Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Tumor Biology 6/2013

01.12.2013 | Research Article

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

verfasst von: Yonghua Niu, Tairi Huang, Feng Lian, Fenghua Li

Erschienen in: Tumor Biology | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for diagnosis of small (≤2 cm in diameter) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a meta-analysis of published studies. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China BioMedicine databases was conducted on articles published before 1 March 2013. Data from selected studies were pooled to yield summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-Disc version 1.4 and STATA version 12.0 softwares. Fifteen studies were included with a total of 908 cirrhotic patients with 1,032 small hepatic nodules. All lesions were histologically confirmed through liver biopsies after CEUS. The pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95 % CI = 0.78–0.85); the pooled specificity was 0.86 (95 % CI = 0.82–0.89). The pooled positive LR was 5.90 (95 % CI = 3.90–8.94); the pooled negative LR was 0.20 (95 % CI = 0.14–0.29). The pooled DOR was 37.07 (95 % CI = 24.79–55.44). The area under the SROC curve was 0.93 (SE = 0.01). Meta-regression analysis showed that the number of lesions may be a major source of heterogeneity. No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis indicates that CEUS is a useful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying small HCC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Dickie LA, Kleiner DE. Hepatocellular carcinoma confirmation, treatment, and survival in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registries, 1992–2008. Hepatology. 2012;55:476–82.PubMedCrossRef Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Dickie LA, Kleiner DE. Hepatocellular carcinoma confirmation, treatment, and survival in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registries, 1992–2008. Hepatology. 2012;55:476–82.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabibbo G, Craxi A. Epidemiology, risk factors and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:352–5.PubMed Cabibbo G, Craxi A. Epidemiology, risk factors and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:352–5.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomaa AI, Khan SA, Toledano MB, Waked I, Taylor-Robinson SD. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2008;14:4300–8.PubMedCrossRef Gomaa AI, Khan SA, Toledano MB, Waked I, Taylor-Robinson SD. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2008;14:4300–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Verslype C, Rosmorduc O, Rougier P. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO–ESDO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol/ESMO. 2012;23 Suppl 7:vii41–8. Verslype C, Rosmorduc O, Rougier P. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO–ESDO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol/ESMO. 2012;23 Suppl 7:vii41–8.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2013;34:11–29 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2013;34:11–29
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie L, Guang Y, Ding H, Cai A, Huang Y. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:854–61.PubMedCrossRef Xie L, Guang Y, Ding H, Cai A, Huang Y. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:854–61.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2008;29:28–44 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2008;29:28–44
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Serste T, Barrau V, Ozenne V, Vullierme MP, Bedossa P, et al. Accuracy and disagreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: role of biopsy. Hepatology. 2012;55:800–6.PubMedCrossRef Serste T, Barrau V, Ozenne V, Vullierme MP, Bedossa P, et al. Accuracy and disagreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: role of biopsy. Hepatology. 2012;55:800–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo M. Early detection and curative treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2005;3:S144–8.CrossRef Kudo M. Early detection and curative treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2005;3:S144–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:187–210.PubMedCrossRef Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:187–210.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Re Methodol. 2006;6:9.CrossRef Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Re Methodol. 2006;6:9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamza TH, Arends LR, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T. Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:73.PubMedCrossRef Hamza TH, Arends LR, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T. Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:73.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Villanueva EV, Zavarsek S. Evaluating heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:18.PubMedCrossRef Villanueva EV, Zavarsek S. Evaluating heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:18.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Rothstein HR. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ. 2008;336:1413–5.PubMedCrossRef Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Rothstein HR. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ. 2008;336:1413–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker WL, White CM, Cappelleri JC, Kluger J, Coleman CI. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1426–34.PubMedCrossRef Baker WL, White CM, Cappelleri JC, Kluger J, Coleman CI. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1426–34.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA:J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295:676–80.CrossRef Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA:J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295:676–80.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-disc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:31.PubMedCrossRef Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-disc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiting P, Harbord R, de Salis I, Egger M, Sterne J. Evidence-based diagnosis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13 Suppl 3:57–63.PubMedCrossRef Whiting P, Harbord R, de Salis I, Egger M, Sterne J. Evidence-based diagnosis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13 Suppl 3:57–63.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu XL, Hou WJ, Li Q, Zhang C, Xu Y. et al [Early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance]. Chin J Ultrason. 2010;19:688–92. Zhu XL, Hou WJ, Li Q, Zhang C, Xu Y. et al [Early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance]. Chin J Ultrason. 2010;19:688–92.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou FS, Wu PX, Zhou H, Jiang R, Tang QF. et al [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small focal liver lesions under the background of hepatocirrhosis]. J Ultrasound Clin Med. 2010;12:396–8. Zhou FS, Wu PX, Zhou H, Jiang R, Tang QF. et al [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small focal liver lesions under the background of hepatocirrhosis]. J Ultrasound Clin Med. 2010;12:396–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei RX, Wang WP, Ding H, Huang BJ, Li CL. et al [Comparison of enhancement features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and recurrent hepatocelluar carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography]. Chin J Ultrason. 2010;19:773–5. Wei RX, Wang WP, Ding H, Huang BJ, Li CL. et al [Comparison of enhancement features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and recurrent hepatocelluar carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography]. Chin J Ultrason. 2010;19:773–5.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Leoni S, Piscaglia F, Golfieri R, Camaggi V, Vidili G, et al. The impact of vascular and nonvascular findings on the noninvasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma based on the EASL and AASLD criteria. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:599–609.PubMedCrossRef Leoni S, Piscaglia F, Golfieri R, Camaggi V, Vidili G, et al. The impact of vascular and nonvascular findings on the noninvasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma based on the EASL and AASLD criteria. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:599–609.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kan M, Hiraoka A, Uehara T, Hidaka S, Ichiryu M, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using perfluorobutane (Sonazoid(®)) in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with dynamic computed tomography. Oncol Lett. 2010;1:485–8.PubMed Kan M, Hiraoka A, Uehara T, Hidaka S, Ichiryu M, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using perfluorobutane (Sonazoid(®)) in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with dynamic computed tomography. Oncol Lett. 2010;1:485–8.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaia E, Alaimo V, Baratella E, Medeot A, Midiri M, et al. The added diagnostic value of 64-row multidetector CT combined with contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of hepatocellular nodule vascularity: implications in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:651–63.PubMedCrossRef Quaia E, Alaimo V, Baratella E, Medeot A, Midiri M, et al. The added diagnostic value of 64-row multidetector CT combined with contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of hepatocellular nodule vascularity: implications in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:651–63.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang HJ, Kim TK, Wilson SR. Small nodules (1–2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:418–24.PubMedCrossRef Jang HJ, Kim TK, Wilson SR. Small nodules (1–2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:418–24.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat He W, Ju WH, Zhou P, Luo ZQ. Li RZ [Investigation of diffetentiating small focal nodules related to cirrhosis during hepatocarcinogenesis using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography]. Chin J Ultrason. 2008;24:919–22. He W, Ju WH, Zhou P, Luo ZQ. Li RZ [Investigation of diffetentiating small focal nodules related to cirrhosis during hepatocarcinogenesis using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography]. Chin J Ultrason. 2008;24:919–22.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dai L, Feng YR, Chen YP, Wen WQ. Xu YK [Imaging diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and multislice spiral CT]. J South Med Univ. 2008;28:1469–71. Dai L, Feng YR, Chen YP, Wen WQ. Xu YK [Imaging diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and multislice spiral CT]. J South Med Univ. 2008;28:1469–71.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu HX, Xie XY, Lu MD, Liu GJ, Xu ZF, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma < or =2 cm. J Clin Ultrasound: JCU. 2008;36:257–66.PubMedCrossRef Xu HX, Xie XY, Lu MD, Liu GJ, Xu ZF, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma < or =2 cm. J Clin Ultrasound: JCU. 2008;36:257–66.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, Bianchi L, Sole M, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;47:97–104.PubMedCrossRef Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, Bianchi L, Sole M, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;47:97–104.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dai Y, Chen MH, Fan ZH, Yan K, Yin SS, et al. Diagnosis of small hepatic nodules detected by surveillance ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. Hepatol Res: Off J Japan Soc Hepatol. 2008;38:281–90.CrossRef Dai Y, Chen MH, Fan ZH, Yan K, Yin SS, et al. Diagnosis of small hepatic nodules detected by surveillance ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. Hepatol Res: Off J Japan Soc Hepatol. 2008;38:281–90.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Giorgio A, De Stefano G, Coppola C, Ferraioli G, Esposito V, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the characterization of small hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients: comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:4263–9.PubMed Giorgio A, De Stefano G, Coppola C, Ferraioli G, Esposito V, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the characterization of small hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients: comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:4263–9.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JH, Lu SN, Hung CH, Chen TY, Chen CH, et al. Small hepatic nodules (< or =2 cm) in cirrhosis patients: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Liver Int: Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2006;26:928–34.CrossRef Wang JH, Lu SN, Hung CH, Chen TY, Chen CH, et al. Small hepatic nodules (< or =2 cm) in cirrhosis patients: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Liver Int: Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2006;26:928–34.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fracanzani AL, Burdick L, Borzio M, Roncalli M, Bonelli N, et al. Contrast-enhanced doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and premalignant lesions in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001;34:1109–12.PubMedCrossRef Fracanzani AL, Burdick L, Borzio M, Roncalli M, Bonelli N, et al. Contrast-enhanced doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and premalignant lesions in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001;34:1109–12.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ. Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 2003;46:147–59.PubMedCrossRef Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ. Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 2003;46:147–59.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Postema M, Gilja OH. Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2011;17:28–41.PubMedCrossRef Postema M, Gilja OH. Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2011;17:28–41.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Piscaglia F, Lencioni R, Sagrini E, Pina CD, Cioni D, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:531–50.PubMedCrossRef Piscaglia F, Lencioni R, Sagrini E, Pina CD, Cioni D, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:531–50.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis
verfasst von
Yonghua Niu
Tairi Huang
Feng Lian
Fenghua Li
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Tumor Biology / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Elektronische ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0948-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Tumor Biology 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.