Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 4/2022

24.01.2022 | Original Article

Conversion from dose length product to effective dose for the CT component of whole-body PET/CT

verfasst von: Yusuke Inoue, Yu Ohkubo, Kazunori Nagahara, Ayuka Uehara, Makoto Takano

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

For dose management of CT, the ratio of effective dose (ED) to dose length product (DLP) is often used to convert DLP to ED. We evaluated this ratio in the CT component of whole-body PET/CT performed under various imaging conditions to determine a practical method for ED estimation applicable to PET/CT.

Methods

In total, 400 patients who underwent whole-body PET/CT were enrolled. The imaging conditions were variable in terms of the scanner model, setting of automatic exposure control (AEC) setting and arm positioning. The scan range was divided into six anatomical regions. DLP was calculated for each region, and multiplied by the conversion factor for the respective region to determine regional ED. The six regional EDs were summed together to determine ED by the regional DLP method (EDrDLP). Additionally, regional ED was assessed using CT-Expo, software dedicated to CT dose estimation, and the total of six regional EDs were defined as ED by the CT-Expo method (EDCT-Expo). EDrDLP/DLP and EDCT-Expo/DLP were calculated using DLP automatically provided by the scanner.

Results

EDrDLP/DLP ranged from 0.0121 to 0.0128 mSv/mGy/cm with the arms up and from 0.0127 to 0.0134 mSv/mGy/cm with the arms down. Putting the arms down slightly increased EDrDLP/DLP, presumably due to an increased contribution of the chest and abdomen to total radiation exposure. The AEC setting and scanner model also influenced EDrDLP/DLP significantly but slightly. EDCT-Expo/DLP showed apparent scanner dependence, which appeared mainly attributable to differences in the constants used for DLP calculation between the scanner and CT-Expo.

Conclusion

Multiplication of scanner-derived DLP by a conversion factor of 0.013 mSv/mGy/cm provides acceptable ED estimates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann. ICRP 2000;30. ICRP. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann. ICRP 2000;30.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP 2007;37. ICRP. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP 2007;37.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011;258:236–42.CrossRef Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011;258:236–42.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995–1003.CrossRef Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995–1003.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 20. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRef Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 20. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Alenezi A, Soliman K. Trends in radiation protection of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. Ann ICRP. 2015;44:259–75.CrossRef Alenezi A, Soliman K. Trends in radiation protection of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. Ann ICRP. 2015;44:259–75.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonkopi E, Ross AA, MacDonald A. CT dose optimization for whole-body PET/CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:257–63.CrossRef Tonkopi E, Ross AA, MacDonald A. CT dose optimization for whole-body PET/CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:257–63.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Tanaka Y, Miyatake H, Hata H, Hara T. Methods of CT dose estimation in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:695–700.CrossRef Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Tanaka Y, Miyatake H, Hata H, Hara T. Methods of CT dose estimation in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:695–700.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233:649–57.CrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233:649–57.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ, et al. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics. 2008;28:1451–9.CrossRef Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, Ye SJ, Park CM, Chun EJ, et al. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics. 2008;28:1451–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography—an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:625–34.CrossRef Söderberg M, Gunnarsson M. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography—an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:625–34.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Kudo H, Itoh H. CT dose modulation using automatic exposure control in whole-body PET/CT: effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;25(8):143–52. Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Kudo H, Itoh H. CT dose modulation using automatic exposure control in whole-body PET/CT: effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;25(8):143–52.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Franck C, Bacher K. Influence of localizer and scan direction on the dose-reducing effect of automatic tube current modulation in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:136–42.CrossRef Franck C, Bacher K. Influence of localizer and scan direction on the dose-reducing effect of automatic tube current modulation in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:136–42.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Iball GR, Tout D. Computed tomography automatic exposure control techniques in 18F-FDG oncology PET-CT scanning. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:372–81.CrossRef Iball GR, Tout D. Computed tomography automatic exposure control techniques in 18F-FDG oncology PET-CT scanning. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:372–81.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Inoki Y, Hara T, Miyatake H. Clinical evaluation of CT radiation dose in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in relation to scout imaging direction and arm position. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33:169–76.CrossRef Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Inoki Y, Hara T, Miyatake H. Clinical evaluation of CT radiation dose in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in relation to scout imaging direction and arm position. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33:169–76.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltybaeva N, Jafari ME, Hupfer M, Kalender WA. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities. Radiology. 2014;273:153–9.CrossRef Saltybaeva N, Jafari ME, Hupfer M, Kalender WA. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities. Radiology. 2014;273:153–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Seong JH, Park SK, Kim JS, Jung WY, Kim HS, Dong KR, et al. A comparative study on the CT effective dose for various positions of the patient’s arm. J Korean Phys Soc. 2012;61:1137–42.CrossRef Seong JH, Park SK, Kim JS, Jung WY, Kim HS, Dong KR, et al. A comparative study on the CT effective dose for various positions of the patient’s arm. J Korean Phys Soc. 2012;61:1137–42.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Petrovic D, Jamnik E, Aran S, Pourjabbar S, Kave ML, et al. Effect of localizer radiograph on radiation dose associated with automatic exposure control: human cadaver and patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:293–8.CrossRef Singh S, Petrovic D, Jamnik E, Aran S, Pourjabbar S, Kave ML, et al. Effect of localizer radiograph on radiation dose associated with automatic exposure control: human cadaver and patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:293–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Söderberg M. Overview, practical tips and potential pitfalls of using automatic exposure control in CT: Siemens CARE Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:84–91.CrossRef Söderberg M. Overview, practical tips and potential pitfalls of using automatic exposure control in CT: Siemens CARE Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:84–91.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Kudo H, Itoh H. Effects of the scan range on radiation dose in the computed tomography component of oncology positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2019;185:1–6.CrossRef Inoue Y, Nagahara K, Kudo H, Itoh H. Effects of the scan range on radiation dose in the computed tomography component of oncology positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2019;185:1–6.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conversion from dose length product to effective dose for the CT component of whole-body PET/CT
verfasst von
Yusuke Inoue
Yu Ohkubo
Kazunori Nagahara
Ayuka Uehara
Makoto Takano
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-022-01720-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe