Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Original Article

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: prospective evaluation of contrast safety in 1,010 children

verfasst von: Frederica Papadopoulou, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Ekaterini Siomou, Kassa Darge

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objective

To evaluate the safety of intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound (US) contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Materials and methods

One thousand and ten children (563 girls, 447 boys; mean age: 2.9 years, range: 15 days-17.6 years) with 2,043 pelvi-ureter-units underwent contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ce-VUS) to rule out vesicoureteral reflux. A second-generation US contrast agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan) was administered intravesically through transurethral bladder catheterization at a dose of 0.5 ml/bladder filling. Possible adverse events were monitored during the examination and followed up for 7 days after ce-VUS by phone calls. Urine analysis and culture were performed 3–5 days before ce-VUS in all children and 24–48 h in any patient who reported with adverse events.

Results

No case of serious adverse event was recorded. Minor events were reported in 37 children (3.66% of the study population). These included dysuria (n = 26, 2.57%), urinary retention (n = 2, 0.2%), abdominal pain (n = 2, 0.2%), anxiety (n = 1, 0.1%) and crying (n = 1, 0.1%) during micturition, blood and mucous discharge (n = 1, 0.1%), increased frequency of micturition (n = 1, 0.1%), vomiting (n = 1, 0.1%), perineal irritation (n = 1, 0.1%), and an episode of urinary tract infection 10 days after ce-VUS (n = 1, 0.1%). Of these adverse events, 91.9% were subacute in onset and 8.1% were delayed. All events were self-limited and none required hospitalization.

Conclusion

There were no serious adverse events. Only a few minor events were reported, most likely due to the catheterization process. Thus, ce-VUS with intravesical administration of the second-generation US contrast agent (SonoVue®) for vesicoureteral reflux detection or exclusion had a favorable safety profile in our study group.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider K, Kruger-Stollfuss I, Ernst G et al (2001) Paediatric fluoroscopy–a survey of children’s hospitals in Europe. I. Staffing, frequency of fluoroscopic procedures and investigation technique. Pediatr Radiol 31:238–246PubMedCrossRef Schneider K, Kruger-Stollfuss I, Ernst G et al (2001) Paediatric fluoroscopy–a survey of children’s hospitals in Europe. I. Staffing, frequency of fluoroscopic procedures and investigation technique. Pediatr Radiol 31:238–246PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with US contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. II. Comparison with radiological examinations. Pediatr Radiol 38:54–63, quiz 126–127PubMedCrossRef Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with US contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. II. Comparison with radiological examinations. Pediatr Radiol 38:54–63, quiz 126–127PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure. Pediatr Radiol 38:40–53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure. Pediatr Radiol 38:40–53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartram U, Darge K (2005) Harmonic versus conventional ultrasound imaging of the urinary tract in children. Pediatr Radiol 35:655–660PubMedCrossRef Bartram U, Darge K (2005) Harmonic versus conventional ultrasound imaging of the urinary tract in children. Pediatr Radiol 35:655–660PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K, Moeller RT, Trusen A et al (2005) Diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux with low-dose contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging. Pediatr Radiol 35:73–78PubMedCrossRef Darge K, Moeller RT, Trusen A et al (2005) Diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux with low-dose contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging. Pediatr Radiol 35:73–78PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giordano M, Marzolla R, Puteo F et al (2007) Voiding urosonography as first step in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children: a clinical experience. Pediatr Radiol 37:674–677PubMedCrossRef Giordano M, Marzolla R, Puteo F et al (2007) Voiding urosonography as first step in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children: a clinical experience. Pediatr Radiol 37:674–677PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Duran C, del Riego J, Riera L et al (2012) Voiding urosonography including urethrosonography: high-quality examinations with an optimised procedure using a second-generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 42:660–667PubMedCrossRef Duran C, del Riego J, Riera L et al (2012) Voiding urosonography including urethrosonography: high-quality examinations with an optimised procedure using a second-generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 42:660–667PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlief R (1996) Developments in echo-enhancing agents. Clin Radiol 51:5–7PubMed Schlief R (1996) Developments in echo-enhancing agents. Clin Radiol 51:5–7PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB et al (1995) BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles. Invest Radiol 30:451–457PubMedCrossRef Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB et al (1995) BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles. Invest Radiol 30:451–457PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K, Beer M, Gordjani N et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with the use of a 2nd generation US contrast medium: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 34:S97CrossRef Darge K, Beer M, Gordjani N et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with the use of a 2nd generation US contrast medium: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 34:S97CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S et al (2004) Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 34:481–487PubMedCrossRef Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S et al (2004) Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 34:481–487PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulou F, Anthopoulou A, Siomou E et al (2009) Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Radiol 39:239–244PubMedCrossRef Papadopoulou F, Anthopoulou A, Siomou E et al (2009) Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Radiol 39:239–244PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kis E, Nyitrai A, Varkonyi I et al (2010) Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Nephrol 25:2289–2293PubMedCrossRef Kis E, Nyitrai A, Varkonyi I et al (2010) Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Nephrol 25:2289–2293PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kljucevsek D, Battelino N, Tomazic M et al (2012) A comparison of echo-enhanced voiding urosonography with X-ray voiding cystourethrography in the first year of life. Acta Paediatr 101:e235–e239PubMedCrossRef Kljucevsek D, Battelino N, Tomazic M et al (2012) A comparison of echo-enhanced voiding urosonography with X-ray voiding cystourethrography in the first year of life. Acta Paediatr 101:e235–e239PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Riccabona M (2012) Application of a second‐generation US contrast agent in infants and children—a European questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol 42:1471–1480PubMedCrossRef Riccabona M (2012) Application of a second‐generation US contrast agent in infants and children—a European questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol 42:1471–1480PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadopoulou F, Tsampoulas C, Siomou E et al (2006) Cyclic contrast-enhanced harmonic voiding urosonography for the evaluation of reflux. Can we keep the cost of the examination low? Eur Radiol 16:2521–2526PubMedCrossRef Papadopoulou F, Tsampoulas C, Siomou E et al (2006) Cyclic contrast-enhanced harmonic voiding urosonography for the evaluation of reflux. Can we keep the cost of the examination low? Eur Radiol 16:2521–2526PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K, Troeger J (2002) Vesicoureteral reflux grading in contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography. Eur J Radiol 43:122–128PubMedCrossRef Darge K, Troeger J (2002) Vesicoureteral reflux grading in contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography. Eur J Radiol 43:122–128PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sicherer SH, Leung DY (2013) Advances in allergic skin disease, anaphylaxis, and hypersensitivity reactions to foods, drugs, and insects in 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131:55–66PubMedCrossRef Sicherer SH, Leung DY (2013) Advances in allergic skin disease, anaphylaxis, and hypersensitivity reactions to foods, drugs, and insects in 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131:55–66PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell RL, Hagan JB, Manivannan V et al (2012) Evaluation of national institute of allergy and infectious diseases/food allergy and anaphylaxis network criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in emergency department patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:748–752PubMedCrossRef Campbell RL, Hagan JB, Manivannan V et al (2012) Evaluation of national institute of allergy and infectious diseases/food allergy and anaphylaxis network criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in emergency department patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:748–752PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Voepel-Lewis T (2011) The ongoing quandaries of behavioral pain assessment in children with neurocognitive impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 53:106–107PubMedCrossRef Voepel-Lewis T (2011) The ongoing quandaries of behavioral pain assessment in children with neurocognitive impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 53:106–107PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Voepel-Lewis T, Merkel S, Tait AR et al (2002) The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg 95:1224–1229, table of contentsPubMedCrossRef Voepel-Lewis T, Merkel S, Tait AR et al (2002) The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg 95:1224–1229, table of contentsPubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zerin JM, Shulkin BL (1992) Postprocedural symptoms in children who undergo imaging studies of the urinary tract: is it the contrast material or the catheter? Radiology 182(3):727–730 Zerin JM, Shulkin BL (1992) Postprocedural symptoms in children who undergo imaging studies of the urinary tract: is it the contrast material or the catheter? Radiology 182(3):727–730
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Darge K, Papadopoulou F, Ntoulia A et al (2013) Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children for non-cardiac applications: a review by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS). Pediatr Radiol 43:1063–1073PubMedCrossRef Darge K, Papadopoulou F, Ntoulia A et al (2013) Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children for non-cardiac applications: a review by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS). Pediatr Radiol 43:1063–1073PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRef Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33:33–59PubMedCrossRef Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33:33–59PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Riccabona M, Avni FE, Damasio MB et al (2012) ESPR Uroradiology Task Force and ESUR Paediatric Working Group–Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part V: childhood cystic kidney disease, childhood renal transplantation and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in children. Pediatr Radiol 42:1275–1283PubMedCrossRef Riccabona M, Avni FE, Damasio MB et al (2012) ESPR Uroradiology Task Force and ESUR Paediatric Working Group–Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part V: childhood cystic kidney disease, childhood renal transplantation and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in children. Pediatr Radiol 42:1275–1283PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DL, Dou C, Wiggins RC et al (2007) An in vivo rat model simulating imaging of human kidney by diagnostic ultrasound with gas-body contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:129–135PubMedCrossRef Miller DL, Dou C, Wiggins RC et al (2007) An in vivo rat model simulating imaging of human kidney by diagnostic ultrasound with gas-body contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:129–135PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DL, Averkiou MA, Brayman AA et al (2008) Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents. J Ultrasound Med 27:611–632, quiz 633–616PubMed Miller DL, Averkiou MA, Brayman AA et al (2008) Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents. J Ultrasound Med 27:611–632, quiz 633–616PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: prospective evaluation of contrast safety in 1,010 children
verfasst von
Frederica Papadopoulou
Aikaterini Ntoulia
Ekaterini Siomou
Kassa Darge
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2832-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Pediatric Radiology 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.