating to the previous contra- or ipsilateral surgery, concomitant knee injuries, graft choice, fixation method, and other potential simultaneous interventions. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee at Karolinska Institutet (2016/1613-31/2).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented with numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were presented using means, standard deviations, medians, and range. Demographic variables were analyzed using Fischer’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. The distribution of concomitant meniscal and cartilage injuries was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gender. Similarly, in the analysis of KT-1000 parameters, multivariate logistic regression was used to detect differences between the reference group (Group A) and the other subgroups. Multivariate analysis of the KT-1000 analysis was chosen to enable the adjustment of the following covariates: age, gender, graft choice, and meniscal injuries. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Results

A total of 10,957 patients were available in the local patient data register, of which 1065 (9.7%) patients were excluded. The most frequent reason for exclusion was revision ACL surgery (793 patients, 74.5%), followed by contralateral ACL injury (148 patients, 13.9%) and age below 14 years at the time of surgery (124 patients, 11.6%, Fig. 1).
A total of 8502 (77.6%) patients had ROM data for the contralateral healthy knee available and were included in the final analysis. Demographic parameters for the analyzed subgroups, based on the degree of contralateral knee hyperextension, are presented in Table 1. The largest subgroup was composed of patients with no hyperextension (Group A 4335 patients). Groups B, C, and D contained 3331, 771, and 65 patients, respectively. Patients with the highest degree of hyperextension (Group D) had the youngest mean age (25.6 ± 8.1 years), whereas patients with no hyperextension (Group A) had the oldest mean age (29 ± 10.2 years, p = 0.013). There was a higher rate of females in the subgroups with hyperextension (Group B 46.6%, p < 0.0001, Group C 47.9%, p = 0.0003, Group D 47.7%, p = 0.34) compared with the subgroup with no hyperextension (Group A 39.7%). A patellar tendon autograft was more commonly used in patients with hyperextension (Group B 38.4%, p < 0.0001, Group C 42.5%, p < 0.0001, Group D 50.8%, p < 0.0001) than in patients without (Group A 26.4%, Table 1). An analysis of meniscal injuries, including injuries to both the medial and the lateral menisci, showed that injuries were proportionally more frequent in patients with no hyperextension (Group A 34.1%) compared with patients with an increasing degree of hyperextension (Group B 27.1%, p < 0.0001, Group C 27.0%, p = 0.0003, Group D 18.5%, p = 0.012) (Table 2).
Table 1
Demographics of contralateral knee extension subgroups
Outcome variables
Subgroups based on contralateral knee extension
Group A (HE ≤  0°)
Group B (HE 1°–5°)
Group C (HE 6°–10°)
Group D (HE > 10°)
  
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
 
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
 
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
Age, years
29 (10.2)
28 (14; 90)
n = 4335
27.5 (9.6)
26 (14; 66)
n = 3331
1.48 (1.03; 1.91)
< 0.0001
26.8 (9.4)
26 (14; 79)
n = 771
2.19 (1.46; 2.91)
< 0.0001
25.6 (8.1)
24 (15; 48)
n = 65
3.37 (1.34; 5.34)
0.013
Patient sex
          
 Male
2612 (60.3%)
1778 (53.4%)
6.9 (4.6; 9.1)
 
402 (52.1%)
8.1 (4.2; 12.0)
 
34 (52.3%)
7.9 (− 5.1; 21.0)
 
 Female
1723 (39.7%)
1553 (46.6%)
− 6.9 (− 9.1; − 4.6)
< 0.0001
369 (47.9%)
− 8.1 (− 12.0; − 4.2)
0.0003
31 (47.7%)
− 7.9 (− 21.0; 5.1)
ns
Tendon
          
 Patellar tendon
1145 (26.4%)
1278 (38.4%)
− 12.0 (− 14.1; − 9.8)
 
328 (42.5%)
− 16.1 (− 19.9; − 12.3)
 
33 (50.8%)
− 24.4 (− 37.4; − 11.4)
 
 Hamstring tendon
3190 (73.6%)
2053 (61.6%)
12.0 (9.8; 14.1)
< 0.0001
443 (57.5%)
16.1 (12.3; 19.9)
< 0.0001
32 (49.2%)
24.4 (11.4; 37.4)
< 0.0001
For categorical variables, n (%) is presented
For continuous variables, the mean (SD)/median (min; max)/n = is presented
Comparisons were made between control Group A and the other groups using Fisher’s exact test (lowest one-sided p value multiplied by 2) for dichotomous variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables
Diff difference, HE hyperextension
Table 2
Concomitant meniscal and chondral injuries
Outcome variables
Subgroups based on contralateral knee extension
Group A (HE ≤ 0°)
Group B (HE 1°–5°)
Group C (HE 6°–10°)
Group D (HE > 10°)
  
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
 
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
 
Diff between groups, mean (95% CI)
p value
Cartilage injury
          
 Yes
678 (15.6%)
404 (12.1%)
3.5 (1.9; 5.1)
 
92 (11.9%)
3.7 (1.1; 6.3)
 
7 (10.8%)
4.9 (− 3.5; 13.3)
 
 No
3657 (84.4%)
2927 (87.9%)
− 3.5 (− 5.1; − 1.9)
0.0015
679 (88.1%)
− 3.7 (− 6.3; − 1.1)
ns
58 (89.2%)
− 4.9 (− 13.3; 3.5)
ns
Medial meniscus injury
          
 Yes
911 (21.0%)
527 (15.8%)
5.2 (3.4; 7.0)
 
124 (16.1%)
4.9 (2.0; 7.9)
 
7 (10.8%)
10.2 (1.8; 18.7)
 
 No
3424 (79.0%)
2804 (84.2%)
− 5.2 (− 7.0; − 3.4)
< 0.0001
647 (83.9%)
− 4.9 (− 7.9; − 2.0)
0.0062
58 (89.2%)
− 10.2 (− 18.7; − 1.8)
ns
Lateral meniscus injury
          
 Yes
827 (19.1%)
527 (15.8%)
3.3 (1.5; 5.0)
 
115 (14.9%)
4.2 (1.3; 7.0)
 
7 (10.8%)
8.3 (− 0.1; 16.7)
 
 No
3508 (80.9%)
2804 (84.2%)
− 3.3 (− 5.0; − 1.5)
0.0002
656 (85.1%)
− 4.2 (− 7.0; − 1.3)
0.0043
58 (89.2%)
− 8.3 (− 16.7; 0.1)
ns
Meniscal injury, dichotomous
          
 Yes
1479 (34.1%)
903 (27.1%)
7.0 (4.9; 9.1)
 
208 (27.0%)
7.1 (3.6; 10.7)
 
12 (18.5%)
15.7 (5.3; 26.0)
 
 No
2856 (65.9%)
2428 (72.9%)
− 7.0 (− 9.1; − 4.9)
< 0.0001
563 (73.0%)
− 7.1 (− 10.7; − 3.6)
0.0003
53 (81.5%)
− 15.7 (− 26.0; − 5.3)
0.012
For categorical variables, n (%) is presented
For continuous variables, the mean (SD)/median (min; max)/n = is presented
Comparisons were made between control Group A and the other groups using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for age and gender
Diff difference, HE hyperextension
The mean preoperative ATT of the healthy contralateral knee was significantly greater for Groups B and C compared with Group A (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Group D did not differ in terms of ATT when compared with Group A (ns). Similar results were seen for the ACL-injured knee preoperatively, with a significantly greater ATT for Groups B and C compared with Group A (Table 2). Multivariate analysis of the ATT of the injured knee 6 months postoperatively revealed a gradual increase in ATT, from 8.2 mm (Group A) to 8.5 (Group B, p < 0.0001), 8.5 (Group C, p < 0.035), and 9.1 (Group D, ns). An analysis of preoperative or 6-month postoperative differences in side-to-side measurements of the injured knee did not reveal any significant differences between the subgroups (Table 3).
Table 3
KT-1000 outcome variables with regard to contralateral knee extension subgroups
Outcome variables
Subgroups based on contralateral knee extension
Group A (HE ≤ 0°)
Group B (HE 1°–5°)
Group C (HE 6°–10°)
Group D (HE > 10°)
Mean (mm)
Mean (mm)
95% CI
p value
Mean (mm)
95% CI
p value
Mean (mm)
95% CI
p value
KT-1000 preoperative, contralateral knee
6.5
6.8
(0.14–0.42)
< 0.0001
6.9
(0.17–0.68)
0.0002
6.3
(− 1.01–0.60)
ns
KT-1000 preoperative, injured knee
10.1
10.3
(0.06–0.42)
0.0055
10.6
(0.23–0.89)
0.0004
10.0
(− 1.08–0.96)
ns
KT-1000 6-month postoperative, injured knee
8.2
8.5
(0.13–0.45)
< 0.0001
8.5
(0.02–0.60)
0.035
9.1
(− 0.08–1.77)
ns
KT-1000 preoperative, side-to-side difference
3.5
3.5
(− 0.22–0.14)
ns
3.7
(− 0.19–0.45)
ns
3.7
(− 0.88–1.14)
ns
KT-1000 6-month postoperative, side-to-side difference
1.7
1.8
(− 0.06–0.23)
ns
1.7
(− 0.21–0.30)
ns
2.4
(− 0.08–1.56)
ns
KT-1000 reduction from preoperative to postoperative side-to-side difference
− 1.8
− 1.7
(− 0.09–0.28)
ns
− 1.9
(− 0.41–0.24)
ns
− 1.4
(− 0.62–1.43)
ns
Analysis was adjusted for age, gender, type of graft, and meniscal injury (dichotomous). Comparisons were made between control Group A and the other groups using multivariate logistic regression analysis
CI confidence interval, HE hyperextension

Discussion

The main finding in this study was the significantly higher level of ATT measured in the ACL-injured knee in patients with contralateral knee hyperextension, thereby confirming the hypotheses stated in the introduction. Patients with mild and moderate contralateral knee hyperextension showed a significant increase in ATT in the ACL-injured knee compared with patients with no hyperextension, both pre- and postoperatively. Conversely, the group with severe hyperextension, corresponding to a level of hyperextension equivalent to a Beighton score point, did not reveal significantly higher preoperative ATT in either the injured or the contralateral knee. A tendency towards an increase in ATT was observed at the 6-month follow-up in patients with severe hyperextension, presenting with the highest mean ATT of all groups. Analyzing the same group, a similar tendency was observed for the side-to-side difference analysis, indicating an increase in postoperative ATT compared with the reference group. The relatively small number of patients in the group with severe hyperextension is a possible explanation for the analyses not reaching statistical significance, making the analysis underpowered. The reduction in pre- to postoperative ATT was the same after ACL reconstruction in all subgroups. An acceptable ATT can thus also be reached in patients with hyperextension after ACL reconstruction, at least in the short term.
Although conclusions cannot be drawn from this study alone, the trend towards an increase in the postoperative ATT in the ACL-injured knee raises a suspicion of inferior quality in the autograft or inferior graft remodeling in patients with hypermobility. An important study by Larson et al. [15] demonstrated that patients with joint hypermobility run an elevated risk of both graft re-rupture and contralateral ACL rupture. Moreover, joint hypermobility is thought to be caused by alterations in the connective tissue [20]. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that the higher degree of ATT observed in patients with contralateral knee hyperextension may be attributable in part to suboptimal conditions in the connective tissues of both the graft and the surrounding secondary stabilizers, such as the joint capsule and the menisci.
It was hypothesized that hyperextension would be associated with an increased risk of associated injuries, but, in actual fact, meniscal injuries were clearly less common with increasing contralateral knee hyperextension. Knowing that joint hypermobility is a risk factor for ACL injury [18, 19, 21, 27], it may seem logical to assume that an increasing incidence of concomitant injures would also be observed in patients with knee hyperextension. However, one possible explanation could be that the knees of patients with no joint hypermobility are more resilient and more severe traumas are required, with increasing torque acting at the knee joint at the time of injury, to rupture their ACL. More severe traumas would also increase the risk of concomitant intra-articular injuries. Individuals with less joint hypermobility would, therefore, hypothetically, not sustain an ACL injury when exposed to the same amount of force as a hypermobile individual.
It the present study, it was obvious that the use of PT autografts was increasingly more common in patients with higher degrees of contralateral knee hyperextension and this factor was, therefore, adjusted for in the statistical analysis. Previously, Kim et al. [11, 12, 14] have demonstrated that a PT autograft is superior to an HT autograft in terms of knee stability and function in patients with knee hyperextension. On the same subject, Benner et al. [5] studied patients with knee hyperextension of the ACL-injured knee and were not able to observe any differences in ACL graft rupture or subjective outcome depending on the level of knee hyperextension, therefore, assuming that the use of a PT autograft was a good alternative. The reason for the dominance of the PT autograft in hyperextending knees observed in the present study was not intentional at an organized level, meaning that there were no institutional recommendations for using PT autografts in this category of patients. However, individual surgeons may have preferred the PT autograft, considering the increased preoperative ATT seen in these patients, with the knowledge that the PT autograft is thought to be better at reducing ATT [17].
As mentioned, patients with knee hyperextension and GJH are susceptible to ACL injury [18, 19, 21, 27], making them a priority for further research. The present study reveals new data enhancing our understanding of anterior knee laxity in patients with knee hyperextension. Future studies are needed to investigate potential differences in ATT in this patient group over longer follow-up periods. The question of the potential influence of knee hyperextension on rotatory knee laxity also remains to be answered in future studies. Moreover, the newly established inverse association between contralateral knee hyperextension and injuries to the menisci and articular cartilage needs to be further scrutinized.
One limitation of the present study is the short follow-up period of 6 months. After 6 months, many patients will not have returned to their preoperative level of activity and the strength of the graft will not have been tested to the limit of its ability and tensile strength. As a result, this study possibly underestimates postoperative long-term ATT and the results should not be regarded as representative for patients who have returned to sports. The difference in the risk of graft rupture or long-term graft failure could not be assessed. Moreover, the differences in ATT observed between the groups are small in absolute numbers and the differences between the means of the groups are within the margin of error for the KT-1000 arthrometer in examinations of individual patients [24]. At the same time, since analyses are made at group level, containing a large number of patients, the results indicate a progressive increase in ATT with increasing degrees of contralateral knee hyperextension.
In summary, this study underlines the greater risk of having increased ATT for patients with hypermobile joints. Since it has been shown that the use of PT autograft, compared with HT autograft, is associated with less postoperative ATT [17, 23], the use of this graft-type could be recommended for patients with significant contralateral knee hyperextension to lower the risk of having a greater postoperative anteroposterior laxity.

Conclusion

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with greater pre- and postoperative ATT in the ACL-injured knee. In patients with contralateral knee hyperextension, concomitant injuries to the menisci are less frequent. Surgeons should consider grafts with superior properties regarding postoperative anteroposterior laxity to patients with contralateral knee hyperextension.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of intrerest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee at Karolinska Institutet (2016/1613-31/2).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D, Lazaro-Haro C et al (2009) Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:705–729CrossRefPubMed Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, Samitier G, Romero D, Lazaro-Haro C et al (2009) Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:705–729CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Andernord D, Bjornsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J et al (2014) Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med 42:1574–1582CrossRefPubMed Andernord D, Bjornsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J et al (2014) Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med 42:1574–1582CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andernord D, Desai N, Bjornsson H, Ylander M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2015) Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:121–127CrossRefPubMed Andernord D, Desai N, Bjornsson H, Ylander M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2015) Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:121–127CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Benner RW, Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2016) The Degree of knee extension does not affect postoperative stability or subsequent graft tear rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 44:844–849CrossRefPubMed Benner RW, Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2016) The Degree of knee extension does not affect postoperative stability or subsequent graft tear rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 44:844–849CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Castori M, Colombi M (2015) Generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 169c:1–5CrossRefPubMed Castori M, Colombi M (2015) Generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 169c:1–5CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Goss BC, Howell SM, Hull ML (1998) Quadriceps load aggravates and roofplasty mitigates active impingement of anterior cruciate ligament grafts against the intercondylar roof. J Orthop Res 16:611–617CrossRefPubMed Goss BC, Howell SM, Hull ML (1998) Quadriceps load aggravates and roofplasty mitigates active impingement of anterior cruciate ligament grafts against the intercondylar roof. J Orthop Res 16:611–617CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goss BC, Hull ML, Howell SM (1997) Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthop Res 15:263–268CrossRefPubMed Goss BC, Hull ML, Howell SM (1997) Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthop Res 15:263–268CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell SM, Barad SJ (1995) Knee extension and its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof. implications for positioning the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 23:288–294CrossRefPubMed Howell SM, Barad SJ (1995) Knee extension and its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof. implications for positioning the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 23:288–294CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jagodzinski M, Leis A, Iselborn KW, Mall G, Nerlich M, Bosch U (2003) Impingement pressure and tension forces of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:85–90CrossRefPubMed Jagodzinski M, Leis A, Iselborn KW, Mall G, Nerlich M, Bosch U (2003) Impingement pressure and tension forces of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:85–90CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Chang JH, Kim TW, Jo SB, Oh KS (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single or double-bundle technique in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:257–262CrossRefPubMed Kim SJ, Chang JH, Kim TW, Jo SB, Oh KS (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single or double-bundle technique in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:257–262CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Choi CH, Kim SH, Lee SK, Lee W, Kim T et al (2018) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4881-y CrossRefPubMed Kim SJ, Choi CH, Kim SH, Lee SK, Lee W, Kim T et al (2018) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00167-018-4881-y CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Choi CH, Lee SK, Lee W, An H, Jung M (2018) Minimum two-year follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:278–287CrossRefPubMed Kim SJ, Choi CH, Lee SK, Lee W, An H, Jung M (2018) Minimum two-year follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:278–287CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Moon HK, Kim SG, Chun YM, Oh KS (2010) Does severity or specific joint laxity influence clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1136–1141CrossRefPubMed Kim SJ, Moon HK, Kim SG, Chun YM, Oh KS (2010) Does severity or specific joint laxity influence clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1136–1141CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsubara H, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Toyoda K, Uemura M, Hashizume M et al (2013) Intercondylar roof impingement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with knee hyperextension. Am J Sports Med 41:2819–2827CrossRefPubMed Matsubara H, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Toyoda K, Uemura M, Hashizume M et al (2013) Intercondylar roof impingement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with knee hyperextension. Am J Sports Med 41:2819–2827CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, Nick TG, Hewett TE (2008) The effects of generalized joint laxity on risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in young female athletes. Am J Sports Med 36:1073–1080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, Nick TG, Hewett TE (2008) The effects of generalized joint laxity on risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in young female athletes. Am J Sports Med 36:1073–1080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Onate JA, Everhart JS, Clifton DR, Best TM, Borchers JR, Chaudhari AM (2016) Physical exam risk factors for lower extremity injury in high school athletes: a systematic review. Clin J Sport Med 26:435–444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Onate JA, Everhart JS, Clifton DR, Best TM, Borchers JR, Chaudhari AM (2016) Physical exam risk factors for lower extremity injury in high school athletes: a systematic review. Clin J Sport Med 26:435–444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacey V, Tofts L, Wesley A, Collins F, Singh-Grewal D (2015) Joint hypermobility syndrome: a review for clinicians. J Paediatr Child Health 51:373–380CrossRefPubMed Pacey V, Tofts L, Wesley A, Collins F, Singh-Grewal D (2015) Joint hypermobility syndrome: a review for clinicians. J Paediatr Child Health 51:373–380CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramesh R, Von Arx O, Azzopardi T, Schranz PJ (2005) The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:800–803CrossRefPubMed Ramesh R, Von Arx O, Azzopardi T, Schranz PJ (2005) The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:800–803CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC (2007) Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol 34:804–809PubMed Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC (2007) Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol 34:804–809PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2001) Evaluation of the reproducibility of the KT-1000 arthrometer. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:120–125CrossRefPubMed Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2001) Evaluation of the reproducibility of the KT-1000 arthrometer. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:120–125CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Snaebjornsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Ayeni OR, Alentorn-Geli E, Krupic F, Norberg F et al (2017) Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register based on 2240 patients. Am J Sports Med 45:2092–2097CrossRefPubMed Snaebjornsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Ayeni OR, Alentorn-Geli E, Krupic F, Norberg F et al (2017) Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register based on 2240 patients. Am J Sports Med 45:2092–2097CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Uhorchak JM, Scoville CR, Williams GN, Arciero RA, St Pierre P, Taylor DC (2003) Risk factors associated with noncontact injury of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective four-year evaluation of 859 West Point cadets. Am J Sports Med 31:831–842CrossRefPubMed Uhorchak JM, Scoville CR, Williams GN, Arciero RA, St Pierre P, Taylor DC (2003) Risk factors associated with noncontact injury of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective four-year evaluation of 859 West Point cadets. Am J Sports Med 31:831–842CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with increased anterior tibial translation and fewer meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee
Publikationsdatum
04.07.2018
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5047-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.