Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition 6/2018

16.05.2018 | Letter to the Editor

Control, perceived control or self-efficacy as confounders in the relation between fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological disorders

verfasst von: Zayra Teresa Lopez Ixta

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nutrition | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

With regard to Safhafian et al. article on “Consumption of fruit and vegetables in relation with psychological disorders in Iranian adults” [1], it stands out that the authors found that there is an inverse and significant association between fruits and vegetables (F&V) intake and symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological distress in Iranian women; but not in Iranian men. The authors recognized that the findings may be the result of gender differences in perceived stress or health behaviors. Nevertheless, the authors did not incorporate psychosocial factors associated with mental health in their study; as a result, their findings may be confounded by those factors. Research on stress has proven that control or perceived control as a proxy of actual control has an important impact on the resulting level of distress experienced by individuals regardless of the gender [24]. Thus, people with real or perceived capacity to take decisions should be expected to enjoy better mental health. In this study, the relation between high F&V intake and women’s psychological wellbeing may be due to the more control or perceived control that some women may exert on their lives, which may be reflected on their capacity to achieve what they may consider as a healthy diet. Not surprisingly, the participants with the highest intake of F&V were more likely to be older and educated. In contrast, Iranian men’s diets may not be associated with psychosocial factors, and hence, F&V intake variation in this group did not present significant association with psychological wellbeing. Consequently, the authors’ recommendation of promoting F&V intake to improve mental health is not warranted given that they did not control for direct and potentially confounding factors that may be associated with the outcome and the exposure of interest. Thus, the authors should have included measurements for variables such as perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy or actual control [5]. …
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishebein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior. Psychology, New York Fishebein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior. Psychology, New York
Metadaten
Titel
Control, perceived control or self-efficacy as confounders in the relation between fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological disorders
verfasst von
Zayra Teresa Lopez Ixta
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nutrition / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1436-6207
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1700-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

European Journal of Nutrition 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Reply to ZT Lopez-Ixta

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.